Clinical delineation of the PACS1-related syndrome--Report on 19 patients.

We report on 19 individuals with a recurrent de novo c.607C>T mutation in PACS1. This specific mutation gives rise to a recognizable intellectual disability syndrome. There is a distinctive facial appearance (19/19), characterized by full and arched eyebrows, hypertelorism with downslanting palpebral fissures, long eye lashes, ptosis, low set and simple ears, bulbous nasal tip, wide mouth with downturned corners and a thin upper lip with an unusual "wavy" profile, flat philtrum, and diastema of the teeth. Intellectual disability, ranging from mild to moderate, was present in all. Hypotonia is common in infancy (8/19). Seizures are frequent (12/19) and respond well to anticonvulsive medication. Structural malformations are common, including heart (10/19), brain (12/16), eye (10/19), kidney (3/19), and cryptorchidism (6/12 males). Feeding dysfunction is presenting in infancy with failure to thrive (5/19), gastroesophageal reflux (6/19), and gastrostomy tube placement (4/19). There is persistence of oral motor dysfunction. We provide suggestions for clinical work-up and management and hope that the present study will facilitate clinical recognition of further cases.

Evaluating the performance of the breast cancer genetic risk models BOADICEA, IBIS, BRCAPRO and Claus for predicting BRCA1/2 mutation carrier probabilities: a study based on 7352 families from the German Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Consortium.

BACKGROUND: Risk prediction models are widely used in clinical genetic counselling. Despite their frequent use, the genetic risk models BOADICEA, BRCAPRO, IBIS and extended Claus model (eCLAUS), used to estimate BRCA1/2 mutation carrier probabilities, have never been comparatively evaluated in a large sample from central Europe. Additionally, a novel version of BOADICEA that incorporates tumour pathology information has not yet been validated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using data from 7352 German families we estimated BRCA1/2 carrier probabilities under each model and compared their discrimination and calibration. The incremental value of using pathology information in BOADICEA was assessed in a subsample of 4928 pedigrees with available data on breast tumour molecular markers oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor 2. RESULTS: BRCAPRO (area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)=0.80 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.81)) and BOADICEA (AUC=0.79 (0.78-0.80)), had significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than IBIS and eCLAUS (p<0.001). The AUC increased when pathology information was used in BOADICEA: AUC=0.81 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.83, p<0.001). At carrier thresholds of 10% and 15%, the net reclassification index was +3.9% and +5.4%, respectively, when pathology was included in the model. Overall, calibration was best for BOADICEA and worst for eCLAUS. With eCLAUS, twice as many mutation carriers were predicted than observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the use of BRCAPRO and BOADICEA for decision making regarding genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations. However, model calibration has to be improved for this population. eCLAUS should not be used for estimating mutation carrier probabilities in clinical settings. Whenever possible, breast tumour molecular marker information should be taken into account.

The risk of contralateral breast cancer in patients from BRCA1/2 negative high risk families as compared to patients from BRCA1 or BRCA2 positive families: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: While it has been reported that the risk of contralateral breast cancer in patients from BRCA1 or BRCA2 positive families is elevated, little is known about contralateral breast cancer risk in patients from high risk families that tested negative for BRCA1/2 mutations. METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study was performed from 1996 to 2011 and comprised 6,235 women with unilateral breast cancer from 6,230 high risk families that had tested positive for BRCA1 (n = 1,154) or BRCA2 (n = 575) mutations or tested negative (n = 4,501). Cumulative contralateral breast cancer risks were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method and were compared between groups using the log-rank test. Cox regression analysis was applied to assess the impact of the age at first breast cancer and the familial history stratified by mutation status. RESULTS: The cumulative risk of contralateral breast cancer 25 years after first breast cancer was 44.1% (95%CI, 37.6% to 50.6%) for patients from BRCA1 positive families, 33.5% (95%CI, 22.4% to 44.7%) for patients from BRCA2 positive families and 17.2% (95%CI, 14.5% to 19.9%) for patients from families that tested negative for BRCA1/2 mutations. Younger age at first breast cancer was associated with a higher risk of contralateral breast cancer. For women who had their first breast cancer before the age of 40 years, the cumulative risk of contralateral breast cancer after 25 years was 55.1% for BRCA1, 38.4% for BRCA2, and 28.4% for patients from BRCA1/2 negative families. If the first breast cancer was diagnosed at the age of 50 or later, 25-year cumulative risks were 21.6% for BRCA1, 15.5% for BRCA2, and 12.9% for BRCA1/2 negative families. CONCLUSIONS: Contralateral breast cancer risk in patients from high risk families that tested negative for BRCA1/2 mutations is similar to the risk in patients with sporadic breast cancer. Thus, the mutation status should guide decision making for contralateral mastectomy.

Association of death receptor 4 variant (683A > C) with ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Dysregulation of apoptosis plays an important role in carcinogenesis. Therefore, apoptosis-associated genes like the death receptor 4 (DR4, TRAIL-R1) are interesting candidates for modifying the penetrance of breast and ovarian cancer in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. The DR-4 haplotype 626C-683C [626C > G, Thr209Arg (rs4871857) and 683A > C, Glu228Ala (rs17088993)] has recently been linked to an increased risk of breast cancer. To evaluate whether DR4 626C > G or DR4 683A > C modifies the risk of breast or ovarian cancer in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, we undertook a national multicenter study including data of 840 carriers of breast cancer gene (BRCA) mutations. DNA samples were collected from 12 German research centers between 1996 and 2005 and were genotyped by the Taqman allelic discrimination assay. The association between genotypes and incidence of breast or ovarian cancer data was evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. We found evidence for a significant association of DR4 683A > C with a higher risk for ovarian cancer in carriers of BRCA1 mutations [n = 557, hazard ratio 1.78 (1.24-2.55), p = 0.009]. Our results thus indicate that the DR4 683A > C variant modifies the risk of ovarian cancer in carriers of BRCA1 mutations.

Low-risk variants FGFR2, TNRC9 and LSP1 in German familial breast cancer patients.

To validate common low-risk variants predisposing for breast cancer (BC) in a large set of BRCA1/2 negative familial or genetically enriched cases from Germany, we genotyped 1,415 cases and 1,830 healthy women by MALDI-TOF in 105 candidate SNPs. Significantly higher ORs than previously reported for heterozygous unselected cases were found for the minor allele in FGFR2 (OR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.30-1.59, p-value = 1.24 x 10(-12)) and for TNRC9 (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.19-1.46, p-value = 1.54 x 10(-7)). Most intriguing, however, were the ORs for homozygous carriers from high-risk families for FGFR2 (OR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.68-2.51, LSP1 (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.28-0.86) and TNRC9 (OR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.27-2.07). Moreover, the additional validation of 99 CGEMS-SNPs identified putative novel susceptibility alleles within the LSP1 gene (OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.61-0.87, p-value = 5.23 x 10(-4)). Finally, we provide evidence for the first time that a low-risk variant located at 6q22.33 (rs6569479) is associated with estrogen receptor negative BC in familial cases (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.06-1.66; p-value = 0.012). Our data confirm the impact of the previously identified susceptibility loci and provide preliminary evidence for novel susceptibility loci in familial BC cases and correlate them to specific histopathological subtypes defined by estrogen receptor status.

Comprehensive genetic and functional characterization of IPH-926: a novel CDH1-null tumour cell line from human lobular breast cancer.

Infiltrating lobular breast cancer (ILBC) is a clinically and biologically distinct tumour entity defined by a characteristic linear cord invasion pattern and inactivation of the CDH1 tumour suppressor gene encoding for E-cadherin. ILBCs also lack beta-catenin expression and show aberrant cytoplasmic localization of the E-cadherin binding protein p120-catenin. The lack of a well-characterized ILBC cell line has hampered the functional characterization of ILBC cells in vitro. We report the establishment of a permanent ILBC cell line, named IPH-926, which was derived from a patient with metastatic ILBC. The DNA fingerprint of IPH-926 verified genetic identity with the patient and had no match among the human cell line collections of several international biological resource banks. IPH-926 expressed various epithelial cell markers but lacked expression of E-cadherin due to a previously unreported, homozygous CDH1 241ins4 frameshift mutation. Detection of the same CDH1 241ins4 mutation in archival tumour tissue of the corresponding primary ILBC proved the clonal origin of IPH-926 from this particular tumour. IPH-926 also lacked beta-catenin expression and showed aberrant cytoplasmic localization of p120-catenin. Array-CGH analysis of IPH-926 revealed a profile of genomic imbalances that included many distinct alterations previously observed in primary ILBCs. Spectral karyotyping of IPH-926 showed a hyperdiploid chromosome complement and numerous clonal, structural aberrations. IPH-926 cells were anti-cancer drug-resistant, clonogenic in soft agar, and tumourigenic in SCID mice. In xenograft tumours, IPH-926 cells recapitulated the linear cord invasion pattern that defines ILBCs. In summary, IPH-926 significantly extends the biological spectrum of the established breast cancer cell lines and will facilitate functional analyses of genuine human ILBC cells in vitro and in vivo.

Diagnostic accuracy of methods for the detection of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: a systematic review.

As sequence analysis for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is both time- and cost-intensive, current strategies often include scanning techniques to identify fragments containing genetic sequence alterations. However, a systematic assessment of the diagnostic accuracy has been lacking so far. Here, we report on a systematic review to assess the internal and external validity of current scanning techniques. Inclusion criteria were: controlled design, investigators blinded, and tests suitable as a scanning tool for the whole genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. Outcome parameters were sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values compared to direct sequencing. Out of 3816 publications, 10 studies reporting on 12 methods met our inclusion criteria. The internal and external validity of most of these studies was limited. Sensitivities were reported to be 100% for enzymatic mutation detection (EMD), multiple-dye cleavase fragment length polymorphism (MD-CFLP), fluorescence-based conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis (F-CSGE), RNA-based sequencing, restriction endonuclease fingerprinting-single strand conformation polymorphism (REF-SSCP), stop codon (SC) assay, and denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC). Sensitivity was 50-96% for SSCP, 88-91% for two-dimensional gene scanning (TDGS), 76% for conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis (CSGE), 75% for protein truncation test (PTT), and 58% for micronucleus test (MNT). Specificities close to 100% were reported, except for MNT. PTT and SC assay are only able to detect truncating mutations. Most studies were designed to introduce new experimental approaches or modifications of established methods and require further evaluation. F-CSGE, REF-SSCP, RNA-based sequencing, EMD, and MD-CFLP will need further evaluation before their use in a routine setting can be considered. SSCP, MNT, PTT, CSGE, and TDGS cannot be recommended because of their low sensitivity. DHPLC outperforms all other methods studied. However, none of the four studies evaluating DHPLC was performed on BRCA2.

A complex rearrangement in the APC gene uncovered by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Germline mutations in the tumor suppressor gene APC are the underlying cause of familial adenomatous polyposis, an autosomal-dominant cancer predisposition syndrome of the colorectum. Here, we describe a complex pathogenic rearrangement in the APC gene that was detected during deletion screening and transmitted throughout at least three generations. The rearrangement consists of a deletion of 604 bp in intron 4 that impairs the binding site of the reverse primer for exon 4 and of an insertion of 119 bp in exon 4 that interferes with the binding site of the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) probes for exon 4. The insertion is composed of three duplicated sequences derived from exon 4, intron 3, and intron 4, all in inverse direction. By transcript analysis, we found that the mutation results in complete skipping of exon 4 and that it leads to a frameshift. The rearrangement would not have been identified had it occurred outside the MLPA hybridization site. Our findings demonstrate that part of the pathogenic mutations remain undetected by routine methods. Moreover, MLPA and RNA analysis alone would have led to an incorrect interpretation of a genomic deletion of exon 4.

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia is caused by the Q490X mutation of the ACVRL1 gene in a large Arab family: support of homozygous lethality.

In a large Saudi Arabian family with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), we identified ACVRL1 (ALK1) nonsense mutation Q490X in 40 HHT patients and three healthy children, but neither in 11 individuals with epistaxis, 41 other healthy family members, nor in 50 healthy unrelated Saudi Arabian controls. Sequence analysis of the entire coding region of the ACVRL1 and ENG genes in five of the 11 epistaxic individuals did not reveal any other disease-causing mutation. Epistaxis seems to be a relatively common phenocopy of HHT in the family under study. One couple, both affected by HHT and carriers of Q490X, had 12 pregnancies. Three of them ended in spontaneous abortion, four in early neonatal death, and only five yielded living offspring, all of which had HHT and were Q490X heterozygous. This observation corroborates previous claims that homozygosity for HHT-causing mutations is lethal.

Standardised fluorescence in situ hybridisation in cytological and histological specimens.

Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) has gained major impact in the detection of chromosomal aberrations. The application of FISH, however, is hampered due to complicated protocols. We therefore designed a FISH protocol that allows the fast and reliable application on cytological and histological specimens. Cytological and histological specimens of bone marrow, lymph nodes, liver and breast were analysed with 14 sets of centromere or locus-specific probes. A pretreatment of enzymatic digestion and microwave heating with the same incubation times for all specimens and probes used was performed. Hybridisation efficiency was proved by calculating the thresholds for monosomy, trisomy and translocations. Values in cytological specimens reached 9.0, 3.9 and 4.6%, respectively. In histological sections, values of 6.4% were seen for aneusomy and 3.1% for translocations. However, values for monosomy reached 20.5% in bone marrow and 61.8% in liver tissues due to cutting artifacts. In bone marrow with acute myeloid leukaemias, lymph nodes with follicular and mantle cell lymphomas, breast carcinomas and liver cell carcinomas, FISH confirmed aberrations already found using conventional cytogenetics. The protocol shown here is easy to perform and can be used with cytological and histological specimens. Moreover, with "hands on" time of less than 2 h, FISH can also be used for daily routine purposes.

BCR-ABL gene amplification and overexpression in a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib.

Imatinib mesylate was designed as an inhibitor targeting the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase, the molecular counterpart of the Philadelphia translocation t(9;22)(q34;q11). We report on a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) undergoing acceleration during imatinib treatment. Cytogenetic analysis revealed four different cell populations: 46,XX,t(9;22)(q34;q11),der(18)t(2;18)(p11;p11)[1]/47,idem,i(17)(q10),-der(18)t(2;18),+der(22)t(9;22)[1]/46,idem,-t(9;22),der(9)t(9;22),ider(22)t(9;22)[12]/ 47,idem,-t(9;22),der(9)t(9;22),+22,ider(22)t(9;22)x2[1]. FISH analysis confirmed the presence of these four clones. Moreover, 49% of the interphase nuclei contained either one or two clustered fusion signals, indicating a low-level amplification of the BCR-ABL fusion gene. With quantitative real-time RT-PCR, a BCR-ABL/G6PDH ratio of 0.8 was determined, which is comparable to that measured in the K562 cell line with a known BCR-ABL amplification and which is increased by more than about 60-fold compared to a CML at diagnosis with >80% Philadelphia-positive cells. We give further evidence that the genomic BCR-ABL amplification results in an increased level of BCR-ABL transcript linking two potent mechanisms of resistance against imatinib treatment.

No evidence for breast cancer susceptibility associated with variants of BRD7, a component of p53 and BRCA1 pathways.

BRD7 (bromodomain 7), a subunit of poly-bromo-associated BRG1-associated factor (PBAF)-specific Swi/Snf chromatin remodeling complexes, has been proposed as a tumour suppressor protein following its identification as an important component of both functional p53 and BRCA1 (breast cancer 1, early onset) pathways. As low BRD7 expression levels have been linked to p53-wild-type breast tumour cells, we hypothesized an implication of BRD7 germline alterations in the pathogenesis of hereditary breast cancer similar to that of TP53 in Li-Fraumeni syndrome. We performed sequence analysis of the BRD7 gene on 61 high-risk individuals with hereditary or very-early-onset breast cancer and 100 healthy controls. Four potentially disease-causing single-nucleotide alterations were detected within the cohort of breast cancer patients (one listed as a rare single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) SNP database). Two of the detected variants were also each found once within the control collective. Segregation analysis on both families of those carrying the remaining two variants revealed segregation of these BRD7 alterations independent of breast cancer. In conclusion, it seems that the BRD7 variants we detected represent rare polymorphisms and mainly rule out BRD7 as a frequent high-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility gene. However, further analyses in larger cohorts of women with hereditary breast cancer should clarify the role of BRD7 in breast cancer predisposition.

Genetic testing for familial/hereditary breast cancer-comparison of guidelines and recommendations from the UK, France, the Netherlands and Germany.

In this review, the national guidelines and recommendations for genetic testing for familial/hereditary breast cancer from the UK, France, the Netherlands and Germany were evaluated as to the inclusion criteria for genetic testing. In all four countries, access to genetic testing relies basically on the family history of breast and ovarian cancer. Similarities are obvious for most selection criteria. All four guidelines recommend embedding genetic testing within a framework of genetic counselling, and all agree to perform genetic testing first in an affected person. However, there are differences regarding the thresholds based on certain familial constellations, detailed description of selection criteria, the degree of relatedness between affected individuals and the counsellee, the age of diagnosis, the individual history of early onset breast cancer, bilateral breast cancer, the tumour morphology or the access to intensified surveillance. These differences and open questions not covered by the guidelines, e.g. on how to deal with phenocopies, unclassified variants, genetic variants in newly identified breast cancer susceptibility genes or with family constellations not fitting the criteria, are discussed. New evidence is usually slowly integrated into the guidelines. An exchange process towards the harmonization of the guidelines will ensure high quality health care across Europe.

Recurrent involvement of heterochromatic regions in multiple myeloma-a multicolor FISH study.

Chromosome aberrations are important prognostic markers in multiple myeloma (MM), but their identification may be hampered by complexity of the karyotypes. Using multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (mFISH), we found cryptic aberrations in 7 of 10 patients with a complex karyotype. Moreover, in addition to typical aberrations involving 1q, 13q, 14q and 17p and structural aberrations in chromosomes 1, 6, 9 and 19, (iso)dicentric chromosomes and whole-arm translocations were detected. These chromosome aberrations were generated by breaks in heterochromatic regions indicating an increased breakage of these regions, which may predispose to the generation of chromosome aberrations in multiple myeloma.

Novel CHD7 mutations contributing to the mutation spectrum in patients with CHARGE syndrome.

CHARGE syndrome is an autosomal dominant inherited multiple malformation disorder typically characterized by coloboma, choanal atresia, hypoplastic semicircular canal, cranial nerve defects, cardiovascular malformations and ear abnormalities. Mutations in the chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 7 (CHD7) gene are the major cause of CHARGE syndrome. Mutation analysis was performed in 18 patients with firm or tentative clinical diagnosis of CHARGE syndrome. In this study eight mutations distributed across the gene were found. Five novel mutations - one missense (c.2936T > C), one nonsense (c.8093C > A) and three frameshift mutations (c.804_805insAT, c.1757_1770del14, c.1793delA) - were identified. As far as familial data were available these mutations were found to have arisen de novo. Comparison of the clinical features of patients with the same mutation demonstrates that expression of the phenotype is highly variable. The mutation detection rate in this study was 44.4% in patients with a clinically established or suspected diagnosis of CHARGE syndrome.

Association of the variants CASP8 D302H and CASP10 V410I with breast and ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

BACKGROUND: The genes caspase-8 (CASP8) and caspase-10 (CASP10) functionally cooperate and play a key role in the initiation of apoptosis. Suppression of apoptosis is one of the major mechanisms underlying the origin and progression of cancer. Previous case-control studies have indicated that the polymorphisms CASP8 D302H and CASP10 V410I are associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer in the general population. METHODS: To evaluate whether the CASP8 D302H (CASP10 V410I) polymorphisms modify breast or ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, we analyzed 7,353 (7,227) subjects of white European origin provided by 19 (18) study groups that participate in the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA). A weighted cohort approach was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: The minor allele of CASP8 D302H was significantly associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (per-allele HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.97; P(trend) = 0.011) and ovarian cancer (per-allele HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.89; P(trend) = 0.004) for BRCA1 but not for BRCA2 mutation carriers. The CASP10 V410I polymorphism was not associated with breast or ovarian cancer risk for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. CONCLUSIONS: CASP8 D302H decreases breast and ovarian cancer risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers but not for BRCA2 mutation carriers. IMPACT: The combined application of these and other recently identified genetic risk modifiers could in the future allow better individual risk calculation and could aid in the individualized counseling and decision making with respect to preventive options in BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Breast cancer susceptibility: current knowledge and implications for genetic counselling.

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women in the Western world. Except for the high breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers as well as the risk for breast cancer in certain rare syndromes caused by mutations in TP53, STK11, PTEN, CDH1, NF1 or NBN, familial clustering of breast cancer remains largely unexplained. Despite significant efforts, BRCA3 could not be identified, but several reports have recently been published on genes involved in DNA repair and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with an increased breast cancer risk. Although candidate gene approaches demonstrated moderately increased breast cancer risks for rare mutations in genes involved in DNA repair (ATM, CHEK2, BRIP1, PALB2 and RAD50), genome-wide association studies identified several SNPs as low-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility polymorphisms within genes as well as in chromosomal loci with no known genes (FGFR2, TOX3, LSP1, MAP3K1, TGFB1, 2q35 and 8q). Some of these low-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility polymorphisms also act as modifier genes in BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers. This review not only outlines the recent key developments and potential clinical benefit for preventive management and therapy but also discusses the current limitations of genetic testing of variants associated with intermediate and low breast cancer risk.

Histopathological criteria and selection algorithms for BRCA1 genetic testing.

To ensure targeted treatment, it would be useful to know at the time of diagnosis whether a BRCA mutation is causally related to an individual breast cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate in an unselected series of breast cancer patients the value of incorporating morphological and immunohistochemical features for the selection of patients who may benefit from BRCA1 genetic testing. In a retrospective approach, histopathological results of tumors from 897 women were reevaluated regarding age at diagnosis, subtype of cancer, tumor grade, and estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR), and Her2/neu receptor status, as well as p53 and Ki67 status. In all, 142 tumors fulfilled morphological criteria indicative of a BRCA1 mutation. Of the 59 women willing to participate, 26 women concomitantly showed a positive family history. Pathogenic BRCA1 germline mutations were detected in 7 of 18 women (39%) (95% confidence interval = 0.17-0.64). All BRCA1-associated tumors were of high grade, invasive-ductal subtype, and PR and Her2/neu negative, and 91% of the tumors were negative for ER; 60% of the tumors showed a high expression of p53 and 60% a high expression of Ki67. There was a significant difference with respect to grading (P = 0.001 for G3), ER negativity (P = 0.0075), Ki67 > or = 65% (P = 0.0039), and triple negativity (i.e., ER(-), PR(-), Her2/neu(-)) (P = 0.0019) between tumors of mutation carriers and noncarriers.

Contralateral breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

PURPOSE: To estimate the risk for contralateral breast cancer in members of BRCA1- and BRCA2-positive families and to determine predictive risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter, cohort study was performed from 1996 until 2008 and comprised 2,020 women with unilateral breast cancer (index patients, n = 978; relatives, n = 1.42) from 978 families who had a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Cox regression analysis was applied to assess the association of age at first breast cancer with time from first to contralateral breast cancer, stratified by the affected BRCA gene. RESULTS: The cumulative risk for contralateral breast cancer 25 years after first breast cancer was 47.4% (95% CI, 38.8% to 56.0%) for patients from families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Members of families with BRCA1 mutations had a 1.6-fold (95% CI, 1.2-fold to 2.3-fold) higher risk of contralateral breast cancer than members of families with BRCA2 mutations. Younger age at first breast cancer was associated with a significantly higher risk of contralateral breast cancer in patients with BRCA1 mutation, and a trend was observed in patients with BRCA2 mutation. After 25 years, 62.9% (95% CI, 50.4% to 75.4%) of patients with BRCA1 mutation who were younger than 40 years of age at first breast cancer developed contralateral breast cancer, compared with only 19.6% (95% CI, 5.3% to 33.9%) of those who were older than 50 years of age at first breast cancer. CONCLUSION: Contralateral breast cancer risk depends on age at first breast cancer and on the affected BRCA gene, and this risk should be considered in treatment planning.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization reveals closely correlated results in cytological and histological specimens of hematological neoplasias compared to conventional cytogenetics.

OBJECTIVES: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has become a useful tool to identify chromosomal aberrations in non-dividing cells. Numerous studies have compared chromosomal banding analysis (CBA) and FISH on fixed cultured bone marrow cells. However, up to now, there has been no study comparing two main sources of diagnostic material, i.e. bone marrow aspirates and trephine biopsies. We therefore analyzed these materials by FISH in comparison with CBA. METHODS: CBA revealed chromosomal aberrations in 18 patients suffering from myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 13), acute myeloid leukemia (n = 3), or chronic myeloproliferative syndrome (n = 2). FISH was performed on fixed cultured bone marrow cells, aspirates and trephine biopsies from each patient. RESULTS: Percentages of aberrant cells in the different materials correlated highly with Pearson values of 0.909 for biopsy/fixed cultured cells (p < 0.001), 0.830 for biopsy/aspirate (p < 0.001) and 0.768 for aspirate/fixed cultured cells (p < 0.001). Moreover, in bone marrow biopsies peritrabecular and central intertrabecular areas yielded very similar FISH results with a high correlation (r = 0.968, p < 0.001). FISH revealed a lower proportion of aberrant cells than CBA in 90% of the specimens. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the different materials available for the FISH examination are comparable in sensitivity and show similar quantitative results. Therefore, the use of biopsy sections for the routine FISH examination of chromosomal abnormalities is a valid method.