[Comparison of current critical care information systems from the perspective of clinical users : Summary of the results of a German nationwide survey]. / Vergleich aktueller Patientendatenmanagementsysteme in der Intensivmedizin aus Sicht der klinischen Nutzer : Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse einer deutschlandweiten Umfrage.

BACKGROUND: Critical care information systems (CCIS) are computer-based systems designed to process the growing amount of complex medical data in intensive care units (ICU). Previous studies have shown that CCICs can increase the quality of patient care by reducing errors and improving work efficiency; however, other studies have shown that CCISs can also cause harmful effects by disrupting workflow, facilitating medication errors or increasing charting time. The factors that decide whether a CCIS has a positive or negative impact on patient care are summarized under the term "usability". This article summarizes the results of three previously published papers on this topic. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify which CCIS functions were considered useful by clinical ICU staff and how well these functions are implemented in the CCISs currently used in German ICUs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online survey was performed targeting nurses and physicians working in German ICUs using a previously validated questionnaire. The questionnaire included a list of functions (36 for physicians/31 for nurses) that were preselected by experts based on a comprehensive model of ICU work processes. Each of these functions was rated by the study participants on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (worst rating) to 5 (best rating) with respect to the usefulness to identify which functions of CCIS can truly be considered as useful by clinical ICU staff. Furthermore, the participants rated how well these functions were implemented in the CCIS currently in use on the ICU, also using a Likert scale of 0-5. Further questions were provided to rate specific technical usability aspects of the CCISs currently in use. In addition, to capture possible confounders the questionnaire recorded 18 individual and workspace characteristics which might influence the ratings. RESULTS: A total of 171 nurses and 741 physicians participated in the survey of which 535 used CCISs. Of the functions 33 were rated as useful for doctors and 28 functions for nurses with median scores between 4 and 5. Participants currently using CCISs gave higher ratings compared to participants not using CCISs. The quality of the functions was rated relatively lower than the usefulness and the availability. Furthermore, currently used CCISs in Germany differ greatly in their technical and task-specific usability. Of the CCISs investigated, the system ICUData had the best overall rating and technical usability followed by the systems ICM and MetaVision. The same three CCIS were rated best in task-specific functions without significant differences between them. CONCLUSION: Those functions that were identified as useful based on the ratings of clinical ICU staff should be implemented in current CCIS. The list of these functions might be regarded as a first step towards providing a catalog of functional requirements for CCISs. Furthermore, as the results show that the quality of the available functions was rated lower than the availability of the functions, manufacturers should shift more of the effort away from the development of new features and focus on improving the user-friendliness and quality of existing functions.

Events which will influence intensive care units in future. A Delphi study.

OBJECTIVE: To find out and analyse the events which are expected to influence the future of Intensive Care Units (ICU). DESIGN: Three round Delphi study. SETTING: In a first preparation round 9 events were defined. In the two rating rounds an international panel of 60 experts heads of ICUs) estimated the time when the events may come true and whether they are desired or not. RESULTS: Computer tools are desired and expected in the near future (before the year 2000) for audit, quality assurance, record keeping and telecommunication; complex closed loops and nursing robots will not be used in clinical routine before 2005, they are not desired.

Clinical information process units (CIPUs) - a system ergonomic approach to medical information systems.

This article constitutes an introduction to the basic tools necessary to understand Systems Ergonomics applied to the development of clinical systems. A basic description of clinical patient care in the system ergonomics language is provided, and the current situation found in hospital information management is criticized from an ergonomic point of view. We have laid out a model of the information flow in the clinical environment, which breaks the complex process of patient care in clearly defined elements: the Clinical Information Process Units. Presented here as an example of the application of Systems Ergonomics to the clinical working processes, the Clinical Information Process Units constitute the central element in the system ergonomic model of the information flow in the clinical environment.

Analysis of the chest X-ray conference in an intensive care unit.

Bed chest X-rays carried out in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) are an important means of patient monitoring. To get the starting points for standardization of the documentation of X-ray findings, we examined course and contents of the daily X-ray conference in an ICU. We video-taped the conferences and registered its vocabulary.Mean entire duration to comment on the X-rays of one patient was 150 s. On an average, discussion between radiologist and anaesthetist lasted 40 s, dictation of findings 50 s. Sorting and viewing the X-rays took 60 s. Main disruptions were related to non-availability of X-rays and clinical patient data. Clinical information reported during the discussion is rarely mentioned in the dictated findings.

Memorandum on the use of information technology to improve medication safety.

BACKGROUND: Information technology in health care has a clear potential to improve the quality and efficiency of health care, especially in the area of medication processes. On the other hand, existing studies show possible adverse effects on patient safety when IT for medication-related processes is developed, introduced or used inappropriately. OBJECTIVES: To summarize definitions and observations on IT usage in pharmacotherapy and to derive recommendations and future research priorities for decision makers and domain experts. METHODS: This memorandum was developed in a consensus-based iterative process that included workshops and e-mail discussions among 21 experts coordinated by the Drug Information Systems Working Group of the German Society for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (GMDS). RESULTS: The recommendations address, among other things, a stepwise and comprehensive strategy for IT usage in medication processes, the integration of contextual information for alert generation, the involvement of patients, the semantic integration of information resources, usability and adaptability of IT solutions, and the need for their continuous evaluation. CONCLUSION: Information technology can help to improve medication safety. However, challenges remain regarding access to information, quality of information, and measurable benefits.

Patient-related data management.

Patient-related data management (PDM) has become an increasingly important and time-consuming task in intensive care medicine. Currently, all data are usually collected in a poorly structured patient chart consisting of forms and pictures, with about 400 manual entries a day. To handle this amount of data, we have designed a three-level patient system: level 1, summarizing the whole patient; level 2, summarizing one organ system or one isolated problem; and level 3, variables describing morphology and function of organ systems. PDM must be adapted to different clinical situations. We observed three different scenarios: (1) Exploratory PDM, where the clinician learns about the patient and builds up an individual patient model in his or her mind. (2) Operational PDM, where in routine care clinicians are part of a feedback control system, in which they use the patient-related model. (3) Summary PDM, where a clinician summarizes all the information gathered during a period when he or she was responsible for the patient. Computing tools based on clinical thinking and adapted to different situations can ensure accurate, clear, and concise patient care communication among the members of the intensive care staff.

[Future working conditions of anesthesiologists. Attempt at an analysis]. / Zukünftiger Arbeitsplatz des Anaesthesisten. Versuch einer Analyse.

The present conditions of the anaesthesiologist's workplace are characterized by completely unacceptable circumstances, incompatibilities, inflexibility and unsafeness. Like inadequate cockpit conditions in airplanes, these workplace conditions pose considerable risks to the safety of patients and personnel. Taking into consideration the literature and our own views, we have proposed some changes which are essential for improving the working conditions of anesthesiologists: Ergonomic improvements of the anaesthesiological workplace in order to facilitate the anesthetist's performance, to provide him with adequate space, and to automatize repeated and relatively unimportant activities. Vital information about the patient's condition must be located in a position where they will dominate the anesthetist's attention. Information about medications, infusions, transfusions, etc. can be located on the left-hand side of the anesthetist. All other devices can be located beside the anesthetist or even behind him, as they are of minor importance. The most useful alternative to the present conditions would be to locate the information panels of primary and secondary monitoring devices to the immediate right, or on the right- und left-hand sides of the anesthetist at an angle of 15 degrees-30 degrees each. Furthermore, these information panels should be arranged so that they can be monitored using moving and slightly tilted screens. The most important of the patients, clinical parameters as well as the functions of the equipment should be monitored by alarms, warning devices, or simply indicators, which can easily be separated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Analysis of data management in anesthesia from an ergonomic viewpoint]. / Analyse des Datenmanagement in der Anästhesie aus ergonomischer Sicht.

In the perioperative phase the anesthetist has to manage an increasing amount of knowledge, information and data. Using a system-ergonomic approach we can define three types of data management (DM): Exploratory DM, Operative DM, Concluding DM. The preliminary examination of the patient is Exploratory DM. Data are collected and recorded. Here, a well structured form prevents things being forgotten, provides forgetting anything. Help from electronic devices is not available. Control of anaesthesia is based on Operative DM. The anesthetist is part of an ongoing process. He investigates and records a situation based on his knowledge and experience and a prompt reaction to untoward circumstances may be necessary. Today's workplace provides insufficient support for this task. Data presentation is unstructured and distributed around the workplace which produces potentially dangerous overloading in critical situations. It is necessary to view the work layout as an integrated whole. The data being displayed must be hierarchically structured and appropriate to the situation. Concluding DM involves summarising data and information on completion of a process in ways appropriate to specific purposes. With this the anesthetist completes an anaesthesia and transfers the patient to the next unit, e.g. to the recovery room. He has to fill in several forms for clinical and statistical reasons. Electronic aids are available only for parts of some tasks. The goal should be a multifunctional summary satisfactory for clinical and statistical purposes, most aspects of which are created automatically by a computer system.

[The "preoxygenation" special function in mechanical ventilators. Medically necessary and an ergonomic plus?]. / Sonderfunktion "Präoxygenierung" am Beatmungsgerät. Medizinisch notwendig und ein Plus an Ergonomie?

Hypoxia-related cardiovascular complications and unnecessary monitor and ventilator alarms are well-known problems during tracheobronchial suctioning. Preoxygenation together with temporary muting of acoustic alarms for tracheobronchial suctioning are provided by a single operational control of the ventilator "Evita", software release 9 (Drägerwerk AG). This integrated function was evaluated in medical and ergonomic respects. METHODS. Thirty tracheobronchial suctioning procedures each, with or without preoxygenation, were evaluated. The subjects were patients in our anesthesiological intensive care unit who were under continuous positive-pressure ventilation with FIO2 between 0.25 and 0.6. They ranged in age from 18 months to 72 years. Each patient served as her/his own control after about 1-h delays. Depending on the preference of the nurse, the procedures were either both on-ventilator (via the catheter port) or both off-ventilator suctionings. Arterial samples for blood gas analyses as well as arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) determinations were taken before preoxygenation, at the moment of disconnection or opening of the catheter port, at reconnection or closure of the port, and 5 min later. Moreover, the number of changes in position of the performing nurse, the number of acoustic ventilator alarms, and the duration of the procedure were recorded. Finally, assessments of the integrated ventilator feature by the 28 participating nurses were collected both as a score from 1 ("most useful and innovative") to 5 ("completely superfluous and distracting") and as detailed statements. RESULTS. Arterial blood gas results and SaO2 courses differentiated as to procedures with or without preoxygenation as well as on-ventilator and off-ventilator suctioning are shown in Table 1 (values are mean +/- standard deviation). Without preoxygenation, most patients did not exhibit threatening drops in SaO2 (values fell from 98.2%) to 97.0% on the average). Nevertheless, preoxygenation provided an additional safety margin (100% saturation throughout the procedure in all patients). Under certain conditions, e.g., low functional residual capacity as in small children or patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome (in 1 of these cases we observed a SaO2 drop to 87%), it is mandatory. Although occurring far less frequently, unnecessary acoustic alarms were not completely excluded by the integrated function because the ventilator would not recognize the insertion of the suction catheter via the catheter port as the expected disconnection. Thus, coughing was able to trigger the "high airway pressure" alarm. As expressed by an average score of 2.8, approval of the integrated ventilator function prevailed among the involved nursing staff.

[Pharmacodynamics of vecuronium in infants during intravenous induction of anesthesia with ketamine]. / Pharmakodynamik von Vecuronium im Kleinkindesalter bei intravenöser Narkoseeinleitung mit Ketamin.

The pharmacodynamic effects of vecuronium in children aged 1 to 6 years were investigated after intravenous induction of anaesthesia with ketamine, using an initial dose of vecuronium of 0.08 mg/kg body wt. 0.1 mg/kg body wt. The degree of neuromuscular blockade was determined by measuring the contraction force of the m. adductor pollicis after supramaximal stimulation of the ulnar nerve using an electromechanical device. The results (median, chi min and chi max) were as follows. For the initial dose 0.08 mg/kg body wt., the onset time was 150 s (110-360 s); total blockade: 5 of 9 children, D25 (duration of 25% recovery) 13 min (10-31); RI (recovery index): 8.5 min (6.0-14.5); D90 (duration of 90% recovery): 27 min (20-44). For the initial dose of 0.1 mg/kg body wt., the onset time was 135 s (80-300); total blockade: all children, D25: 19.5 min (12-32.5); RI: 8.75 min (6.5-13.5); D90 35 min (22-45). Only the D25 was significantly shorter using an initial dose of 0.08 mg/kg body wt. For a total blockade, a higher dose of vecuronium is necessary using intravenous induction of anaesthesia compared with previously described inhalation techniques. Even with the high dosage, recovery from neuromuscular blockade is so rapid in this age group that it can be used even for short operations without reversal.

Ergonomics applied to anaesthesia record keeping.

For almost 100 years, the anaesthesia record has been the sole information tool trying to fulfill an ample catalogue of functions related to the anaesthesia information processes. Automated anaesthetic record systems have evolved around data being available online, as an imitation of the handwritten record. None has developed an information tool capable of an efficient utilization of the wide range of resources provided by modern technology to fulfill the information requirements of the anaesthetic environment. We used a system ergonomic analysis trying to find the best solutions. As a result of it we drafted an Anaesthesia Information Concept (AIC) in which the complexity of data & information (D&I) processes is broken down to modules called Clinical Information Process Units (CIPUs). A CIPU is mainly defined by the responsibility of a staff member and focuses on the basic system patient, staff and machine (all devices). The internal functions of a CIPU are treatment control and medicolegal documentation. The external functions are fulfilled by transferring required sets of D&I for subsequent treatment control (next CIPU), audit, quality control, cost calculation, etc. Using such an approach, an Anaesthesia Information Concept (AIC) can be realized by a wide range of modular and hybrid systems (combination of different tools such as paper records, computers, etc), as opposed to universal and single automated documentation systems, which up to now have failed to fulfill the information demands of the anaesthetic environment.

Postoperative information transfer: a study comparing two university hospitals.

Several studies have addressed the processing of anesthetic information by paper anesthetic data records or by the electronic storage and transfer of anesthetic data. Our purpose was to analyze the oral transfer of information in the postoperative period. We investigated 198 post-operative transfer situations with 120 patients in a U.S. hospital to compare the results with those of a former study in a German hospital. A great number of parameters were used in both hospitals, but there were remarkable differences. In the U.S. hospital numeric values of current vital functions, including oxygen saturation, were more common during information transfer, whereas in the German hospital the emphasis was on case history and chronic health status. The data from the U.S. hospital and those of the German hospital show that in spite of complete anesthetic records, a short (112.3 +/- 104 sec in the U.S. and 94.1 +/- 83.6 sec in Germany) oral information transfer is inevitable when the patient is transferred from the OR to the recovery room, and from the recovery room to the ward (122.7 +/- 61.4 sec in the U.S. and and 88.0 +/- 73.0 in Germany). Software developers of patient data management systems could learn from this study that in some situations it is necessary and possible to create a small set of data which will reflect the patients status quite well.

[Experimental studies on the recovery of anesthetic gases]. / Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Rückgewinnung von Narkosegasen.

The volatile anesthetic agents halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane are chlorofluorocarbons (CFC) and contribute to ozone depletion. Although the contribution is small, its importance is rising, as technical CFCs will be phased out according to the Montreal protocol (1987) and the London conference (1990) by the year 2000. Alternative procedures and CFC-free volatile agents such as des- and sevoflurane do not contribute to depletion of the ozone layer, but will not replace standard methods using volatile anesthetic agents in the near future. METHODS. In an experimental setup, we filtered anesthetic waste gases from scavenging systems of rebreathing circles by activated carbon filters. The filtered substances were desorbed by a heat chamber and condensed in a cold trap. RESULTS. By this method, it was possible to retrieve 50%-60% of the applied gases. Gas chromatographic analysis showed halothane containing traces of pollutants and isoflurane and enflurane as pure substances. DISCUSSION. The retrieval of anesthetic waste gases is easy; no sophisticated technical equipment is necessary. Purity of substances could make recycling possible and offer a method to avoid environmental pollution by volatile anesthetics.

Can a clinician predict the technical equipment a patient will need during intensive care unit treatment? An approach to standardize and redesign the intensive care unit workstation.

The technical equipment of today's intensive care unit (ICU) workstation has been characterized by a gradual, incremental accumulation of individual devices, whose presence is dictated by patient needs. These devices usually present differently designed controls, operate under different alarm philosophies, and cannot communicate with each other. By contrast, ICU workstations could be equipped permanently and in a standardized manner with electronically linked modules if the attending physicians could reliably predict, at the time of admission, the patient's equipment needs. Over a period of 3 1/2 months, the doctors working in our 20-bed surgical ICU made 1,000 predictions concerning outcome, equipment need, duration of artificial ventilation, and duration of hospitalization for 300 recently admitted patients. The interviews were made within the first 24 hours after admission. The doctors being interviewed were usually (i.e., in over 90% of cases) unfamiliar with the patient. Information concerning the patient's general state of health, special pre-ICU events, and complications was offered to the interviewed clinician because this information represents standard admission data. It was found that the equipment need (represented by two different setups, "high tech" and "low tech") could be predicted most reliably (96.4% correct predictions) compared with a prediction on outcome of ICU treatment (94.5%), on duration of artificial ventilation (75.4%), and on duration of stay (43.4%). There was no significant (p greater than 0.05) difference in the reliability of predictions between residents and consultants. Factors influencing the postoperative equipment need varied with surgical specialty.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Decision making in high dependency environments--can we learn from modern industrial management models?

Increasing complexity and increased restraints affect the task of patient management in High Dependency Environments, which has become intricate and difficult. Medical knowledge alone is not enough any longer for proper patient care. Management ability and facilities are required. Current medical knowledge should be expanded by management methods and techniques. By looking at management models in the industry, we found striking similarities between the industrial management situation and clinical patient management. Both systems share complexity in structure, complexity in interaction and evolutionary character. Clinical patient management can be compared with a navigation process. The patient is steered by a control system, and course information is given by control dimensions. Clinical patient management becomes a succession of steering activities influenced by the surrounding systems. This system can be structured in three interacting layers: an operational level, in which information is collected and actions executed; a strategic level in which strategies based on goal-oriented mental anticipation of a probabilistic system are formulated; and a normative level at which principles and norms are defined. It is possible then, to define the tools which have to be developed and implemented to improve clinical management capabilities. At the operational level these tools are addressed to improve clinical decision making by providing information in an ergonomical way. They include artifact elimination, data reduction, increase in meaningful information and unwanted data filtering. At the strategic level, tools to check the feasibility of the applied strategies have to be developed, such as: ideal patient course plots and increased training in strategic thinking.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Improvement of oxygenation in thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation using a new intraoperative CPAP device]. / Untersuchungen zur Verbesserung der Oxigenierung bei thoraxchirurgischen Eingriffen unter Ein-Lungen-Beatmung mit einem neuen intraoperativen CPAP-Gerät.

For thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation, the use of CPAP for the non-ventilated lung can improve oxygenation. We studied the use of a newly developed CPAP device in 28 patients undergoing single-lung ventilation. This device was easy to use, in particular because the components are familiar to every anesthesiologist. The use of +5 mbar CPAP improved oxygenation by an average of 39.5 mm Hg; +10 mbar CPAP brought about an improvement of 89 mm Hg. Pulse oximetry proved useful in monitoring adequate oxygenation.

System ergonomic analysis of the morning ward round in an intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to find out what is discussed during a bedside morning ward round (MWR), whether there are any weak points, and if a standard work process structure can be recommended. METHODS: An intensive care unit (ICU) consultant recorded in a predefined form the topics that were discussed in 225 bedside discussions. RESULTS: The median length of discussions was 5 min. In more than 60% of the discussions, items were considered related to the respiratory, neurological, and cardiovascular systems, as well as to surgical and nursing problems. Specific variables relating to organ system conditions were seldom used (e.g., inspired O2 concentration, 35%; temperature, 28%; ventilation mode, 25%). We recorded two interruptions per MWR; only 17% of them were related to urgent decisions. Information that could not be found in the patient's file usually concerned microbiology findings (10%) or surgical procedures (6%). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the following structure: (1) Addressing the patient by saying "hello"; (2) presentation of information related to case history, acute status (findings and strategy) (including the function of the main organ systems), infection status, and nursing problems; (3) patient-related discussion; and (4) discussion of general treatment rules, triggered by individual patient condition.