Comparison of prognostic impact of anticoagulants in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation and renal dysfunction: direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists.

Although high thromboembolic risk was assumed in elderly patients with heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF), inadequate control of prothrombin time/international normalized ratio was often observed in patients using vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). We hypothesized that patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) would have a better outcome than those treated with VKAs. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacies of DOACs and VKAs in elderly patients with HF and AF. We retrospectively analyzed data from a multicenter, prospective observational cohort study. A total of 1036 patients who were hospitalized for acute decompensated HF were enrolled. We assessed 329 patients aged > 65 years who had non-valvular AF and divided them into 2 groups according to the anticoagulant therapy they received. A subgroup analysis was performed using renal dysfunction based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; mL/min/1.73 m2). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcomes were non-cardiovascular death or stroke. The median follow-up period was 730 days (range 334-1194 days). The primary outcome was observed in 84 patients; non-cardiovascular death, in 25 patients; and stroke, in 14 patients. The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the DOAC group than in the VKA group (log-rank p = 0.033), whereas the incidence rates of non-cardiovascular death (log-rank p = 0.171) and stroke (log-rank p = 0.703) were not significantly different in the crude population. DOAC therapy was not associated with lower mortality in the crude population (log-rank p = 0.146) and in the eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 subgroup (log-rank p = 0.580). However, DOAC therapy was independently associated with lower mortality after adjustments for age, diabetes mellitus, and albumin level (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.99; p = 0.045) in the eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 subgroup. Compared with VKA therapy, DOAC therapy was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality in the elderly HF patients with AF and renal dysfunction.

Gender difference in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: clinical profiles, examinations, and prognosis.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has currently become a major concern in the aging society owing to its substantial and growing prevalence. Recent investigations regarding sacubitril/valsartan have suggested that there is a gender difference in the efficacy of the medication in HFpEF cohort. However, information of gender difference in clinical profiles, examination, and prognosis have not been well investigated. The present study aimed to evaluate the differences in baseline characteristics and outcomes between women and men in a Japanese HFpEF cohort. We analyzed the data from our prospective, observational, and multicenter cohort study. Overall, 1036 consecutive patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure were enrolled. We defined patients with an ejection fraction (EF) of ≥ 50% as HFpEF. Patients with severe valvular disease were excluded; the remaining 379 patients (women: n = 201, men: n = 178) were assessed. Women were older than men [median: 85 (79-89) years vs. 83 (75-87) years, p = 0.013]. Diabetes mellitus, hyperuricemia, and coronary artery disease were more prevalent in men than in women (34.8% vs. 23.9%, p = 0.019, 23.6% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.002, and 23.0% vs. 11.9%, p = 0.005, respectively). EF was not significantly different between women and men. The cumulative incidence of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for congestive heart failure (CHF) was significantly lower in women than in men (log-rank p = 0.040). Women with HFpEF were older and less often exhibited an ischemic etiology; further, they were associated with a lower risk for cardiovascular death or hospitalization for CHF compared with men in the Japanese population.

Prognostic significance of diastolic blood pressure in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Although systolic blood pressure (SBP) is routinely considered when treating acute heart failure (HF), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is hardly been assessed in the situation. There are no previous studies regarding the predictive value of DBP in elderly patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in Japan. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of DBP in patients with acute decompensated HFpEF. We analyzed data of all HFpEF patients admitted to Shinonoi General Hospital for HF treatment between July 2016 and December 2018. We excluded patients with acute coronary syndrome and severe valvular disease. Patients were divided into two groups according to their median DBP; the low DBP group (DBP ≤ 77 mmHg, n = 106) and the high DBP group (DBP > 77 mmHg, n = 100). The primary outcome was HF readmission. In 206 enrolled patients (median 86 years), during a median follow-up of 302 days, the primary outcome occurred in 48 patients. The incidence of HF readmission was significantly higher in the low DBP group (33.0% vs 18.5%, p = 0.024). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, low DBP predicted HF readmission (Log-rank test, p = 0.013). In Cox proportional hazard analysis, low DBP was an independent predictor of HF readmission after adjustment for age, sex, SBP, hemoglobin, serum albumin, serum creatinine, B-type natriuretic peptide, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, left ventricular ejection fraction, coronary artery disease, and whether they live alone (hazard ratio, 2.229; 95% confidence interval, 1.021-4.867; p = 0.044). Low DBP predicted HF readmission in patients with HFpEF.