Patients referred for arteriovenous fistula construction: a retrospective outcome analysis.

OBJECTIVES: With lower rates of sepsis and re-interventions, arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferred vascular access modality. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of patients referred for AVF construction at a single center in Cork, Ireland. METHODS: The current study is a single-center retrospective review of all patients who underwent AVF creation between 2015 and 2017. Additionally, the kidney disease clinical patient management system was used to provide statistics on AVF use in Ireland. RESULTS: 39.3% of hemodialysis patients in Ireland use an AVF for vascular access. Regional use ranged from 50 to 20% across Irish hemodialysis centers. At Cork University Hospital, 192 AVFs were created. The population was 69.3% male (n = 133), 30.7% female (n = 59) with a mean (±SEM) age of 58.8 ± 1.03 years. 69.5% of females received a brachiocephalic AVF (BCAVF) while 13.6% had a radiocephalic AVF (RCAVF) constructed. Significance was seen when comparing gender and AVF type (p < 0.001). Fifty-four percent of the fistulae were brachiocephalic (n = 103), 33% were radiocephalic (n = 63), and 4% were brachiobasilic (n = 8). BCAVF patients (62.7 ± 1.2 years) were significantly older than patients receiving a RCAVF (54.5 ± 1.9 years, p < 0.001). A post-operative thrill or continuous flow on Doppler was present in 99% of patients (n = 190) with maturation and complication rates of 82.7% (n = 153) and 5.7% (n = 11) respectively. 69.9% of AVFs were needled for hemodialysis (n = 114). CONCLUSIONS: AVF outcomes at this center are consistent with reported statistics in the literature. Patient age, sex, and diabetic status may influence the use of proximal AVF. AVF creation rates in Ireland are below international reported recommendations.

Mycotic aneurysm of the popliteal artery secondary to Streptococus pneumoniae: a case report and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Cases of true mycotic popliteal artery aneurysm are rare. Presentation is variable but invasive and non-invasive investigations collectively facilitate diagnosis and guide operative procedures. Definitive treatment generally utilizes surgical intervention with excision and reconstruction using autologous vein graft. Prolonged targeted antibiotic therapy is an important adjuvant. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe the clinical presentation, radiological investigations and strategies on the management of a 47-year-old Caucasian Irish man who presented with a mycotic aneurysm of the popliteal artery due to thromboembolisation from Streptococus pneumoniae endocarditis. CONCLUSION: Cases of true mycotic popliteal artery aneurysms are rare. To the best of our knowledge this is the first documented case of a popliteal artery mycotic aneurysm developing secondary to Streptococus pneumoniae highlighting the changing profile of causative microorganisms.

Provider volume and outcomes for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, carotid endarterectomy, and lower extremity revascularization procedures.

BACKGROUND: Intuitively, vascular procedures performed by high-volume vascular subspecialists working at high-volume institutions should be associated with improved patient outcome. Although a large number of studies assess the relationship between volume and outcome, a single contemporary compilation of such studies is lacking. METHODS: A review of the English language literature was performed incorporating searches of the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane collaboration databases for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (elective and emergent), carotid endarterectomy, and arterial lower limb procedures for any volume outcome relationship. Studies were included if they involved a patient cohort from 1980 onwards, were community or population based, and assessed health outcomes (mortality and morbidity) as a dependent variable and volume as an independent variable. RESULTS: We identified 74 relevant studies, and 54 were included. All showed either an inverse relationship of variable magnitude between provider volume and mortality, or no volume-outcome effect. The reduction in the risk-adjusted mortality rate (RAMR) for high-volume providers was 3% to 11% for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, 2.5 to 5% for emergent AAA repair, 0.7% to 4.7% carotid endarterectomy, and 0.3% to 0.9% for lower limb arterial bypass procedures. Subspeciality training also conferred a considerable morbidity and mortality benefit for emergent AAA repair, carotid endarterectomy, and lower limb arterial procedures. CONCLUSION: High-volume providers have significantly better outcomes for vascular procedures both in the elective and emergent setting. Subspeciality training also has a considerable impact. These data provide further evidence for the specialization of vascular services, whereby vascular procedures should generally be preformed by high-volume, speciality trained providers.