SARS-CoV-2 outbreak among staff and evacuees at Operation Allies Welcome Safe Havens.

We report on five SARS-CoV-2 congregate setting outbreaks at U.S. Operation Allies Welcome Safe Havens/military facilities. Outbreak data were collected, and attack rates were calculated for various populations. Even in vaccinated populations, there was rapid spread, illustrating the importance of institutional prevention and mitigation policies in congregate settings.

Public Health Actions to Control Measles Among Afghan Evacuees During Operation Allies Welcome - United States, September-November 2021.

On August 29, 2021, the United States government oversaw the emergent establishment of Operation Allies Welcome (OAW), led by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and implemented by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and U.S. Department of State (DoS), to safely resettle U.S. citizens and Afghan nationals from Afghanistan to the United States. Evacuees were temporarily housed at several overseas locations in Europe and Asia* before being transported via military and charter flights through two U.S. international airports, and onward to eight U.S. military bases,† with hotel A used for isolation and quarantine of persons with or exposed to certain infectious diseases.§ On August 30, CDC issued an Epi-X notice encouraging public health officials to maintain vigilance for measles among Afghan evacuees because of an ongoing measles outbreak in Afghanistan (25,988 clinical cases reported nationwide during January-November 2021) (1) and low routine measles vaccination coverage (66% and 43% for the first and second doses, respectively, in 2020) (2).

Patisiran, an RNAi Therapeutic, for Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND: Patisiran, an investigational RNA interference therapeutic agent, specifically inhibits hepatic synthesis of transthyretin. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive intravenous patisiran (0.3 mg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo once every 3 weeks. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the modified Neuropathy Impairment Score+7 (mNIS+7; range, 0 to 304, with higher scores indicating more impairment) at 18 months. Other assessments included the Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) questionnaire (range, -4 to 136, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life), 10-m walk test (with gait speed measured in meters per second), and modified body-mass index (modified BMI, defined as [weight in kilograms divided by square of height in meters]×albumin level in grams per liter; lower values indicated worse nutritional status). RESULTS: A total of 225 patients underwent randomization (148 to the patisiran group and 77 to the placebo group). The mean (±SD) mNIS+7 at baseline was 80.9±41.5 in the patisiran group and 74.6±37.0 in the placebo group; the least-squares mean (±SE) change from baseline was -6.0±1.7 versus 28.0±2.6 (difference, -34.0 points; P<0.001) at 18 months. The mean (±SD) baseline Norfolk QOL-DN score was 59.6±28.2 in the patisiran group and 55.5±24.3 in the placebo group; the least-squares mean (±SE) change from baseline was -6.7±1.8 versus 14.4±2.7 (difference, -21.1 points; P<0.001) at 18 months. Patisiran also showed an effect on gait speed and modified BMI. At 18 months, the least-squares mean change from baseline in gait speed was 0.08±0.02 m per second with patisiran versus -0.24±0.04 m per second with placebo (difference, 0.31 m per second; P<0.001), and the least-squares mean change from baseline in the modified BMI was -3.7±9.6 versus -119.4±14.5 (difference, 115.7; P<0.001). Approximately 20% of the patients who received patisiran and 10% of those who received placebo had mild or moderate infusion-related reactions; the overall incidence and types of adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, patisiran improved multiple clinical manifestations of hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis. (Funded by Alnylam Pharmaceuticals; APOLLO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01960348 .).

Meta-analysis of drug-induced adverse events associated with intensive-dose statin therapy.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials evaluating intensive dose statin therapy have found enhanced protection against cardiovascular (CV) events compared with moderate-dose statin therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or stable coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the potential for an increase in the risk of drug-induced adverse events with such therapy has not been quantified. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was performed to compare the incremental risks associated with intensive- and moderate-dose statin therapy. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 1995 to 2006 using the following terms: acute, coronary syndrome, stable coronary artery disease, atorvastatin, simvastatin, rosuvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and fluvastatin. Prospective, randomized controlled trials evaluating intensive- and moderate-dose statin therapy for the reduction of CV events were included in the review. The safety end points examined were elevations in creatine kinase (CK) >or= 10 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), elevations in alanine or aspartate aminotransferase >or=3 times the ULN, rhabdomyolysis, drug-induced adverse events requiring discontinuation of therapy, and any drug-induced events. The efficacy end points examined were all-cause mortality, CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke. Each analysis compared the effect of intensive- or moderate-dose statin therapy on statin-induced adverse events and clinical efficacy outcomes. Simple absolute risk, the number needed to treat, and the number needed to harm were also calculated to quantify the incremental benefit or harm associated with intensive-dose statin therapy. RESULTS: Four trials were included in the analysis.Together, they included 27,548 patients with ACS or stable CAD followed for a mean of 3.4 years, representing 108,049 patient-years of clinical-trial experience. Intensive-dose therapy with atorvastatin or simvastatin 80 mg was associated with a significant increase in the risk for any adverse event (odds ratio [OR] = 1.44; 95% CI, 1.33-1.55; P < 0.001) and adverse events requiring discontinuation of therapy (OR = 1.28; 95% CI, 1.18-1.39; P < 0.001). Intensive-dose therapy also was associated with an increased risk for abnormalities on liver function testing (OR = 4.48; 95% Cl, 3.27-6.16; P < 0.001) and elevations in CK (OR = 9.97; 95% CI, 1.28-77.92; P = 0.028). The benefits of intensive-dose statin therapy included reductions in CV death (OR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.99; P = 0.031), MI (OR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76-0.93; P < 0.001), and stroke (OR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72-0.94; P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Although intensive-dose statin therapy was associated with a reduced risk for important CV events, it was also associated with an increased risk for statin-induced adverse events. Therefore, moderate-dose statin therapy may be the most appropriate choice for achieving CV risk reduction in the majority of individuals, whereas intensive-dose statin therapy may be reserved for those at highest risk.

Assessment of eptifibatide dosing in renal impairment before and after in-service education provided by pharmacists.

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulant and antithrombotic agents are frequently cited as sources of medication errors. Several factors increase the risk of receiving excess dosing of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), including older age, female gender, elevated serum creatinine, a history of diabetes mellitus, and a history of heart failure. In June 2003, the manufacturer of eptifibatide released a recommendation adjusting infusion rate downward to 1 mcg per kg per minute for eptifibatide in patients with renal impairment, defined as an estimated creatinine clearance (CrCl) < 50 ml per minute. Eptifibatide is known to accumulate in patients with renal impairment, thereby increasing hemorrhagic risk. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of education on physician adherence to the renal dosing recommendation for eptifibatide at 2 academic medical centers. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients with renal impairment dosed appropriately with eptifibatide before and after in-service education provided by a clinical pharmacist. Secondary outcome measures included the difference in the improvement in dosing adherence between the 2 sites and the influence of patient variables on the incidence of bleeding events. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted in patients with renal impairment who received eptifibatide for the medical management of unstable angina (UA) or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or for the interventional management of chronic stable angina, UA, NSTEMI, or ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI, not a Food and Drug Administration-approved use). Patient data were assessed at 2 tertiary care teaching institutions between June 2003 and December 2005. The preeducation phase for the sites ran from June 2003 through April 2005 for Site A and from June 2003 through May 2005 for Site B. The posteducation phase ran from May 2005 through December 2005 for Site A and from June 2005 through December 2005 for Site B. At site A, a 1-hour educational seminar on ACS management strategies was employed, in which 5 minutes focused on adherence of prescribers to the guideline for renal dosing recommendations for eptifibatide. This tutorial was accomplished through (1) an in-service provided by 1 clinical pharmacist to the cardiology department, and (2) handouts containing the renal dosing recommendations for eptifibatide along with dosing for other medications used to manage ACS. The intervention at Site B involved an eptifibatide-focused seminar presented to cardiologists by a clinical pharmacist, 10 minutes of which was devoted to renal dosing recommendations that included (1) a summary of literature supporting the infusion rate reduction in patients with renal impairment and (2) the specific updated dosing recommendation for eptifibatide. The data collected in retrospective chart review included patient demographics, baseline laboratory values, and risk factors for bleeding. An appropriate eptifibatide dose was defined as a physician order for a continuous infusion of 1 mcg per kg per minute in patients with an estimated CrCl < 50 ml per minute. RESULTS: A total of 148 patients with renal impairment who received eptifibatide were evaluated (106 in the preeducation phase and 42 in the posteducation phase). A significant increase in the adherence rate for eptifibatide dosing in patients with renal impairment was observed from 36.8% in the preeducation phase to 69.0% in the posteducation phase (P < 0.001) for the 2 sites combined. The incidence of major and minor bleeding was 16.7% in the preeducation phase and 14.3% in the posteducation phase (P = 0.742). When bleeding incidence was stratified by the appropriateness of infusion, the incidence of major and minor bleeding was also similar for appropriate dosing (1 mcg per kg per minute, 16.4%) versus inappropriate dosing (2 mcg per kg per minute, 15.7%; P = 0.916). CONCLUSION: This educational intervention provided by a clinical pharmacist was associated with improved prescriber adherence to dosing recommendations for eptifibatide in patients with renal impairment. Improved adherence to the dosing guideline and administration of an appropriate infusion rate were not associated with reduction in either minor or major bleeding events.

Statin-related adverse events: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The absolute frequencies of adverse events (AEs) between statins and placebo are very low in clinical trials, making clinical interpretation and application difficult. OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis was intended to synthesize the collective AE data observed in prospective randomized clinical trials to facilitate clinical interpretation. METHODS: Using the search terms atorvastatin, simvastatin,pravastatin, rosuvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, prospective trial, and randomized trial, the MEDLINE/EMBASE and the Cochrane Collaboration databases were reviewed for prospective randomized primary and secondary prevention trials of statin monotherapy. Nonrandomized uncontrolled studies and those missing AE data were excluded. The Mantel-Haenszel test for fixed and random effects was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and log ORs. RESULTS: Eighteen trials including 71,108 persons, and 301,374 person-years of follow-up were represented in this analysis. There were 36,062 persons receiving a statin and 35,046 receiving a placebo. Statin therapy increased the risk of any AE by 39% (OR = 1.4; 95% CI, 1.09-1.80; P = 0.008; NNH [number needed to harm] = 197) compared with placebo. Statins were associated with a 26% reduction in the risk of a clinical cardiovascular event (OR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.69-0.80; P < 0.001; number needed to treat = 27). Treating 1000 patients with a statin would prevent 37 cardiovascular events, and 5 AEs would be observed. Serious events (creatine phosphokinase >10 times the upper limit of normal or rhabdomyolysis) are infrequent (NNH = 3400) and rhabdomyolysis, although serious, is rare (NNH = 7428). Atorvastatin was associated with the greatest risk of AEs and fluvastatin with the least risk. Simvastatin, pravastatin, and lovastatin had similar odds of AEs. Nonurgent AEs such as myalgia and liver function elevations were responsible for approximately two thirds of AEs reported in trials. CONCLUSIONS: Statin therapy was associated with greater odds of AEs compared with placebo but with substantial clinical benefit. Similar rates of serious AEs were observed between statin and placebo.

Platelet inhibitors in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention: glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, clopidogrel, or both?

The role of glycoprotein (Gp) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists remains controversial and these agents are infrequently utilized during non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) despite American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines. Despite recommendations, the NRMI-4 (National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 4) and CRUSADE (Can rapid risk stratification of unstable angina patients suppress adverse outcomes with early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines?) registries observed that only 25%-32% of eligible patients received early Gp IIb/IIIa therapy, despite a 6.3% absolute mortality reduction in NRMI-4 and a 2% absolute mortality reduction in CRUSADE. A pooled analysis of Gp IIb/IIIa data from these registries suggest a major reduction in mortality (Odds Ratio = 0.43, 95% Confidence Index 0.25-0.74, p = 0.002) with early Gp IIb/IIIa therapy, yet clinicians fail to utilize this option in NSTE-ACS. The evidence-based approach to NSTE-ACS involves aspirin, clopidogrel, low-molecular weight heparins, or unfractionated heparin in concert with Gp IIb/Ila receptor antagonists, however, newer percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-based trials challenge current recommendations. Novel strategies emerging in NSTE-ACS include omitting Gp IIb/Ila inhibitors altogether or using Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors with higher doses of clopidogrel in selected patients. The ISAR-REACT (Intracoronary stenting and antithrombotic regimen-Rapid early action for coronary treatment) and ISAR-SWEET (ISAR-Is abciximab a superior way to eliminate elevated thrombotic risk in diabetics) trials question the value of abciximab when 600 mg of clopidogrel concurrently administered during PCI. The CLEAR-PLATELETS (Clopidogrel loading with eptifibatide to arrest the reactivity of platelets) and PEACE (Platelet activity extinction in non-Q-wave MI with ASA, clopidogrel, and eptifibatide) trials suggest more durable platelet inhibition when Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors are used with higher doses clopidogrel. The ISAR-COOL (ISAR: Cooling off strategy) trial found no difference in ischemic outcomes when Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors were excluded and ARMYDA-2 (Antiplatelet therapy for reduction of myocardial damage during angioplasty) suggested higher doses of clopidogrel are more appropriate during PCI when Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors are not utilized. This constellation of new trials forces reconsideration of current recommendations in regards to patient risk stratification, choice of antithrombotic therapy, doses, and timing. These new data will impact emerging guidelines and updates are currently in progress.

Rapid progression of familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy: a multinational natural history study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between severity of neuropathy and disease stage, and estimate the rate of neuropathy progression in a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of a multinational population of patients with familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP). METHODS: We characterize neuropathy severity and rate of progression in available patients with FAP in France, the United States, Portugal, and Italy. Neuropathy Impairment Scores (NIS), time from symptom onset to NIS measurement, polyneuropathy disability (PND) scores, FAP disease stage, and manual grip strength data were collected. We estimated neuropathy progression using Loess Fit and Gompertz Fit models. RESULTS: For the 283 patients studied (mean age, 56.4 years), intercountry genotypic variation in the transthyretin (TTR) mutation was observed, with the majority of patients in Portugal (92%) having early-onset Val30Met-FAP. There was also marked intercountry variation in PND score, FAP stage, and TTR stabilizer use. NIS was associated with PND score (NIS 10 and 99 for scores I and IV, respectively; p < 0.0001) and FAP stage (NIS 14 and 99 for stages 1 and 3, respectively; p < 0.0001). In addition, there was an association between NIS and TTR genotype. The estimated rate of NIS progression for a population with a median NIS of 32 was 14.3 points/year; the corresponding estimated rate for the modified NIS+7 is 17.8 points/year. CONCLUSIONS: In a multinational population of patients with FAP, rapid neuropathic progression is observed and the severity of neuropathy is associated with functional scales of locomotion.

Antifactor Xa levels in four patients with burn injuries who received enoxaparin to prevent venous thromboembolism.

Four patients with severe burn injuries received enoxaparin 40 mg twice/day subcutaneously for the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Peak antifactor Xa levels were measured 4 hours after administration of a dose, and trough antifactor Xa levels were measured 30 minutes before the next scheduled dose. Ultrasonography was performed once/week to assess the presence of VTE. Any occurrence of major bleeding was documented in the patients' charts. All patients had trough antifactor Xa levels below 0.1 U/ml. Enoxaparin dosages were subsequently adjusted to achieve trough antifactor Xa levels of 0.1-0.2 U/ml. This required dosages higher than those typically recommended for VTE prophylaxis (40 mg every 24 hrs or 30 mg every 12 hrs). One patient needed more than 60 mg every 12 hours. No patient had a venous thromboembolic event or major bleeding. The low antifactor Xa levels that were observed suggest that a reduced dose-response relationship may exist between subcutaneously administered enoxaparin and antifactor Xa activity in patients with severe burn injuries. Prospective studies should be performed to further investigate this relationship.

Sirolimus-eluting coronary stent.

PURPOSE: The mechanism of action and pharmacokinetics of sirolimus when used as part of a drug-eluting stent (DES) and the efficacy and cost of using DESs versus bare-metal stents are discussed. SUMMARY: The use of balloon angioplasty with or without coronary artery stenting is limited by the phenomenon of in-stent restenosis (ISR). Until very recently, most efforts to overcome ISR had been ineffective. The search to prevent or reduce the frequency of ISR has led to the recent development of novel coronary artery stents designed to deliver a drug that acts locally. The first DES was approved by FDA in April 2003. This stent releases sirolimus, an agent that inhibits vascular smooth-muscle-cell proliferation. To date, four major clinical trials have demonstrated the sirolimus-eluting stent to be safe and effective in preventing restenosis in de novo coronary artery lesions. CONCLUSION: The sirolimus-eluting coronary stent is associated with less ISR than non-drug-containing stents, but further investigation is needed to determine its exact place in the treatment of coronary artery occlusion.

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors for lowering elevated levels of C-reactive protein.

PURPOSE: Clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of therapy with hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors for reducing elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and associated coronary events are reviewed. SUMMARY: Atherosclerotic plaque growth may be attenuated with therapy aimed at minimizing inflammation. Because increased levels of CRP have been associated with arterial-wall inflammation, statins can prevent ischemia by both inhibiting deposition of lipids and decreasing inflammation. Evaluation of recent clinical trials, including WOSCOPS, PRINCE, AFCAPS/ TexCAPS, MIRACL, CURVES, REVERSAL, and JUPITER, demonstrated the correlation of statin therapy with decreased levels of CRP. WOSCOPS found that patients with CRP values of > 4.59 mg/L at baseline were at the highest risk of coronary events. The PRINCE trial evaluated the antiinflammatory effects of pravastatin and found a mean 16.9% reduction in CRP levels after 24 weeks of therapy. AFCAPS/TexCAPS researchers found that lovastatin provded a 14.8% reduction in the median levels of CRP (p < 0.001). The MIRACL study showed that atorvastatin reduced CRP levels by 83% (p < 0.001). Researchers in the CURVES study found a significant reduction in CRP levels with pravastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin compared with baseline (p < 0.025). Results of the REVERSAL study linked atorvastatin with a 36.4% decrease in CRP levels, while pravastatin was associated with a 5.2% decrease (p < 0.0001). JUPITER is ongoing and will determine whether long-term use of rosuvastatin can reduce the rate of coronary events. CONCLUSION: The lowering of elevated CRP levels by statins may reduce the risk of coronary events independently of the effect of statins on lipid levels.

Fluconazole- and levofloxacin-induced torsades de pointes in an intensive care unit patient.

Patients initiated on fluconazole and levofloxacin should be closely monitored for QTc-interval prolongation. While there have been published reports of fluconazole and levofloxacin causing QTc-interval prolongation when given alone, coadministration of these two agents may further increase this risk. This case describes an episode of TdP in which levofloxacin and fluconazole were likely significant factors. QT prolongation was present at baseline prior to drug initiation (QTc = 454-505 ms) and levofloxacin resulted in further prolongation (QTc = 480-536 ms). After two days of therapy with fluconazole, overlapping with levofloxacin, the patient had an episode of PMVT with syncope, and progressive QT prolongation was evident (QTc = 554 ms). Only mild hypokalemia (potassium concentration = 3.6 meq/L) was present, and not additional etiologies for TdP were identified. Levofloxacin and fluconazole were discontinued and no further PMVT was observed, but the QT interval did not return to normal until after an additional 11 days (QTc = 436 ms). As in many cases of TdP, multiple factors were involved. Renal failure, drug dosing, mild hypokalemia, and a baseline abnormal QT interval potentiated the role of levofloxacin and fluconazole in the development of TdP. We recommend that neither drug be used alone or in combination when there is baseline QT prolongation. We also recommend that concomitant use of these agents be avoided when possible. If combination therapy is required, caution is warranted, particularly in patients with risk factors for QT prolongation. Specific attention should be given to drug dosing, interactions, electrolytes, and ECG monitoring.

A comparative study of simple auditory reaction time in blind (congenitally) and sighted subjects.

BACKGROUND: Reaction time is the time interval between the application of a stimulus and the appearance of appropriate voluntary response by a subject. It involves stimulus processing, decision making, and response programming. Reaction time study has been popular due to their implication in sports physiology. Reaction time has been widely studied as its practical implications may be of great consequence e.g., a slower than normal reaction time while driving can have grave results. OBJECTIVE: To study simple auditory reaction time in congenitally blind subjects and in age sex matched sighted subjects. To compare the simple auditory reaction time between congenitally blind subjects and healthy control subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: STUDY HAD BEEN CARRIED OUT IN TWO GROUPS: The 1(st) of 50 congenitally blind subjects and 2(nd) group comprises of 50 healthy controls. It was carried out on Multiple Choice Reaction Time Apparatus, Inco Ambala Ltd. (Accuracy±0.001 s) in a sitting position at Government Medical College and Hospital, Bhavnagar and at a Blind School, PNR campus, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India. OBSERVATIONS/RESULTS: Simple auditory reaction time response with four different type of sound (horn, bell, ring, and whistle) was recorded in both groups. According to our study, there is no significant different in reaction time between congenital blind and normal healthy persons. CONCLUSION: Blind individuals commonly utilize tactual and auditory cues for information and orientation and they reliance on touch and audition, together with more practice in using these modalities to guide behavior, is often reflected in better performance of blind relative to sighted participants in tactile or auditory discrimination tasks, but there is not any difference in reaction time between congenitally blind and sighted people.

Outpatient consolidation treatment with clofarabine in a phase 2 study of older adult patients with previously untreated acute myelogenous leukemia.

This report describes outpatient (OP) administration of clofarabine in older patients (≥60 years) with untreated acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Overall, 112 patients underwent clofarabine induction. Clofarabine was administered to 35 OPs for a total of 72 OP cycles, with 81% of these cycles representing consolidation treatment. Median length of hospital stay was 0-6 days and 5-25 days across OP and inpatient (IP) cycles, respectively. The most common adverse events (AEs) were nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, edema, hypokalemia and pneumonia. The overall frequency of treatment-emergent grade ≥3 AEs and serious AEs was generally not different with IP or OP administration of clofarabine. No deaths were reported within 30 days following OP or IP consolidation cycles. In the appropriately selected older patient, OP administration of clofarabine consolidation appears feasible, is as well tolerated as IP administration and has potential to contribute to the quality of life in elderly patients with AML.

Randomized Trial of a Pharmacist-Delivered Intervention for Improving Lipid-Lowering Medication Adherence among Patients with Coronary Heart Disease.

A randomized trial of a pharmacist-delivered intervention (PI) versus usual care (UC) was conducted; 689 subjects with known coronary heart disease were recruited from cardiac catheterization laboratories. Participants in the PI condition received 5 pharmacist-delivered telephone counseling calls post-hospital discharge. At one year, 65% in the PI condition and 60% in the UC condition achieved an LDL-C level <100 mg/dL (P = .29); mean statin adherence was 0.88 in the PI, and 0.90 in the UC (P = .51). The highest percentage of those who reached the LDL-C goal were participants who used statins as opposed to those who did not use statins (67% versus 58%, P = .05). However, only 53% and 56% of the patients in the UC and PI conditions, respectively, were using statins. We conclude that a pharmacist-delivered intervention aimed only at improving patient adherence is unlikely to positively affect outcomes. Efforts must be oriented towards influencing physicians to increase statin prescription rates.

Lepirudin-induced thrombocytopenia following subcutaneous administration.

PURPOSE: A case of lepirudin-induced thrombocytopenia is reported. SUMMARY: A 61-year-old white man arrived at the emergency department with complaints of pain in his left thigh that worsened with walking. His medical history was significant for extensive thromboses over a period of six months. He had recently been discharged from the hospital for suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) while on enoxaparin. A venous duplex scan revealed two new deep venous thromboses in the left common, superficial, and popliteal veins. The patient was admitted and initiated on aspirin 325 mg and warfarin sodium 2 mg daily. Intravenous lepirudin with an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) goal of 60-80 seconds was also started. Because of his recurrent thrombotic event, a new International Normalized Ratio (INR) goal of 3.0-3.5 was established for warfarin therapy. Eighteen days after admission, the patient's INR and aPTT were high; therefore, his warfarin dose was reduced and i.v. lepirudin was changed to subcutaneous administration. The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) and, 5 days later, he developed melena. During the 7 days of treatment with subcutaneous lepirudin, a drop in platelet counts was observed. Subcutaneous lepirudin was discontinued after resolution of melena, and i.v. lepirudin was restarted. After 15 days, his platelet counts increased and he was switched back to subcutaneous lepirudin, which again led to a drop in platelets. After 27 days in the ICU, the patient's INR and aPTT remained high. Lepirudin was discontinued and i.v. bivalirudin was initiated. His platelet count increased and he was discharged. Eleven days later, the patient was found unresponsive with left-sided fasciculations. The patient died secondary to respiratory arrest as a consequence of intracranial hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: A 61-year-old white man with a history of thromboses and suspected HIT developed thrombocytopenia possibly associated with receiving two courses of subcutaneous lepirudin. Careful monitoring of platelet counts are warranted in patients who have a history of HIT and are receiving subcutaneous lepirudin.

Possible mechanisms of drug-induced aspirin and clopidogrel resistance.

Aspirin (ASA) and clopidogrel have been identified as standard of care in the prevention of major cardiovascular events. Aspirin irreversibly inhibits the cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) enzyme, whereas non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reversibly inhibit the COX-1 enzyme. An analysis of the literature revealed a statistically significant decrease in clinical benefit of ASA with concomitant administration of ibuprofen. Another NSAID, diclofenac, showed minimal effect on the inhibition of platelet aggregation when administered with ASA. Furthermore, the selective COX-2 inhibitor, rofecoxib, was not shown to influence the effect of ASA. Clopidogrel is metabolized to an active thiol metabolite by the CYP 3A4 enzyme. Some HMG CoA reductase inhibitors have the ability to inhibit the CYP 3A4 enzyme, which can result in a possible interaction if administered concomitantly with clopidogrel. Studies have demonstrated clopidogrel's platelet inhibition being significantly attenuated by atorvastatin. However in a post-hoc analysis, it was demonstrated that there was no difference in clinical outcomes between patients taking clopidogrel and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors metabolized by and not metabolized by CYP 3A4. Data suggest that the interaction observed involving clopidogrel and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors appears to be significant in-vitro. Therefore, practitioners should advise patients receiving chronic aspirin therapy to limit the use of ibuprofen and may consider concomitant administration of clopidogrel with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors without regard for the drug interaction. The intent of this paper is to review the literature discussing possible mechanisms of drug-induced aspirin and clopidogrel resistance and discuss whether the interactions translate into clinical effects.