Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 56
Filtrar
1.
J Med Internet Res ; 25: e38481, 2023 09 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37698897

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dry eye (DE) and hay fever (HF) show synergistic exacerbation of each other's pathology through inflammatory pathways. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the association between DE and HF comorbidity and the related risk factors. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted using crowdsourced multidimensional data from individuals who downloaded the AllerSearch smartphone app in Japan between February 2018 and May 2020. AllerSearch collected the demographics, medical history, lifestyle and residential information, HF status, DE symptoms, and HF-related quality of life. HF symptoms were evaluated using the nasal symptom score (0-15 points) and nonnasal symptom score (0-12 points). HF was defined by the participants' responses to the questionnaire as HF, non-HF, or unknown. Symptomatic DE was defined as an Ocular Surface Disease Index total score (0-100 points), with a threshold score of 13 points. HF-related quality of life was assessed using the Japanese Allergic Conjunctival Disease Standard Quality of Life Questionnaire (0-68 points). We conducted a multivariable linear regression analysis to examine the association between the severity of DE and HF symptoms. We subsequently conducted a multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify the factors associated with symptomatic DE (vs nonsymptomatic DE) among individuals with HF. Dimension reduction via Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection stratified the comorbid DE and HF symptoms. The symptom profiles in each cluster were identified using hierarchical heat maps. RESULTS: This study included 11,284 participants, classified into experiencing HF (9041 participants), non-HF (720 participants), and unknown (1523 participants) groups. The prevalence of symptomatic DE among individuals with HF was 49.99% (4429/9041). Severe DE symptoms were significantly associated with severe HF symptoms: coefficient 1.33 (95% CI 1.10-1.57; P<.001) for mild DE, coefficient 2.16 (95% CI 1.84-2.48; P<.001) for moderate DE, and coefficient 3.80 (95% CI 3.50-4.11; P<.001) for severe DE. The risk factors for comorbid symptomatic DE among individuals with HF were identified as female sex; lower BMI; medicated hypertension; history of hematologic, collagen, heart, liver, respiratory, or atopic disease; tomato allergy; current and previous mental illness; pet ownership; living room and bedrooms furnished with materials other than hardwood, carpet, tatami, and vinyl; discontinuation of contact lens use during the HF season; current contact lens use; smoking habits; and sleep duration of <6 hours per day. Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection stratified the heterogeneous comorbid DE and HF symptoms into 14 clusters. In the hierarchical heat map, cluster 9 was comorbid with the most severe HF and DE symptoms, and cluster 1 showed severe HF symptoms with minimal DE-related symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: This crowdsourced study suggested a significant association between severe DE and HF symptoms. Detecting DE among individuals with HF could allow effective prevention and interventions through concurrent treatment for ocular surface management along with HF treatment.


Assuntos
Síndromes do Olho Seco , Hipersensibilidade , Aplicativos Móveis , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal , Feminino , Humanos , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Qualidade de Vida , Síndromes do Olho Seco/diagnóstico , Síndromes do Olho Seco/epidemiologia
2.
J Med Internet Res ; 25: e42638, 2023 08 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37535409

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Using traditional patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as paper-based questionnaires, is cumbersome in the era of web-based medical consultation and telemedicine. Electronic PROs may reduce the burden on patients if implemented widely. Considering promising reports of DryEyeRhythm, our in-house mHealth smartphone app for investigating dry eye disease (DED) and the electronic and paper-based Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) should be evaluated and compared to determine their equivalency. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to assess the equivalence between smartphone app-based and paper-based questionnaires for DED. METHODS: This prospective, nonblinded, randomized crossover study enrolled 34 participants between April 2022 and June 2022 at a university hospital in Japan. The participants were allocated randomly into 2 groups in a 1:1 ratio. The paper-app group initially responded to the paper-based Japanese version of the OSDI (J-OSDI), followed by the app-based J-OSDI. The app-paper group responded to similar questionnaires but in reverse order. We performed an equivalence test based on minimal clinically important differences to assess the equivalence of the J-OSDI total scores between the 2 platforms (paper-based vs app-based). A 95% CI of the mean difference between the J-OSDI total scores within the ±7.0 range between the 2 platforms indicated equivalence. The internal consistency and agreement of the app-based J-OSDI were assessed with Cronbach α coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficient values. RESULTS: A total of 33 participants were included in this study. The total scores for the app- and paper-based J-OSDI indicated satisfactory equivalence per our study definition (mean difference 1.8, 95% CI -1.4 to 5.0). Moreover, the app-based J-OSDI total score demonstrated good internal consistency and agreement (Cronbach α=.958; intraclass correlation=0.919; 95% CI 0.842 to 0.959) and was significantly correlated with its paper-based counterpart (Pearson correlation=0.932, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the equivalence of PROs between the app- and paper-based J-OSDI. Implementing the app-based J-OSDI in various scenarios, including telehealth, may have implications for the early diagnosis of DED and longitudinal monitoring of PROs.


Assuntos
Síndromes do Olho Seco , Aplicativos Móveis , Humanos , Estudos Cross-Over , Síndromes do Olho Seco/diagnóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Smartphone , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
Allergol Int ; 72(3): 418-427, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36740498

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary efforts to prospectively collect and analyze symptoms of hay fever are limited. We aimed to identify the characteristics of nasal and ocular symptoms of hay fever, using the AllerSearch smartphone application. METHODS: This mobile health-based prospective observational study using the AllerSearch smartphone application was conducted between February 1, 2018, and May 1, 2020. Individuals who downloaded AllerSearch from Japan and provided comprehensive self-assessments (including 17 items related to quality of life [QoL]-related items) were included. The characteristics and risk factors for allergic rhinitis (AR) and allergic conjunctivitis (AC) were identified using hierarchical heat maps and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 9041 participants with hay fever, 58.8% had AR and AC, 22.2% had AR, and 5.7% had AC. The AR-AC comorbid cohort showed worse symptoms of hay fever and QoL scores than the other cohorts. Factors (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval) associated with AR-AC included a lower age (0.98, 0.97-0.98), female sex (1.31, 1.19-1.45), liver disease (1.58, 1.26-2.35), dry eye disease (1.45, 1.30-1.63), unknown dry eye disease status (1.46, 1.31-1.62), contact lens use discontinuation during the hay fever season (1.69, 1.28-2.23), and bedroom flooring material other than hardwood, carpet, tatami, or vinyl (1.91, 1.16-3.14). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of medical big data for hay fever performed using a mobile health app helped identify risk factors and characteristics of AC, AR, and AR-AC. Phenotyping of highly variable symptoms of hay fever, such as nasal and ocular symptoms, can facilitate better-quality clinical care.


Assuntos
Conjuntivite Alérgica , Crowdsourcing , Síndromes do Olho Seco , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal , Rinite Alérgica , Feminino , Humanos , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/diagnóstico , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Transversais , Rinite Alérgica/diagnóstico , Rinite Alérgica/epidemiologia , Síndromes do Olho Seco/diagnóstico , Síndromes do Olho Seco/epidemiologia , Síndromes do Olho Seco/etiologia
4.
Chem Res Toxicol ; 35(11): 2107-2121, 2022 11 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36315617

RESUMO

Amino acid derivative reactivity assay (ADRA) is an in chemico assay for assessing the skin sensitization potential of chemicals by evaluating the reactivity of nucleophilic reagents that mimic skin proteins. N-(2-(1-Naphthyl)acetyl)-l-cysteine (NAC) and α-N-(2-(1-naphthyl)acetyl)-l-lysine (NAL), used as nucleophilic reagents, are small-molecule derivatives of two different amino acids, each with a naphthalene ring attached. The rate of decrease in the amount of NAC or NAL in the reaction solution is evaluated in this assay as an indicator of the test substance's skin sensitization ability. However, the products formed between the nucleophilic reagent and the test substance, which play an important role in vivo, are not directly identified. Therefore, six highly reactive chemicals, including the proficiency substances listed in the OECD Test Guidelines─squaric acid diethyl ester, 2-methyl-2H-isothiazol-3-one (MI), p-benzoquinone, palmitoyl chloride, diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP), and imidazolidinyl urea (IU)─were used to determine each formed product. Samples were prepared according to the standard ADRA method, and the formed products were predicted on the basis of the reaction mechanism. Excluding DPCP, the estimated structures were validated using mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometry on the synthesized samples. In this manner, the products of each nucleophile were confirmed for all examined test substances. The estimated structure products were obtained through a series of reactions initiated by the nucleophilic attack of NAC's thiol group or NAL's amino group on the test substance's electron-deficient carbonyl carbon. However, contrary to expectations, disulfide-linked-type ring-opened products were detected in the case of MI, and products with free formaldehyde in solution were detected in the case of IU. In summary, all skin sensitizers tested herein reacted with NAC and/or NAL to give products. This supports the theoretical validity of ADRA, which provides an indirect evaluation of the formed products based on a decrease in nucleophilic reagents.


Assuntos
Alternativas aos Testes com Animais , Pele , Animais , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/métodos , Indicadores e Reagentes , Pele/metabolismo , Bioensaio/métodos , Cisteína/química
5.
J Appl Toxicol ; 42(6): 1078-1090, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35043433

RESUMO

The amino acid derivative reactivity assay (ADRA) is an in chemico alternative assay for skin sensitization listed in OECD test guideline 442C. ADRA evaluates the reactivity of sensitizers to proteins, which is key event 1 in the skin sensitization adverse outcome pathway. Although the current key event 1 evaluation method is a simple assay that evaluates nucleophile and test chemical reactivity, mixtures of unknown molecular weights cannot be evaluated because a constant molar ratio between the nucleophile and test chemical is necessary. In addition, because the nucleophile is quantified by HPLC, the frequency of co-eluting the test chemical and nucleophile increases when measuring multi-component mixtures. To solve these issues, test conditions have been developed using a 0.5 mg/mL test chemical solution and fluorescence-based detection. Since the practicality of these methods has not been substantiated, a validation test to confirm reproducibility was conducted in this study. The 10 proficiency substances listed in the ADRA guidelines were tested three times at five different laboratories. The results of both within- and between-laboratory reproducibility were 100%, and the results of ultraviolet- and fluorescence-based measurements were also consistent. In addition to the proficiency substances, a new positive control, squaric acid diethyl ester, was tested three times at the five laboratories. The results showed high reproducibility with N-(2-(1-naphthyl)acetyl)-l-cysteine depletion of 37%-52% and α-N-(2-(1-naphthyl)acetyl)-l-lysine depletion of 99%-100%. Thus, high reproducibility was confirmed in both evaluations of the 0.5 mg/mL test chemical and the fluorescence-based measurements, validating the practicability of these methods.


Assuntos
Alternativas aos Testes com Animais , Laboratórios , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/métodos , Animais , Bioensaio/métodos , Cisteína/química , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Pele/metabolismo
6.
J Appl Toxicol ; 42(2): 318-333, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34855227

RESUMO

Amino acid derivative reactivity assay (ADRA) for skin sensitization was adopted as an alternative method in the 2019 OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals (OECD TG 442C). The molar ratio of the nucleophilic reagent to the test chemicals in the reaction solution was set to 1:50. Imamura et al. reported that changing this molar ratio from 1:50 to 1:200 reduced in false negatives and improved prediction accuracy. Hence, a ring study using ADRA with 4 mM of a test chemical solution (ADRA, 4 mM) was conducted at five different laboratories to verify within- and between-laboratory reproducibilities (WLR and BLR, respectively). In this study, we investigated the WLR and BLR using 14 test chemicals grouped into three classes: (1) eight proficiency substances, (2) four test chemicals that showed false negatives in the ADRA with 1 mM test chemical solution (ADRA, 1 mM), but correctly positive in ADRA (4 mM), and (3) current positive control (phenylacetaldehyde) and a new additional positive control (squaric acid diethyl ester). The results showed 100% reproducibility and 100% accuracy for skin sensitization. Hence, it is clear that the ADRA (4 mM) is an excellent test method in contrast to the currently used ADRA (1 mM). We plan to resubmit the ADRA (4 mM) test method to the OECD Test Guideline Group in the near future so that OECD TG 442C could be revised for the convenience and benefit of many ADRA users.


Assuntos
Aminoácidos/uso terapêutico , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/estatística & dados numéricos , Bioensaio/estatística & dados numéricos , Compostos Orgânicos/toxicidade , Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Laboratórios , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
7.
Allergol Int ; 71(3): 325-334, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35105520

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of hay fever, a multifactorial allergic disease, is increasing. Identifying individual characteristics and associated factors of hay fever is essential for predictive, preventive, personalized, and participatory (P4) medicine. This study aimed to identify individual characteristics and associated factors of hay fever using an iPhone application AllerSearch. METHODS: This large-scale mobile health-based cross-sectional study was conducted between February 2018 and May 2020. Individuals who downloaded AllerSearch in Japan and provided a comprehensive self-assessment (general characteristics, medical history, lifestyle habits, and hay fever symptoms [score range 0-36]) were included. Associated factors of hay fever (vs. non-hay fever) and severe hay fever symptoms were identified using multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses, respectively. RESULTS: Of the included 11,284 individuals, 9041 had hay fever. Factors associated with hay fever (odds ratio) included age (0.98), female sex (1.33), atopic dermatitis (1.40), history of dry eye diagnosis (1.36), discontinuation of contact lens use during hay fever season (3.34), frequent bowel movements (1.03), and less sleep duration (0.91). The factors associated with severe hay fever symptoms among individuals with hay fever (coefficient) included age (-0.104), female sex (1.329), history of respiratory disease (1.539), history of dry eye diagnosis (0.824), tomato allergy (1.346), discontinuation of contact lens use during hay fever season (1.479), smoking habit (0.614), and having a pet (0.303). CONCLUSIONS: Our large-scale mobile health-based study using AllerSearch elucidated distinct hay fever presentation patterns, characteristics, and factors associated with hay fever. Our study establishes the groundwork for effective individualized interventions for P4 medicine.


Assuntos
Síndromes do Olho Seco , Hipersensibilidade , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal , Telemedicina , Estudos Transversais , Síndromes do Olho Seco/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/diagnóstico , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/epidemiologia
8.
Bioorg Med Chem Lett ; 47: 128195, 2021 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34119614

RESUMO

Cytochrome P450 (CYPs) are oxidoreductases distributed in various tissues in plants and animals. Among the CYP families, CYP3A is the most abundant in vivo, particularly in humans, and it is involved in the metabolism of many drugs. It is crucial to measure CYP3A activity for both pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals because inhibition or induction of this enzyme can seriously affect the occurrence of toxicity or efficacy. In the present study, a novel fluorescent probe, 6-(2,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzyloxy)-9-(4-methoxy-2-methylphenyl)-3H-xanthen-3-one (BMX, quantum efficiency: 21%), was designed and synthesized. The design was done by photoinduced electron transfer strategy. BMX was specifically metabolized only using CYP3A to generate 2-Me-4-MeO TokyoGreen (quantum efficiency: 85%), resulting in strong fluorescence in the presence of CYP3A isozymes. Protein assays using recombinant human, rat, and mouse CYP isozymes demonstrated the selective metabolism of BMX and production of fluorescence only by CYP3A in all species.


Assuntos
Citocromo P-450 CYP3A/análise , Desenho de Fármacos , Corantes Fluorescentes/química , Xantenos/química , Citocromo P-450 CYP3A/metabolismo , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Transporte de Elétrons , Corantes Fluorescentes/síntese química , Humanos , Estrutura Molecular , Processos Fotoquímicos , Relação Estrutura-Atividade , Xantenos/síntese química
9.
J Appl Toxicol ; 40(6): 843-854, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32052484

RESUMO

The amino acid derivative reactivity assay (ADRA), which is an in chemico alternative to the use of animals in testing for skin sensitization potential, offers significant advantages over the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) in that it utilizes nucleophilic reagents that are sensitive enough to be used with test chemical solutions prepared to concentrations of 1 mm, which is one-hundredth that of DPRA. ADRA testing of hydrophobic or other poorly soluble compounds requires that they be dissolved in a solvent consisting of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and acetonitrile. DMSO is known to promote dimerization by oxidizing thiols, which then form disulfide bonds. We investigated the extent to which DMSO oxidizes the cysteine-derived nucleophilic reagents used in both DPRA and ADRA and found that oxidation of both N-(2-(1-naphthyl)acetyl)-l-cysteine (NAC) and cysteine peptide increases as the concentration of DMSO increases, thereby lowering the concentration of the nucleophilic reagent. We also found that use of a solvent consisting of 5% DMSO in acetonitrile consistently lowered NAC concentrations by about 0.4 µm relative to the use of solvents containing no DMSO. We also tested nine sensitizers and four nonsensitizers having different sensitization potencies to compare NAC depletion with and without 5% DMSO and found that reactivity was about the same with either solvent. Based on the above, we conclude that the use of a solvent containing 5% DMSO has no effect on the accuracy of ADRA test results. We plan to review and propose revisions to OECD Test Guideline 442C based on the above investigation.


Assuntos
Alternativas aos Testes com Animais , Cisteína/química , Dimetil Sulfóxido/química , Irritantes/toxicidade , Testes de Irritação da Pele , Solventes/química , Acetonitrilas/química , Cisteína/análogos & derivados , Irritantes/química , Oxirredução , Medição de Risco
10.
J Med Internet Res ; 22(6): e18996, 2020 06 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32589162

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Discontinuation of contact lens use is mainly caused by contact lens-associated dry eye. It is crucial to delineate contact lens-associated dry eye's multifaceted nature to tailor treatment to each patient's individual needs for future personalized medicine. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to quantify and stratify individual subjective symptoms of contact lens-associated dry eye and clarify its risk factors for future personalized medicine using the smartphone app DryEyeRhythm (Juntendo University). METHODS: This cross-sectional study included iPhone (Apple Inc) users in Japan who downloaded DryEyeRhythm. DryEyeRhythm was used to collect medical big data related to contact lens-associated dry eye between November 2016 and January 2018. The main outcome measure was the incidence of contact lens-associated dry eye. Univariate and multivariate adjusted odds ratios of risk factors for contact lens-associated dry eye were determined by logistic regression analyses. The t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding algorithm was used to depict the stratification of subjective symptoms of contact lens-associated dry eye. RESULTS: The records of 4454 individuals (median age 27.9 years, SD 12.6), including 2972 female participants (66.73%), who completed all surveys were included in this study. Among the included participants, 1844 (41.40%) were using contact lenses, and among those who used contact lenses, 1447 (78.47%) had contact lens-associated dry eye. Multivariate adjusted odds ratios of risk factors for contact lens-associated dry eye were as follows: younger age, 0.98 (95% CI 0.96-0.99); female sex, 1.53 (95% CI 1.05-2.24); hay fever, 1.38 (95% CI 1.10-1.74); mental illness other than depression or schizophrenia, 2.51 (95% CI 1.13-5.57); past diagnosis of dry eye, 2.21 (95% CI 1.63-2.99); extended screen exposure time >8 hours, 1.61 (95% CI 1.13-2.28); and smoking, 2.07 (95% CI 1.49-2.88). The t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding analysis visualized and stratified 14 groups based on the subjective symptoms of contact lens-associated dry eye. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified and stratified individuals with contact lens-associated dry eye and its risk factors. Data on subjective symptoms of contact lens-associated dry eye could be used for prospective prevention of contact lens-associated dry eye progression.


Assuntos
Lentes de Contato/efeitos adversos , Crowdsourcing/métodos , Síndromes do Olho Seco/complicações , Aplicativos Móveis/normas , Smartphone/instrumentação , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco
12.
J Appl Toxicol ; 39(11): 1492-1505, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31313332

RESUMO

The amino acid derivative reactivity assay (ADRA) is an in chemico alternative method that focuses on protein binding as the molecular initiating event for skin sensitization. It is a simple and versatile method that has successfully solved some of the problems of the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA). The transferability and within- and between-laboratory reproducibility of ADRA were evaluated and confirmed as part of a validation study conducted at four participating laboratories. The transfer of ADRA technology from the lead laboratory to the four participating laboratories was completed successfully during a two-step training program, after which the skin sensitization potentials of 40 coded chemicals were predicted based on the results of ADRA testing. Within-laboratories reproducibility was 100% (10 of 10), 100% (10 of 10), 100% (7 of 7) and 90% (9 of 10), or an average of 97.3% (36 of 37); between-laboratory reproducibility as calculated on the results of three laboratories at the time was 91.9%. The overall predictive capacity comprised an accuracy of 86.9%, sensitivity of 81.5% and specificity of 98.1%. These results satisfied the targets set by the validation management team for demonstrating transferability, within- and between-laboratory reproducibility, and predictive capacity as well as gave a clear indication that ADRA is easily transferable and sufficiently robust to be used in place of DPRA.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/toxicidade , Aminoácidos/química , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/métodos , Laboratórios/normas , Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Alérgenos/química , Bioensaio , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Indicadores e Reagentes , Ensaio de Proficiência Laboratorial , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Pele/imunologia , Solventes/química
13.
J Appl Toxicol ; 39(2): 191-208, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30221369

RESUMO

The amino acid derivative reactivity assay (ADRA) is an in chemico alternative to animal testing for skin sensitization that solves certain problems found in the use of the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA). During a recent validation study conducted at multiple laboratories as part of the process to include ADRA in an existing OECD test guideline, one of the nucleophilic reagents used in ADRA-N-(2-(1-naphthyl)acetyl)-l-cysteine (NAC)-was found to be susceptible to oxidation in much the same manner that the cysteine peptide used in DPRA was. Owing to this, we undertook a study to clarify the cause of the promotion of NAC oxidation. In general, cysteine and other chemicals that have thiol groups are known to oxidize in the presence of even minute quantities of metal ions. When metal ions were added to the ADRA reaction solution, Cu2+ promoted NAC oxidation significantly. When 0.25 µm of EDTA was added in the presence of Cu2+ , NAC oxidation was suppressed. Based on this, we predicted that the addition of EDTA to the NAC stock solution would suppress NAC oxidation. Next, we tested 82 chemicals used in developing ADRA to determine whether EDTA affects ADRA's ability to predict sensitization. The results showed that the addition of EDTA has virtually no effect on the reactivity of NAC with a test chemical, yielding an accuracy of 87% for predictions of skin sensitization, which was roughly the same as ADRA.


Assuntos
Acetilcisteína/química , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/métodos , Bioensaio/métodos , Ácido Edético/química , Alérgenos/administração & dosagem , Alérgenos/química , Alérgenos/toxicidade , Animais , Cobre/química , Compostos Férricos/química , Modelos Químicos , Oxirredução , Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Pele/metabolismo
16.
Transl Vis Sci Technol ; 13(9): 6, 2024 Sep 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39235400

RESUMO

Purpose: Long-term ramifications of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on various care-seeking characteristics of patients with diabetic retinopathy remain unclear. This study aimed to identify risk factors for dropout from regular fundus examinations (RFEs) in patients with diabetic retinopathy in Japan. Methods: We extracted demographic and health checkup data (April 2018 to March 2021) from the JMDC database. Patients with diabetes identified using diagnosis-related and medication codes were included. The dropout and continuation groups included patients who discontinued and continued to undergo RFEs during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, respectively. Results: The number of RFEs was significantly lower during the mild lockdown period (April and May 2020) than during the prepandemic period. Of the 14,845 patients with diabetes, 2333 (15.7%) dropped out of RFEs during the pandemic, whereas before the pandemic, of the 11,536 patients with diabetes, 1666 (14.4%) dropped out of RFEs (P = 0.004). Factors associated with dropout in the multivariate logistic regression analysis included younger age, male sex, high triglyceride levels, high γ-glutamyl transpeptidase levels, smoking habit, alcohol consumption, weight gain of more than 10 kg since the age of 20 years, and certain stages of lifestyle improvement. Factors associated with continuation included low body mass index and high glycosylated hemoglobin levels. Conclusions: Our findings can assist in identifying patients with diabetes at risk of dropout. Translational Relevance: These results have implications for public health and identifying patients with diabetes at risk of dropout. Education and tailored monitoring regimens could be pivotal role in fostering adherence.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Retinopatia Diabética , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Masculino , Retinopatia Diabética/epidemiologia , Feminino , Japão/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Fatores de Risco , Pandemias , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos
17.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 4623, 2024 02 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38409465

RESUMO

This retrospective study aimed to determine the optimal cutoff values of the Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score (DEQS) questionnaire for diagnosing dry eye disease (DED) and classifying DED severities. Participants completed the DEQS questionnaire, the Japanese version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (J-OSDI) questionnaire, and DED examinations. DED was diagnosed according to the 2016 Asia Dry Eye Society diagnostic criteria based on DED symptoms (J-OSDI ≥ 13 points) and tear film breakup time ≤ 5 s. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to calculate the optimal cutoff values of the DEQS summary score for detecting DED and grading its severity. Among 427 patients, 296 (69.3%) and 131 (30.7%) were diagnosed with DED and non-DED, respectively. ROC analysis determined an optimal cutoff value of 15.0 points for DED diagnosis, with 83.5% sensitivity, 87.0% specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.915. The positive and negative predictive values for DEQS ≥ 15.0 points were 93.6% and 69.9%, respectively. DEQS cutoff values of 15.0, 20.0, and 26.8 points could be accepted for severity classification of DED subjective symptoms in clinical use and represent mild, moderate, and severe DED, respectively. Conclusively, the optimal cutoff values of DEQS enable DED detection and subjective symptom severity classification.


Assuntos
Síndromes do Olho Seco , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Curva ROC , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Síndromes do Olho Seco/diagnóstico , Qualidade de Vida , Lágrimas
18.
Clin Transl Allergy ; 14(9): e12394, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39286886

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hay fever (HF) presents with various symptoms, including allergic conjunctivitis and rhinitis, and requires cross-organ treatment. This study assessed the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on HF treatment trends. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the JMDC database collected between January 2018 and May 2021. Patients with HF were identified based on the relevant International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision diagnosis codes and the prescription of HF-related medications. The treatment approaches were compared during the cedar and cypress pollen allergy season (January to May in Japan) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2018 and 2019, and 2020 and 2021, respectively). RESULTS: This study included 2,598,178 patients with HF. The numbers of prescribed HF-related claims in 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021 were 3,332,854, 3,534,198, 2,774,380, and 2,786,681 times, respectively. Oral second-generation antihistamine prescriptions decreased by >10% from 2019 to 2020, with a <10% change in the subsequent year. Anti-allergic eye drop prescriptions also decreased by >10% from 2019 to 2020 but increased by >10% from 2020 to 2021. Compared with 2018, 2019, and 2020, the number of claims in the rhinitis symptoms dominant group was significantly decreased in 2021 (p < 0.001, all). In contrast, the number of claims in the eye symptoms dominant group and the rhinitis and eye symptoms dominant group increased in 2021 compared with that in 2018, 2019, and 2020 (p < 0.001, all). CONCLUSION: Changes in HF treatment and related outcomes could be attributed to lifestyle modifications resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Measures, such as limiting outdoor activities and adopting mask-wearing practices may have influenced HF symptoms, preventive behaviors, and the overall approach to treating HF.

19.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 13583, 2023 08 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37604900

RESUMO

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has emphasized the paucity of non-contact and non-invasive methods for the objective evaluation of dry eye disease (DED). However, robust evidence to support the implementation of mHealth- and app-based biometrics for clinical use is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of app-based maximum blink interval (MBI) measurements using DryEyeRhythm and equivalent traditional techniques in providing an accessible and convenient diagnosis. In this single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, observational study, 83 participants, including 57 with DED, had measurements recorded including slit-lamp-based, app-based, and visually confirmed MBI. Internal consistency and reliability were assessed using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients. Discriminant and concurrent validity were assessed by comparing the MBIs from the DED and non-DED groups and Pearson's tests for each platform pair. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to assess the agreement between platforms. App-based MBI showed good Cronbach's alpha coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Pearson correlation coefficient values, compared with visually confirmed MBI. The DED group had significantly shorter app-based MBIs, compared with the non-DED group. Bland-Altman analysis revealed minimal biases between the app-based and visually confirmed MBIs. Our findings indicate that DryEyeRhythm is a reliable and valid tool that can be used for non-invasive and non-contact collection of MBI measurements, which can assist in accessible DED detection and management.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Síndromes do Olho Seco , Aplicativos Móveis , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Smartphone , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Síndromes do Olho Seco/diagnóstico , Teste para COVID-19
20.
Clin Transl Allergy ; 13(5): e12244, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37227421

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hay fever is a common allergic disease, with an estimated worldwide prevalence of 14.4% and a variety of symptoms. This study assessed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of nasal symptom score (NSS), non-nasal symptom score (NNSS), and total symptoms score (TSS) for app-based hay-fever monitoring. METHODS: MCIDs were calculated based on the data from a previous large-scale, crowdsourced, cross-sectional study using AllerSearch, an in-house smartphone application. MCIDs were determined with anchor-based and distribution-based methods. The face scale score of the Japanese Allergic Conjunctival Disease Standard Quality of Life Questionnaire Domain III and the daily stress level due to hay fever were used as anchors for determining MCIDs. The MCID estimates were summarized as MCID ranges. RESULTS: A total of 7590 participants were included in the analysis (mean age: 35.3 years, 57.1% women). The anchor-based method produced a range of MCID values (median, interquartile range) for NSS (2.0, 1.5-2.1), NNSS (1.0, 0.9-1.2), and TSS (2.9, 2.4-3.3). The distribution-based method produced two MCIDs (based on half a standard deviation, based on a standard error of measurement) for NSS (2.0, 1.8), NNSS (1.3, 1.2), and TSS (3.0, 2.3). The final suggested MCID ranges for NSS, NNSS, and TSS were 1.8-2.1, 1.2-1.3, and 2.4-3.3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MCID ranges for app-based hay-fever symptom assessment were obtained from the data collected through a smartphone application, AllerSearch. These estimates may be useful for monitoring the subjective symptoms of Japanese patients with hay fever through mobile platforms.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA