Validation of the Mexican version of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 in patients with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of the quality of life (QoL) of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) is an essential measure to measure the impact of the disease and treatments on the lives of patients. However, in Latin America there is no validated and reliable instrument to assess this construct. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to validate the EORTC QLQ-CR29 instrument in the Mexican population with CRC. METHODS: This study aims to validate the EORTC QLQ-CR29 instrument in the Mexican population with CRC. The study used an instrumental design and a nonprobabilistic sample due to availability, made up of 251 patients with CRC, with an average age of 54.7 ± 12.28 years. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed, as well as concurrent validity tests. RESULTS: The exploratory factorial analysis yielded 4 factors that explained 51.64% of the variance, with a Cronbach reliability coefficient of .766 and an Omega index of .725. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the proposed theoretical model fits the data almost perfectly, with an error close to 0, which shows that it is a balanced and parsimonious instrument to measure the QoL of the patients with CRC. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: The EORTC QLQ-CR29 instrument proved to be a valid and reliable instrument for use in clinical care and research directed at patients with CRC in Mexico. Its use is recommended by multidisciplinary health teams in oncology in Mexico, since it allows knowing the patient's perspective on the impact of CRC on their life, guiding therapeutic decision-making and being a primary outcome measure.

Factors associated with the presence of fear of contagion and burnout syndrome in nursing personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, nursing personnel presented a higher prevalence of fear of contagion, anxiety symptoms, depression, and burnout syndrome. However, the variables associated with these conditions in Mexico are unknown. Objective: To determine the clinical, sociodemographic, and psychological variables associated with fear of contracting COVID-19 and burnout syndrome in nursing personnel. Methods: The study was a cross-sectional correlational study. It included 423 Mexican nursing professionals, working in public and private institutions, of different specialties aged 18-61 years (M = 36 years), the sampling was non-probabilistic by convenience. The instruments used were: COVID-19 fear scale, Maslach Burnout Inventory, Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 and Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to analyse the results. Results: The factors associated with fear of contagion were anxiety symptoms (Odds Ratio [OR]: 7.806, p < 0.05), caring for patients with COVID-19 (OR: 5.460, p < 0.05, 0.001) and mild emotional exhaustion (OR: 5.181, p < 0.05). The syndrome dimensions were: depressive symptoms (OR: 12.062; 7.667, p < 0.05), fear of contagion (OR: 4.978; 4.913; 4.921; 4.921, p < 0.01), marital status (OR: 3.404; 3.219, p < 0.05) and young age (OR: 1.064; 1.084, p < 0.05). Conclusions: The factors associated with fear of contagion and burnout syndrome found were having clinical psychological symptoms, as well as being young, being single, being married and being in the health system caring for patients with COVID-19.

[Effect of psychological interventions on psychosocial variables in patients with colorectal cancer: a narrative review of the literature]. / Efecto de intervenciones psicológicas sobre variables psicosociales en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal: una revisión narrativa de la literatura.

Objective: To describe the effects of psychological interventions on anxiety, depression, emotional distress and/or quality of life (QoL) of patients with colorectal cancer. Methods: Narrative literature review in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane Library, 2011-2021. Results: A total of 553 articles were obtained, of which twelve were included. Most were brief, individual, face-to-face interventions. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy was the most reported intervention, showing positive effects on QoL, specifically in stoma patients; Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and solution-focused therapy also identified improvements in QoL. Reminiscence therapy and a self-efficacy intervention reported significant improvements in anxiety and depression. Relaxation and writing training were not proven effective; psychoeducation showed inconsistent effects. Conclusion: There is a paucity of studies conducted during the last years, which do not evidence a consensus of the therapeutic model that produces consistent improvements in psychological well-being.

Symptoms of anxiety and depression and self-care behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic in the general population / Síntomas de ansiedad, depresión y conductas de autocuidado durante la pandemia de COVID-19 en la población general

Abstract Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic can have important psychosocial consequences in the population. Objective: To determine the levels anxiety and depression symptoms and self-care behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic in the general population. Method: Online survey distributed over three weeks using a non-probability sampling. The PHQ-9 Patient Health Questionnaire, the GAD-7 Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale and a self-care behaviors visual analogue scale were used. Between-group (anxiety and depression) descriptive and comparison analyses were carried out. Results: Out of 1508 included participants, 20.8 % had symptoms of severe anxiety, while 27.5 % showed symptoms of severe depression. Being a woman, being single, having no children, having medical comorbidities and a history of mental health care were associated with the presence of higher levels of anxiety and depression symptoms; 66 to 80 % of the population complied with self-care recommendations. A need for receiving mental health care was identified in our study population. Conclusion: A larger number of individuals with moderate to severe anxiety and depression symptoms were observed than in other pandemics. COVID-19 pandemic psychological effects are considered an emerging public mental health problem, and implementation of programs for their care is therefore recommended.

Resumen Introducción: La pandemia por COVID-19 puede tener consecuencias psicosociales importantes en la población. Objetivo: Determinar los niveles de síntomas de ansiedad, depresión y conductas de autocuidado durante la pandemia de COVID-19 en población general. Método: Encuesta en línea distribuida durante tres semanas mediante muestreo no probabilístico. Se empleó el Cuestionario sobre la Salud del Paciente PHQ-9, la Escala del Trastorno de Ansiedad Generalizada GAD-7 y la Escala análoga visual de conductas de autocuidado. Se realizaron análisis descriptivos y de comparación entre los grupos con ansiedad y depresión. Resultados: Se incluyeron 1508 participantes, 20.8 % presentó síntomas de ansiedad grave y 27.5 %, síntomas de depresión grave. Ser mujer, soltero(a) no tener hijos, presentar comorbilidad médica y antecedentes de atención a la salud mental estuvieron relacionados con la presencia de mayores niveles de síntomas de ansiedad y depresión; 66 a 80 % de la población cumplía con las recomendaciones de autocuidado. Se identificó la necesidad de recibir atención de salud mental. Conclusión: Se observó mayor número de individuos con síntomas de ansiedad y depresión moderadas a graves que en otras pandemias. Los efectos psicológicos de la pandemia de COVID-19 se consideran un problema de salud mental pública emergente, por lo que se recomienda la implementación de programas para su atención.

Validación de FACIT-TS-PS en una muestra de pacientes mexicanos con cáncer / Validation of an instrument to assess health care quality (FACIT-TS-PS) in cancer patients

Resumen Introducción: La satisfacción del paciente oncológico con el equipo de salud es de relevancia para evaluar la calidad de la atención del sistema de salud. En México no se dispone de una herramienta válida y confiable para evaluar este constructo. Objetivo: Validar el Instrumento de Evaluación de Funcionalidad en el Tratamiento para Enfermedades Crónicas-Satisfacción con el Tratamiento-Satisfacción del Paciente (FACIT-TS-PS) versión 4, en pacientes mexicanos con cáncer. Método: Diseño transversal, muestreo no probabilístico, por disponibilidad. La muestra consistió en 200 pacientes diagnosticados con cáncer, con edad promedio de 45.86 ± 15.01 años. Se realizó un análisis factorial exploratorio y confirmatorio. Resultados: Se identificaron cuatro factores con un alfa de Cronbach de 0.945 y una varianza explicada de 68.15 %. El análisis factorial confirmatorio indicó que el modelo teórico propuesto se ajusta a los datos con error próximo a cero y que, además, es equilibrado y mide cuidadosamente la satisfacción global del paciente con el tratamiento. Conclusión: FACIT-TS-PS mostró ser un instrumento válido y confiable para su uso en la atención clínica e investigación dirigida a pacientes mexicanos con cáncer. Se recomienda su utilización en la evaluación de equipos de salud multidisciplinarios en oncología en México.

Abstract Introduction: Cancer patient satisfaction with the healthcare team is of great relevance for assessing the quality of the care provided by the health system. In Mexico, no valid and reliable tool is available to assess this construct. Objective: To validate the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Treatment Satisfaction-Patient Satisfaction (FACIT-TS-PS) instrument, version 4, in cancer patients. Method: Cross-sectional design, non-probability convenience sampling. The sample consisted of 200 cancer-diagnosed patients, with mean age of 45.86 ± 15.01 years. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted. Results: The exploratory factor analysis identified four factors, with a Cronbach alpha of 0.945, and an explained variance of 68.15 %. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the proposed theoretical model adjusts to the data with an error close to zero and, in addition, it is balanced and carefully measures overall patient satisfaction with the treatment. Conclusion: FACIT-TS-PS was shown to be a valid and reliable instrument for use in clinical care and research in Mexican cancer patients. Its use is recommended in the evaluation of oncology multidisciplinary healthcare teams in Mexico.

Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala Hospitalaria de Ansiedad y Depresión (HADS) en una población de pacientes oncológicos mexicanos / Psychometric properties of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in a Mexican population of cancer patients

ANTECEDENTES: La sintomatología ansiosa y depresiva es parte de los principales problemas de salud mental en pacientes oncológicos, lo cual afecta la calidad de vida y la adhesión al tratamiento, además de que se asocia con mayor número de síntomas y estancia hospitalaria. Mediante instrumentos de tamizaje válidos y confiables, como la Escala hospitalaria de ansiedad y depresión (HADS), ha sido posible detectar posibles casos en pacientes hospitalarios. Sin embargo, hasta ahora no se habían caracterizado las propiedades psicométricas en pacientes oncológicos en población mexicana.OBJETIVO: Determinar las propiedades psicométricas de la HADS en una muestra de pacientes oncológicos.MÉTODO: Participaron 400 pacientes del Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, de los cuales 226 eran mujeres (56.5%) y 174 eran hombres (43.6%); la edad promedio fue de 47.4 ± 14.1 años. Los participantes contestaron, además de la HADS, los siguientes inventarios: depresión de Beck, ansiedad de Beck, termómetro de distrés.RESULTADOS: Un análisis factorial ajustado a dos factores presentó un instrumento con 12 reactivos, similar a la versión original. La consistencia interna de la escala global mostró un índice satisfactorio (a=0.86). Los alfas de Cronbach de cada subescala tuvieron un valor de .79 y .80 que explicaron el 48.04% de la varianza. La validez, por medio de correlación con las medidas concurrentes, mostró resultados significativos (r de Pearson de .51 a .71, p<0.05).DISCUSIÓN Y CONCLUSIÓN: La HADS en pacientes con cáncer en población mexicana presentó adecuadas características psicométricas. La relevancia de los resultados obtenidos radica en que se trata de una población que puede llegar a requerir atención oportuna en salud mental en etapas tempranas de su tratamiento. La detección de sintomatología ansiosa y depresiva por medio de la HADS deriva en beneficios para la población oncológica y en estrategias funcionales de atención adecuada y costo-efectivas.

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of anxiety and depression are among the major mental health problems in cancer patients. These symptoms affect the quality of life and treatment adherence, and are associated with other symptoms and longer hospital stays. Valid and reliable screening instruments such as the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), have made possible the detection of possible cases of depression and anxiety in medically ill patients. However, the psychometric properties of this instrument have not been documented in different types of cancer diagnoses in the Mexican population.OBJECTIVE: To determine the psychometric properties of the HADS in a sample of patients with cancer from the Mexican population.METHOD: Four hundred patients from the National Cancer Institute participated, of which 226 were women (56.5%) and 174 men (43.6%), with a mean age of 47.4 ±14.1 years. Participants completed concurrently the HADS as well as the following inventories: 1. Beck Depression, 2. Beck Anxiety and 3. Distress Thermometer.RESULTS: A factor analysis adjusted to two factors explained 48.04% of the variance, with 12 items loading on these two factors in a way similar to the original version. The internal consistency of the overall scale was satisfactory (α=0.86). Cronbach's alphas for each subscale were .79 and .80. The concurrent validity assessed by way of correlations with concurrent measures showed significant associations (Pearson r=51-71, p<0.05).DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The HADS has adequate construct validity, internal consistency and concurrent validity for its use in cancer patients from the Mexican population. The relevance of these results is a cost effective tool to provide timely mental health care early in oncological treatment for those in need. Detecting anxiety and depression symptoms through the HADS may benefit cancer patients by ensuring appropriate care that may increase their quality of life and treatment adherence, and reduce their hospital stays.