Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 18(5): 10-21, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28786239

RESUMO

The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) is a nonprofit professional society whose primary purposes are to advance the science, education, and professional practice of medical physics. The AAPM has more than 8,000 members and is the principal organization of medical physicists in the United States. The AAPM will periodically define new practice guidelines for medical physics practice to help advance the science of medical physics and to improve the quality of service to patients throughout the United States. Existing medical physics practice guidelines will be reviewed for revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner. Each medical physics practice guideline represents a policy statement by the AAPM, has undergone a thorough consensus process in which it has been subjected to extensive review, and requires the approval of the Professional Council. The medical physics practice guidelines recognize that the safe and effective use of diagnostic and therapeutic radiology requires specific training, skills, and techniques, as described in each document. Reproduction or modification of the published practice guidelines and technical standards by those entities not providing these services is not authorized. The following terms are used in the AAPM practice guidelines: Must and Must Not: Used to indicate that adherence to the recommendation is considered necessary to conform to this practice guideline. Should and Should Not: Used to indicate a prudent practice to which exceptions may occasionally be made in appropriate circumstances. Approved by AAPM Professional Council 3-31-2017 and Executive Committee 4-4-2017.


Assuntos
Física Médica/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Sociedades Científicas/normas , Física Médica/educação , Humanos , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal/normas , Física , Radioterapia (Especialidade)/normas , Estados Unidos
2.
Med Phys ; 38(6): 2914-36, 2011 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21815366

RESUMO

The task group (TG) for quality assurance for robotic radiosurgery was formed by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine's Science Council under the direction of the Radiation Therapy Committee and the Quality Assurance (QA) Subcommittee. The task group (TG-135) had three main charges: (1) To make recommendations on a code of practice for Robotic Radiosurgery QA; (2) To make recommendations on quality assurance and dosimetric verification techniques, especially in regard to real-time respiratory motion tracking software; (3) To make recommendations on issues which require further research and development. This report provides a general functional overview of the only clinically implemented robotic radiosurgery device, the CyberKnife. This report includes sections on device components and their individual component QA recommendations, followed by a section on the QA requirements for integrated systems. Examples of checklists for daily, monthly, annual, and upgrade QA are given as guidance for medical physicists. Areas in which QA procedures are still under development are discussed.


Assuntos
Medicina , Física , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Radiocirurgia/normas , Relatório de Pesquisa , Robótica , Sociedades Científicas , Calibragem , Marcadores Fiduciais , Humanos , Fenômenos Mecânicos , Movimento , Imagens de Fantasmas , Controle de Qualidade , Proteção Radiológica/normas , Radiocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Radiocirurgia/instrumentação , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador , Segurança , Silício , Software , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA