Gemcitabine plus Epi-doxorubicin as first-line chemotherapy for bladder cancer in advanced or metastatic stage: a phase II.

Combination chemotherapy with newer, more active drugs in patients with advanced and/or metastatic bladder cancer might show improved response rate and survival. Gemcitabine (GEM) and Epidoxorubicin (EPI) have demonstrated activity in this disease. In addition, experimental studies in vitro have shown that the two agents have additive-synergistic effects when used in combination. Our prior phase I dose-finding study in previously untreated patients with advanced or metastatic bladder cancer defined recommended doses for further trials of GEM 1000 mg/m2 and EPI 25 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days. A phase II trial at this dose level was initiated in previously untreated patients to assess efficacy and toxicity. Eligible patients had measurable disease; Karnofsky performance status (PS) of > 40; no prior chemotherapy; and adequate bone marrow reserve, cardiac, hepatic and renal function. Thirty- one patients (22 males, 9 females) with median age of 64 (range 44-75) and median PS of 80 were accrued, and all were eligible. Twelve patients had T4N1-2 M0, 8 had lymph node only metastases, while 11 had visceral metastases (liver, bone, lung). A total of 181 cycles was administered (range 3-7 per patient). Major toxicities (WHO grade > or = 3) were: neutropenia in 5 patients, thrombocytopenia in 2 patients, and anemia in 2 patients. Three patients had febrile neutropenic episodes and only 3 patients required dose reduction. Grade 1-2 non-hematological toxicities included nausea/vomiting, stomatitis and alopecia. No cardiac toxicity was observed. Of the 30 response evaluable patients, 17 (57%) demonstrated a major response (3 complete and 14 partial) (95% CI: 39%-75%), 7 had stable disease (23%) and 6 progressed (20%). These preliminary results confirm the phase I observation that the combination of GEM--EPI is highly active in the treatment of advanced and metastatic bladder cancer with a favourable toxicity profile.

Long-term survival in metastatic melanoma patients treated with sequential biochemotherapy: report of a Phase II study.

The overall survival for patients with metastatic melanoma is very poor, with a median survival of 8.5 months. In this Phase II trial, we assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a sequential biochemotherapy schedule, using dacarbazine as antiblastic agent and immunomodulant doses of interleukin-2 and interferon-alfa. Thirty-one eligible patients with metastatic melanoma received dacarbazine IV as antiblastic therapy and interluekin-2, plus interferon-alfa SC as sequential immunotherapy, for 6 months. Responding and nonprogressing patients were subsequently maintained on immunotherapy treatment for further 6 months. Twenty-nine patients had an adequate trial, and were assessable for both response and toxicities, with a median follow-up of 49 months. The overall response rate was 52 percent (3 CR and 12 PR), SD was 8 (27 percent) and PD were achieved in 6 patients (21 percent). The median survival duration of responders was 28 months, significantly longer (p < 0.001) than the 16 months of nonresponders. Therapy was well tolerated and produced a significant improvement in progressive-free survival. Further studies, thus, are recommended for larger groups of patients not only to confirm these results, but also to apply this biochemotherapy regimen as adjuvant postsurgical treatment in early stages of malignant melanoma.

Weekly paclitaxel and epirubicin in the treatment of symptomatic hormone-refractory advanced prostate carcinoma: report of a phase II trial.

The efficacy of weekly paclitaxel in androgen-independent prostate cancer and its addictive cytotoxicity with anthracycline derivatives led us to determine the safety and efficacy of a weekly schedule of paclitaxel and epirubicin. Between October 2000 and November 2002, 32 patients were enrolled in this study. Patients characteristics included a median age of 72 years (range 68-77), adequate hepatic, cardiac, renal and bone marrow functions, ECOG performance status of 1-2, and no prior chemotherapy. All patients had received hormonal manipulation and seven patients (22%) had received prior palliative radiation therapy. The regimen consisted of paclitaxel 70 mg/m2 i.v. infusion for 2 h and epirubicin 30 mg/m2 in bolus every week. Treatment was continued for 3 months or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity were observed. During the study, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was monitored and response was defined as a 50% reduction in PSA levels, to be confirmed 4 weeks later. Thirty-one patients were evaluable for toxicity and 21 for objective response. Seventeen patients (57%) had a decline above 50% in PSA level that lasted more than 4 weeks with a median time to PSA progression and a median duration of PSA response of approximately 5.5 months. Ten of the 21 patients with measurable disease (47%) had a confirmed objective response (one complete response and 20 partial responses). Thirteen of 25 symptomatic patients (56 %) had improvement in pain. The median time to disease progression was 7.6 months and the median survival was 12.9. The most prominent grade 3 toxicities were reversible myelosuppression and fatigue. Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and peripheral edema were minimal. No evidence of cardiac toxicity was recorded. Alopecia was frequent, but reversible, in all patients. We conclude that despite the small sample size, this study demonstrates that the combination of weekly paclitaxel and epirubicin is a well-tolerated regimen for androgen-independent prostate cancer. The results imply that a combination of these agents in a weekly schedule may have clinical potential in prostate cancer treatment.

Weekly gemcitabine plus Epirubicin as effective chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: a multicenter phase II study.

The current role of chemotherapy in pancreatic carcinoma is limited, and progress in the treatment of this disease represents a significant challenge to medical oncology. The most promising drug under study is gemcitabine, a relatively new antimetabolite that represents an attractive candidate for combination chemotherapy because of its excellent side-effect profile and the absence of overlapping toxicities with other chemotherapeutic agents. Combined administration of gemcitabine and anthracyclines could result in the induction of DNA breaks that are not easily repaired by the cell's machinery, thus enhancing the apoptotic signals triggered by these lesions. Forty-four patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled in this multicenter study. Patients received Epirubicin 20 mg m(-2) for 3 weeks followed by 1 week of rest (1 cycle) and gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) after Epirubicin on the same day. All were assessable for toxicity and response, 11 patients responded to treatment with one complete response and 10 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 25%. Median survival was 10.9 months (range, 2-26 months). Therapy was well tolerated, with a low incidence of haematologic grade >2 toxicity. A total of 12 of 27 (44.4%) eligible patients attained a clinical benefit response. Our findings suggest that the gemcitabine-epirubicin schedule is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Phase II trial of weekly intravenous gemcitabine administration with interferon and interleukin-2 immunotherapy for metastatic renal cell cancer.

PURPOSE: Since metastatic renal cell carcinoma has a poor prognosis and treatment strategies, including hormone therapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy, have little impact on the quality of life and global survival statistics, new interest has recently focused on the combination of immuno-chemotherapy using pyrimidine analogues, such as gemcitabine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a phase II study 16 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma were treated with 1,000 mg./m. gemcitabine intravenously on days 1, 8, 15 and 28 for 6 months, 3 MU (1 MU = 1 x 10(6) IU) interferon (IFN)-alpha intramuscularly 3 times a week and 4.5 million IU interleukin (IL)-2 subcutaneously daily for 5 days a week for 2 consecutive weeks every month for 6 months. Responding and nonprogressing cases were maintained on immunotherapy consisting of IFN-alpha and IL-2 for further 6 months. RESULTS: In 15 evaluable patients overall response rate (1 complete response plus 3 partial response) was 28% while stable disease was achieved in 7 (47%). Median survival duration was 20 months (range, 9 to 26+) and median time to tumor progression was 14 months (6 to 26+). The complete response lasted 24+ months and partial response lasted 16 months. The regimen was well tolerated with only 1 case of neutropenia (WHO grade 3), while anorexia, fatigue and flu-like symptoms were the most common toxicity problems but were never greater than grade 2. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the small sample size, this study demonstrates that gemcitabine combined with standard doses of IFN-alpha and low doses of IL-2 is effective treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. This biotherapy was well tolerated and resulted in an optimum objective response and relatively long-term survival.

Raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal carcinoma: a multicentric phase II trial.

For advanced colorectal carcinoma, two new drugs, raltitrexed (TOM) and oxaliplatin (L-OHP), have recently shown interesting results. Preclinical and clinical studies suggest that this combination, because of its favorable toxicity profile, high response rate and convenient schedule of administration, can be administered successfully in this disease. In our phase II study, 37 non pre-treated patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma were treated with TOM (3 mg/m(2)) and L-OHP (130 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks. In total, 222 cycles were administered; all patients received at least 2 cycles (median 6, range 2-8). There were two complete and 14 partial responses for an overall response rate of 43% (95% CI 27-69%). The median time to response was 2.5 months (range 2-4) and the median duration was 10.3 months (range 5-18). Twelve of the 23 (52%) patients with symptomatic colorectal cancer were classified as clinical benefit responders for at least 4 weeks during the study period. Treatment was well tolerated, and both acute, essentially hematologic, and cumulative hepatic and neurologic toxicities were manageable and reversible. Response rate and toxic effects observed during this study warrant additional studies comparing this TOM-L-OHP regimen with CPT-11 and/or capacitebine-containing regimens in metastatic colorectal carcinoma.