MRGPRX2 and Immediate Drug Hypersensitivity: Insights From Cultured Human Mast Cells.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mast cell (MC) degranulation via activation of the Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor X2 (MRGPRX2) plays a key role in immediate drug hypersensitivity (IDH). However, data in humans are limited to observations in specific cell lines. Objective: To study the usefulness of silencing MRGPRX2 in human MCs with the aim of further unveiling the MRGPRX2 pathway in IDH. METHODS: MCs were cultured from CD34+ progenitor cells obtained from peripheral blood (PBCMCs) and incubated with substance P (as a positive control), rocuronium, moxifloxacin, morphine, or amoxicillin. Immunophenotyping of the cells included flow cytometry and microscopy analyses of the expression of CD117, CD203c, and MRGPRX2. Intracellular calcium was measured using Fluo-4. Degranulation was analyzed by quantifying CD63 expression. For MRGPRX2 silencing, MCs were electroporated with Dicer small interference RNAs. RESULTS: Incubation of MCs with substance P, morphine, and moxifloxacin increased intracellular calcium levels and triggered MC degranulation, which, for the drugs, is almost completely abolished by selective MRGPRX2 silencing. Despite an increase in intracellular calcium in MRGPRX2+ cells, incubation with nontoxic concentrations of rocuronium does not result in degranulation of PBCMCs. Amoxicillin has no effect on PBCMCs. CONCLUSION: The use of MRGPRX2 silencing in human MCs can provide important insights into the role of MRGPRX2 in the pathogenesis of IDH. As induction of calcium signals does not necessarily translate into a secretory response, measurement of the degranulation reaction seems more meaningful in the context of drug testing.

Immediate moxifloxacin hypersensitivity: Is there more than currently meets the eye?

Immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions (IDHR) to moxifloxacin constitute a pathomechanistic conundrum and a diagnostic challenge. Our objective was to study whether simultaneous phenotyping and quantification of histamine release might add to our knowledge about the basophil activation properties of moxifloxacin and constitute a reliable diagnostic aid. Fifteen patients with an IDHR to moxifloxacin and nine moxifloxacin challenged controls were selected. All had a basophil activation test (BAT) with moxifloxacin. Flow cytometric analysis of basophil responses implied labeling for CD63, CD203c, and intracellular histamine. Unlike tolerant challenged controls, basophilic upregulation of CD203c in response to moxifloxacin was observed in seven of 15 patients. Only two of these seven patients demonstrated appearance of CD63 and release of histamine. In the remainder eight patients, no basophil responses were demonstrable. In conclusion, immediate hypersensitivity to moxifloxacin might involve mechanisms difficult to capture by traditional CD63-/CD203c-based BAT. Deciphering the complexity of quinolone IDHR seems mandatory.

Cannabis sativa allergy: looking through the fog.

IgE-mediated Cannabis (C. sativa, marihuana) allergy seems to be on the rise. Both active and passive exposure to cannabis allergens may trigger a C. sativa sensitization and/or allergy. The clinical presentation of a C. sativa allergy varies from mild to life-threatening reactions and often seems to depend on the route of exposure. In addition, sensitization to cannabis allergens can result in various cross-allergies, mostly for plant foods. This clinical entity, designated as the 'cannabis-fruit/vegetable syndrome', might also imply cross-reactivity with tobacco, natural latex and plant-food-derived alcoholic beverages. Hitherto, these cross-allergies are predominantly reported in Europe and appear mainly to rely upon cross-reactivity between nonspecific lipid transfer proteins or thaumatin-like proteins present in C. sativa and their homologues, ubiquitously distributed throughout plant kingdom. At present, diagnosis of cannabis-related allergies predominantly rests upon a thorough history completed with skin testing using native extracts from crushed buds and leaves. However, quantification of specific IgE antibodies and basophil activation tests can also be helpful to establish correct diagnosis. In the absence of a cure, treatment comprises absolute avoidance measures. Whether avoidance of further use will halt the extension of related cross-allergies remains uncertain.

Allergy to illicit drugs and narcotics.

Despite their frequent use, allergy to illicit drugs and narcotics is rarely reported in literature. We present a review of the different classes of drugs of abuse that might be involved in allergies: central nervous system (CNS) depressants (such as cannabis, opioids and kava), CNS stimulants (cocaine, amphetamines, khat and ephedra) and hallucinogens such as ketamine and nutmeg. Diagnosis of drug and narcotic allergy generally relies upon careful history taking, complemented with skin testing eventually along with quantification of sIgE. However, for various reasons, correct diagnosis of most of these drug allergies is not straightforward. For example, the native plant material applied for skin testing and sIgE antibody tests might harbour irrelevant IgE-binding structures that hamper correct diagnosis. Diagnosis might also be hampered due to uncertainties associated with the non-specific histamine releasing characteristics of some compounds and absence of validated sIgE tests. Whether the introduction of standardized allergen components and more functional tests, that is, basophil activation and degranulation assays, might be helpful to an improved diagnosis needs to be established. It is anticipated that due to the rare character of these allergies further validation is although necessary.

Clinical practice of hereditary angioedema in Belgium: opportunities for optimized care.

INTRODUCTION: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare disorder characterized by unpredictable painful and potentially life-threatening swelling episodes. The international WAO/EAACI guideline on the diagnosis and management of HAE was recently updated and provides up-to-date guidance for the management of. In this paper, we assessed to what extent the Belgian clinical practice was aligned with the revised guideline, and whether there were opportunities to optimise Belgian clinical practice in HAE. METHODS: We compared the updated international guideline for HAE with information we acquired on Belgian clinical practice, a Belgian patient registry and expert opinion analysis. The Belgian patient registry was developed with the involvement of eight Belgian reference centers for HAE patients. Eight Belgian experts, physicians in the participating centers, included patients in the patient registry and participated in the expert opinion analysis. RESULTS: The main action points to further optimise the Belgian clinical practice of HAE are Work towards total disease control and normalize patients' life by considering the use of new and innovative long-term prophylactic treatment options; (2) inform C1-INH-HAE patients about new long-term prophylactic therapies; (3) assure the availability of on-demand therapy for all C1-INH-HAE patients; (4) implement a more universally used assessment including multiple aspects of the disease (e.g. quality of life assessment) in daily clinical practice; and (5) continue and expand an existing patient registry to assure continued data availability on C1-INH-HAE in Belgium. CONCLUSIONS: In light of the updated WAO/EAACI guideline, five action points were identified and several other suggestions were made to optimise the Belgian clinical practice in C1-INH-HAE.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) in Belgium: results from a national survey.

Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare heritable disorder that is characterized by recurrent, circumscribed, nonpitting, nonpruritic, often painful subepithelial swellings of sudden unpredictable onset that generally fade during 48-72 h. Epidemiological data of hereditary angioedema patients in Belgium is lacking. Methods: We set up a nation-wide, multicentric study involving the 8 Belgian hospitals known to follow-up patients with Type I and II HAE. All Belgium HAE patients were asked to fill out questionnaires that mainly covered demographic data, family history, and detailed information about diagnosis, treatment and burden of their Type I and II HAE. Results: 112 patients with type I or type II HAE could be included. Median delay between first symptoms and diagnosis was 7 years. 51% of patients had experienced pharyngeal or tongue swelling and 78% had experienced abdominal symptoms, both known to cause an important reduction in quality of life. 60% of symptomatic patients reported to receive long term prophylactic treatment. Human plasma-derived C1-esterase inhibitor concentrate was used by 56.3% of patients. 16.7% and 27.1% of patients used a 17-α-alkylated androgen and tranexamic acid as long term prophylactic therapy. Conclusions: We present the first nation-wide epidemiological study regarding HAE in Belgium. Our data show that the morbidity of HAE is not to be underestimated. Knowledge and dissemination of this data is critical in raising awareness, encouraging development of therapies and optimising nationwide management.

Rationale and design of the multicentric, double-blind, double-placebo, randomized trial APrepitant versus HYdroxyzine in association with cytoreductive treatments for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasia suffering from Persistent Aquagenic Pruritus. Trial acronym: APHYPAP.

BACKGROUND: Aquagenic pruritus (AP), an intense sensation of scratching induced after water contact, is the most troublesome aspect of BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Mostly described in polycythemia vera (PV, ~ 40%), it is also present in essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) (10%). Even if this symptom can decrease or disappear under cytoreductive treatments, 30% of treated MPN patients still persist with a real impact on the quality of life (QoL). Because its pathophysiology is poorly understood, efficient symptomatic treatments of AP are missing. The neuropeptide substance P (SP) plays a crucial role in the induction of pruritus. Several studies showed the efficacy of aprepitant, an antagonist of SP receptor (NK-1R), in the treatment of chronic pruritus but never evaluated in AP. The objectives of APHYPAP are twofold: a clinical aim with the evaluation of the efficacy of two drugs in the treatment of a persistent AP for MPN patients and a biological aim to find clues to elucidate AP pathophysiology. METHODS/DESIGN: A multicentric, double-blind, double-placebo, randomized study will include 80 patients with MPN (PV or ET or PMF) treated since at least 6 months for their hemopathy but suffering from a persistent AP (VAS intensity ≥6/10). Patients will be randomized between aprepitant (80 mg daily) + placebo to match to hydroxyzine OR hydroxyzine (25 mg daily) + placebo to match to aprepitant for 14 days. At D0, baseline information will be collected and drugs dispense. Outcome measures will be assessed at D15, D30, D45, and D60. The primary study endpoint will be the reduction of pruritus intensity below (or equal) at 3/10 on VAS at D15. Secondary outcome measures will include the number of patients with a reduction or cessation of AP at D15 or D60; evaluation of QoL and AP characteristics at D0, D15, D30, D45, and D60 with MPN-SAF and AP questionnaires, respectively; modification of plasmatic concentrations of cytokines and neuropeptides at D0, D15, D30, and D60; and modification of epidermal innervation density and pruriceptor expression at D0 and D15. DISCUSSION: The APHYPAP trial will examine the efficacy of aprepitant vs hydroxyzine (reference treatment for AP) to treat persistent AP in MPN patients. The primary objective is to demonstrate the superiority of aprepitant vs hydroxyzine to treat persistent AP of MPN patients. The treatment received will be considered efficient if the AP intensity will be reduced at 3/10 or below on VAS after 14 days of treatment. The results of this study may provide a new treatment option for this troublesome symptom and also give us more insights in the pathophysiology understanding of AP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: APHYPAP. NCT03808805 , first posted: January 18, 2019; last update posted: June 10, 2021. EudraCT 2018-090426-66.

Association between depression and hostile attribution bias in hostile and non-hostile individuals: An ERP study.

BACKGROUND: Hostility and aggression have been found to be highly prevalent among depressed patients and are associated with higher comorbidity and illness severity levels. Although negative interpretation biases are a fundamental element of cognitive models of depression, few studies have examined the specific biases in information processing, mainly the hostile attribution bias, found in hostile individuals who present depressive symptoms. METHOD: Using pre-collected data from a sample of 72 (male=41,6%, female=58,3%) undergraduate and community-based hostile (n = 26) and non-hostile (n = 46) adult participants, the authors aimed to examine the association between depression and the hostile attribution bias by determining whether depression level scores were uniquely related to electrophysiological measures of the hostile attribution bias. RESULTS: The hostile group showed higher measured levels of depression and reactive aggression compared to the non-hostile group. Also, depression scores were significant predictors of the N400 effect in the non-hostile task condition, while reactive aggression was not, whereas in the hostile condition, the overall model was significant, with depression and reactive aggression levels both showing strong trends towards significance. LIMITATIONS: A small sample size limited the scope of our conclusions. Also, sample selection prevented us from examining specific group differences regarding the hostile attribution bias in depressed and non-depressed groups. CONCLUSION: Clinical and research implications include the necessity to apply cognitive restructuring techniques to counter biased interpretation processes in settings where depression and aggression intersect, and the need to consider alternatives to self-evaluative methodologies.

In Vitro Diagnosis of Immediate Drug Hypersensitivity Anno 2017: Potentials and Limitations.

BACKGROUND: For most physicians, quantification of drug-specific immunoglobulin E (drug-sIgE) antibodies constitutes the primary in vitro measure to document immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions (IDHR). Unfortunately, this is often insufficient to correctly identify patients with IgE-mediated IDHR and impossible for non-IgE-mediated IDHR that result from alternative routes of basophil and mast cell activation. In these difficult cases, diagnosis might benefit from cellular tests such as basophil activation tests (BAT). AIM: The aim was to review the potential and limitations of quantification of sIgE and BAT in diagnosing IDHR. The utility of quantification of serum tryptase is discussed. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using the key words allergy, basophil activation, CD63, CD203c, diagnosis, drugs, hypersensitivity, flow cytometry, specific IgE antibodies; this was complemented by the authors' own experience. RESULTS: The drugs that have been most studied with both techniques are ß-lactam antibiotics and curarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA). For sIgE morphine, data are available on the value of this test as a biomarker for sensitization to substituted ammonium structures that constitute the major epitope of NMBA, especially rocuronium and suxamethonium. For the BAT, there are also data on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and iodinated radiocontrast media. For ß-lactam antibiotics, sensitivity and specificity of sIgE varies between 0 and 85% and 52 and 100%, respectively. For NMBA, sensitivity and specificity varies between 38.5 and 92% and 85.7 and 100%, respectively. Specific IgE to morphine should not be used in isolation to diagnose IDHR to NMBA nor opiates. For the BAT, sensitivity generally varies between 50 and 60%, whereas specificity attains 80%, except for quinolones and NSAIDs. CONCLUSIONS: Although drug-sIgE assays and BAT can provide useful information in the diagnosis of IDHR, their predictive value is not absolute. Large-scale collaborative studies are mandatory to harmonize and optimize test protocols and to establish drug-specific decision thresholds.

Flow-assisted basophil activation tests in immediate drug hypersensitivity: two decades of Antwerp experience.

The last two decades have witnessed that flow-assisted analysis of in vitro-activated basophils can constitute a valuable adjunct in the in vitro diagnostic approach of immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions (IDHR). This article summarises the current experience with the basophil activation test in the diagnosis of IDHR, with particular focus on allergy to curarising neuromuscular blocking agents, antibiotics (ß-lactams and fluoroquinolones), iodinated radiocontrast media and opiates.

Molecular allergy diagnosis: status anno 2015.

IgE antibodies play a key role in type I allergic reactions. Today, different in vitro immunoassays for allergen-specific IgE antibodies are available. However, some major issues should be taken into account for correct interpretation of specific IgE (sIgE) antibody results, as these assays do not demonstrate absolute positive and negative predictive values. Therefore, additional diagnostic tests are needed to make the correct diagnosis. During the last two decades significant progress in biochemistry and molecular biology enabled the detection and quantification of sIgE antibodies to allergen protein components and epitope-emulating peptides, also called molecular allergy diagnosis or component resolved diagnosis (CRD). In contrast to conventional sIgE antibody assays, molecular allergy diagnosis makes it possible to discriminate between genuine allergy and merely sensitisation, to establish personalized sensitization patterns and to assess the individual risk of severity of an allergic reaction and finally it helps us to predict the natural course. In this review the use of CRD in inhalant, food, latex and hymenoptera venom allergy will be discussed. The primary focus will be on the most relevant clinical applications of CRD rather than to describe all the currently available allergen components and epitopes. Appropriate experience of our own research group is provided.