Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 960, 2021 Sep 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34530739

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Entamoeba histolytica (E. histolytica) is rarely identified as a cause of amebic pericarditis. We report a case of amebic pericarditis complicated by cardiac tamponade, in which the diagnosis was missed initially and was made retrospectively by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of a stored sample of pericardial fluid. Furthermore, we performed a systematic review of the literature on amebic pericarditis. CASE PRESENTATION: A 71-year-old Japanese man who had a history of sexual intercourse with several commercial sex workers 4 months previously, presented to our hospital with left chest pain and cough. He was admitted on suspicion of pericarditis. On hospital day 7, he developed cardiac tamponade requiring urgent pericardiocentesis. The patient's symptoms temporarily improved, but 1 month later, he returned with fever and abdominal pain, and multiple liver lesions were found in the right lobe. Polymerase chain reaction of the aspiration fluid of the liver lesion and pericardial and pleural fluid stored from the previous hospitalization were all positive for E. histolytica. Together with the positive serum antibody for E. histolytica, a diagnosis of amebic pericarditis was made. Notably, the diagnosis was missed initially and was made retrospectively by performing PCR testing. The patient improved with metronidazole 750 mg thrice daily for 14 days, followed by paromomycin 500 mg thrice daily for 10 days. CONCLUSIONS: This case suggests that, although only 122 cases of amebic pericarditis have been reported, clinicians should be aware of E. histolytica as a potential causative pathogen. The polymerase chain reaction method was used to detect E. histolytica in the pericardial effusion and was found to be useful for the diagnosis of amebic pericarditis in addition to the positive results for the serum antibody testing for E. histolytica. Because of the high mortality associated with delayed treatment, prompt diagnosis should be made.


Assuntos
Amebíase , Entamoeba histolytica , Derrame Pericárdico , Idoso , Entamoeba histolytica/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Derrame Pericárdico/diagnóstico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 11(9): ofae499, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39296342

RESUMO

Background: In immunocompromised individuals, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) for Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) prophylaxis has adverse events, and the optimal dosage is unclear. The objective of this study was to assess efficacy and safety of intermittent versus daily TMP/SMX for PCP prophylaxis. Methods: This systematic review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indexed in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Ichushi, or Embase databases, published from database inception to September 2023. The inclusion criteria were adults taking intermittent or daily TMP/SMX for PCP prophylaxis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The primary outcomes were PCP incidence, PCP-related mortality, and adverse events requiring temporary or permanent TMP/SMX discontinuation. Results: Four RCTs (N = 2808 patients) were included. PCP incidence did not differ significantly between the intermittent and daily regimen groups (risk ratio [RR], 1.17 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .89-1.53]; certainty: very low). There was no PCP-related mortality in the 3 RCTs reporting its outcome. Compared with the daily regimen group, the intermittent regimen group experienced significantly fewer adverse events requiring temporary or permanent TMP/SMX discontinuation (RR, 0.51 [95% CI, .42-.61]; certainty: low). Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that intermittent TMP/SMX regimens for PCP prophylaxis may be more tolerable than daily regimens and may have similar efficacy. Further RCTs are needed to apply this to current practice. Clinical Trials Registration. PROSPERO (CRD42022359102).

4.
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann ; 23(5): 570-2, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24585299

RESUMO

An aneurysm of the sinus of Valsalva is clinically rare, and its operative indications and procedures are controversial. We herein report the rare case of a 68-year-old woman with severe right ventricular outflow tract obstruction caused by an aneurysm of the right sinus of Valsalva. We performed partial aortic root reconstruction using a bovine pericardial patch, and aortic valve replacement. Although this case provides evidence that these are suitable surgical techniques for treatment of aneurysm of the sinus of Valsalva, total aortic root replacement should have been chosen based on the pathological finding of aortic medial and valve degeneration.


Assuntos
Aorta/cirurgia , Aneurisma Aórtico/cirurgia , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Seio Aórtico/cirurgia , Obstrução do Fluxo Ventricular Externo/etiologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma Aórtico/complicações , Aneurisma Aórtico/diagnóstico por imagem , Implante de Prótese Vascular/métodos , Feminino , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos , Humanos , Seio Aórtico/diagnóstico por imagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia , Obstrução do Fluxo Ventricular Externo/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA