RESUMO
PURPOSE: Multidisciplinary molecular tumor boards (MTBs) decode complex genomic data into clinical recommendations. Although MTBs are well-established in the oncology practice in developed countries, this strategy needs to be better explored in developing countries. Herein, we describe the possible benefits and limitations of the first MTB established in Colombia. METHODS: Demographic, clinical, and genomic information was collected between August 2020 and November 2021. By mid-2020, an MTB strategy was created to discuss clinical cases with one or more genomic alterations identified by next-generation sequencing using an open-access virtual platform. We characterized the patient population as benefiting from the recommended treatment option. We assessed the benefits and access to available targeted therapies that have the potential to change clinical management by making recommendations to treating oncologists on the basis of genomic profiling. However, we did not assess the treatment oncologists' compliance with MTB recommendations because they were not intended to replace clinical judgment/standard of care. RESULTS: A total of 146 patients were included in the discussions of the MTB. The median age was 59 years, and 59.6% were women. Genomic results prompting a change in therapeutic decisions were obtained in 53.1% of patients (95% CI, 44.9 to 61.3). The most prevalent malignancy was non-small-cell lung cancer (51%). Other malignancies represented 60%, 50%, and 30% of patients with soft-tissue sarcomas, brain tumors, and breast cancer, respectively. CONCLUSION: Using an open-access virtual platform, MTBs were feasible in low- and middle-income countries on the basis of the capability to provide the benefits and access to available targeted therapies that are not standard of care. Furthermore, MTB recommendations were made available to the treating oncologist in different locations across Colombia, providing the option to modify clinical management in most of these patients.
Assuntos
Hispânico ou Latino , Neoplasias , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Mama , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Oncologia , Sarcoma , Neoplasias Encefálicas , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles , Neoplasias/terapia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Introducción. En los meningiomas, ocurren con frecuencia mutaciones en la región promotora de la transcriptasa inversa de la telomerasa. Objetivo. Estimar la importancia pronóstica de las mutaciones de la transcriptasa inversa de la telomerasa en pacientes colombianos con meningiomas de grados II y III. Materiales y métodos. Es un estudio de cohorte, retrospectivo y multicéntrico, que incluyó pacientes con diagnóstico de meningioma persistente o recidivante, de grados II y III, según la clasificación de la OMS, reclutados entre el 2011 y el 2018, con tratamiento sistémico (sunitinib, everolimus con octreótido o sin él, y bevacizumab). El estado de la mutación del promotor de la transcriptasa inversa de la telomerasa se determinó por medio de la PCR. Resultados. Se incluyeron 40 pacientes, en 21 (52,5 %) de los cuales se encontraron mutaciones en la transcriptasa inversa de la telomerasa, siendo las variantes más frecuentes la C228T (87,5 %) y la C250T (14,3 %). Estas fueron más frecuentes entre los pacientes con meningiomas anaplásicos (p=0,18), en aquellos con más de dos recurrencias (p=0,04), y en los que presentaron lesiones en la región parasagital y la fosa anterior (p=0,05). Los sujetos caracterizados por tener alteraciones puntuales fueron tratados con mayor frecuencia con la serie de medicamentos everolimus, sunitinib y bevacizumab (p=0,06). Tras el inicio del tratamiento médico, la supervivencia global fue de 23,7 meses (IC95% 13,1-34,2) en los pacientes con mutaciones y, de 43,4 meses (IC95% 37,5-49,3), entre aquellos sin mutaciones (p=0,0001). Los resultados del análisis multivariado demostraron que, únicamente, el número de recurrencias y la presencia de mutaciones en el gen de la transcriptasa inversa de la telomerasa, fueron factores que afectaron negativamente la supervivencia global. Conclusiones. Las mutaciones en el gen promotor de la transcriptasa inversa de la telomerasa permiten identificar los pacientes con alto riesgo, cuya detección podría ser de utilidad para seleccionar el mejor esquema terapéutico.
Introduction: Mutations in the promoter region of telomerase reverse transcriptase occur frequently in meningiomas. Objective: To estimate the prognostic importance of telomerase reverse transcriptase mutations in Colombian patients with grades II and III meningioma. Materials and methods: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with refractory or recurrent WHO grades II and III meningiomas, recruited between 2011 and 2018, and treated with systemic therapy (sunitinib, everolimus ± octreotide, and bevacizumab). Mutation status of the telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter was established by PCR. Results: Forty patients were included, of which telomerase reverse transcriptase mutations were found in 21 (52.5%), being C228T and C250T the most frequent variants with 87.5 % and 14.3 %, respectively. These were more frequent among patients with anaplastic meningiomas (p=0.18), with more than 2 recurrences (p=0.04); and in patients with parasagittal region and anterior fossa lesions (p=0.05). Subjects characterized as having punctual mutations were more frequently administered with everolimus, sunitinib and bevacizumab drug series (p=0.06). Overall survival was 23.7 months (CI95% 13.1-34.2) and 43.4 months (CI95% 37.5-49.3; p=0.0001) between subjects with and without mutations, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the number of recurrences and the presence of telomerase reverse transcriptase mutations were the only variables that negatively affected overall survival. Conclusions: Mutations in telomerase reverse transcriptase allows the identification of high-risk patients and could be useful in the selection of the best medical treatment.
Assuntos
Meningioma , Telomerase , Mutação com Ganho de FunçãoRESUMO
Resumen Introducción: Staphylococcus aureus es uno de los agentes causales más comunes de la endocarditis infecciosa. Se reportan pocos estudios en Latinoamérica acerca de las diferencias entre los perfiles de resistencia a la meticilina. Objetivo: Describir las características y el curso clínico de los pacientes con S. aureus sensible a meticilina frente al resistente. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo, cohorte histórica de pacientes adultos con diagnóstico confirmado de endocarditis entre los años 2011 y 2015. Se seleccionaron pacientes positivos para S. aureus comparando las características y el curso clínico entre los casos S. aureus sensible a meticilina frente al resistente. Resultados: Se estudiaron 86 pacientes con endocarditis. 28 (33%) tenían infección por S. aureus. 21 (75%) tenían endocarditis por S. aureus sensible a meticilina y 7 (25%) por S. aureus resistente a meticilina. En el grupo S. aureus sensible a meticilina, 11 (52,3%) fueron infecciones asociadas a atención en salud. La mayoría de casos de S. aureus resistente a meticilina fueron (85,7%) adquiridos en comunidad. La mortalidad de endocarditis por S. aureus sensible a meticilina fue superior a la causada por el resistente (33,3% vs. 14%). Conclusiones: S. aureus sigue siendo el agente más frecuente en endocarditis, más comúnmente el sensible a la meticilina. Los eventos embólicos y la gravedad fueron mayores en S. aureus sensible a meticilina. La mayor proporción de endocarditis debido a S. aureus resistente a meticilina se adquirió en la comunidad, por lo que se sugiere iniciar cobertura empírica contra S. aureus resistente a meticilina en todo caso de endocarditis adquirida en la comunidad.
Abstract Introduction: Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most common sources of infectious endocarditis. There are few studies in Latin America that report on the differences between the methicillin resistance profiles. Objective: To describe the characteristics and clinical course of patients with methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) compared to methicillin-resistance S. aureus (MRSA) Methods: An observational, retrospective study was conducted on a historical cohort of adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of endocarditis between the years 2011 and 2015. Patients positive for S. aureus were selected and the characteristics and clinical course and the cases of MSSA were compared with those of MRSA. Results: A total of 86 patients with endocarditis were included, of whom 28 (33%) had an infection due to S. aureus, and 21 (75%) had endocarditis due to methicillin-sensitive S. aureus, and 7 (25%) due to MRSA. In the MSSA group, 11 (52.3%) were infections associated with health care. The majority (85.7%) of cases of MRSA were community acquired. The endocarditis mortality due to MSSA was higher than that caused by MRSA (33.3% vs. 14%). Conclusions: S. aureus continues to be the most common agent in endocarditis, with MSSA being more common. The embolic events and the severity were greater in MSSA. The majority of endocarditis due to MRSA is acquired in the community, and for this reason it is suggested starting empirical cover against MRSA in all cases of community acquired endocarditis.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Endocardite , Mortalidade , Embolização Terapêutica , Meticilina , Nuclease do MicrococoRESUMO
Introducción: el bajo rendimiento y la consecuente deserción académica son problemas crecientes que pueden afectar la situación socio-económica de un país. Se han postulado los estilos de aprendizaje como factores determinantes del rendimiento académico y es necesario estudiarlos, con el fin de proponer estrategias encaminadas a su resolución. Objetivos: relacionar el estilo de aprendizaje y diferentes variables sociodemográficas con el rendimiento académico en los estudiantes de medicina de una universidad privada del suroccidente colombiano. Métodos: participaron los estudiantes de medicina que cumplían los criterios de inclusión: caso por bajo rendimiento y su respectivo control, a quienes se les analizó variables sociodemográficas, académicas y estilos de aprendizaje; información que se obtuvo de la base de registro académico de la universidad ICESI, mediante un proceso avalado por el comité de ética de dicha universidad. Para el análisis, se usaron técnicas de estadística descriptiva e inferencial por medio del software SPSS 19.0. Resultados: del total de la población (n= 340 estudiantes), 35 cumplieron los criterios de elegibilidad, a quienes se les asignó el respectivo control. No se encontró relación estadísticamente significativa entre el estilo de aprendizaje y el rendimiento académico general, ni con el rendimiento específico de las materias profesionales evaluadas. Tampoco se encontró relación entre el rendimiento académico y las variables sociodemográficas de la población a estudio. Conclusiones: el rendimiento académico en los estudiantes de medicina de nuestra población, puede estar influenciado por otras variables diferentes al estilo de aprendizaje. Sin embargo, se deben tener en cuenta las diversas limitaciones técnicas que este estudio pudo haber tenido(AU)
Introduction: low academic performance and dropout rates are consistently growing problems that can affect the socio-economic situation of a country. The determinants of the problem need to be identified, in order to propose strategies which could be adopted for a further solution. Objectives: Relate learning style and different sociodemographic variables with academic performance in medical students of a private university in southwestern Colombia. Methods: The study includes medical students which met the criteria for inclusion as a case for underperformance and its respective control. Socio-demographic, academic and learning style variables were analyzed with information obtained from the basis of the academic record from Icesi university. Through a process, supported by the ethics committee of the institution. For the analysis, descriptive and inferential statistics techniques were used by SPSS 19.0 software. Results: of the total population (n = 340 students), 35 met the criteria for eligibility and were assigned to their respective control. No statistically significant relationship between learning style and the general performance or the specific performance of professionalizing subjects was found. Nor relationship between academic performance and socio-demographic variables of the study population was found. Conclusions: academic performance in medical students in our population may be influenced by other different learning style variables. However, the technical limitations of the study should had been considered(AU)