Efficacy of pancreaticojejunostomy of the pancreatic stump during distal or central pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: A stapler is usually used for transection and closure of the pancreas in distal pancreatectomy (DP) or central pancreatectomy (CP). When the pancreas is transected to the right of the portal vein, it is difficult to use a stapler and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) frequently occurs. We report on the efficacy of pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) of the pancreatic stump for patients in whom stapler use is difficult. METHODS: Patients who underwent DP or CP were enrolled in this study. The pancreas was usually transected by a stapler, and ultrasonic coagulating shears (UCS) were used depending on the tumor situation. When using UCS, hand-sewn closure or PJ was performed for the pancreatic stump. The relationship between clinicopathological factors and the methods of pancreatic transection and closure were investigated. RESULTS: In total, 164 patients underwent DP or CP, and the pancreas was transected with a stapler in 150 patients and UCS in 14 patients. The rate of CR-POPF was higher and the postoperative hospital stay was longer in the UCS group than in the stapler group. PJ of the pancreatic stump, which was performed for 7 patients, did not worsen intraoperative factors. CR-POPF was not seen in these 7 patients, which was significantly less than that with hand-sewn closure. CONCLUSIONS: PJ of the pancreatic stump during DP or CP reduces CR-POPF compared with hand-sewn closure and may be useful especially when the pancreas is transected to the right of the portal vein.

Glucose metabolic upregulation via phosphorylation of S6 ribosomal protein affects tumor progression in distal cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA) remains poor; thus, the identification of new therapeutic targets is warranted. Phosphorylated S6 ribosomal protein indicates a mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) activity, and mTORC1 plays a central role in controlling cell growth and regulating glucose metabolism. We aimed to clarify the effect of S6 phosphorylation on tumor progression and the glucose metabolic pathway in dCCA. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with dCCA who underwent curative resection were enrolled in this study. S6 phosphorylation and the expression of GLUT1 were evaluated by immunohistochemistry, and their relationship with clinical factors was investigated. The effect of S6 phosphorylation on glucose metabolism with PF-04691502 treatment, an inhibitor of S6 phosphorylation, was examined in cancer cell lines by Western blotting and metabolomics analysis. Cell proliferation assays were performed with PF-04691502. RESULTS: S6 phosphorylation and the expression of GLUT1 were significantly higher in patients with an advanced pathological stage. Significant correlations between GLUT1 expression, S6 phosphorylation, and SUV-max of FDG-PET were shown. In addition, cell lines with high S6 phosphorylation levels showed high GLUT1 levels, and the inhibition of S6 phosphorylation reduced the expression of GLUT1 on Western blotting. Metabolic analysis revealed that inhibition of S6 phosphorylation suppressed pathways of glycolysis and the TCA cycle in cell lines, and then, cell proliferation was effectively reduced by PF-04691502. CONCLUSION: Upregulation of glucose metabolism via phosphorylation of S6 ribosomal protein appeared to play a role in tumor progression in dCCA. mTORC1 may be a therapeutic target for dCCA.

Impact of AI system on recognition for anatomical landmarks related to reducing bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: According to the National Clinical Database of Japan, the incidence of bile duct injury (BDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy has hovered around 0.4% for the last 10 years and has not declined. On the other hand, it has been found that about 60% of BDI occurrences are due to misidentifying anatomical landmarks. However, the authors developed an artificial intelligence (AI) system that gave intraoperative data to recognize the extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD), cystic duct (CD), inferior border of liver S4 (S4), and Rouviere sulcus (RS). The purpose of this research was to evaluate how the AI system affects landmark identification. METHODS: We prepared a 20-s intraoperative video before the serosal incision of Calot's triangle dissection and created a short video with landmarks overwritten by AI. The landmarks were defined as landmark (LM)-EHBD, LM-CD, LM-RS, and LM-S4. Four beginners and four experts were recruited as subjects. After viewing a 20-s intraoperative video, subjects annotated the LM-EHBD and LM-CD. Then, a short video is shown with the AI overwriting landmark instructions; if there is a change in each perspective, the annotation is changed. The subjects answered a three-point scale questionnaire to clarify whether the AI teaching data advanced their confidence in verifying the LM-RS and LM-S4. Four external evaluation committee members investigated the clinical importance. RESULTS: In 43 of 160 (26.9%) images, the subjects transformed their annotations. Annotation changes were primarily observed in the gallbladder line of the LM-EHBD and LM-CD, and 70% of these shifts were considered safer changes. The AI-based teaching data encouraged both beginners and experts to affirm the LM-RS and LM-S4. CONCLUSION: The AI system provided significant awareness to beginners and experts and prompted them to identify anatomical landmarks linked to reducing BDI.

An intraoperative artificial intelligence system identifying anatomical landmarks for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective clinical feasibility trial (J-SUMMIT-C-01).

BACKGROUND: We have implemented Smart Endoscopic Surgery (SES), a surgical system that uses artificial intelligence (AI) to detect the anatomical landmarks that expert surgeons base on to perform certain surgical maneuvers. No report has verified the use of AI-based support systems for surgery in clinical practice, and no evaluation method has been established. To evaluate the detection performance of SES, we have developed and established a new evaluation method by conducting a clinical feasibility trial. METHODS: A single-center prospective clinical feasibility trial was conducted on 10 cases of LC performed at Oita University hospital. Subsequently, an external evaluation committee (EEC) evaluated the AI detection accuracy for each landmark using five-grade rubric evaluation and DICE coefficient. We defined LM-CBD as the expert surgeon's "judge" of the cystic bile duct in endoscopic images. RESULTS: The average detection accuracy on the rubric by the EEC was 4.2 ± 0.8 for the LM-CBD. The DICE coefficient between the AI detection area of the LM-CBD and the EEC members' evaluation was similar to the mean value of the DICE coefficient between the EEC members. The DICE coefficient was high score for the case that was highly evaluated by the EEC on a five-grade scale. CONCLUSION: This is the first feasible clinical trial of an AI system designed for intraoperative use and to evaluate the AI system using an EEC. In the future, this concept of evaluation for the AI system would contribute to the development of new AI navigation systems for surgery.

Development of an artificial intelligence system for real-time intraoperative assessment of the Critical View of Safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: The Critical View of Safety (CVS) was proposed in 1995 to prevent bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The achievement of CVS was evaluated subjectively. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) system to evaluate CVS scores in LC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: AI software was developed to evaluate the achievement of CVS using an algorithm for image classification based on a deep convolutional neural network. Short clips of hepatocystic triangle dissection were converted from 72 LC videos, and 23,793 images were labeled for training data. The learning models were examined using metrics commonly used in machine learning. RESULTS: The mean values of precision, recall, F-measure, specificity, and overall accuracy for all the criteria of the best model were 0.971, 0.737, 0.832, 0.966, and 0.834, respectively. It took approximately 6 fps to obtain scores for a single image. CONCLUSIONS: Using the AI system, we successfully evaluated the achievement of the CVS criteria using still images and videos of hepatocystic triangle dissection in LC. This encourages surgeons to be aware of CVS and is expected to improve surgical safety.

Development of a cross-artificial intelligence system for identifying intraoperative anatomical landmarks and surgical phases during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Attention to anatomical landmarks in the appropriate surgical phase is important to prevent bile duct injury (BDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Therefore, we created a cross-AI system that works with two different AI algorithms simultaneously, landmark detection and phase recognition. We assessed whether landmark detection was activated in the appropriate phase by phase recognition during LC and the potential contribution of the cross-AI system in preventing BDI through a clinical feasibility study (J-SUMMIT-C-02). METHODS: A prototype was designed to display landmarks during the preparation phase and Calot's triangle dissection. A prospective clinical feasibility study using the cross-AI system was performed in 20 LC cases. The primary endpoint of this study was the appropriateness of the detection timing of landmarks, which was assessed by an external evaluation committee (EEC). The secondary endpoint was the correctness of landmark detection and the contribution of cross-AI in preventing BDI, which were assessed based on the annotation and 4-point rubric questionnaire. RESULTS: Cross-AI-detected landmarks in 92% of the phases where the EEC considered landmarks necessary. In the questionnaire, each landmark detected by AI had high accuracy, especially the landmarks of the common bile duct and cystic duct, which were assessed at 3.78 and 3.67, respectively. In addition, the contribution to preventing BDI was relatively high at 3.65. CONCLUSIONS: The cross-AI system provided landmark detection at appropriate situations. The surgeons who previewed the model suggested that the landmark information provided by the cross-AI system may be effective in preventing BDI. Therefore, it is suggested that our system could help prevent BDI in practice. Trial registration University Hospital Medical Information Network Research Center Clinical Trial Registration System (UMIN000045731).

Appropriate indications for laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy (LRH) has increased, but appropriate indications for LRH are unclear. This study aimed to clarify appropriate indications for LRH. METHODS: We retrospectively compared surgical outcomes between open RH (ORH) (n = 57) and LRH (n = 40) groups. To detect difficult cases of complete pure LRH, we examined patients with unplanned intraoperative hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS)/open conversion (n = 6). RESULTS: In the LRH versus ORH group, as previous hepatectomy, laparoscopic (75% vs. 12%, p < 0.001) and partial hepatectomy (Hr0) (73% vs. 37%, p = 0.002) were more frequently performed, and as RH procedure, partial hepatectomy (Hr0) (88% vs. 47%, p = 0.0002) was more frequently performed. S1 tumor cases were higher in ORH group (11% vs. 0%), but S2-6 cases were higher in LRH group (73% vs. 49%) (p = 0.02). In LRH group, compared to the pure LRH patients, HALS/open conversion patients underwent significantly more previous hepatectomy with more than lobectomy (Hr2-3) (33% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.033) and more RH procedures with segmentectomy (HrS) (33% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.03). All LRH requiring a repeat hepatic hilar approach were HALS conversions. CONCLUSION: Appropriate indications for LRH were previous hepatectomy was laparoscopic partial hepatectomy (Hr0), and RH procedure was partial hepatectomy (Hr0) for S2-6 tumor location. When RH is more than segmentectomy (HrS) requiring a repeat hepatic hilar approach, planned HALS or ORH may be a better approach than pure LRH.

Artificial intelligence software available for medical devices: surgical phase recognition in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Surgical process modeling automatically identifies surgical phases, and further improvement in recognition accuracy is expected with deep learning. Surgical tool or time series information has been used to improve the recognition accuracy of a model. However, it is difficult to collect this information continuously intraoperatively. The present study aimed to develop a deep convolution neural network (CNN) model that correctly identifies the surgical phase during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). METHODS: We divided LC into six surgical phases (P1-P6) and one redundant phase (P0). We prepared 115 LC videos and converted them to image frames at 3 fps. Three experienced doctors labeled the surgical phases in all image frames. Our deep CNN model was trained with 106 of the 115 annotation datasets and was evaluated with the remaining datasets. By depending on both the prediction probability and frequency for a certain period, we aimed for highly accurate surgical phase recognition in the operation room. RESULTS: Nine full LC videos were converted into image frames and were fed to our deep CNN model. The average accuracy, precision, and recall were 0.970, 0.855, and 0.863, respectively. CONCLUSION: The deep learning CNN model in this study successfully identified both the six surgical phases and the redundant phase, P0, which may increase the versatility of the surgical process recognition model for clinical use. We believe that this model can be used in artificial intelligence for medical devices. The degree of recognition accuracy is expected to improve with developments in advanced deep learning algorithms.

Risk factors of unplanned intraoperative conversion to hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery or open surgery in laparoscopic liver resection.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is possible in many patients, but pure LLR is sometimes difficult to complete, and unplanned intraoperative hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) or open conversion is sometimes necessary. However, appropriate indications and timing for conversion are unclear. This study aimed to clarify the indications for HALS and open conversion from pure LLR. METHODS: We collected data from 208 patients who underwent LLR from January 2010 to February 2021 in our department. We retrospectively examined these data between cases of unplanned intraoperative HALS conversion, open conversion, and pure LLR, and clarified risk factors and indications for HALS or open conversion. RESULTS: There were 191 pure LLRs, nine HALS conversions, and eight open conversions. In the HALS conversion group versus pure LLR group, body mass index (BMI) (27.0 vs. 23.7 kg/m2, p = 0.047), proportions of patients with history of upper abdominal surgery (78% vs. 33%; p = 0.006), repeat hepatectomy (56% vs. 15%; p = 0.002), S7 or S8 tumor location (67% vs. 35%; p = 0.049), and difficulty score (DS) ≥ 7 (56% vs. 19%; p = 0.008) were significantly higher, and surgical time (339 vs. 239 min; p = 0.031) was significantly longer. However, postoperative states were not significantly different between the two groups. The BMI cutoff value for risk of unplanned intraoperative conversion determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was 25 kg/m2, and the proportion of patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (89% vs. 31%, p < 0.001) was significantly higher in the HALS conversion versus pure LLR group. In the open conversion group, although there were no significant differences compared to the HALS group in clinicopathological factors except for sex, blood loss was greater (1425 vs. 367 mL; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Risk factors for considering HALS during LLR were patients with a history of upper abdominal surgery including repeat hepatectomy, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2, S7 or S8 tumor location, DS ≥ 7, and prolonged surgical time. Furthermore, uncontrollable intraoperative bleeding was an indication for open conversion.

Surgical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (L-RAMPS) with those of open RAMPS (O-RAMPS) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: We reviewed, retrospectively, the medical records of 50 patients who underwent RAMPS for PDAC without resection of major vessels and adjacent organs between 2007 and 2019, and analyzed the relationship between the operative method and surgical and oncological outcomes. RESULTS: Nineteen of the 50 patients underwent L-RAMPS and 31 patients underwent O-RAMPS. L-RAMPS was associated with significantly less blood loss (P = 0.034) but a longer operative time (P = 0.001) than O-RAMPS. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics, tumor factors, or postoperative course; or in the rates of recurrence-free survival (P = 0.084) or overall survival (P = 0.402) between the L-RAMPS and O-RAMPS groups. CONCLUSION: L-RAMPS for PDAC resulted in less blood loss but a longer operative time than O-RAMPS. Although L-RAMPS may be feasible, the operative time needs to be reduced by standardizing the procedure.

Predictors of early withdrawal from follow-up visits after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in a Japanese institution.

PURPOSE: Postoperative weight loss is related to postoperative adherence to follow-up after bariatric/metabolic surgery, but many patients stop attending follow-up visits early. The aim of this study was to clarify predictors of early withdrawal from follow-up after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in a Japanese institution. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-three patients who underwent LSG were retrospectively included in this study. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate independent predictors of withdrawal from follow-up visits within 12 months after LSG among significant or nearly significant factors in the univariate analyses. The discrimination power of significant factors was estimated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Within 12 months after LSG, 25 of the 153 patients withdrew from follow-up visits. The multivariate analysis showed that age was the only significant predictor of withdrawal. The AUC for age was 0.685, and the cut-off value was < 40 years. The younger patients (< 40 years old) had a significantly higher rate of withdrawal compared with the older patients (≥ 40 years) (27.0% vs. 8.9%). CONCLUSION: Older Japanese patients (≥ 40 years old) may be better candidates for LSG. We consider it significant to continue to emphasize the importance of follow-up visits in younger patients after LSG.

How Should We Treat Pancreatic Metastases from Renal Cell Carcinoma? A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The treatment strategy for pancreatic metastasis (PM) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is unclear due to its rarity. The aim of this study was to reveal the role of surgery for PM from RCC. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed and the Cochrane Library. The effectiveness of surgery for PM was evaluated based on the primary outcome of overall survival (OS), which was investigated in relation to surgical procedures and metastatic sites via subgroup analyses. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the rate of 2-year OS between the surgery and control group (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.14-1.26, P = 0.12). However, the rate of 5-year OS was significantly higher in the surgery group than the control group (OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.18-0.93, P = 0.03). The rates of the complications and OS were not significantly different between radical and conservative pancreatectomies. The rate of 5-year OS of the patients with PM was higher than that with other metastases (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20-0.74, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Surgical resection for PM from RCC is associated with good prognosis. Limited surgery may be a useful option depending on the location of the lesion.

Short internal pancreatic stent reduces pancreatic fistula in pancreatoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) is a major complication of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). A pancreatic stent is usually used for drainage of the pancreatic duct, but the best type of the stent remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate perioperative factors and their influence on the risk of CR-POPF following PD. METHODS: From 2006 to 2019, the records of 246 patients who underwent PD were retrospectively reviewed, and the relationship between perioperative factors including type of pancreatic stent and CR-POPF was investigated. External or internal pancreatic stents were used for drainage of the pancreatic duct, and the internal stent was inserted 1 cm into the jejunum to decrease stent obstruction. RESULTS: External and internal pancreatic stents were used in 137 and 109 patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the diameter of the main pancreatic duct (odds ratio = 0.292, 95% confidence interval = 0.140-0.605, P = 0.001), diagnosis (odds ratio = 3.359, 95% confidence interval = 1.498-7.693, P = 0.003), and type of pancreatic stent (odds ratio = 0.435, 95% confidence interval = 0.203-0.934, P = 0.033) were independent factors related to CR-POPF after PD. Internal stent was associated with a low rate of CR-POPF (P < 0.001) and short postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.001) compared to external stent. CONCLUSION: A short pancreatic internal stent could decrease the incidence of CR-POPF.

Relationship between the tumor location and clinicopathological features in left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Although the same distal pancreatectomy (DP) is performed regardless of the location of left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the clinicopathological features may differ depending on the tumor location. The present study investigated the relationship between the tumor location and clinicopathological features in patients with left-sided PDAC. METHODS: The records of 59 patients who underwent DP for PDAC were enrolled. The relationship between the tumor location and clinicopathological features was investigated. The tumor location was classified into three groups according to the 7th AJCC/UICC TNM classification: body (Pb), body and tail (Pbt), and tail (Pt). RESULTS: Tumors were located at the Pb in 26 patients, Pbt in 15, and Pt in 18. There was no metastasis to the lymph nodes around the common hepatic artery in Pt. The rate of peritoneal dissemination in the Pt was higher than that in the Pb (P = 0.034) or Pbt (P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the overall survival among the three groups. CONCLUSION: There was no metastasis to the lymph nodes around the common hepatic artery, and peritoneal dissemination was the most common site of recurrence in Pt tumors.

Port-sharing techniques for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and sleeve gastrectomy.

In Japan, the number of bariatric surgeries performed has remained low. Thus, concomitant laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is still relatively uncommon, but is increasing. We developed new port-sharing techniques for LC and LSG, which we performed on 26 obese Japanese patients with gall bladder (GB) diseases, using the LSG trocar arrangement and one additional trocar. We performed LC first, and after exchanging a port for a liver retractor in the epigastrium, we then completed LSG. One patient with an anomalous extrahepatic bile duct required one additional port. The mean LC time was 55 min, and the transition to LSG just after LC was smooth in all the patients. One patient suffered postoperative intraperitoneal hemorrhage, which was managed conservatively. Concomitant LC with LSG using port-sharing techniques is feasible and safe for obese Japanese patients with GB diseases.

Development of Endoscopic Surgery Navigated by Artificial Intelligence.

Endoscopic surgery, which was first introduced in the late 1980s, has rapidly become widespread. However, despite its popularity, the occurrence of intraoperative organ damage has not necessarily decreased. To avoid intraoperative bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which is one of the most popular procedures in endoscopic surgery, we are developing a laparoscopic surgical system that uses Artificial Intelligence (AI) to identify four anatomical landmarks (cystic duct of the gallbladder, common bile duct, lower surface of hepatic S4, and Rouviere's sulcus, related to "Calot's triangle") in real time during surgery. The development process consists of 5 steps: 1) identification of anatomical landmarks, 2) collection and creation of teaching data, 3) annotation and deep learning, 4) validation of development model, and 5) actual clinical performance evaluation. At present, anatomical landmarks can be identified with high accuracy in an actual clinical performance test in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, whereas issues for practical clinical use, such as a need to recognize the scene of surgical steps and surgical difficulties related to inflammation of the gallbladder, have also been clarified. The development of an AI-navigation system for endoscopic surgery, which could identify anatomical landmarks in real time during surgery, could be expected to support surgeons' decisions, reduce surgical complications, and contribute to improving the quality of surgical treatments.

[Long‒Term Survival after Lung Resection for Lung Metastasis of Pancreatic Cancer-A Report of Two Cases].

Some reports have shown that the prognosis of recurrent lung metastases after resection of pancreatic cancer is better than that for other organs. We report on 2 cases of long‒term survival after lung resection for lung metastases from pancreatic cancer. Case 1: A 73‒year‒old man underwent distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic body cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy of S‒1 was administered for 6 months. At 3 years after surgery, 2 small metastatic nodules were detected in the right lung, and the patient underwent thoracoscopic right upper lobectomy. At 5 years and 9 months after the initial surgery, he is alive without recurrence. Case 2: An 81‒year‒old woman underwent pylorus‒preserving pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy of S‒1 was administered for 4 months. At 1 year and 9 months after surgery, a metastatic nodule was detected in the left upper lung, and the patient underwent thoracoscopic left upper lobectomy. At 4 years and 6 months after initial surgery, radiation therapy was performed for localized bone metastasis. At 5 years and 1 month after the initial surgery, she is alive without other recurrences. In conclusion, recurrent lung metastases of pancreatic cancer with a small number of metastases may result in long‒term survival following resection.

[IPMC of the pancreas with enlarged para-aortic lymph nodes with a high accumulation of FDG-PET:a case report].

A 74-year-old man was admitted for evaluation of a pancreatic tumor. Abdominal CT revealed a multilocular cystic tumor with thickened septal walls and an enhanced mural nodule in the head of the pancreas, as well as enlarged para-aortic lymph nodes. FDG-PET revealed FDG accumulation in the nodule and in the para-aortic nodes. The tumor was diagnosed as intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (IPMC) with para-aortic lymph node metastases. After 2 courses of chemotherapy with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel, the tumor decreased slightly in size, but the lymph nodes did not change. Surgery was then performed. Intraoperative pathology examination confirmed that the para-aortic lymph nodes had only inflammatory swelling. Accordingly, pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. Histopathology examination revealed atypical cells without invasion, and IPMC (TisN0M0;stage 0) was diagnosed. It is thus important for selection of the appropriate treatment approach to determine if enlarged para-aortic lymph nodes are benign or malignant.

Prediction of intraoperative surgical difficulty during laparoscopic cholecystectomy using drip infusion cholangiography with computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: Although findings from drip infusion cholangiography with computed tomography (DIC-CT) are useful in preoperative anatomic evaluation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), their relationship with intraoperative surgical difficulty based on the difficulty score (DS) proposed by Tokyo Guidelines 2018 is unclear. We examined this relationship. METHODS: Data were collected from 202 patients who underwent LC for benign gallbladder (GB) disease with preoperative DIC-CT in our department. DIC-CT findings were classified into GB-positive and GB-negative groups based on GB opacification, and clinical characteristics were compared. DS assessed only on findings from around Calot's triangle was considered "cDS", and patients were divided into cDS ≤2 and ≥3 groups. Preoperative data including DIC-CT findings were evaluated using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: DIC-CT findings showed 151 (74.8%) GB-positive and 51 (25.2%) GB-negative patients. Surgical outcomes were significantly better in the GB-positive versus GB-negative group for operation time (107 vs. 154 min, p < .001), blood loss (8 vs. 25 mL, p < .001), cDS (0.8 vs. 2.2, p < .001), and critical view of safety score (4.0 vs. 3.1, p < .001). cDS was ≤2 in 174 (86.1%) and ≥3 in 28 (13.9%) patients. By multivariate analysis, DIC-CT findings and alkaline phosphatase values were independent factors predicting intraoperative difficulty. CONCLUSION: DIC-CT findings are useful for predicting cDS in LC.

Technical and oncological safety of pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer in older adults aged over 75 years versus younger adults: A single-center retrospective cohort study.

AIM: The number of surgeries for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in older adults has been rising. This study aimed to evaluate the technical and oncological safety of pancreatectomy for older adults aged ≥75 years with PDAC by retrospectively comparing their short- and long-term outcomes with those of younger adults aged <75 years. METHODS: Data were collected from 117 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for PDAC in our department. The indication for surgery regarding patient characteristics was considered according to each patient's American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status Scale. Data of older adults (n = 32) were compared with those of younger adults (n = 85), and comprised patient background, surgical factors, postoperative course, histopathological factors and prognostic factors. Additionally, prognostic nutritional index values preoperatively and at 1 and 6 months postoperatively were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Although American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status and comorbidities were worse in older adults, there were no significant differences in surgical factors, postoperative courses and histopathological factors between the two groups. The overall complication rate tended to be higher in older adults (40.6%) than in younger adults (29.4%). There were no differences in median lengths of recurrence-free survival and overall survival (older adults vs younger adults: 12 vs 13 months, P = 0.545, and 26 vs 20 months, P = 0.535, respectively) between the two groups. Furthermore, no significant differences were found in prognostic nutritional index preoperatively to 6 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: With careful determination of surgical indications, pancreatectomy for PDAC can be carried out with acceptable post-pancreatectomy morbidity in younger adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2023; 23: 531-536.