Blocking SphK/S1P/S1PR1 axis signaling pathway alleviates remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia in rats.

Recent research shows a correlation between altered sphingolipid metabolism and nociceptive processing. Activation of the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 subtype (S1PR1) by its ligand, sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), causes neuropathic pain. However, its role in remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia (RIH) has not been investigated. The purpose of this research was to establish if the SphK/S1P/S1PR1 axis mediated remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia and identify its potential targets. This study examined the protein expression of ceramide, sphingosine kinases (SphK), S1P, and S1PR1 in the spinal cord of rats treated with remifentanil (1.0 µg/kg/min for 60 min). Prior to receiving remifentanil, rats were injected with SK-1 (a SphK inhibitor); LT1002 (a S1P monoclonal antibody); CYM-5442, FTY720, and TASP0277308（the S1PR1 antagonists); CYM-5478 (a S1PR2 agonist); CAY10444 (a S1PR3 antagonist); Ac-YVAD-CMK (a caspase-1 antagonist); MCC950 (the NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome antagonist); and N-tert-Butyl-α-phenylnitrone (PBN, a reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenger). Mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia were evaluated at baseline (24 h prior to remifentanil infusion) and 2, 6, 12, and 24 h following remifentanil administration. The expression of the NLRP3-related protein (NLRP3, caspase-1), pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-1ß(IL-1ß), IL-18), and ROS was found in the spinal dorsal horns. In the meantime, immunofluorescence was used to ascertain if S1PR1 co-localizes with astrocytes. Remifentanil infusion induced considerable hyperalgesia in addition to increased ceramide, SphK, S1P, and S1PR1, NLRP3-related protein (NLRP3, Caspase-1, IL-1ß, IL-18) and ROS expression, and S1PR1 localized astrocytes. By blocking the SphK/S1P/S1PR1 axis, remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia was reduced, as was the expression of NLRP3, caspase-1, pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1ß, IL-18) and ROS in the spinal cord. In addition, we observed that suppressing NLRP3 or ROS signal attenuated the mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia induced by remifentanil. Our findings indicate that the SphK/SIP/S1PR1 axis regulates the expression of NLRP3, Caspase-1, IL-1ß, IL-18 and ROS in the spinal dorsal horn to mediate remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia. These findings may contribute to pain and SphK/S1P/S1PR1 axis research positively, and inform the future study of this commonly used analgesic.

Safety and effectiveness of the combination of remimazolam tosilate and propofol in gastroscopy: a multicenter, randomized controlled, single-blind clinical trial.

Remimazolam tosilate (RT) is a new short-acting γ-aminobutyric acid A (GABAA) receptors agonist. However, its optimal use mode and dosage still remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the safety and effectiveness of the combination of RT and propofol in gastroscopy. This was a prospective, single-blind, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group study. All eligible 256 patients were randomized into the following 3 groups. Patients were anesthetized with propofol (Group P), RT (Group R) or the combination of RT and propofol (Group RP). The primary efficacy endpoints were: body movement score; satisfaction of gastroscopy doctors; success rate of sedation and effects on sleep status. Sedation induction time, time to be fully alert and adverse events were also recorded. The probability of complete immobility was lower in group R (33.73%) than in group P (86.67%) and RP (83.13%). The rate of doctors' satisfaction was much lower in group R (28.92%) than in group P (77.78%) and RP (72.29%). The success rate of sedation and sleep outcome score has no difference in the three groups. The time to adequate sedation was longer in group RP (77.27 ± 18.63 s) than in group P (64.47 ± 24.36 s), but much shorter than that in group R (102.84 ± 46.43s). The time to be fully alert was shorter in group R (6.30 ± 1.52 min) and RP (6.54 ± 1.13 min) than in group P (7.87 ± 1.08 min). The proportion of sedative hypotension was significantly higher in group P (41.11%) than in group R (1.20%) and group RP (3.61%) (p < 0.001). The incidence of respiratory depression was much higher in group P (17.78%) than in group R (no patient) and group RP (1.2%). The incidence of adverse events was lower in groups R (4.82%) and RP (9.64%) than in group P (31.11%). The combination of RT and propofol takes effect quickly, makes patients alert quickly, provides a sufficient depth of sedation, reduces body movement, does not inhibit circulation and respiratory function, does not affect sleep, and is the preferred mode for gastroscopy doctors and anesthesiologists.