Cannabidiol for the Management of Endometriosis and Chronic Pelvic Pain.

OBJECTIVE: To review the available literature on the effect of cannabis-based products on the female reproductive system and establish whether there is any evidence that they benefit or harm patients with endometriosis and, therefore, whether there is sufficient evidence to recommend them. DATA SOURCES: An electronic-based search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database. Reference lists of articles retrieved were reviewed, and a gray literature search was also performed. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: The original database search yielded 264 articles from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database, of which 41 were included. One hundred sixty-one studies relating to gynecologic malignancy, conditions unrelated to endometriosis, or therapies unrelated to cannabis-based products were excluded. Twelve articles were included from a gray literature search and review of references. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Most available evidence is from laboratory studies aiming to simulate the effects of cannabis-based products on preclinical endometriosis models. Some show evidence of benefit with cannabis-based products. However, results are conflicting, and the impact in humans cannot necessarily be extrapolated from these data. Few studies exist looking at the effect of cannabis or its derived products in women with endometriosis; the majority are in the form of surveys and are affected by bias. National guidance was also reviewed: at present, this dictates that cannabis-based products can only be prescribed for conditions in which there is clear published evidence of benefit and only when all other treatment options have been exhausted. CONCLUSION: Current treatment options for endometriosis often affect fertility and/or have undesirable side effects that impede long-term management. Cannabis-based products have been suggested as a novel therapeutic option that may circumvent these issues. However, there is a paucity of well-designed, robust studies and randomized controlled trials looking at their use in the treatment of endometriosis. In addition, cannabis use has a potential for harm in the long term, with a possible association with "cannabis use disorder," psychosis, and mood disturbances. At present, national guidance cannot recommend cannabis-based products to patients in the UK owing to lack of clear evidence of benefit. More comprehensive research into the impact of endocannabinoids in the context of endometriosis is required before their use can be recommended or prescribed.

Efficacy and Safety of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Real-World Retrospective Studies.

10 kHz spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is increasingly utilized globally to treat chronic pain syndromes. Real-world evidence complementing randomized controlled trials supporting its use, has accumulated over the last decade. This systematic review aims to summarize the retrospective literature with reference to the efficacy and safety of 10 kHz SCS. We performed a systematic literature search of PubMed between 1 January 2009 and 21 August 2020 for English-language retrospective studies of ≥3 human subjects implanted with a Senza® 10 kHz SCS system and followed-up for ≥3 months. Two independent reviewers screened titles/abstracts of 327 studies and 46 full-text manuscripts. In total, 16 articles were eligible for inclusion; 15 reported effectiveness outcomes and 11 presented safety outcomes. Follow-up duration ranged from 6-34 months. Mean pain relief was >50% in most studies, regardless of follow-up duration. Responder rates ranged from 67-100% at ≤12 months follow-up, and from 46-76% thereafter. 32-71% of patients decreased opioid or nonopioid analgesia intake. Complication incidence rates were consistent with other published SCS literature. Findings suggest 10 kHz SCS provides safe and durable pain relief in pragmatic populations of chronic pain patients. Furthermore, it may decrease opioid requirements, highlighting the key role 10 kHz SCS can play in the medium-term management of chronic pain.

Best practice in radiofrequency denervation of the lumbar facet joints: a consensus technique.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency denervation is used to treat selected people with low back pain. Recent trials have been criticised for using a sub-optimal intervention technique. OBJECTIVES: To achieve consensus on a best practice technique for administering radiofrequency denervation of the lumbar facet joints to selected people with low back pain. STUDY DESIGN: A consensus of expert professionals in the area of radiofrequency denervation of the lumbar facet joints. METHODS: We invited a clinical member from the 30 most active UK departments in radiofrequency pain procedures and two overseas clinicians with specific expertise to a 1 day consensus meeting. Drawing on the known anatomy of the medial branch, the theoretical basis of radiofrequency procedures, a survey of current practice and collective expertise, delegates were facilitated to reach consensus on the best practice technique. RESULTS: The day was attended by 24 UK and international clinical experts. Attendees agreed a best practice technique for the conduct of radiofrequency denervation of the lumbar facet joints. LIMITATIONS: This consensus was based on a 1 day meeting of 24 clinical experts who attended and took part in the discussions. The agreed technique has not been subject to input from a wider community of experts. CONCLUSIONS: Current best practice for radiofrequency denervation has been agreed for use in a UK trial. Group members intend immediate implementation in their respective trusts. We propose using this in a planned Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) of radiofrequency denervation for selected people with low back pain.