Outcomes Following ATG Therapy for Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction.

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the major factor limiting survival post lung transplantation (LTx) with limited effective therapeutic options. We report our 12-y experience of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) as second-line CLAD therapy. METHODS: Clinical and lung function data were collected on LTx patients receiving ATG. Rate of FEV1 decline (mL/d) was calculated before and after ATG. Partial response to ATG was defined by rate of FEV1 decline improving 20%. Complete response was defined by an absolute improvement or stability in baseline FEV1. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients received ATG for CLAD. Of these, 5 patients who had a clinical diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection and were treated with plasmapheresis before or after ATG were excluded from analysis. Sixteen (23%) were complete responders, 29 (40%) were partial responders, and 26 (37%) did not respond. Those with CLAD stage 2 or 3 and younger age were more likely to respond. Partial responders had a 65% lower risk of death or retransplant (HR, 0.35; P = 0.003), whereas complete responders reduced their risk by 70% (HR, 0.30; P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: ATG appears to stabilize or attenuate lung function decline in CLAD, which may lead to improved retransplant-free survival. Although certain predictors of response have been identified in this large single-center review, these findings need to be confirmed by a multicenter randomized-controlled trial to determine predictors of response to ATG for CLAD.

Abnormal one-year post-lung transplant spirometry is a significant predictor of increased mortality and chronic lung allograft dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of evaluating spirometry at a fixed time point using standardized population reference has not previously been evaluated. Our aim was to assess the association between spirometric phenotype at 12 months (Spiro12M), survival and incidence of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) in bilateral lung transplant recipients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of bilateral lung transplant recipients transplanted between January 2003 and September 2012. We defined Spiro12M as the mean of the 2 prebronchodilator FEV1 measurements 12-month post-transplant. Normal spirometry was defined as FEV1/FVC ≥0.7 and FEV1≥80% and FVC≥80% predicted population-based values for that recipient. Abnormal spirometry was defined as failure to attain normal function by 12-months. We used a Cox regression model to assess the association between Spiro12M, survival, and CLAD. We used logistic regression to assess potential pretransplant donor and recipient factors associated with abnormal Spiro12M RESULTS: One hundred and eleven (51%) lung transplant recipients normalized their Spiro12M. Normal Spiro12M was associated improved survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.88], p = 0.009. Each 10% decrement in FEV1 increased the risk of death in a stepwise fashion. Additionally, CLAD was reduced in those with normal Spiro12M (HR:0.65, 95%CI:0.46-0.92, p = 0.016). Donor smoking history (OR:2.93, 95% CI:1.21-7.09; p = 0.018) and mechanical ventilation time in hours (OR:1.03, 95% CI:1.004-1.05; p = 0.02) were identified as independent predictors of abnormal Spiro12M. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal Spiro12M is associated with increased mortality and the development of CLAD. The effect is dose dependent with increased dysfunction corresponding to increased risk. This assessment of phenotype at 12-months can easily be incorporated into standard of care.

Continued Successful Evolution of Extended Criteria Donor Lungs for Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In an era of increasing ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) use, it remains important to describe what outcomes can be achieved without EVLP, by taking an aggressive approach to donor use to maximize lung transplantation. METHODS: Data for all lung transplant donor referrals to the Alfred Hospital in Melbourne, Australia were collected for 2012 to 2013. Donor variables were analyzed and calculated into a previously validated lung donor score. Lung transplant recipient outcome data included the following: primary graft dysfunction; duration of mechanical ventilation; need for cardiopulmonary bypass extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; intensive care and hospital length of stay; 30-day, 1-year, and 3- to 4-year survival rates; rates of acute rejection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction; and peak and 12-month lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second). RESULTS: Of the 318 lung donor offers, 129 resulted in successful lung transplantation, with an overall donor use rate of 41%. There was no correlation between donor score and any of the recipient outcomes, and excellent short-term and longer-term survival was achieved. CONCLUSIONS: Future studies examining lung transplantation outcomes with EVLP must consider the excellent results that can be achieved by using marginal lungs and conventional donor management. It is important to consider that adopting a strategy of perioperative lung donor evaluation and intervention allows use of what are considered marginal lungs to achieve promising results.

A spirometric journey following lung transplantation.

Spirometry is regarded as the primary tool for the evaluation of lung function in lung transplant (LTx) recipients. Spirometry is crucial in detecting the various phenotypes of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), including restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS) and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) - note that these phenotypes potentially have different etiologies and therapies. Following LTx for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a 60-year-old male recipient's lung function began to gradually improve, peaking at 5 months post-LTx. Subsequently, with increasing impairment of graft function, the diagnosis of BOS was made. A second LTx was performed and lung function subsequently began to increase again. Unfortunately, another year on, lung function deteriorated again - this time due to the development of RAS, antibody-mediated rejection was implicated as the possible underlying cause. This case report highlights the importance of spirometry in assessing the patterns of CLAD following LTx.