RESUMO
Studying the effect of duration of treatment on prognostic outcomes using real-world data is challenging because only people who survive for a long time can receive a treatment for a long time. Specifying a target trial helps overcome such challenge. We aimed to estimate the effect of different durations of treatment with antihypertensive drugs with anticholinergic properties (AC AHT) on the risk of vascular dementia and Alzheimer's disease by emulating a target trial using the UK CPRD GOLD database (2001-2017). Comparing treatment for 3-6 years versus ≤3 years yielded null results for both types of dementia. Comparing a longer duration of treatment, >6 years versus ≤3 years, yielded a 10-year risk ratio of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.54-0.90) for vascular dementia and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.77-1.10) for Alzheimer's disease. For illustration, we performed an analysis that failed to emulate a target trial by assigning exposure categories using post-baseline information, obtaining implausible beneficial estimates. Our findings indicate a modest benefit of longer duration of treatment with AC AHT on vascular dementia and highlight the value of the target trial emulation to avoid selection bias in the evaluation of the effect of different durations of treatment.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The EUPAS26595 study characterized the rate of acute renal failure (ARF) in patients exposed to levetiracetam versus other antiepileptic drugs using healthcare claims data and a high-dimensional propensity score (hd-PS) for confounding adjustment. The data contained several coding systems by design and an update in International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding dictionary. Such coding heterogeneity can affect the performance of hd-PS, and manually coding harmonization is not feasible. Our objective was to explore the impact of code aggregation via Clinical Classifications Software (CCS) on the analysis of a large claims-based database using hd-PS. METHODS: Patients with epilepsy, who were new-users of an antiepileptic drug, were identified from the IBM® MarketScan® Research Databases. We used CCS categories to harmonize coding and compared the results with other alternatives. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were computed using modified Poisson regression model with a robust variance estimator. RESULTS: For January 2008-October 2015 (before ICD update), 34 833 eligible patients initiated levetiracetam and 52 649 initiated a comparator drug; IRR (95% CI) for ARF for the hd-PS analysis was 1.34 (0.72-2.50) without CCS categories and 1.30 (0.71-2.39) with CCS categories. For January 2008-December 2017 (including ICD coding change), 45 672 eligible patients initiated levetiracetam and 64 664 initiated a comparator drug; IRR (95% CI) for the hd-PS analysis was 1.34 (0.78-2.29) without CCS categories and 1.37 (0.80-2.34) with CCS categories. CONCLUSIONS: Using single-level CCS categories to overcome differences in coding provides consistent results and can be used in studies that use large claims data and hd-PS for adjustment.
Assuntos
Classificação Internacional de Doenças , Software , Humanos , Pontuação de Propensão , Levetiracetam , Atenção à SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Metformin users appear to have a substantially lower risk of cancer than nonusers in many observational studies. These inverse associations may be explained by common flaws in observational analyses that can be avoided by explicitly emulating a target trial. METHODS: We emulated target trials of metformin therapy and cancer risk using population-based linked electronic health records from the UK (2009-2016). We included individuals with diabetes, no history of cancer, no recent prescription for metformin or other glucose-lowering medication, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) <64 mmol/mol (<8.0%). Outcomes included total cancer and 4 site-specific cancers (breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate). We estimated risks using pooled logistic regression with adjustment for risk factors via inverse-probability weighting. We emulated a second target trial among individuals regardless of diabetes status. We compared our estimates with those obtained using previously applied analytic approaches. RESULTS: Among individuals with diabetes, the estimated 6-year risk differences (metformin - no metformin) were -0.2% (95% CI = -1.6%, 1.3%) in the intention-to-treat analysis and 0.0% (95% CI = -2.1%, 2.3%) in the per-protocol analysis. The corresponding estimates for all site-specific cancers were close to zero. Among individuals regardless of diabetes status, these estimates were also close to zero and more precise. By contrast, previous analytic approaches yielded estimates that appeared strongly protective. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that metformin therapy does not meaningfully influence cancer incidence. The findings highlight the importance of explicitly emulating a target trial to reduce bias in the effect estimates derived from observational analyses.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Diabetes Mellitus , Metformina , Neoplasias , Masculino , Humanos , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/induzido quimicamente , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recruitment into randomized trials of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for prevention of COVID-19 has been adversely affected by a widespread conviction that HCQ is not effective for prevention. In the absence of an updated systematic review, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized trials that study the effectiveness of HCQ to prevent COVID-19. METHODS: A search of PubMed, medRxiv, and clinicaltrials.gov combined with expert consultation found 11 completed randomized trials: 7 pre-exposure prophylaxis trials and 4 post-exposure prophylaxis trials. We obtained or calculated the risk ratio of COVID-19 diagnosis for assignment to HCQ versus no HCQ (either placebo or usual care) for each trial, and then pooled the risk ratio estimates. RESULTS: The pooled risk ratio estimate of the pre-exposure prophylaxis trials was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.58-0.90) when using either a fixed effect or a standard random effects approach, and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.55-0.95) when using a conservative modification of the Hartung-Knapp random effects approach. The corresponding estimates for the post-exposure prophylaxis trials were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.72-1.16) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.62-1.35). All trials found a similar rate of serious adverse effects in the HCQ and no HCQ groups. DISCUSSION: A benefit of HCQ as prophylaxis for COVID-19 cannot be ruled out based on the available evidence from randomized trials. However, the "not statistically significant" findings from early prophylaxis trials were widely interpreted as definite evidence of lack of effectiveness of HCQ. This interpretation disrupted the timely completion of the remaining trials and thus the generation of precise estimates for pandemic management before the development of vaccines.
Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Hidroxicloroquina , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Teste para COVID-19 , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/efeitos adversos , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
As with many chronic illnesses, recurrent prostate cancer generally requires sustained treatment to prolong survival. However, initiating treatment immediately after recurrence may negatively impact quality of life without any survival gains. Therefore, we consider sustained strategies for initiating treatment based on specific characteristics of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), which can indicate disease progression. We define the protocol for a target trial comparing treatment strategies based on PSA doubling time, in which androgen deprivation therapy is initiated only after doubling time decreases below a certain threshold. Such a treatment strategy means the timing of treatment initiation (if ever) is not known at baseline, and the target trial protocol must explicitly specify the frequency of PSA monitoring until the threshold is met, as well as the duration of treatment. We describe these and other components of a target trial that need to be specified in order for such a trial to be emulated in observational data. We then use the parametric g-formula and inverse-probability weighted dynamic marginal structural models to emulate our target trial in a cohort of prostate cancer patients from clinics across the United States.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , ProbabilidadeRESUMO
Background: Randomized trials have shown that initiating breast cancer screening between ages 50 and 69 years and continuing it for 10 years decreases breast cancer mortality. However, no trials have studied whether or when women can safely stop screening mammography. An estimated 52% of women aged 75 years or older undergo screening mammography in the United States. Objective: To estimate the effect of breast cancer screening on breast cancer mortality in Medicare beneficiaries aged 70 to 84 years. Design: Large-scale, population-based, observational study of 2 screening strategies: continuing annual mammography, and stopping screening. Setting: U.S. Medicare program, 2000 to 2008. Participants: 1 058 013 beneficiaries aged 70 to 84 years who had a life expectancy of at least 10 years, had no previous breast cancer diagnosis, and underwent screening mammography. Measurements: Eight-year breast cancer mortality, incidence, and treatments, plus the positive predictive value of screening mammography by age group. Results: In women aged 70 to 74 years, the estimated difference in 8-year risk for breast cancer death between continuing and stopping screening was -1.0 (95% CI, -2.3 to 0.1) death per 1000 women (hazard ratio, 0.78 [CI, 0.63 to 0.95]) (a negative risk difference favors continuing). In those aged 75 to 84 years, the corresponding risk difference was 0.07 (CI, -0.93 to 1.3) death per 1000 women (hazard ratio, 1.00 [CI, 0.83 to 1.19]). Limitations: The available Medicare data permit only 8 years of follow-up after screening. As with any study using observational data, the estimates could be affected by residual confounding. Conclusion: Continuing annual breast cancer screening past age 75 years did not result in substantial reductions in 8-year breast cancer mortality compared with stopping screening. Primary Funding Source: National Institutes of Health.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Mamografia , Programas de Rastreamento , Medicare , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: RAS testing is used to select patients with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies sensitivity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, other biomarkers such as BRAF, PIK3CA/PTEN, and p-IGF-1R+/MMP7+ (double positive [DP] phenotype) have not been prospectively assessed to predict anti-EGFR resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed a multicenter prospective trial (NCT01276379) to evaluate whether the biomarkers BRAF mutation, PIK3CA mutation/PTEN loss, and DP phenotype can improve the prediction for 12-months progression-free survival (PFS) over the use of clinical variables exclusively in patients with RAS wild-type (WT) mCRC treated with standard chemotherapy plus biweekly cetuximab as first-line therapy. The planned sample size was 170 RAS WT patients to detect a 20% difference in 12-month PFS based on the analysis of clinical and selected biomarkers (α = .05, ß = .2). The discriminatory capacity of the biomarkers was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: We included 181 RAS WT patients. The biomarker distribution was as follows: BRAF mutant, 20 patients (11%); PIK3CA mutated/PTEN loss, 98 patients (58%); DP, 23 patients (12.7%). The clinical variables in the clinical score were progression status >0, left-sided tumor, and resectable liver metastasis as the only metastatic site. The area under the curve (AUC) of the score containing the clinical variables was 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.75). The AUC of the score with clinical variables and BRAF mutational status was 0.68 (0.61-0.75, p = .37). The AUC of the score with clinical variables and PI3KCA mutation/PTEN status was 0.69 (0.61-0.76, p = .32). The AUC of the score with clinical variables and DP phenotype was 0.66 (0.58-0.73, p = .09). CONCLUSION: The addition of BRAF, PIK3CA/PTEN, and DP to a clinical score does not improve the discrimination of 12-month PFS. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This prospective biomarker design study has important clinical implications because many prospective clinical trials are designed with the hypothesis that BRAF mutation per se and MEK and PIK3CA downstream pathways are critical for colorectal tumor survival. The results lead to the question of whether these pathways should be considered as passengers instead of drivers.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Proteínas ras/genética , Idoso , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Cetuximab/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inibidores , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação , Prognóstico , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: No randomized, controlled trials of screening colonoscopy have been completed, and ongoing trials exclude persons aged 75 years or older. The Medicare program, however, reimburses screening colonoscopy without an upper age limit. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of screening colonoscopy to prevent colorectal cancer (CRC) in persons aged 70 to 74 and those aged 75 to 79 years. DESIGN: Large-scale, population-based, prospective study. The observational data were used to emulate a target trial with 2 groups: colonoscopy screening and no screening. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: 1 355 692 Medicare beneficiaries (2004 to 2012) aged 70 to 79 years at average risk for CRC who used Medicare preventive services and had no previous diagnostic or surveillance colonoscopies in the past 5 years. MEASUREMENTS: 8-year risk for CRC and 30-day risk for adverse events. RESULTS: In beneficiaries aged 70 to 74 years, the 8-year risk for CRC was 2.19% (95% CI, 2.00% to 2.37%) in the screening colonoscopy group and 2.62% (CI, 2.56% to 2.67%) in the no-screening group (absolute risk difference, -0.42% [CI, -0.24% to -0.63%]). Among those aged 75 to 79 years, the 8-year risk for CRC was 2.84% (CI, 2.54% to 3.13%) in the screening colonoscopy group and 2.97% (CI, 2.92% to 3.03%) in the no-screening group (risk difference, -0.14% [CI, -0.41 to 0.16]). The excess 30-day risk for any adverse event in the colonoscopy group was 5.6 events per 1000 individuals (CI, 4.4 to 6.8) in the 70- to 74-year age group and 10.3 per 1000 (CI, 8.6 to 11.1) in the 75- to 79-year age group. LIMITATION: CRC-specific mortality was not available, but CRC incidence and stage were studied at diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Screening colonoscopy may have had a modest benefit in preventing CRC in beneficiaries aged 70 to 74 years and a smaller benefit in older beneficiaries. The risk for adverse events was low but greater among older persons. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.
Assuntos
Colonoscopia , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/prevenção & controle , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Programas de Rastreamento , Idoso , Colonoscopia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/efeitos adversos , Medicare , Estudos Prospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although chemotherapy is the cornerstone treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), acquired chemoresistance is common and constitutes the main reason for treatment failure. Monoclonal antibodies against insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) have been tested in pre-treated mCRC patients, but results have been largely deceiving. METHODS: We analysed time to progression, overall survival, and the mutational status of RAS, BRAF and nuclear p-IGF-1R expression by immunohistochemistry, in 470 metastatic CRC patients. The effect of IGF-1R activation and distribution was also assessed using cellular models of CRC and RNAi for functional validation. RESULTS: Nuclear IGF-1R increased in metastatic tumours compared to paired untreated primary tumours, and significantly correlated with poor overall survival in mCRC patients. In vitro, chemo-resistant cell lines presented significantly higher levels of IGF-1R expression within the nuclear compartment, and PIAS3, a protein implicated also in the sumoylation process of intranuclear proteins, contributed to IGF-1R nuclear sequestration, highlighting the essential role of PIAS3 in this process. Intriguingly, we observed that ganitumab, an IGF-1R blocking-antibody used in several clinical trials, and dasatinib, an SRC inhibitor, increased the nuclear localisation of IGF-1R. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that IGF-1R nuclear location might lead to chemotherapy and targeted agent resistance.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Núcleo Celular/metabolismo , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Transporte Proteico/efeitos dos fármacos , Receptor IGF Tipo 1/metabolismo , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais/farmacologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Bevacizumab/administração & dosagem , Camptotecina/administração & dosagem , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Sobrevivência Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Cetuximab/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Curcumina/farmacologia , Dasatinibe/farmacologia , Ácidos Graxos Insaturados/farmacologia , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/farmacologia , Inativação Gênica , Células HCT116 , Células HT29 , Humanos , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Chaperonas Moleculares/genética , Chaperonas Moleculares/metabolismo , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Niacinamida/farmacologia , Compostos Organoplatínicos/administração & dosagem , Compostos Organoplatínicos/farmacologia , Oxaliplatina , Panitumumabe , Compostos de Fenilureia/farmacologia , Proteínas Inibidoras de STAT Ativados/genética , Proteínas Inibidoras de STAT Ativados/metabolismo , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas B-raf/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras)/genética , Pirimidinas/farmacologia , Pirróis/farmacologia , Transdução de Sinais/efeitos dos fármacos , SorafenibeRESUMO
Observational analyses for causal inference often rely on real world data collected for purposes other than research. A frequent goal of these observational analyses is to use the data to emulate a hypothetical randomized experiment, i.e., the target trial, that mimics the design features of a true experiment, including a clear definition of time zero with synchronization of treatment assignment and determination of eligibility. We review a recent observational analysis that explicitly emulated a target trial of screening colonoscopy using insurance claims from U.S. Medicare. We then compare this explicit emulation with alternative, simpler observational analyses that do not synchronize treatment assignment and eligibility determination at time zero and/or do not allow for repeated eligibility. This empirical comparison suggests that lack of an explicit emulation of the target trial leads to biased estimates, and shows that allowing for repeated eligibility increases the statistical efficiency of the estimates.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) use has been consistently associated with a decreased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in women. Our aim was to use a genome-wide gene-environment interaction analysis to identify genetic modifiers of CRC risk associated with use of MHT. METHODS: We included 10 835 postmenopausal women (5419 cases and 5416 controls) from 10 studies. We evaluated use of any MHT, oestrogen-only (E-only) and combined oestrogen-progestogen (E+P) hormone preparations. To test for multiplicative interactions, we applied the empirical Bayes (EB) test as well as the Wald test in conventional case-control logistic regression as primary tests. The Cocktail test was used as secondary test. RESULTS: The EB test identified a significant interaction between rs964293 at 20q13.2/CYP24A1 and E+P (interaction OR (95% CIs)=0.61 (0.52-0.72), P=4.8 × 10(-9)). The secondary analysis also identified this interaction (Cocktail test OR=0.64 (0.52-0.78), P=1.2 × 10(-5) (alpha threshold=3.1 × 10(-4)). The ORs for association between E+P and CRC risk by rs964293 genotype were as follows: C/C, 0.96 (0.61-1.50); A/C, 0.61 (0.39-0.95) and A/A, 0.40 (0.22-0.73), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that rs964293 modifies the association between E+P and CRC risk. The variant is located near CYP24A1, which encodes an enzyme involved in vitamin D metabolism. This novel finding offers additional insight into downstream pathways of CRC etiopathogenesis.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Terapia de Reposição de Estrogênios/métodos , Estrogênios/uso terapêutico , Progestinas/uso terapêutico , Vitamina D3 24-Hidroxilase/genética , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiologia , Idoso , Teorema de Bayes , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Interação Gene-Ambiente , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla , Genótipo , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Little is known about the magnitude of the association between infective endocarditis and cancer, and about the natural history of cancer patients with concomitant diagnosis of infective endocarditis. We used the SEER-Medicare linked database to identify individuals aged 65 years or more diagnosed with colorectal, lung, breast, or prostate cancer, and without any cancer diagnosis (5% random Medicare sample from SEER areas) between 1992 and 2009. We identified infective endocarditis from the ICD-9 diagnosis of each admission recorded in the Medpar file and its incidence rate 90 days around cancer diagnosis. We also estimated the overall survival and CRC-specific survival after a concomitant diagnosis of infective endocarditis. The peri-diagnostic incidence of infective endocarditis was 19.8 cases per 100,000 person-months for CRC, 5.7 cases per 100,000 person-months for lung cancer, 1.9 cases per 100,000 person-months for breast cancer, 4.1 cases per 100,000 person-months for prostate cancer and 2.4 cases per 100,000 person-months for individuals without cancer. Two-year overall survival was 46.4% (95% CI 39.5, 54.5%) for stage I-III CRC patients with concomitant endocarditis and 73.1% (95 % CI 72.9, 73.3%) for those without it. In this elderly population, the incidence of infective endocarditis around CRC diagnosis was substantially higher than around the diagnosis of lung, breast and prostate cancers. A concomitant diagnosis of infective endocarditis in patients with CRC diagnosis is associated with shorter survival.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Endocardite Bacteriana/epidemiologia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Endocardite Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Classificação Internacional de Doenças , Masculino , Registro Médico Coordenado , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Programa de SEER , Distribuição por Sexo , Análise de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Comparisons of post-relapse survival (PRS) and post-progression survival have been used to measure efficacy in some cancer clinical trials. These comparisons are an attempt to account for second-line therapies and to identify benefits that do not translate in longer overall survival. However, the use of PRS comparisons can be misleading (either a longer or shorter PRS may indicate a benefit, depending on the circumstances) and can result in biased estimates (because of selection). Here, we describe the problems surrounding PRS comparisons and propose alternative approaches to deal with non-randomized therapies administered after progression to the experimental treatment.
Assuntos
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Modelos Estatísticos , Neoplasias/patologia , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recurrent, metastatic, and locally advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) can be treated successfully with imatinib mesylate. Surgery for residual disease has been suggested for nonrefractory metastatic GISTs to reduce the probability of resistant recurrent clones, although no randomized Phase III trial has been performed to answer the question about its benefit. We carried out an analysis of the outcome of patients with recurrent unresectable locally advanced or metastatic imatinib-sensitive priamary GIST in 14 institutions in Spain. We compared two cohorts: treated or not treated with surgery after partial response or stabilization by imatinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from the online GIST registry of the Spanish Group for Research in Sarcomas. Selected patients were then divided into two groups: group A, treated initially only with imatinib, and group B, treated additionally with metastasectomy. Baseline characteristics between groups were compared, and univariate and multivariate analysis for progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were performed. RESULTS: Analysis was undertaken in 171 patients considered nonrefractory to imatinib. The median follow-up time was 56.6 months. Focusing on OS, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status different than 0, extent of disease limited to one metastatic organ, and comparison between groups A or B achieved statistical difference in the multivariate analysis. Median survival was 59.9 months in group A and 87.6 months in group B. CONCLUSIONS: Based in its benefit in OS, our study supports surgery of metastatic disease in GIST patients who respond to imatinib therapy.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirurgia , Mesilato de Imatinib/uso terapêutico , Metastasectomia/mortalidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/tratamento farmacológico , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/mortalidade , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de SobrevidaAssuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Neoplasias , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Incidência , Medicare , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To quantify and characterize duplicated tests performed during the staging of localized colon cancer in the Medicare population. METHODS: We used the SEER-Medicare linked database to select patients diagnosed with localized colon cancer between the years 1996 and 2009. We considered a patient as adequately staged after having received a colonoscopy, an abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan, and a pelvic CT scan. Abdominal and pelvic CT scans performed between complete staging and first cancer-directed treatment, if not ordered due to an acute condition, were considered duplicates. We characterized the institutions providing the tests and evaluated the association with survival using a weighted pooled logistic regression adjusted by baseline and time-varying confounders. RESULTS: Of 36,291 patients with a complete staging, 2680 (7.4%) had at least 1 duplicated test. Patients receiving a duplicate had a higher comorbidity score, were more symptomatic, and had more visits to the emergency department and clinical evaluations. They also were treated with surgery less frequently and had worse survival (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.28). The type of institution involved in the staging (nonprofit/government centers, proprietary centers, free-standing facilities) was not associated with receiving duplicated tests. CONCLUSIONS: We found a low frequency of duplicated abdominal or pelvic CT scans in the staging of colon cancer in the Medicare population.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo/diagnóstico por imagem , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/estatística & dados numéricos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Desnecessários/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias do Colo/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos , Programa de SEER , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: No consensus about the effectiveness of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening exists among clinical guidelines, especially for the elderly. Randomized trials of PSA screening have yielded different results, partly because of variations in adherence, and it is unlikely that new trials will be conducted. Our objective was to estimate the effect of annual PSA screening on prostate cancer (PC) mortality in Medicare beneficiaries age 67-84 years. METHODS: This is a large-scale, population-based, observational study of two screening strategies: annual PSA screening and no screening. We used data from 537,599 US Medicare (2001-2008) beneficiaries age 67-84 years who had a good life expectancy, no previous PC, and no PSA test in the 2 years before baseline. We estimated the 8-year PC mortality and incidence, treatments for PC, and treatment complications of PSA screening. RESULTS: In men age 67-74 years, the estimated difference in 8-year risk of PC death between PSA screening and no screening was -2.3 (95% CI, -4.1 to -1.1) deaths per 1,000 men (a negative risk difference favors screening). Treatment complications were more frequent under PSA screening than under no screening. In men age 75-84 years, risk difference estimates were closer to zero. CONCLUSION: Our estimates suggest that under conventional statistical criteria, annual PSA screening for 8 years is highly compatible with reductions of PC mortality from four to one fewer PC deaths per 1,000 screened men age 67-74 years. As with any study using real-world data, the estimates could be affected by residual confounding.
Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Medicare , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias da Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , IncidênciaRESUMO
The minor allele (G) of rs4939827, a SMAD7 (18q21) intronic variant, is associated with a lower risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) and poorer survival after diagnosis. Our objective was to evaluate the associations of this variant with different tumor phenotype and intratumoral molecular characteristics. We evaluated 1509 CRC cases and 2307 age-matched controls nested within the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. We used the TaqMan assay to genotype rs4939827 and logistic regression to assess the association of rs4939827 with risk of CRC according to different phenotypic and molecular characteristics. We found that the minor allele (G) in rs4939827 (SMAD7, 18q21) was associated with a lower risk of developing tumor stage pT1 or pT2 CRC [multivariate odds ratio (OR), 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.87] but not tumor stage pT3 or pT4 (multivariate OR, 1.07; 95% CI 0.93-1.23, P for heterogeneity = 1.2 × 10(-4)). The association between rs4939827 and CRC also significantly differed by methylation of RUNX3 (P for heterogeneity = 0.005). Among those with CRC, the minor allele (G) in rs4939827 was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (hazards ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.02-1.42). We can conclude that the minor allele (G) of the germline intronic SMAD7 variant rs4939827 is associated with a lower risk of CRC with earlier tumor stage and CRC without methylation of the tumor suppressor RUNX3. These findings suggest that individuals with this SMAD7 variant that develop CRC are more probably to have tumors with greater invasiveness and methylation of RUNX3, which potentially contributes to their poorer observed survival.