The Italian Unitary Society of Colon-proctology (SIUCP: Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia) guidelines for the management of anal fissure.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of these evidence-based guidelines is to present a consensus position from members of the Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (SIUCP: Società Italiana Unitaria di Colon-Proctologia) on the diagnosis and management of anal fissure, with the purpose to guide every physician in the choice of the best treatment option, according with the available literature. METHODS: A panel of experts was designed and charged by the Board of the SIUCP to develop key-questions on the main topics covering the management of anal fissure and to performe an accurate search on each topic in different databanks, in order to provide evidence-based answers to the questions and to summarize them in statements. All the clinical questions were discussed by the expert panel in different rounds through the Delphi approach and, for each statement, a consensus among the experts was reached. The questions were created according to the PICO criteria, and the statements developed adopting the GRADE methodology. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute anal fissure the medical therapy with dietary and behavioral norms is indicated. In the chronic phase of disease, the conservative treatment with topical 0.3% nifedipine plus 1.5% lidocaine or nitrates may represent the first-line therapy, eventually associated with ointments with film-forming, anti-inflammatory and healing properties such as Propionibacterium extract gel. In case of first-line treatment failure, the surgical strategy (internal sphincterotomy or fissurectomy with flap), may be guided by the clinical findings, eventually supported by endoanal ultrasound and anal manometry.

STARR with Contour Transtar for Obstructed Defecation Syndrome: Long-Term Results.

INTRODUCTION: Obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is a widespread and disabling syndrome. With this study, we want to evaluate the long-term results of stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) performed with Contour Transtar device in the treatment for ODS. A re-evaluation of 113 patients subjected to STARR from June 2007 to January 2010 was conducted. METHODS: All the patients treated for symptomatic ODS with STARR with Contour Transtar were included in the study. We re-evaluate all patients treated in the study period with clinical examination and specific questionnaire to verify the stability of the functional results and the satisfaction at 5 years from surgery. Constipation was graded using the Agachan-Wexner constipation score; eventual use of aids to defecate and patient satisfaction were assessed preoperatively, 6 months and 5 years after surgery. Long-term complications were also investigated. RESULTS: Constipation intensity decreased from the preoperative value of 15.8 (±4.9) to 5.2 (±3.9) (p < 0.0001) at 6 months and remained stable after 5 years (7.4 ± 4.1; p < 0.01). Patients who use laxatives and enema decrease from 74 (77%) and 27 (28%) to only 16 (17%; p < 0.001) and 5 (5%; p < 0.001), respectively, at 5-year follow-up. None continue to help themselves with digitations after surgery. Also the satisfaction rate remained stable (3.64 vs 3.81) during the 5 years of the study. CONCLUSION: The long-term results have demonstrated the efficacy of the STARR with Contour Transtar in treating ODS and the stability over time of the defecatory improvements. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02971332.

A new fixation-free 3D multilamellar preperitoneal implant for open inguinal hernia repair.

SUMMARY: Between September 2014 and December 2015, 32 patients with inguinal hernia were treated using a new 3D mesh in our department. This mesh is characterized by a multilamellar flower-shaped central core with a flat, large-pore polypropylene ovoid disk that has to be implanted preperitoneally. Compared with the traditional Lichtenstein procedure, we observed a shorter mean duration of surgery and a significantly lower mean visual analogue scale (VAS) postoperative pain score recorded immediately after the procedure in the 3D mesh group. The mean VAS score recoded after 4 and 8 postoperative days showed better results in the 3D mesh group than the control group. Moreover, there was reduced postoperative morbidity in the 3D mesh group than the control group, even if no patients experienced severe complications.

Cervical Esophagotomy for Removal of an Ingested Clam Shell: A Very Uncommon Foreign Body Ingestion.

OBJECTIVE: To report the removal of an ingested clam shell that was firmly impacted in the esophagus. CLINICAL PRESENTATION AND INTERVENTION: A 77-year-old man presented at our hospital with acute dysphagia after eating a seafood risotto. An urgent dedicated examination (noncontrast helical multislice computed tomography scan of the neck and flexible esophagoscopy) detected a clam shell lodged in the upper esophagus. After several unsuccessful endoscopic attempts, a lifesaving cervical esophagotomy was performed and the foreign body was retrieved. CONCLUSION: This patient who ingested clam shell recovered well following the retrieval of the foreign body by performing a lifesaving cervical esophagotomy.

Does ghost ileostomy have a role in the laparoscopic rectal surgery era? A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage following anterior rectal resection is the most important and most commonly faced complication of laparoscopy and open surgery. To prevent this complication, the construction of a preventing stoma is usually adopted. It is not easy to decide whether to construct a protective stoma in patients with a medium risk of anastomotic leakage. In these patients, ghost ileostomy (GI), a pre-stage ileostomy that can be externalized and opened if needed, has proved useful. We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled study to evaluate the advantages of GI in laparoscopic rectal resection. METHODS: All patients with surgical indications for laparoscopic rectal resection who were at medium risk for anastomotic leakage from January 2007 to January 2013 were included and were randomly divided in 2 groups. All of the patients were subjected to laparoscopic anterior rectal resection with the performance of GI (group A) or without the construction of any protective stoma (group B). The presence and severity of clinically evident postoperative anastomotic leakage and other postoperative complications and reinterventions were investigated. RESULTS: Of the 55 patients allocated to group A, 3 experienced anastomotic leakage compared with 4 in group B. The patients with GI experienced a lower severity of anastomotic leakage and shorter hospitalization compared with the patients in group B. None of the patients with GI and anastomotic leakage required laparotomy to treat the dehiscence. CONCLUSIONS: The use of GI in laparoscopic rectal resections in patients at medium risk for anastomotic leakage was useful because it allowed for the avoidance of stoma creation in all of the patients, thus reducing the number of stomas performed, improving the quality of life of the patients and preserving, in most cases, the benefits gained by laparoscopy.

Does the removal of retained staples really improve postoperative chronic sequelae after transanal stapled operations?

BACKGROUND: Transanal stapled procedures are increasingly being used. Several postoperative complications can be referred to their application, including those related to the presence of retained staples at the level of the staple line. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to assess whether the removal of the retained staples is a useful approach to improve some of the most common postoperative complications of these surgical techniques. DESIGN: This is a retrospective study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at the One-Day Surgery Unit of St. Andrea Hospital. PATIENTS: All of the patients who underwent a stapled transanal procedure from January 2003 to December 2011 were included in the study. Patients included in the study were followed postoperatively for 1 year after surgery to identify the presence of retained staples. INTERVENTIONS: If identified, the retained staples were removed endoscopically or transanally. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: After the staple removal, patients were followed with biweekly office visit for 2 months to evaluate the progression of symptoms. RESULTS: From the 566 patients included in the study, 165 experienced postoperative complications, and in 66 of these cases, retained staples were found and removed. With the removal of retained staples, symptoms were almost all resolved or improved. In only 1 case did the retained staples removal not modify the symptoms. LIMITATIONS: The study design may have introduced potential selection bias. In addition, the study was limited by the lack of a specific questionnaire for the evaluation of symptoms improvement. CONCLUSIONS: The removal of the retained staples is an efficacious and safe procedure to solve or improve postoperative complications and should be always considered.

The Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia) guidelines for the management of acute and chronic hemorrhoidal disease.

The aim of these evidence-based guidelines is to present a consensus position from members of the Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colon-Proctologia, SIUCP) on the diagnosis and management of hemorrhoidal disease, with the goal of guiding physicians in the choice of the best treatment option. A panel of experts was charged by the Board of the SIUCP to develop key questions on the main topics related to the management of hemorrhoidal disease and to perform an accurate and comprehensive literature search on each topic, in order to provide evidence-based answers to the questions and to summarize them in statements. All the clinical questions were discussed by the expert panel in multiple rounds through the Delphi approach and, for each statement, a consensus among the experts was reached. The questions were created according to PICO (patients, intervention, comparison, and outcomes) criteria, and the statements were developed adopting the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) methodology. In cases of grade 1 hemorrhoidal prolapse, outpatient procedures including hemorrhoidal laser procedure and sclerotherapy may be considered the preferred surgical options. For grade 2 prolapse, nonexcisional procedures including outpatient treatments, hemorrhoidal artery ligation and mucopexy, laser hemorrhoidoplasty, the Rafaelo procedure, and stapled hemorrhoidopexy may represent the first-line treatment options, whereas excisional surgery may be considered in selected cases. In cases of grades 3 and 4, stapled hemorrhoidopexy and hemorrhoidectomy may represent the most effective procedures, even if, in the expert panel opinion, stapled hemorrhoidopexy represents the gold-standard treatment for grade 3 hemorrhoidal prolapse.

Stapled transanal rectal resection with contour transtar for obstructed defecation syndrome: lessons learned after more than 3 years of single-center activity.

BACKGROUND: Obstructed defecation syndrome is a widespread and disabling disease. OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stapled transanal rectal resection performed with a new dedicated curved device in the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome. DESIGN: A retrospective review of 187 stapled transanal rectal resections performed from June 2007 to February 2011 was conducted. SETTINGS: The entire study was conducted at a university hospital. PATIENTS: : All the patients with symptomatic obstructed defecation syndrome and the presence of a rectocele and/or a rectorectal or rectoanal intussusception, in the absence of sphincter contractile deficiency, were included in the treatment protocol. INTERVENTIONS: All procedures were performed with the use of the Contour Transtar device. We analyzed the functional results of this technique, the incidence and features of the surgical and functional complications, and ways to prevent or treat them. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Constipation was graded by using the Agachan-Wexner constipation score; use of aids to defecate and patient satisfaction were assessed preoperatively and 6 months after surgery. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were also investigated. RESULTS: The constipation intensity was statistically reduced from the preoperative mean value of 15.8 (± 4.9) to 5.2 (± 3.9) at 6 months after surgery (p < 0.0001). Of the 151 (80.3%) patients who took laxatives and the 49 (26.2%) who used enemas before treatment, only 25 (13.2%; p < 0.0001) and 7 (3.7%; p < 0.0001) continued to do so after surgery. None of the 17 (9.1%) patients who had previously helped themselves with digitations needed to continue this practice. Almost all patients showed a good satisfaction rate (3.87/5) after the procedure. LIMITATIONS: Limitations are the short follow-up of 1 year and the design of the study that may introduce potential selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that stapled transanal rectal resection performed with the use of the Contour Transtar is a safe and effective procedure to treat obstructed defecation syndrome.

Preservation of the inferior mesenteric artery via laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy performed for diverticular disease: real benefit or technical challenge: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Defecatory disorders are very common complications after left hemicolectomy and anterior rectal resection. These disorders seem related primarily to colonic denervation after the resection. To evaluate the real benefits of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) preservation via laparoscopic left hemicolectomy performed for diverticular disease in terms of reduced colonic denervation and improved postoperative intestinal functions, a randomized, single-blinded (patients) controlled clinical trial was conducted. METHODS: From January 2004 to January 2010, patients with symptomatic diverticular disease and a surgical indication were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to two treatment groups. The first group underwent laparoscopic left hemicolectomy, which preserved the IMA by sectioning the sigmoid arteries one by one near the colonic wall, In the second group, the IMA was sectioned immediately below the origin of left colic artery. Defecation disorders were assessed by anorectal manometry and by three questionnaires to evaluate constipation, incontinence, and quality of life 6 months after the intervention. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were included in the study. The 54 patients with preserved IMA showed a statistically lower incidence of defecation disorders such as fragmented evacuations, alternating bowel function, constipation, and minor incontinence, as well as less lifestyle alteration than the 53 patients with the IMA sectioned just below the left colic artery. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that preservation of the IMA should be recommended to reduce the incidence of defecatory disorders after left hemicolectomy for benign disease.

Role of CT angiography with three-dimensional reconstruction of mesenteric vessels in laparoscopic colorectal resections: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery, despite its well-known advantages and continuous technological innovations, still has limitations such as the lack of tactile sensation and reduced view of the operative field. These limitations are particularly evident when performing laparoscopic colorectal resection due to the variability of the number and course of mesenteric vessels. Today, the patient's vascular anatomy can be mapped using computed tomography (CT) angiography and processing of the images with rendering software to reconstruct a three-dimensional model of the mesenteric vessels. To assess how prior knowledge of the patient's mesenteric vascular anatomy represents an advantage when performing laparoscopic colorectal resections, we conducted a randomized, parallel, single-blinded controlled trial. METHODS: From January 2010 to January 2012, all patients with surgical indication to undergo standardized right or left hemicolectomy and anterior rectal resections were randomly assigned to two groups and subjected to CT angiography with three-dimensional reconstruction of mesenteric vessels. In the first group the surgeon was able to view the 3D reconstruction before and during surgery, while in the second group the surgeon was only able to view the 3D reconstruction after surgery. RESULTS: Evaluation of data from 112 patients shows statistically significantly lower operative time, episodes of difficult identification of right anatomy, and incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complication related to difficult or erroneous identification of mesenteric vessels in the group in which the surgeon was able to view the 3D reconstruction before and during surgery compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: This study shows that prior knowledge of the patient's mesenteric vascular anatomy represents an advantage when performing laparoscopic colorectal resection.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in day surgery: feasibility and outcomes of the first 400 patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in a day surgery setting in Italy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between March 2003 and June 2011, in our institution 439 patients were selected for day surgery LC. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the procedure, postoperative complications, pain, nausea and vomiting were monitored at 4, 8, and 24 h after surgery. Patients admitted for an overnight stay or readmitted after discharging were also monitored. RESULTS: Over 8 years we performed 400 LC in day surgery setting and no conversion or major intraoperative complication were detected. A total of 387 patients (96.7%) were successfully discharged after 8-10 h of observation. Postoperative monitoring showed good pain control (mean VAS score 1.5) and only 3 (0.7%) of the 7 patients who experienced major pain were admitted. Twenty-seven patients (6.7%) experienced PONV and 9 (2.2%) of these required admission. None of the patients needed to be readmitted after discharging. The satisfaction questionnaire administered at 1 month office visit showed that 380 patients (95%) were satisfied with day surgery LC. CONCLUSIONS: Our success rate of 96.7% can be attributed to strict adherence to the patient selection criteria. The main reasons for hospital admission were pain and PONV; adequate control of these represents the key of success for day surgery LC. This study confirms the feasibility and safety of LC performed in day surgery setting.

Can a curved stapler made for open surgery be useful in laparoscopic lower rectal resections? Technique and experience of a single centre.

BACKGROUND: The use of laparoscopy to perform lower anterior rectal resection is increasing worldwide because it allows better visualisation and rectal mobilisation and also reduces postoperative pain and recovery. The Contour Curved Stapler (CCS) is a very helpful device because of its curved profile that enables better access into the pelvic cavity and allows rectal closure and section to be performed in one shot. In this paper, we present an original technique to use this device, made for open surgery, in laparoscopy and the results of our experience. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the data of all patients who underwent lower laparoscopic anterior rectal resection and in which the CCS was used to perform section of the rectum between September 2005 and September 2011. To perform section of the rectum a Lapdisc(®) was inserted through a 6-7 cm supra-pubic midline incision to allow placement of the CCS into the pelvic cavity. Patients' biographical and surgical data such as sex, age, indication for surgery, infection, anastomotic leakage or stenosis and staple-line bleeding were prospectively collected in a computerised database and evaluated. RESULTS: Between September 2005 and September 2011, we performed 45 laparoscopic lower rectal resection using CCS, 27 male and 18 female with a mean age of 61 years (range 40-82 years) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 26.5 kg/m(2) (range 16.5-35 kg/m(2)). In 29 cases a temporary ileostomy was performed. Mean operative time was 131 min (range 97-210 min). In all cases it was possible to perform a lower section of the rectum with CCS. No intraoperative or postoperative staple line bleeding occurred. In two patients we observed anastomotic leaks and in one of these a temporary ileostomy was performed. None of the patients showed an anastomotic stenosis at 1-year follow-up colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that CCS enables section of the lower rectum to be easily performed, especially in adverse anatomical condition, and the technique proposed by us allows the use of this stapler without giving up the benefits of laparoscopic access.

Modified technique for performing STARR with Contour Transtar™.

Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR) performed using CCS-30 Contour Transtar™ despite its recent introduction seems to be an effective surgical procedure to treat obstructed defecation syndrome. The major constraint of this procedure is the need to open the prolapse longitudinally using the CCS-30. This is often difficult and can lead to an inadequate or spiralling resection. Our modified technique, presented in this paper, creates the prolapse opening with an electric scalpel between two Kocher clamps, placed to grab the whole prolapsed tissue at 2 and 4 o'clock, respectively. The results of the first 83 procedures confirm that this technique allows the surgeon to simplify the prolapse's longitudinal opening and especially the first loading of the tissue between the CCS-30 jaws, which is necessary to start the circular resection, as confirmed by the absence of spiralling and major complications in this series.

Laparoscopic assisted transvaginal cholecystectomy: single centre preliminary experience.

BACKGROUND: Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) is a new approach that allows abdominal surgery to be performed through a natural orifice such as the oral cavity, vagina or rectum. We present our preliminary experience of laparoscopic assisted transvaginal cholecystectomy (LATC). METHODS: Women affected by cholelithiasis, age below 65 years, BMI under 30, ASA I or II, previous full-term pregnancies, and without previous abdominal surgery underwent LATC. Patients' biographic data, operative time, intraoperative and postoperative complications were collected. RESULTS: We performed 21 LATCs. Median operative time was 58 min. There were no intraoperative complications. The postoperative course was uneventful in all patients. At 1 year there were no complications and no impaired sexual activity. CONCLUSIONS: The results of NOTES are promising, but currently only hybrid NOTES can be safely performed. LATC seems to guarantee better cosmetic results, less postoperative pain, faster mobilization and shorter hospitalization than laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Feasibility and safety study of day-case Transtar™ procedure.

BACKGROUND: Short hospitalization surgery is cost effective and convenient for both patients and healthcare system. Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) conducted with the new curved device, Contour Transtar, has proved an effective and safe procedure for treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of STARR, performed as a day-case procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of all STARR performed as day-case surgery between September 2009 and February 2011. The entire study (intervention, data collection and data analysis) was conducted at the One-day Surgery Unit of the St. Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy. All patients with surgical indication to STARR for the presence of an obstructed defecation syndrome were included in the study. We excluded from day-case protocol, patients over 65 years old, with an ASA score of III-IV or with a BMI over 35. The surgical technique reflects the original technique proposed by Antonio Longo with the exception of the longitudinal prolapse opening, which was created with the use of an electric scalpel between two Kocher clamps and not by an application of Transtar stapler. To evaluate the feasibility and safety of performing this procedure with short hospitalization, we investigated the presence and the time of presentation of post-operative complications. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients underwent STARR as a day-case regimen, and none presented major complications or required an extension of hospital stay or readmission. CONCLUSIONS: STARR performed with Contour Transtar, in selected patients, is safe and feasible in day-case regimen if performed by expert surgeons and in a structure that allows the physician to keep the patient hospitalized or to re-admit and promptly treat those patients who present major surgical complication.

Stapled anopexy as a day surgery procedure: our experience over 400 cases.

BACKGROUND: In 1988, Longo proposed a new treatment for haemorrhoidal disease. In western countries day surgery procedures are becoming more and more common. We propose a new protocol for outpatient haemorrhoidopexy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2003 to 2010, we performed 403 out-patient stapled haemorrhoidopexies under spinal anaesthesia, on patients with symptomatic grade III and IV haemorrhoid disease. We used PPH 01 and PPH 03 staplers (Ethicon Endosurgery, Cincinnati, OH, USA). We assessed early and late postoperative pain with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and clinical postoperative examinations were performed 7 days, 6 months, and 1, 3 and 5 years after surgery. RESULTS: The mean surgery time was about 20 min (range 13-39 min). Out of 403 patients, 41 were not dischargeable as a result of urine retention, severe pain or mild bleeding. Twenty-two patients reported transient faecal urgency, while no patient complained of anal incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with 403 patients demonstrated that stapled haemorrhoidopexy is feasible and safe as a day surgery procedure. However, careful preoperative planning is necessary in order to evaluate the patients' health status and the consequent perioperative and postoperative risk. Our results are positive in terms of surgical safety and postoperative recovery time.

The Role of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence in Rectal Cancer Robotic Surgery: A Narrative Review.

BACKGROUND: In rectal cancer surgery, anastomotic leakage (AL) remains the most feared complication, with a frequency of up to 30% in non-high-volume centers. The preservation of proper vascularization is a key factor for successful anastomosis. The use of fluorescence with indocyanine green (ICG) as an intraoperative method to verify optimal perfusion is becoming an interesting tool in rectal surgery. Today, robotic surgery, together with the use of the intraoperative evaluation of the perfusion with ICG, could be a real strategy to deal with AL, allowing for a more delicate and less traumatic surgical technique. This strategy may allow for an extremely accurate surgery, and for optimal control of the proper vascularization of the rectum. METHODS: The purpose of this descriptive review is to analyze the impact of fluorescence and robotic surgery on short-term surgical outcomes for rectal cancer. RESULTS: We performed a systematic literature search using the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases. The primary endpoints were to evaluate the application of ICG fluorescence in robotic rectal surgery and the rate of anastomotic leakage when using these technological implementations. The secondary endpoints were to evaluate the dosage of ICG and the timing of application by different surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: ICG fluorescence is an inexpensive and quick method to assess bowel perfusion, providing immediate feedback to the surgeon, even if its role has not been proven. A quantitative system must be systematically introduced to minimize the subjectiveness of the visualized image.

The Role of Indocyanine Green in Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resections for Rectal Cancer Previously Treated With Chemo-radiotherapy: A Single-center Retrospective Analysis.

AIM: Anastomotic leakage represents the most fearful complication in colorectal surgery. Important risk factors for leakage are low anastomoses and preoperative radiotherapy. Many surgeons often unnecessarily perform a protective ileostomy, increasing costs and necessitating a second operation for recanalization. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of indocyanine green in assessing bowel perfusion, even in cases of a low anastomosis on tissue treated with radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two groups of patients were selected: Group A (risky group) with only low extraperitoneal rectal tumors (<8 cm) previously treated with neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy; group B (no risk group) with only intraperitoneal rectal tumors (>8 cm), not previously treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Clinical postoperative outcome, morbidity, mortality and anastomotic leakage were compared between these two groups. RESULTS: In group A, comprised of 35 patients, the overall complication rate was 8.6%, with two patients developing anastomotic leakage (5.7%). In group B, comprised of 53 patients, the overall complication rate was 17% with four cases with anastomotic leakage (7.5%). No statistical difference was observed for conversion rate, general complications, or anastomotic leakage. No statistical differences were observed in clinical variables except for American Society of Anesthesiologist score (p=0.04). Patients who developed complications during radiotherapy had no significant differences in postoperative outcomes compared with other patients. CONCLUSION: Indocyanine green appears to be safe and effective in assessing the perfusion of colorectal anastomoses, even in the highest-risk cases, potentially reducing the rate of ileostomy. The main limitation remains the lack of a universally replicable standard assessment.

Evaluation of a Post-Operative Rehabilitation Program in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Pilot Study.

This pilot study explores the effects of a post-operative physical exercise program on the quality of life (QoL) and functional and nutritional parameters of patients that underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery, compared to usual care alone. The intervention group (IG) attended a 2-month-long supervised and combined exercise-training program during the post-operative period. Both IG and control group (CG) participated in the QoL, functional, and nutritional assessments before exercise training (T0), 2 months after the beginning of the exercise (end of treatment) (T1), and 2 (T2) and 4 (T3) months from the end of treatment. Eleven patients with colorectal cancer that underwent laparoscopic surgery were enrolled (six intervention; five control). The IG showed significant improvements compared to the CG in "Physical functioning" (PF2) (p = 0.030), "Cognitive functioning" (CF) (p = 0.018), and "Fatigue" (FA) (p = 0.017) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life-C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) at T1; in SMWT (p = 0.022) at T1; in PF2 (p = 0.018) and FA (p = 0.045) of EORTC QLQ-C30 at T2, in phase angle (PhA) of bioelectrical impedance analysis (p = 0.022) at T3. This pilot study shows that a post-operative, combined, and supervised physical exercise program may have positive effects in improving the QoL, functional capacity, and nutritional status in patients that undergo laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

The "Lazio Network" experience. The first Italian regional research group on the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program. A collective database with 1200 patients in 2016-2017.

AIM: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines represent one of the most important steps forward in colorectal surgery in the last ten years. Despite the well-known and demonstrated positive impact on the clinical outcomes that this pathway provides, a cultural revolution in patient management is needed. This is not easy to obtain, especially in small and peripheral centers. In Italy, the diffusion of minimally invasive surgery and "fast-track" perioperative management of the patient is rapidly spreading, even in the central and southern regions. However, in these regions, the percentage of laparoscopic colorectal procedures is dramatically less than in the north of Italy. In this context, the idea of a research group based in Rome focused on the development and spreading of ERAS protocols in the Lazio Region was developed. METHODS: A research group, based in Rome, was founded in December 2016 to evaluate the diffusion of the ERAS program over the main colorectal centers of the region. This "Lazio Network" began with a group of surgeons and anesthesiologists from 5 hospitals. After one and half years, the project now includes 17 hospitals in the region. A multicenter database was created, including consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection following the ERAS program in the participating centers between January 2016 and December 2017. RESULTS: Data for more than 1200 patients were collected over the observed period. The rate of minimally invasive surgery was higher compared to the regional rate (90% vs. 30%), adherence to the ERAS pathway was around 60% of the items per patient. A clinical study will result from this database. The objective is to evaluate the mean number of ERAS items applied, the most common and uncommon items applied and the influence of this application on the clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of the ERAS program is rapidly increasing even in central Italian regions, even though the total rate of minimally invasive surgery procedures still low. Benefits in terms of clinical outcomes will be evaluated from the analysis of a multi-center database of patients treated between January 2016 and December 2017, including more than 1200 patients. KEY WORDS: Coloretal surgery, ERAS guidelines, Fast track surgery.