Status of incremental costs of first-line treatment recommended in Japanese clinical guidelines for metastatic breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The increasing incidence and prevalence of breast cancer alongside diagnostic and treatment technology advances have produced a debate about the financial burden cancer places on the healthcare system and concerns about access. METHODS: This study was conducted at 51 hospitals belonging to the Breast Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group using a web-based survey. The survey period conducted from July 2021 to June 2022. The study population included patients with metastatic breast cancer who received the related treatment as their first-line therapy. The proportion of patients who selected that regimen as their first-line treatment was tabulated. The total cost increase for each current standard therapy in comparison to conventional treatments was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 702 patients (pts) were surveyed. Of those enrolled, 342 (48.7%) received high-cost treatment [estimated monthly drug costs exceeding ~500 000 Japanese Yen (JPY)]. Of these, 16 pts (4.7%) were receiving very high-cost treatment, amounting to more than 1 000 000 JPY per month. Fifty three (15.5%) of the patients who received high-cost treatment were 75 years of age or older. Of these, 1 pt (0.3%) were receiving very high-cost treatment. Analyses of incremental costs by current drugs showed that abemaciclib was costly with total additional cost of 6 365 670 JPY per patient. The total additional cost of the regimen per patient that included palbociclib was the second highest at 4011248 JPY, followed by atezolizumab at 3209033 JPY. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that evaluating the financial implications of high-cost treatments requires considering not only drug prices but also analysis of total cost increase.

Phase III study of long-term prognosis of estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with/without adjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is a treatment option for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) postmenopausal early breast cancer (EBC). This phase III trial evaluated the prognosis of EBC patients treated with/without chemotherapy (CT) following NET. METHODS: ER+/HER2-, T1c-2, and clinically node-negative EBC patients were enrolled in 2008-2013 and treated with endocrine therapy (ET) in weeks 24-28. All patients, excluding those with progressive disease (PD) during NET or ≥ 4 positive lymph nodes after surgery, were randomized to ET for 4.5-5 years with/without CT. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints included distant DFS (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and DFS/DDFS/OS according to clinical response to NET. RESULTS: Of 904 patients, 669 were randomized to CT+ET (n = 333) or ET alone (n = 336). The median follow-up was 7.8 years. DFS (CT+ET, 47 events; ET alone, 70 events) and DDFS did not reach the planned numbers of events. Eight-year DFS/DDFS rates were 86%/93% and 83%/92%, respectively. DFS was significantly better in CT+ET than ET alone in subgroups aged < 60 years (P = 0.016), T2 (P = 0.013), or Ki67 > 20% (P = 0.026). Progesterone receptor and histological grade were predictive markers for clinical responses to NET. CONCLUSION: NET may be used as standard treatment for patients with ER+EBC. Although it is difficult to decide whether to administer adjuvant CT based solely on the effect of NET, the response to NET may help to inform this decision. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry under UMIN000001090 (registered 20 March 2008).

Retrospective study on the effectiveness of medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of ER-positive/HER2-negative post-menopausal advanced breast cancer: an additional analysis of the JBCRG-C06 Safari study.

BACKGROUND: Only old evidence exists to back up the use of medroxyprogesterone acetate. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the factors that influence the time to treatment failure of medroxyprogesterone acetate in real-world settings as late-line treatment. METHODS: This was a cohort study that used the database of the Safari study on oestrogen receptor-positive post-menopausal advanced breast cancer (UMIN000015168). We created Kaplan-Meier curves for time to treatment failure with medroxyprogesterone acetate. Further, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a Cox hazard model of the clinicopathological factors involved in the time to treatment failure of medroxyprogesterone acetate. RESULTS: From the 1031 patients in the Safari study, 279 patients were selected as the population for the analysis of effectiveness of medroxyprogesterone acetate monotherapy. In the analysis of medroxyprogesterone acetate by treatment line, the median time to treatment failure was 3.0 months for third-line treatment and 4.1 months for fourth and subsequent treatment lines. In cases where medroxyprogesterone acetate was used as a third-line or later endocrine treatment, multivariate analysis showed that the length of the disease-free interval was correlated with the length of time to treatment failure of medroxyprogesterone acetate (P = 0.004). With medroxyprogesterone acetate monotherapy as the fourth-line or later treatment, 20% of the patients achieved a time to treatment failure of 12 months or longer. CONCLUSION: In actual clinical practice, patients treated with medroxyprogesterone acetate alone as the fourth or subsequent treatment lines showed a time to treatment failure of 4 months, suggesting that there is merit in using medroxyprogesterone acetate even in late treatment lines, especially in patients with long disease-free interval and those who are difficult to treat using other antineoplastic agents.

Switch maintenance endocrine therapy plus bevacizumab after bevacizumab plus paclitaxel in advanced or metastatic oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (BOOSTER): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Anticancer treatment regimens typically cause unpleasant side-effects. We aimed to investigate the benefit of switch maintenance endocrine therapy plus bevacizumab after fixed cycles of first-line induction chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab in patients with oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: BOOSTER was a prospective, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 study done in 53 hospitals in Japan. Eligible patients were women aged 20-75 years, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, who had not received chemotherapy for ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer. All patients received four to six cycles (in which 4 weeks of treatment constitute one cycle) of weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab induction therapy (weekly paclitaxel 90 mg/m2, administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle, plus bevacizumab 10 mg/kg administered intravenously on days 1 and 15 of each cycle; first registration). Patients with a complete response, partial response, or stable disease after induction therapy (responders) were then randomly assigned (1:1) using the randomisation enrolment form to either continue weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab or switch to maintenance endocrine therapy (an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant with or without ovarian-function suppression) plus bevacizumab. Randomisation was stratified by induction therapy period, response to induction therapy, age, history of endocrine therapy, and study site. Patients could receive weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab reinduction if they had disease progression with maintenance endocrine therapy plus bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was time to failure of strategy (TFS). Efficacy and safety analyses were done in all treated patients (full analysis set). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01989780, and registration and follow-up are closed. FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2014, and Dec 31, 2015, we enrolled 160 patients who began weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab induction therapy. 125 (78%) patients (responders) were randomly assigned to endocrine therapy plus bevacizumab (n=62; n=61 in the full analysis set) or weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab (n=63; n=63 in the full analysis set). Among 61 patients in the switch maintenance endocrine therapy plus bevacizumab group, 32 (52%) were reinitiated on weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab. At a median follow-up of 21·3 months (IQR 13·0-28·2), TFS was significantly longer in the endocrine therapy plus bevacizumab group than in the weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab group (median 16·8 months [95% CI 12·9-19·0] vs 8·9 months [5·7-13·8]; hazard ratio 0·51 [0·34-0·75]; p=0·0006). The most common grade 3-4 non-haematological adverse events after randomisation were proteinuria (in ten [16%] of 61 patients in the endocrine therapy plus bevacizumab group vs eight [13%] of 63 patients in the weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab group), hypertension (six [10%] vs six [10%]), and peripheral neuropathy (one [2%] vs six [10%]). One treatment-related death was reported in the weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab group (duodenal ulcer perforation). INTERPRETATION: Switch to maintenance endocrine therapy plus bevacizumab with the possibility of weekly paclitaxel reinduction if needed is an efficacious alternative, with a better safety profile, to continuing weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have responded to induction therapy. FUNDING: Chugai Pharmaceutical. TRANSLATION: For the Japanese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Pertuzumab retreatment for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer: A randomized, open-label phase III study (PRECIOUS).

No standard options existed for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer that progresses after second-line trastuzumab emtansine therapy before 2020. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of pertuzumab retreatment after disease progression following pertuzumab-containing therapy for HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer for the first time. This randomized, open-label, multicenter phase III trial was undertaken in 93 sites in Japan. Eligible patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who had received pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy as first- and/or second-line therapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to: (i) pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and physician's choice chemotherapy (PTC), or (ii) trastuzumab and physician's choice chemotherapy (TC). The primary end-point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Between August 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018, 219 patients were randomized to PTC (n = 110) or TC (n = 109). Median follow-up was 14.2 months (interquartile range, 9.0-22.2), and median PFS was 5.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0-6.6) with PTC and 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.2-4.8) with TC (stratified hazard ratio 0.76 [95% CI upper limit 0.967]; p = 0.022). Progression-free survival was improved by adding pertuzumab in all prespecified subgroups. The PTC arm showed a trend towards better overall survival and duration of response, but similar objective response and health-related quality of life. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar between groups except for diarrhea. Pertuzumab retreatment contributes to disease control for HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with pertuzumab-containing regimens.

Factors associated with overall survival after recurrence in patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative postmenopausal breast cancer: an ad hoc analysis of the JBCRG-C06 Safari study.

BACKGROUND: The Safari study (UMIN000015168) was a retrospective, multicenter study in which 1072 consecutive cases of estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer treated using 500 mg fulvestrant were registered. We previously reported the relationship between the patient factors and overall survival after the diagnosis using the same cases and the same factors for the analysis of time to treatment failure in patients with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. The current study is an ad hoc analysis that focused on the relationship between the patient factors and overall survival after recurrence by adding factors generally associated with overall survival after recurrence. METHODS: The overall survival after recurrence in patients with estrogen receptor-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative recurrent breast cancer was analyzed via univariate and multivariate analyses with a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 598 cases were used for the analysis of overall survival after recurrence. Multivariate analysis revealed that favorable overall survival (median, 6.4 years) was significantly correlated with long time from recurrence to fulvestrant use (≥3 years), low nuclear or histological grade (G3 vs. G1), long time to treatment failure of initial palliative endocrine therapy (≥12 months) and long time to initial palliative chemotherapy (≥2 years). CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that sequential endocrine monotherapy may be a useful treatment option for patients with estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative recurrent breast cancer who have been successfully treated with initial long-term palliative endocrine therapy.

Anthracycline-containing regimens or taxane versus S-1 as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: We have previously demonstrated S-1 is non-inferior to taxane with respect to overall survival as first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. We aimed to confirm whether S-1 is also non-inferior to anthracycline-containing regimens in the same setting. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, non-inferiority, Phase 3 study. Individuals who had HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, had received no chemotherapy for advanced disease and had endocrine therapy resistance, were randomly assigned to the anthracycline-containing regimens or S-1. The primary endpoint was overall survival. A pre-planned combined analysis of our two Phase 3 studies was also carried out. RESULTS: We enrolled 230 patients (anthracycline, n = 115; S-1, n = 115). Median overall survival was 30.1 months (95% CI 24.9-35.8) with the S-1 group and 33.7 months (95% CI 25.5-36.9) with the anthracycline group. The HR for the anthracycline group was 1.09 (95% CI 0.80-1.48). The combined analysis constituted 814 patients (395 assigned to standard treatment (anthracycline or taxane); 419 assigned to S-1). Median overall survival was 36.3 months in the standard treatment group and 32.7 months in the S-1 group. S-1 was non-inferior to standard treatment in terms of overall survival (HR 1.06 (95% CI 0.90-1.25); P non-inferiority = 0.0062). CONCLUSIONS: S-1 could be considered a new treatment option for first-line chemotherapy for patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The University Hospital Medical Information Network, Japan: UMIN000005449. This trial was registered on 15 April, 2011.

Clinical usefulness of eribulin as first- or second-line chemotherapy for recurrent HER2-negative breast cancer: a randomized phase II study (JBCRG-19).

BACKGROUND: Anthracycline (A) or taxane T-based regimens are the standard early-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (BC). A previous study has shown a survival benefit of eribulin in heavily pretreated advanced/recurrent BC patients. The present study aimed to compare the benefit of eribulin with treatment of physician's choice (TPC) as first- or second-line chemotherapy for recurrent HER2-negative BC. METHODS: Patients with recurrent HER2-negative BC previously receiving anthracycline and taxane AT-based chemotherapy in the adjuvant or first-line setting were eligible for this open-label, randomized, parallel-group study. Patients were randomized 1:1 by the minimization method to receive either eribulin (1.4 mg/m2 on day one and eight of each 21-day cycle) or TPC (paclitaxel, docetaxel, nab-paclitaxel or vinorelbine) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included time to treatment failure (TTF), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response, and safety (UMIN000009886). RESULTS: Between May 2013 and January 2017, 58 patients were randomized, 57 of whom (26 eribulin and 31 TPC) were analyzed for efficacy. The median PFS was 6.6 months with eribulin versus 4.2 months with TPC (hazard ratio: 0.72 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.40-1.30], p = 0.276). Median TTF was 6.0 months with eribulin versus 3.6 months with TPC (hazard ratio: 0.66 [95% CI, 0.39-1.14], p = 0.136). Other endpoints were also similar between groups. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse event was neutropenia (22.2% with eribulin versus 16.1% with TPC). CONCLUSIONS: Eribulin seemed to improve PFS or TTF compared with TPC without statistical significance. Further validation studies are needed.

Ki-67 response-guided preoperative chemotherapy for HER2-positive breast cancer: results of a randomised Phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of a therapeutic strategy that switches chemotherapy, based on Ki-67 tumour expression after initial therapy, relative to that of standard chemotherapy, has not been evaluated. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to the control arm or the Ki-67 response-guided arm (Ki-67 arm). Primary tumour biopsies were obtained before treatment, and after three once-weekly doses of paclitaxel and trastuzumab to assess the interim Ki-67 index. In the control arm, paclitaxel and trastuzumab were continued for a total of 12 doses, regardless of the interim Ki-67 index. In the Ki-67 arm, subsequent treatment was based on the interim Ki-67 index. Ki-67 early responder is defined as the absolute Ki-67 value that was <10%, and the percentage of Ki-67-positive tumour cells was reduced by >30% compared with before treatment. Early Ki-67 responders continued to receive the same treatment, while early Ki-67 non-responders were switched to epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. RESULTS: A total of 237 patients were randomised. There was almost linear correlation between the Ki-67 reduction rate at interim assessment and the pCR rate. The pCR rate in Ki-67 early non-responders in the Ki-67 arm was inferior to that in the control arm (44.1%; 31.4-56.7; P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: The standard chemotherapy protocol remains as the recommended strategy for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registration: UMIN-CTR as UMIN000007074.

A randomized study comparing docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (TC), 5-fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (FEC) followed by TC, and TC followed by FEC for patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative primary breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Our primary objective was to determine the benefit/risk of anthracycline-free regimens by comparing docetaxel + cyclophosphamide (TC) alone, fluorouracil + epirubicin + cyclophosphamide (FEC) followed by TC, or TC followed by FEC as a primary treatment for patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative BC. METHODS: We randomized patients with stage I-III HR-positive HER2-negative, operable BC to receive either six cycles of TC (TC6), three cycles of FEC followed by three cycles of TC (FEC-TC), or three cycles of TC followed by three cycles of FEC (TC-FEC). The primary endpoint was the pathological response. Secondary endpoints included clinical response, type of surgical procedure, recurrence, death, and adverse events (by NCI-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.3.0). We conducted all statistical analyses using SAS Version 9.2. RESULTS: We enrolled 195 patients and analyzed data from 193 as the intention-to-treat population. Pathological complete response rates were numerically higher in the TC6 group than in the other groups (p = 0.321). The breast conservation rate was significantly higher in the TC6 group (73%) than in the other groups (FEC-TC 51%, TC-FEC 45%, p = 0.007). Adverse events with grade > 3 were not common in the treatment groups (p = 0.569). The overall and distant disease-free survivals were similar among the groups with median follow-up of 5.80 years. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar long-term efficacy and safety profile, the higher breast conservation rate in the TC6 group suggests that preoperative chemotherapy without an anthracycline may benefit patients with HR-positive HER2-negative BC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000003283 https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000003873.

Type 2 diabetes susceptibility genes on mouse chromosome 11 under high sucrose environment.

BACKGROUND: Both genetic and environmental factors contribute to type 2 diabetes development. We used consomic mice established from an animal type 2 diabetes model to identify susceptibility genes that contribute to type 2 diabetes development under specific environments. We previously established consomic strains (C3H-Chr 11NSY and C3H-Chr 14NSY) that possess diabetogenic Chr 11 or 14 of the Nagoya-Shibata-Yasuda (NSY) mouse, an animal model of spontaneous type 2 diabetes, in the genetic background of C3H mice. To search genes contribute to type 2 diabetes under specific environment, we first investigated whether sucrose administration deteriorates type 2 diabetes-related traits in the consomic strains. We dissected loci on Chr 11 by establishing congenic strains possessing different segments of NSY-derived Chr 11 under sucrose administration. RESULTS: In C3H-Chr 11NSY mice, sucrose administration for 10 weeks deteriorated hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, and impaired insulin secretion, which is comparable to NSY mice with sucrose. In C3H-Chr 14NSY mice, sucrose administration induced glucose intolerance, but not insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion. To dissect the gene(s) existing on Chr 11 for sucrose-induced type 2 diabetes, we constructed four novel congenic strains (R1, R2, R3, and R4) with different segments of NSY-derived Chr 11 in C3H mice. R2 mice showed marked glucose intolerance and impaired insulin secretion comparable to C3H-Chr 11NSY mice. R3 and R4 mice also showed impaired insulin secretion. R4 mice showed significant decreases in white adipose tissue, which is in the opposite direction from parental C3H-Chr 11NSY and NSY mice. None of the four congenic strains showed insulin resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Genes on mouse Chr 11 could explain glucose intolerance, impaired insulin secretion, insulin resistance in NSY mice under sucrose administration. Congenic mapping with high sucrose environment localized susceptibility genes for type 2 diabetes associated with impaired insulin secretion in the middle segment (26.0-63.4 Mb) of Chr 11. Gene(s) that decrease white adipose tissue were mapped to the distal segment of Chr 11. The identification of diabetogenic gene on Chr 11 in the future study will facilitate precision medicine in type 2 diabetes by controlling specific environments in targeted subjects with susceptible genotypes.

Omitting surgery for early breast cancer showing clinical complete response to primary systemic therapy.

Breast cancer is highly sensitive to systemic therapy. High probability of pathological complete response suggests a clinical question that omitting surgery is an effective alternative to surgery in breast cancer showing clinical complete response to primary systemic therapy. However, the validity of omitting surgery for early breast cancer after primary systemic therapy has not been sufficiently established; thus, even if pathological complete response is expected in patients showing clinical complete response, excision of the primary tumor site remains the standard treatment of breast cancer. Inappropriate omitting surgery increases the incidence of local recurrence, which can be the risk of a subsequent distant metastasis and reduced overall survival. To achieve acceptable local control rate, omitting surgery should be investigated in patients with early breast cancer where a high percentage of pathological complete response, a high concordance rate between clinical complete response and pathological complete response and an acceptable local control rate are expected. This review presents concept and ongoing clinical trials for omitting surgery for patients with breast cancer showing clinical complete response to primary systemic therapy.

[A Case of Progressive Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Second-Line Nivolumab after Surgery].

A 69-year-old man visited a local doctor for fever, pain in the left abdomen, and macroscopic hematuria. Computed tomography (CT) revealed hydronephrosis of the left kidney, and he was referred to our hospital. Detailed examinations suggested left-side pyonephrosis due to urothelial cancer, and left-side total nephroureterectomy was performed. Pathological diagnosis was sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma. Sunitinib administration was started postoperatively for para-aortic lymph node metastasis, which disappeared. However, metastasis to the common iliac lymph node and liver appeared newly 11 months later. Nivolumab was started in combination with radiation thepapy for the lymph node metastases. The patient remains in a stable disease state as of 21 months after nivolumab administration.

Validation of the 21-gene test as a predictor of clinical response to neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for ER+, HER2-negative breast cancer: the TransNEOS study.

PURPOSE: The Recurrence Score test is validated to predict benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. TransNEOS, a translational study of New Primary Endocrine-therapy Origination Study (NEOS), evaluated whether Recurrence Score results can predict clinical response to neoadjuvant letrozole. METHODS: NEOS is a phase 3 clinical trial of hormonal therapy ± adjuvant chemotherapy for postmenopausal patients with ER+, HER2-negative, clinically node-negative breast cancer, after six months of neoadjuvant letrozole and breast surgery. TransNEOS patients had tumors ≥ 2 cm and archived core-biopsy samples taken before neoadjuvant letrozole and subsequently sent for Recurrence Score testing. The primary endpoint was to evaluate clinical (complete or partial) response to neoadjuvant letrozole for RS < 18 versus RS ≥ 31. Secondary endpoints included evaluation of clinical response and rate of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) by continuous Recurrence Score result, ESR1 and PGR single-gene scores, and ER gene-group score. RESULTS: Of 295 TransNEOS patients (median age 63 years; median tumor size 25 mm; 66% grade 1), 53.2% had RS < 18, 28.5% had RS18-30, and 18.3% had RS ≥ 31. Clinical response rates were 54% (RS < 18), 42% (RS18-30), and 22% (RS ≥ 31). A higher proportion of patients with RS < 18 had clinical responses (p < 0.001 vs. RS ≥ 31). In multivariable analyses, continuous Recurrence Score result (p < 0.001), ESR1 score (p = 0.049), PGR score (p < 0.001), and ER gene-group score (p < 0.001) were associated with clinical response. Recurrence Score group was significantly associated with rate of BCS after neoadjuvant treatment (RS < 18 vs. RS ≥ 31, p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: The Recurrence Score test is validated to predict clinical response to neoadjuvant letrozole in postmenopausal patients with ER+, HER2-negative, clinically node-negative breast cancer.

Multicenter Phase II Study of Intraoperative Radiotherapy of Early Breast Cancer: Ipsilateral Tumor Recurrence.

BACKGROUND: We performed a multicenter phase II study on the efficacy and safety of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as partial breast irradiation using multiple devices. METHODS: The primary endpoint was ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). Key inclusion criteria were T < 2.5 cm, age > 50 years, surgical margin > 1 cm, intraoperative pathologically free margins, and sentinel node negative. After resection of the tumor, radiation at 21 Gy was delivered directly to the mammary gland employing an electron linear accelerator in the operating room, otherwise the patient was transported from the surgical suite to the radiation room. RESULTS: Overall, 142 patients were enrolled in this study and 129 underwent IORT. Stage 0: n = 4 (3.1%); stage I: n = 98 (76.0%); and stage IIA: n = 27 (20.9%). Luminal type: n = 116 (89.9%); triple-negative: n = 9 (7.0%); and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2: n = 4 (3.1%). Median follow-up time was 59.5 months (range 27.5-99.0), and the rate of IBTR was 3.1% (95% confidence interval 0.9-7.8). The toxicities included fibrosis in deep-connective tissue: grade 1, 78.1%; wound infection: grade 3, 1.6% and grade 2, 1.6%; and soft tissue necrosis: grade 3, 0.8% and grade 2, 0.8%. Recurrence in the breast occurred in four cases; the site of recurrence was just under the skin near the primary tumor site, with similar histology and subtype. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter phase II study, the rate of IBTR was low and IORT at 21 Gy was feasible in properly selected patients. It is important to use a careful surgical technique to reduce local recurrence because the skin is not included in the radiation field of IORT.

Durable complete response in HER2-positive breast cancer: a multicenter retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: Though advanced and metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive disease is not curable, a small proportion of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer remain in prolonged complete remission with anti-HER2 treatment. We hypothesized that some cases of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer may be curable. In this large, multicenter retrospective study, we aimed to assess the long-term outcomes for patients with a durable response to trastuzumab. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the data of patients diagnosed with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who received trastuzumab for more than 2 years as the first-line treatment. Patients diagnosed between April 1, 2001 and December 31, 2014 at 19 institutions in Japan were included in the analysis. From 124 potential subjects, 16 were excluded and 108 were evaluated. RESULTS: The median follow-up length was 7.7 years. Disease progression occurred in 44/108 (40.7%) patients and 13/108 (12%) patients died. The median progression-free survival was 11.2 years, and as more than 80% of patients were alive 10 years after metastatic breast cancer diagnosis. Of the 108 patients, 57 achieved a clinical complete response. Trastuzumab therapy was interrupted for 27 (47.4%) of these patients (based on the doctor's recommendation for 19 patients, owing to adverse events for 4 patients, owing to unknown reasons for 3 patients, and at the request of 1 patient). Disease progression occurred in 4 of the 27 patients after the interruption of trastuzumab treatment. The median duration of trastuzumab therapy for all 27 patients was 5.1 years (0.9-9.3 years). CONCLUSION: We found that some patients showed no evidence of disease after the interruption of trastuzumab therapy. Discontinuation of maintenance trastuzumab in this patient population after a limited time should be explored cautiously while awaiting a global collaborative effort for a randomized trial.

A randomized, open-label, Phase III trial of pertuzumab retreatment in HER2-positive locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with pertuzumab, trastuzumab and chemotherapy: the Japan Breast Cancer Research Group-M05 PRECIOUS study.

The PRECIOUS study (UMIN000018202) is being conducted as a multicenter, randomized, open-label Phase III study to determine if retreatment with pertuzumab is more effective than conventional treatment in HER2-positive locally advanced (LA)/metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients previously treated with pertuzumab, trastuzumab and chemotherapy. Patients are randomized 1:1 into chemotherapy plus trastuzumab with or without pertuzumab groups. The latest regimen before enrollment did not include pertuzumab, and the number of previous chemotherapy regimens for LA/MBC did not exceed three. The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include independent reviewer-assessed progression-free survival, progression-free survival in patients treated with trastuzumab emtansine as the latest regimen, response rate, response duration, overall survival, safety and health-related quality of life. Target accrual is 370 patients, allowing the observation of 325 events, yielding an 80% power for detection of a hazard ratio of 0.739 with a one-sided 5% level of significance.

Hormonal Therapy Resistant Estrogen-receptor Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Cohort (HORSE-BC) Study : Current Status of Treatment Selection in Japan.

The Hormonal therapy resistant estrogen-receptor positive metastatic breast cancer cohort (HORSE-BC) study is a multicenter observational study evaluating the efficacy and safety of secondary endocrine therapy (ET) for postmenopausal cases of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with poor response to primary ET. In this initial report we analyze the HORSE-BC baseline data to clarify the current status of treatment selection for MBC in Japan. Baseline data for the 50 patients enrolled in HORSE-BC were analyzed, including patient characteristics, types of secondary ET, and reasons for selecting secondary ET. Postoperative recurrence was detected in 84% of patients (42/50) and de novo stage IV breast cancer in 16% (8/50). Forty-one patients (41/50; 82%) received fulvestrant, 5 patients (10%) received selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), 3 patients (6%) received ET plus a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, and 1 patient received an aromatase inhibitor (AI) as the secondary ET. Forty-five patients selected their secondary ET based on its therapeutic effect, while 14 patients selected it based on side effects. Most patients with progression after primary ET selected fulvestrant as the secondary ET based on its therapeutic and side effects. We await the final results from the HORSE-BC study.