Randomised crossover trial showed that using breast milk or sucrose provided the same analgesic effect in preterm infants of at least 28 weeks.

AIM: Repeated, ongoing exposure to pain influences the growth, cognitive and motor functions, behaviour, personality and neurodevelopment of preterm infants. We compared the analgesic effects of expressed breast milk (EBM) and 24% oral sucrose on preterm neonates during venipuncture. METHODS: This multicentre randomised, noninferiority, crossover trial focused on five neonatal university units in Madrid, Spain, from October 2013 to October 2014. It comprised 66 preterm infants born at less than 37 weeks and randomly split into two groups. They received either EBM or sucrose two minutes before venepuncture, together with nonnutritive sucking and swaddling, then the opposite procedure at a later point. Pain was measured with the premature infant pain profile (PIPP) and crying was also measured. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups. The PIPP scores were seven (4-9) with breast milk and six (4-8.25) with sucrose (p = 0.28). The 11 infants born at under 28 weeks of age showed higher median scores of nine (9-14) for breast milk and four (4-7) for sucrose (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: EBM and 24% sucrose had the same analgesic effect during venipuncture in most of the preterm neonates, but sucrose worked better in extremely preterm infants.

Suitability of therapeutic effort in paediatric intensive care units: Opinion and attitude of professionals. / Adecuación del esfuerzo terapéutico en unidades de cuidados intensivos pediátricos: opinión y actitud de los profesionales.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the opinion and describe the attitude of different health professionals on suitability of therapeutic effort. METHOD: Multi-centre, cross-sectional observational study carried out with nurses and doctors who work in the paediatric intensive care units of four hospitals in the Madrid region. A self-administered questionnaire, previously piloted to assess its viability, was used and a sealed box was set up at the nursing station to hand it in. The analysis was performed using SPSS 21.0 software. RESULTS: The 98.9% of the respondents were in favour of suitability of therapeutic effort. Doctors consider that the decision is made with the agreement of the multidisciplinary staff and the child's parents (48.8%). Of the nurses, 51.1% believe that the decision is made by agreement with the doctors and parents. Of the nurses, 65.5% state that they are never asked about decision-making for their patients. Of the doctors, 75% are always or almost always asked. Fifty-seven percent of the nurses and 83% of the doctors feel capable of making decisions about suitability of therapeutic effort. Of the professionals, 77.2% believe that suitability is used less often than required. CONCLUSIONS: There are differences between doctors and nurses both in the perception of the decision-making model and in the way to proceed. Professionals seem not to follow any protocols or circuits in the decision-making process.

[Questionnaire to evaluate the importance of the family in nursing care. Validation of the Spanish version (FINC-NA)]. / Cuestionario para evaluar la importancia de la familia en los cuidados de enfermería. Validación de la versión española (FINC-NA).

BACKGROUND: The nursing profession is focused on patient care, without forgetting that patients are part of a social group, the family. The aim of this study was the adaptation of the "Families' Importance in Nursing Care-Nurses' Attitudes" (FINC-NA) scale to the Spanish language and its validation. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out, using the bidirectional translation method for linguistic-cultural adaptation. It was applied to the nursing staff in the Paediatric Department of a University Hospital in Madrid. To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Spanish version, reliability, internal consistence and construct validity were calculated. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 274 professionals. Cronbach´s Alpha coefficient for the total scale was 0.864, oscillating between 0.888 and 0.769 in the subscales. The principal components factor analysis identified 4 factors, which explained 54.22% of total variance. CONCLUSIONS: The new instrument makes it possible to determine the importance nurses give to participation by family members and their attitude to involving the latter in patient care, and the possibility of involving them in planning. It has been adapted to the Spanish population with good psychometrics results and enough evidence for its use in this context.