Specific IgE against the house dust mite allergens Der p 5, 20 and 21 influences the phenotype and severity of atopic diseases.

BACKGROUND: House dust mites (HDM) are among the most important sources for airborne allergens with high relevance for atopic diseases. Routine tests contain only 4 of 32 registered allergens of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus. Clinical relevance and pathomechanistic properties of many allergens are not well understood. OBJECTIVE: The association of several HDM allergens with allergic rhinitis, allergic asthma, and atopic dermatitis was investigated to identify allergens with biomarker potential and to transfer them into diagnostics. METHODS: Eight out of nine D. pteronyssinus allergens (nDer p 1, rDer p 2, rDer p 5, rDer p 7, rDer p 10, rDer p 13, rDer p 20, rDer p 21, rDer p 23) were recombinantly expressed and purified. Sensitization patterns of 384 HDM-allergic individuals exhibiting different clinical phenotypes were analyzed with a serum-saving multiplex array. RESULTS: Sensitization to more than three mite allergens (sensitization count) was associated with allergic asthma and/or atopic dermatitis. Reactions to Der p 5 and Der p 21 were more frequent in allergic asthma compared to allergic rhinitis. Atopic dermatitis patients were more often sensitized to Der p 5, Der p 20, and Der p 21 among others. Der p 20-IgE > 80 kU/L was associated with severe atopic dermatitis in 75% of patients. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the clinical importance of the sensitization count and of certain allergens (Der p 5, Der p 20, and Der p 21) not available for routine diagnostics yet. Implementing them as well as the sensitization count in diagnostic measures will improve diagnosis and risk assessment of HDM-allergic patients.

Combination of immunotherapies for severe allergic asthma.

INTRODUCTION: Difficult-to-treat or severe persistent asthma accounts for 5-10% of the asthma population worldwide. However, this group of patients creates a higher burden on health systems due to their morbidity and need for long-term and additional treatment. Biological drugs constitute an alternative therapy in the treatment of patients with refractory asthma. In cases where inhalant allergy is part of the pathomechanism, allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) is a causative treatment option for allergic asthma. However, SIT is contraindicated for uncontrolled asthma and cannot be administered according to the guidelines. This is due to the risk of further worsening of uncontrolled asthma during treatment. CASE STUDY: We herein report a case of a 67-year-old male with severe allergic asthma who was successfully treated with SIT after asthma control was achieved by using target treatments. RESULTS: Complete control of asthma was achieved, and SIT with allergens from early flowering trees (birch-alder-hazel) was administered. Further, no asthmatic exacerbations or decrease in respiratory function occurred during the 15 months of treatment with mepoluzimab. He did not need any oral glucocorticosteroids. CONCLUSION: The case report presented here suggests the effectiveness of an individualized approach and phenotype-specific treatment of patients who cannot receive allergen-specific immunotherapy due to the contraindication uncontrolled asthma and who receive SIT after asthma control is achieved by using target treatments.

Effect of comorbid pulmonary disease on the severity of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was first detected in Wuhan, China, in late 2019 and continues to spread worldwide. Persistent questions remain about the relationship between the severity of COVID-19 and comorbid diseases, as well as other chronic pulmonary conditions. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to examine in detail whether the underlying chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD), asthma and chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) were associated with an increased risk of more severe COVID-19. A comprehensive literature search was performed using five international search engines. In the initial search, 722 articles were identified. After eliminating duplicate records and further consideration of eligibility criteria, 53 studies with 658,073 patients were included in the final analysis. COPD was present in 5.2% (2191/42,373) of patients with severe COVID-19 and in 1.4% (4203/306,151) of patients with non-severe COVID-19 (random-effects model; OR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.99-3.34, Z = 7.15, p < 0.001). CRD was present in 8.6% (3780/44,041) of patients with severe COVID-19 and in 5.7% (16,057/280,447) of patients with non-severe COVID-19 (random-effects model; OR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.74-2.64, Z = 7.1, p < 0.001). Asthma was present in 2.3% (1873/81,319) of patients with severe COVID-19 and in 2.2% (11,796/538,737) of patients with non-severe COVID-19 (random-effects model; OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.79-1.60, Z = 0.66, p = 0.50). In conclusion, comorbid COPD and CRD were clearly associated with a higher severity of COVID-19; however, no association between asthma and severe COVID-19 was identified.

Hypersensitivity reactions to biologics (part I): allergy as an important differential diagnosis in complex immune-derived adverse events.

Purpose: Biotechnological substances (BSs) are strongly relied upon to prevent rejection of transplanted organs, and to treat oncological, allergological, and other inflammatory diseases. Allergic reactions to partly foreign biologics can occur due to their potential immunogenicity. The severity of an immune response to a biological drug may range from no clinical significance to a severe, life-threatening anaphylactic reaction.Methods: Detailed searches were performed on Pubmed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to include all available publications. In addition, the Food and Drug Administration, the European Medicines Agency, and British Columbia Cancer Agency Drug Manual databases were screened for hypersensitivity reaction (HSR), infusion reaction, injection site reaction, urticaria, and anaphylaxis for individual BSs.Results: Treatment with BSs can cause various types of HSR. These are mentioned in the literature with definitions such as allergic reactions, anaphylactoid reactions, anaphylaxis, HSR, infusion reactions, injection site reactions, cytokine release syndrome, and urticaria. Due to the overlap in signs and symptoms in the reported descriptions, it is not always possible to differentiate these reactions properly according to their pathomechanism. Similarly, many data reported as anaphylaxis actually describe severe anaphylactic reactions (grades III or IV).Conclusion: There is an urgent need for a simpler symptom- or system-based classification and scoring system to create an awareness for HSRs to BSs. A better understanding of the pathophysiology of HSRs and increased clinical experience in the treatment of side effects will provide timely control of unexpected reactions. As a result, immunotherapy with BSs will become safer in the future.Cite this as Gülsen A, Wedi B, Jappe U. Hypersensitivity reactions to biologics (part I): allergy as an important differential diagnosis in complex immune-derived adverse events. Allergo J Int 2020; 29:97-125https://doi.org/10.1007/s40629-020-00126-6.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Frequent Exacerbator Phenotype: What is Different in these Patients?

Background: Acute exacerbation events, which can develop during the natural course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can lead to worsening quality of life, increased hospital costs, and higher rates of morbidity and mortality. In recent years, individuals at heightened risk of COPD exacerbations have been said to display a so-called "frequent exacerbator (FE)" phenotype, defined as having two or more exacerbation events (or ≥ 1 exacerbation with a hospitalization) within 1 year. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving 299 patients with COPD. Patients were divided into 2 groups as non-exacerbator phenotype (group-1, n=195) and FE phenotype (group-2, n=104). Results: FE phenotype was identified in 35.1% of patients. There were no significant differences between these two phenotypes in terms of gender, smoking status, or leukocyte count. However, FEs were found to be older (p=0.04), with more frequent detection of emphysema (p=0.02) and lower eosinophil levels (p=0.02). FEs also demonstrated worse pulmonary function parameters. Conclusion: COPD patients with the FE phenotype likely require a different treatment algorithm due to differing clinical features such as poorer respiratory function, lower eosinophil levels, and more frequent emphysema.

Air exposure and cell differentiation are essential for investigation of SARS-CoV-2 entry genes in human primary airway epithelial cells in vitro.

Background: In-vitro models of differentiated primary human airway epithelial cells are a valuable tool to study severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Through the use of these models, it has been shown that the expression of SARS-CoV-2 entry genes in human airway epithelia is influenced by various factors such as age, sex, smoking status, and pathogenic conditions. In this study, we aimed to determine the effects of cell culture conditions and donor demographic and clinical characteristics on the expression of SARS-CoV-2 entry genes including angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2), cathepsin L (CTSL), and tyrosine protein kinase receptor UFO (AXL) in primary airway epithelial cells. Methods: Eleven lung cancer patients with or without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma were recruited. Human bronchial epithelial cells (HBEC) or small airway epithelial cells (SAEC) isolated from submerged or air-liquid interface (ALI) cultures were analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR. We also tested for correlations with clinical data. Results: In ALI cultures, the expression of AXL was significantly higher in HBEC than in SAEC. In addition, the expression of ACE2, TMPRSS2, and CTSL was significantly increased in both HBEC and SAEC differentiated under ALI conditions compared with the submerged culture. Negligible association was found between the expression of SARS-CoV-2 entry genes in SAEC and the age, sex, smoking status, and complication of COPD, asthma or hypertension of the cell donors. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that the expression of SARS-CoV-2 entry genes in differentiated primary airway epithelial cells in-vitro is much more influenced by individual culture conditions than by specific characteristics of individual donors.

Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction with Autologous Blood: What is the Evidence?

Biological lung volume reduction (BioLVR) is a novel and low-cost endobronchial treatment method aimed at reducing the volume of the target lung lobe using biological agents, including fibrin-based hydrogel, fibrinogen, and autologous blood (AB) with thrombin. BioLVR induces local inflammation, resulting in acute airway obstruction, resorption atelectasis, fibrosis, and finally tissue remodeling by contraction of the target lobe and reduction in the lung volume, similar to the application of hot water vapor and foam. In addition, patients with severe impairment in lung function and quality of life may refuses to undergo surgery, resulting in limited treatment options. In such complex clinical scenarios, BioLVR with AB appears to be a good therapeutic option. These treatment modalities resulted in favorable outcomes in patients with heterogeneous and bullous emphysema, pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis, and giant bullous lesions. AB applications result in functional improvement, improvement in the quality of life, decrease in dyspnea scores, and reduction in the size of bullae. Based on the available evidence, application of AB for lung volume reduction is minimally invasive and well tolerated by patients. There was no incidence of pneumothorax or mortality. This review aimed to investigate the benefits, complications, and future perspectives of AB application as BioLVR in the treatment of hyperinflated lung diseases.

Omalizumab ensures compatibility to bee venom immunotherapy (VIT) after VIT-induced anaphylaxis in a patient with systemic mastocytosis.

BACKGROUND: Systemic reactions and anaphylaxis due to Hymenoptera venoms occur in up to 7.5% of the European population. Fatal sting reactions are very rare. Serum tryptase levels should be measured in all patients with a history of severe reactions in order to detect mastocytosis and to determine the risk of severe reactions to venom immunotherapy (VIT). The risk to experience severe or even fatal anaphylaxis due to insect stings is quite high in patients with mastocytosis. Therefore, lifelong VIT is recommended in these highly threatened patients. Multicenter studies involving a large population report that up to 20% of patients undergoing VIT have intolerance and systemic reactions to immunotherapy. Some of these side effects occur repeatedly and cannot be managed by standard treatment. A pre-treatment with the anti-IgE antibody omalizumab was useful in many cases. However, omalizumab is not approved for the indication anaphylaxis. Therefore, there is still no defined protocol for omalizumab pre-treatment, and the optimal duration, dosage as well as long-time benefits are still unclear. CASE REPORT: We present a 60-year-old female patient with mastocytosis who developed a severe anaphylactic reaction during initiation of bee VIT. Serum tryptase was elevated, and a KIT mutation D816V was subsequently confirmed. Component-resolved diagnostic tests revealed specific IgE antibodies to recombinant Api m 1 only. The patient was treated with 150 mg omalizumab, administered subcutaneously 5 weeks, 3 weeks, and 1 week prior to re-start of immunotherapy and for 2 months in parallel to VIT. Updosing was done by a 7-day rush schedule. During this period, no anaphylactic reaction developed, and the bee VIT was well tolerated with up to 200 µg bee venom. The patient is currently in the 3rd year of treatment and tolerates the treatment very well. CONCLUSION: Omalizumab may be used as a premedication in patients with mastocytosis who do not tolerate VIT. Although there is no consensus on the treatment protocol, treatment for 2 - 6 months is considered adequate. The long-term benefits of such treatment require further research.

Biologics for atopic diseases: Indication, side effect management, and new developments.

With the advent of biologicals, more and more therapeutics are available that specifically address specific switch points in the pathomechanism of immunologically dominated diseases. Thus, the focus of diagnostics and therapy (precision medicine) is more on the individual disease characteristics of the individual patient. Regarding the different phenotypes of atopic diseases, severe asthma was the first entity for which biologicals were approved, followed by urticaria, and finally atopic dermatitis and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Experience in the treatment of severe bronchial asthma has shown that the intensity of the response to biological therapy depends on the quality of clinical and immunological phenotyping of the patients. This also applies to different diseases of the atopic form, as patients can suffer from several atopic diseases at the same time, each with different characteristics. Biologics are already emerging that may represent a suitable therapy for allergic bronchial asthma, which often occurs together with severe neurodermatitis, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. In practice, however, the question of possible combinations of biologicals for the therapy of complex clinical pictures of individual patients is increasingly arising. In doing so, the side effect profile must be taken into account, including hypersensitivity reactions, whose diagnostic and logistical management must aim at a safe and efficient therapy of the underlying disease. Increased attention must also be paid to biological therapy in pregnancy and planned (predictable) vaccinations as well as existing infections, such as SARS-CoV-2 infection. Before starting a biological therapy, the immune status should be checked with regard to chronic viral and bacterial infections and, if necessary, the vaccination status should be refreshed or missing vaccinations should be made up for before starting therapy. Currently, reliable data on the effect of biologicals on the immunological situation of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 are not available. Therefore, research and development of suitable diagnostic methods for detection of immunologically caused side effects as well as detection of potential therapy responders and non-responders is of great importance.

Pulmonary Function Changes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients According to Smoking Status.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to examine pulmonary functions of patients from all stages of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) according to their smoking status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was carried out. Total of 148 patients were enrolled and divided into two groups in regards to their smoking status (quitters, n=68; non-quitters, n=80). Pulmonary function parameters, COPD assessment test score, Fagerström Nicotine Addiction Questionnaire score, smoking history and status were obtained from the electronic hospital data system. Patients' admission and 12-month data were recorded. RESULTS: In non-quitters, the mean FEV1 values decreased from 2.32±1.14 to 2.24±1.12 (p<0.001). Particularly, in Stage-0, in the early high-risk group of COPD, the reduction in FEV1 was 90 mL, while the reduction was 70, 60, 40, and 40 mL in Stage-I, -II, -III, and -IV, respectively. In quitters, the mean FEV1 levels increased from 2.10±1.19 to 2.19±1.20 (p<0.001). For COPD patients overall, an average increase in FEV1 of 80-110 mL was observed. At the end of the 12 months follow-up, 17 (27.5%) of the non-quitters showed deterioration, and five (7.3%) of the quitters showed improvement in COPD stage. CONCLUSION: FEV1 decline was accelerated in COPD patients who continued to smoke, whereas this decline was not prevented by inhaler treatments. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Stage-0 group, which is not included in the current guidelines, needs to be redefined. This group appears to be the most important group for implementing the smoking cessation and prevention strategy.

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using coil therapy: complications and management.

Nonsurgical approaches involving bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) have been developed in the last decade. One of these, the BLVR coil procedure, is a treatment option for patients with homogeneous and heterogeneous end-stage emphysema and a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 15-45%. This treatment decreases hyperinflation and improves lung function, the quality of life, and exercise capacity. It is very important to prepare patients for treatment, premedications, anesthesia applications, intubation, post-procedure follow-up and treatments. Further, it has been observed that various complications can develop during and after the procedure. Generally, the observed and reported complications are chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation, chest pain, mild bleeding, pneumonia, pneumothorax, and respiratory failure. Rarely, aspergillus cavitation (coil-related aspergilloma), bronchopleural fistula and penetration into the pleural space, bronchiectasis, coil-associated inflammatory response and opacities, and hiccups are observed. Common complications are usually mild or moderate, while the rare ones can be life-threatening (except hiccup), so early diagnosis and treatment are necessary. However, patients treated with BLVR have lower mortality rates than untreated patients with similar morbidity. Based on the findings of this review, we can estimate that premedication one day before and just before the procedure may reduce potential complications. Some medical centers apply and recommend 30-day macrolide treatment after the procedure. New generation supraglottic devices may be preferred to avoid complications due to endotracheal intubation. Moreover, further research is needed to identify risk factors, prevent potential complications, and a common consensus is required for routine preventive treatment.

Health Hazards and Complications Associated with Electronic Cigarettes: A Review.

Electronic cigarettes (ECs) are devices that vaporize and release a sweetened liquid containing nicotine as a substitute for burning tobacco. EC manufacturers have suggested that "vaping" is a safer alternative to conventional smoking because of the potential reduction of exposure to toxic substances. In 2019, National Youth Tobacco Survey reported that 10.5% and 27.5% of middle and high school students used ECs in the previous 30 days (0.6% and 1.5% in 2011, 3.3% and 11.7% in 2017, and 4.9% and 20.8 in 2018), respectively. Increased EC use among younger individuals is mainly because of the widespread perception that ECs are relatively less harmful than conventional cigarettes as they do not involve smoking tobacco and contain little or no nicotine. This review suggests that ECs may not be completely harmless. There are increasing number of case reports on various complications arising from using ECs, which are especially popular among young individuals and could negatively affect their health. Reported complications include lipoid pneumonia, acute eosinophilic pneumonia, hypersensitivity pneumonia, organizing pneumonia, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, multiple reactive pulmonary nodules, subacute bronchiolitis, mouth and tongue injuries, dental injuries, complex facial fractures, thermal injuries, nickel contact allergy, C1 and C2 fractures, and fatal intoxication after ingesting liquids. Complications that develop directly from the substances in the devices and those resulting from device explosion and burning are being reported with increasing frequency. There is an urgent need for legislation and restriction regarding the sale of these devices considering their increasing frequency of use by younger individuals.

Hypersensitivity reactions to biologics (part I): allergy as an important differential diagnosis in complex immune-derived adverse events.

PURPOSE: Biotechnological substances (BSs) are strongly relied upon to prevent rejection of transplanted organs, and to treat oncological, allergological, and other inflammatory diseases. Allergic reactions to partly foreign biologics can occur due to their potential immunogenicity. The severity of an immune response to a biological drug may range from no clinical significance to a severe, life-threatening anaphylactic reaction. METHODS: Detailed searches were performed on Pubmed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to include all available publications. In addition, the Food and Drug Administration, the European Medicines Agency, and British Columbia Cancer Agency Drug Manual databases were screened for hypersensitivity reaction (HSR), infusion reaction, injection site reaction, urticaria, and anaphylaxis for individual BSs. RESULTS: Treatment with BSs can cause various types of HSR. These are mentioned in the literature with definitions such as allergic reactions, anaphylactoid reactions, anaphylaxis, HSR, infusion reactions, injection site reactions, cytokine release syndrome, and urticaria. Due to the overlap in signs and symptoms in the reported descriptions, it is not always possible to differentiate these reactions properly according to their pathomechanism. Similarly, many data reported as anaphylaxis actually describe severe anaphylactic reactions (grades III or IV). CONCLUSION: There is an urgent need for a simpler symptom- or system-based classification and scoring system to create an awareness for HSRs to BSs. A better understanding of the pathophysiology of HSRs and increased clinical experience in the treatment of side effects will provide timely control of unexpected reactions. As a result, immunotherapy with BSs will become safer in the future.

The Effect of Smoking on COVID-19 Symptom Severity: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SAR2-COV-2) and was first identified in Wuhan, China, in December of 2019, but quickly spread to the rest of the world, causing a pandemic. While some studies have found no link between smoking status and severe COVID-19, others demonstrated a significant one. The present study aimed to determine the relationship between smoking and clinical COVID-19 severity via a systematic meta-analysis approach. METHODS: We searched the Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases to identify clinical studies suitable for inclusion in this meta-analysis. Studies reporting smoking status and comparing nonsevere and severe patients were included. Nonsevere cases were described as mild, common type, nonintensive care unit (ICU) treatment, survivors, and severe cases as critical, need for ICU, refractory, and nonsurvivors. RESULTS: A total of 16 articles detailing 11322 COVID-19 patients were included. Our meta-analysis revealed a relationship between a history of smoking and severe COVID-19 cases (OR = 2.17; 95% CI: 1.37-3.46; P < .001). Additionally, we found an association between the current smoking status and severe COVID-19 (OR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.12-2.05; P < .008). In 10.7% (978/9067) of nonsmokers, COVID-19 was severe, while in active smokers, severe COVID-19 occurred in 21.2% (65/305) of cases. CONCLUSION: Active smoking and a history of smoking are clearly associated with severe COVID-19. The SARS-COV-2 epidemic should serve as an impetus for patients and those at risk to maintain good health practices and discontinue smoking. The trial is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42020180173.

Comparison of Postoperative Pulmonary Complication Indices in Elective Abdominal Surgery Patients.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) are important problems that prolong hospital stays by increasing morbidity and mortality of patients. Early identification of risky cases through preoperative evaluation is important for reducing the complications that may be seen in patients postoperatively. The aim of this study is to calculate, evaluate and compare the risk indices for PPC in patients who will undergo elective abdominal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-four patients who were hospitalized for elective abdominal surgery were included in this prospective observational study. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), Epstein and Shapiro scores, respiratory failure index (RFI), pneumonia risk indexes (PI) and scores were calculated preoperatively. Patients were re-evaluated at the 48th postoperative hour, and one-week follow-up was performed. The patients with PPCs are recorded. RESULTS: The mean PPC rate was 36.8%. Based on this, pleural effusion was observed in 18.5%, prolonged mechanical ventilation in 8.9%, atelectasis in 9.7%, and respiratory failure in 5.7%, bronchospasm in 4.0%, and pneumonia in 3.2% of patients. An increased risk in PPC was determined if ASA were above 3 (odds ratio, [OR], 7.06; <0.001), PI scores were above 3 (OR, 6.67; <0.001), RFI score were above 4 (OR, 6.30, p:0.001) and Shapiro score above 2 (OR, 20.01; <0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: The Shapiro index is the strongest predictor of pulmonary complications, whereas the PI is the strongest predictor of morbidity risk. However, RFI and the PI are equally valuable for predicting respiratory complications and may prove to be useful in abdominal surgeries for preoperative assessment.

Effects of Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction Coil Treatment on Arterial Blood Gases.

BACKGROUND: Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) coil treatment is an increasingly used treatment modality for selected severe emphysema patients in recent years. Emphysema causes dynamic hyperinflation, loss of elastic recoil, air trapping, and decreased exercise capacity in advanced stages. This process progresses over time, leading to hypoxic and hypercapnic respiratory failure. The goal of this study is to elucidate the effects of BLVR coil treatment on arterial blood gas parameters in severe emphysema patients with respiratory failure. METHODS: This is a retrospective study performed at a single pneumology center in Turkey. In total, this study included 39 patients diagnosed with severe emphysema who underwent bilateral BLVR coil treatment according to the general inclusion and exclusion criteria in the literature. The patients baseline and 12-month data were collected from medical records. RESULTS: Twelve months after BLVR coil treatment, significant improvements were observed in patients' pulmonary function tests, an increase in partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) from 58.05±9.36 to 73.82±13.3 (P<0.000) and decrease in partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood (PaCO2) of hypercapnic patients (from 51.60±4.1 to 46.55±6.6 mm Hg; P=0.001). CONCLUSION: BLVR coil treatment is reliable and effective in emphysema patients who have hypoxic or mild hypercapnic respiratory failure. Besides improving lung function, BLVR coil treatment can significantly increase PaO2 and decrease PaCO2 in the medium term.

[Dental technician's pneumoconiosis; a case report]. / Dis teknisyeni pnömokonyozu olgusu.

Since 1939, it has been known that, silicosis and extrinsic allergic alveolitis can be seen among dental technicians. The interstitial disease caused by the exposure to complex substances used by dental technicians is classified as a special group called dental technician's pneumoconiosis. A 36-year-old man, who has no smoking history, presented with severe dyspnea. He had worked in different dental laboratories for 22 years, but he did not have respiratory symptoms until five years ago. After that date, he had hospitalized and had been examined for respiratory pathologies for many times. He had came to our clinic, because of the progression of his dyspnea. Diffuse pulmonary parenchymal infiltrates which can be related with pneumoconiosis and chronic type 1 respiratory deficiency had been diagnosed as the result of the examinations. While he has no history of smoking or any other risk factors or diseases in his medical history, the case was accepted as dental technician's pneumoconiosis. The factors related with the pathogenesis of dental technician's pneumoconiosis are; the complex compound of the substances (metal dusts, silica, plaster, wax and resins, chemical liquids, methyl methacrylate) used in this sector and their effects on the lung parenchyma. Extrinsic allergic alveolitis related with methyl methacrylate has been reported. The most important factor to acquire an occupational lung disease is a complex occupational exposure. The insufficient workplace airing and the lack of preventive measures added on this exposure, the risks become much more greater.

Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction: A 2018 Review and Update.

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) procedure has expanded the treatment spectrum of patients with end-stage emphysema. These treatments include valve, coil, thermal vapor ablation, bio-lung volume reduction, targeted lung denervation, and airway bypass stent. This short review provides an up-to-date information on BLVR treatments, their clinical benefits, and an overview of complications. BLVR treatments generally affect dyspnea by reducing hyperinflation and residual volume (RV). Benefits of treatment are associated with improvement in lung function parameters (forced expiration volume in the first second, total lung capacity, RV, and 6-minute walking test) and quality of life. Serious potential pulmonary complications, such as pneumothorax, pneumonia, respiratory failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation, may also occur after BLVR treatment. In addition to these, low-cost BLVR methods, such as autologous blood and fibrin glue, are in the developmental stage. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatments are a promising method with positive results for patients with severe emphysema. The widespread use of these techniques, inadequate selection of patients, and non-critical and, therefore, unsuccessful use of BLVR in non-specialist centers lead to a false negative impression of the effectiveness of these techniques. In addition to these considerations, it is obvious that these treatments, which are quite expensive, are burdening social health systems. The reduction of costs or the development of lower-cost treatment methods is important for the future and for the availability of treatments.

Importance of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction coil therapy in potential candidates for lung transplantation.

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) coil treatment is a alternative and promising treatment modality for selected severe emphysema patients. The main indication of this treatment modality is a forced expiration volume in one second (FEV1) of 15-45% and a residual volume (RV) > 175%. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of BLVR coil therapy in patients with end-stage emphysema who were potential candidates for lung transplantation and had FEV1 values less than 25%. Twenty-one patients who underwent bilateral BLVR coil therapy between September 2013 and May 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. We compared the changes in clinical and laboratory parameters at the baseline and 12 months after the treatment. Twelve months after the bilateral BLVR coil treatment, we observed an average increase in FEV1 (110 mL and 4.6%), a decrease in residual volume (660 mL and 33%), and an increase in 6-minute walk tests (67 m). The most common complications were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation (47.6%) and pneumonia (23.8%). All patients tolerated the general anesthesia and procedure very well. BLVR coil therapy is safe and effective in patients with end-stage emphysema, who are potential candidates for lung transplantation within a short to medium period. The complication rates of this treatment were not different from those of the other coil treatments, and the improvements in the clinical parameters after the treatment resulted in gaining time for lung transplantation. Future research for evaluating the long-term efficacy of BLVR coil therapy in these patients is essential.

Psychological Features of Smokers.

BACKGROUND: Smoking tobacco is believed to be common among patients with psychiatric disorders like anxiety, depression, schizophrenia, and affective disorders. The aim of this study was to investigate the psychological symptoms of people without known psychiatric diseases who have freely decided to quit smoking. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was designed, and 124 healthy active-smokers (66 female) and 127 healthy non-smokers (61 female) were recruited. The symptom check list and Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) were used to assess psychological symptoms and nicotine addiction level. Smokers were divided into 3 groups: light smokers (0-9 cigarettes/d), moderate smokers (10-19 cigarettes/d), and heavy smokers (> 20 cigarettes/d). RESULTS: When subjects were compared by daily levels of cigarette consumption, somatic findings were more prominent in the mild smoker group (1.61 ± 0.72 vs 0.77 ± 0.56, P < .001), while depression and hostility were similar across all groups. When subjects were compared by nicotine addiction ratio, the general symptom index of the group with high-grade nicotine addiction was found to be significantly higher than that of the control group (1.34 ± 0.72 vs 0.79 ± 0.49, P < .001). In addition, the high-grade nicotine addiction group had higher scores than the other groups for somatization, anxiety, depression, paranoid symptoms, hostility, and other symptoms. CONCLUSION: This study examined the association between psychological symptoms and smokers' daily cigarette consumption and nicotine addiction levels. Psychiatric symptoms (ie, somatization, anxiety, depression, hostility, and paranoia) were observed more frequently in people with high-grade nicotine addiction (FTND score 7-10 points).