Decision regret analysis in early URSL vs medical expulsive therapy 1 for ureteric calculi ≤ 1cm.

BACKGROUND: The study assesses the decisional regret following Shared Decision-making (SDM) in patients selecting either early ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) or medical expulsive therapy (MET) for ureteric stones ≤ 1 cm, with the aim to evaluate their decisional Conflict, satisfaction, and regret regarding their opted treatment choices. METHODS: Adults aged more than 18 years with one stone up to 1 cm in either ureter were included. After SDM, the patients were allocated into their opted group viz. URSL or MET. Patients in each group were reassessed at "treatment completion". Cambridge Ureteric Stone PROM (CUSP) questionnaire for HRQoL, Decision Regret Scale and the OPTION scale (SDM) were filled at treatment completion. FINDINGS: 111 patients opted for MET, while 396 patients opted for early URSL. Mean stone size was larger in URSL group (7.16 ± 1.63 mm vs. 5.50 ± 1.89; p < 0.001). Decisional conflict was higher in patients opting for URSL (77.3% vs. 57.7%; p < 0.001). Stone-free rate at four weeks was higher in URSL group (87.1%vs68.5%, p < 0.001). Decisional regret was higher in patients opting for MET (33.24 ± 30.89 vs. 17.26 ± 12.92; p = 0.002). Anxiety, was higher in patients opting for MET (6.94 ± 1.89 vs. 5.85 ± 1.54; p < 0.001). Urinary symptoms and interference in patients' travel plans and work-related activities were more in URSL group (6.21 ± 1.57 vs. 5.59 ± 1.46; p < 0.001 and 6.56 ± 1.59 vs. 6.05 ± 1.72; p < 0.001 respectively). INTERPRETATION: After SDM, decisional regret is higher in patients opting for MET mainly due protracted treatment duration with increased pain and anxiety during the treatment course and the need for additional procedure for attaining stone clearance and the. Despite higher decisional conflict, a larger proportion of patients opt for early URSL with the aim of avoiding anxiety and achieving early stone clearance.

Super-mini PCNL (SMP) with suction versus standard PCNL for the management of renal calculi of 1.5 cm-3 cm: a randomized controlled study from a university teaching hospital.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of super-mini PCNL (SMP, 14 Fr) when compared to standard PCNL (sPCNL, 24-30 Fr) in the management of renal calculi of size ranging from 1.5 to 3 cm. METHODS: From February 2021 to January 2022, a total of 100 patients were randomized to either SMP group or sPCNL group in a 1:1 ratio (50 in each group) using computer-generated simple randomization. Demographic data, stone characteristics, operative times, perioperative complications, blood transfusions, postoperative drop in haemoglobin, postoperative pain, duration of hospital stay and stone-free rates were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Mean stone volume (2.41 cm2 vs 2.61 cm2) and stone-free rates (98% vs 94%, p = 0.14) were similar in both the SMP and sPCNL groups, respectively. The SMP group had significantly longer mean operative times (51.62 ± 10.17 min vs 35.6 ± 6.8 min, p = 0.03). Intraoperative calyceal injury (1/50 vs 7/50, p = 0.42) and mean postoperative drop in haemoglobin (0.8 ± 0.7 g/dl vs 1.2 ± 0.81, p = 0.21) were lower in the SMP group, but not statistically significant. SMP group showed significantly lower mean postoperative pain VAS scores (5.4 ± 0.7 vs 5.9 ± 0.9, p = 0.03) and mean duration of hospital stay (28.38 ± 3.6 h vs 39.84 ± 3.7 h, p = 0.0001). Complications up to Clavien grade 2 were comparable, with grade ≥ 3 complications higher in the standard group, but not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Super-mini PCNL is equally effective as standard PCNL in treating renal calculi up to 3 cm, with significantly reduced postoperative pain and duration of hospital stay and lower risk of Clavien grade ≥ 3 complications, although with higher operative times.

Percutaneous treatment of stone containing calyceal diverticula: Strategies and outcomes from a University teaching hospital in a developing country.

INTRODUCTION: There is a dearth of research available on the outcomes, complications, and recurrence rates of the modalities employed in treatment of diverticula after stone clearance by PCNL. We present our experience of various approaches employed in our institute for treatment of caliceal diverticulum after stone clearance by PCNL. We aimed to review the outcomes, complications, and recurrence rates of these procedures which can provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of these techniques in the treatment of stone containing caliceal diverticulum. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients diagnosed with caliceal diverticular stone was conducted. The primary outcome was the stone-free rate (SFR) at the time of hospital discharge, determined by a combined nephroscopic/fluoroscopic assessment, and the obliteration of the diverticular sac. Secondary outcomes included the evaluation of operative time, duration of hospital stay and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were evaluated. The mean diverticulum size was 23.2 mm, most common location was the superior calyx (30 (56.7%)). Group 1 (diverticular neck treatment + DJ stent) included 27 patients, group 2 (diverticular wall fulguration + PCN) included 18 patients and group 3 (PCN alone) included 8 patients. Mean operating time was highest in group 1 (80 min). Stone clearance was 100% in group 1, 91% in group 2 and 88% in group 3. Obliteration of caliceal diverticulum was highest in group 1 (90%). Mean duration of hospital stay was lowest in group 1 (3.2 days). Overall complications were lowest in group 2 (3/18). CONCLUSION: PCNL followed by combination of diverticular wall fulguration and PCN or treatment of diverticular neck and DJ stenting is safe and effective in causing diverticular obliteration. Placement of nephrostomy tube alone was not found to be effective in causing diverticular obliteration in our study.