A systematic guide for peer reviewers for a medical journal.

Performing a peer review of an article under consideration for publication requires not only an understanding of the subject matter, but also a systematic approach that includes screening for conflicts of interest; determining whether the manuscript is within or outside the reviewer's area of expertise; properly classifying the manuscript; and writing a detailed, organized review. Although some journals may provide guidelines for the reviewers, the guidelines usually are not detailed and do not take into consideration the variability in reviewer experience. This article is meant to serve as a guideline for peer reviewers and provide concrete information on how to write a comprehensive, unbiased review that will serve both the author and the journal well.

United States anesthesiologists over 50: retirement decision making and workforce implications.

BACKGROUND: Anesthesiology is among the medical specialties expected to have physician shortage. With little known about older anesthesiologists' work effort and retirement decision making, the American Society of Anesthesiologists participated in a 2006 national survey of physicians aged 50-79 yr. METHODS: Samples of anesthesiologists and other specialists completed a survey of work activities, professional satisfaction, self-defined health and financial status, retirement plans and perspectives, and demographics. A complex survey design enabled adjustments for sampling and response-rate biases so that respondents' characteristics resembled those in the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. Retirement decision making was modeled with multivariable ordinal logistic regression. Life-table analysis provided a forecast of likely clinical workforce trends over an ensuing 30 yr. RESULTS: Anesthesiologists (N = 3,222; response rate = 37%) reported a mean work week of 49.4 h and a mean retirement age of 62.7 yr, both values similar to those of other older physicians. Work week decreased with age, and part-time work increased. Women worked a shorter work week (mean, 47.9 vs. 49.7 h, P = 0.024), partly due to greater part-time work (20.2 vs. 13.1%, P value less than 0.001). Relative importance of factors reported among those leaving patient care differed by age cohort, subspecialty, and work status. Poor health was cited by 64% of anesthesiologists retiring in their 50s as compared with 43% of those retiring later (P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: This survey lends support for greater attention to potentially modifiable factors, such as workplace wellness and professional satisfaction, to prevent premature retirement. The growing trend in part-time work deserves further study.

Doctors in acute and longitudinal care specialties emphasise different professional attributes: implications for training programmes.

OBJECTIVES: Organised medicine mandates that professionalism be taught during specialty training. This study's primary objective was to determine the relative importance that doctors in different specialties place on different attributes of a medical professional. METHODS: Attending staff and resident doctors in acute care (anaesthesia, emergency medicine, surgery) and longitudinal care (internal medicine, psychiatry) specialties at a large academic hospital completed an anonymous, web-based survey. The forced-choice format required respondents to narrow down 25 professional attributes to three. The main outcome measure was the number of doctors in the two specialty groups who chose one or more attributes in each of six underlying categories. RESULTS: Almost two-thirds of respondents in both groups chose Moral and Ethical attributes. Significantly more longitudinal than acute care doctors chose Relationships with Patients attributes (76% versus 58%) and Communication Skills attributes (28% versus 18%), whereas significantly more acute care doctors chose Clinical Competence attributes (44% versus 29%). Specialty group was more important in choice of professional attributes than gender or position as a resident or attending staff doctor. CONCLUSIONS: Most respondents chose attributes that the literature and organised medicine define as core elements of medical professionalism. The differences between specialty groups suggest that attributes in the Relationships with Patients and Communication Skills categories be emphasised for trainees in acute care specialties, and attributes in the Clinical Competence category be emphasised for trainees in longitudinal care specialties.

Differential efficacy of intravenous lidocaine in alleviating ipsilateral versus contralateral neuropathic pain in the rat.

In the this study we have investigated the threshold plasma concentration of lidocaine for reversal of mechanical 'allodynia' in a neuropathic pain model in the rat, defined the concentration-dependent limits of that reversal and compared the acute reversal during intravenous drug infusion with the persistent relief of allodynia assayed 48 h later. Actions of i.v. lidocaine on ipsilateral and contralateral legs were also assessed. Forty rats were sorted into five groups (n = 7-10) and underwent spinal root (L5-6) ligation to produce allodynia, as quantified by a lower force of von Frey hairs at the plantar hindpaw required to elicit paw withdrawal (PWT, paw withdrawal threshold). During surgery, intravenous catheters were placed for programmed lidocaine infusion and in some animals arterial catheters were also inserted for assaying lidocaine blood levels. PWTs were measured in ipsilateral and contralateral paws before and after ligation and during infusions which, beginning at 5 days after surgery, were conducted every other day to incrementing levels (1.1-9.7 microg/ml plasma). Ligation produced allodynia in ipsilateral paws (PWT = 1.22 +/- 0.42 g (+/-SEM)) and in contralateral paws (PWT = 4.99 +/- 0.61 g), both markedly lower than pre-operative control values for either paw (11.31 +/- 0.41 g). The ipsilateral allodynia was partially, but significantly and permanently reversed (to PWT = 6-8 g) after a lidocaine infusion to 2.1 microg/ml in two separate groups (n = 7, 8). Lower concentrations resulted in elevation of PWT during infusion but no sustained relief. The elevation of PWT during infusion at this threshold level among individual animals was positively correlated with the relief measured 48 h later, but higher lidocaine concentrations infused in subsequent dosings could exact no further sustained relief. The residual PWT level, after reversal by threshold lidocaine and greater, was constant for each individual rat tested over the next 14 days but varied substantially among individuals; some were restored to pre-operative PWTs and some were totally unresponsive to drug. Retrospective analysis revealed a significant and unanticipated correlation between the incidence of low pre-operative PWTs (< 10 g) and a lack of sustained reversal of post-operative allodynia by lidocaine. Contralateral allodynia, despite its acute reversal during infusion to 2.1 microg/ml and higher, was not persistently relieved after infusion of lidocaine to any concentration. Repeated infusions to subthreshold levels (<2 microg/ml) did not provide persisting relief of allodynia on either side, and infusions of saline were impotent. These findings show that experimental allodynia results from multiple factors, only some of which are sensitive to lidocaine treatment, and that prolonged reversal of allodynia is limited in extent and likely influenced by pre-existing factors.

Practice policies for older anesthesiologists in academic departments: a national survey of academic departmental chairpersons.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine 1) which proportion of academic departments have policies concerning older anesthesiologists, 2) whether departments with such policies, particularly those related to call, had characteristics such as departmental size and proportions of older anesthesiologists that differed from departments without these policies, 3) if departments routinely screened their older members for problem behaviors, and 4) if departments provided nonclinical roles for older anesthesiologists. DESIGN: Survey instrument. SETTING: Academic medical centers. MEASUREMENTS: An anonymous, web-based questionnaire that included questions on demographics and specific policy-related issues was sent to chairpersons of all academic anesthesia departments in the ASA database. MAIN RESULTS: No department directly addressed every issue listed in the survey. Department size and the number of anesthesiologists over 60 years of age were unrelated to whether that department had one or more policies for older anesthesiologists. Twenty percent of programs stopped night call at age 60 years. Most departments did not exempt older anesthesiologists of any age from call responsibilities. Almost all departments tracked critical incidents and errors in technique and/or judgment. Almost three quarters tracked substance abuse, and over half of the responding departments tracked physical and emotional impairment and fixation errors. A third of departments tracked all 6 types of problem behavior. Only 12% had specific assessment tools for tracking problem behaviors in the clinic, and no department used these tools specifically for older anesthesiologists. While only 17% of departments directed older anesthesiologists into nonclinical roles, older clinicians had teaching, mentoring, and administrative roles within most of the departments. CONCLUSIONS: Relatively few departments had specific policies for older anesthesiologists that addressed the issues raised in the survey. Further research is needed to determine whether departments should decrease ambiguity of their policies, formulate explicit policies for older anesthesiologists, especially in regard to call, and assess problem behaviors more directly.