Visual acuity changes in the preoperative period in patients undergoing cataract surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study quantifies change in best visual acuity (BVA) over the preoperative period and assesses factors associated with postoperative outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review conducted at a single institution. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 691 patients underwent cataract surgery and had a preoperative assessment 0-30 days prior to surgery following their surgical evaluation. METHODS: Baseline demographics and past medical and clinical data were collected through electronic medical record query. BVA was noted at initial surgical evaluation, preoperative assessment, and nearest postoperative assessment. RESULTS: A total of 691 patients (911 eyes) were included with mean BVAs at the initial evaluation, preoperative assessment, and postoperative assessment of 68.3 ± 16.8, 64.6 ± 18.5, and 81.1 ± 12.0 ETDRS letters, respectively. Mean BVA was significantly higher postoperatively compared with the preoperative assessment and initial evaluation (p < 0.0001). There was a mean of 53.8 days between initial surgical evaluation and surgery date and a mean of 49.9 days between the preoperative assessment and initial surgical evaluation. The mean interval between the preoperative assessment and surgery was 11.7 days. In the preoperative period, 9.1% of eyes experienced worsening of BVA by >3 eyes and 0.9% experienced improvement of BVA by >3 lines. Time to surgery was significantly associated with change in postoperative BVA (effect size, -0.03 ETDRS letters; p = 0.015) but was not significant on multiple linear regression. BVA at initial evaluation, glaucoma, and glaucoma surgery were all significantly associated with postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSION: Most eyes experienced stable vision in the preoperative period for cataract surgery. On average, patients with high BVAs at the time of initial surgical evaluation may be able to defer surgery without the risk of poorer surgical outcomes.

Perioperative COVID-19 Screening at a Tertiary Ophthalmic Institution.

Purpose: To characterize the rate of COVID-19 positivity during presurgical screening and the surgical outcomes of ophthalmic patients who were positive for COVID-19 and to report the overall cost. Methods: This retrospective study included patients 18 years or older who had ophthalmic surgical procedures at a tertiary institution between May 11, 2020, and December 31, 2020. Patients without a valid presurgical COVID-19 test within 3 days before their scheduled procedure, who had incomplete or mislabeled visits, or who had incomplete or missing data in their file were excluded. COVID-19 screening was completed using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) kit. Results: Of the 3585 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 2044 (57.02%) were women; the mean age was 68.2 years ± 12.8 (SD). Thirteen asymptomatic patients (0.36%) tested positive for COVID-19 via PCR screening. Three patients had a known positive COVID-19 infection within the 90 days before surgery; thus, 10 patients (0.28%) were found to have asymptomatic naïve COVID-19 infection via PCR testing. Testing was associated with a total charge of US $800 000. Five of the 13 patients (38.46%) who tested positive for COVID-19 experienced a delay in their surgery; the mean delay was 17.23 ± 22.97 days. Conclusions: Asymptomatic ophthalmic surgical patients had a low positivity rate with a limited impact on surgery scheduling at a significant cost. Further studies would be valuable in evaluating a targeted presurgical screening population as opposed to universal testing.

Characterization of ophthalmology virtual visits during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the use of virtual visits, as well as compare the characteristics to in-person visits during the pandemic period. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who had virtual and in-person ophthalmology visits from March 19, 2020, to July 31, 2020, in a large multispecialty ophthalmic center. Exclusion criteria included patients aged less than 18 years old; canceled, incomplete, mislabelled, and duplicated visits. 2943 virtual and 56,174 in-person visits were identified. A random sample of 3000 in-person visits was created. Each visit was analyzed as an individual data point. RESULTS: 2,266 virtual visits (2,049 patients, 64.3% female, mean [SD] age 64.3 [16.6] years old) and 2590 in-person visits (2509 patients, 59.5% female, 65.9 [15.8] years old) were included. Most virtual visits were classified as comprehensive ophthalmology (34.6%), optometry-related (19.5%), and oculoplastics (13.0%). For in-person visits, the most common specialties were optometry (29.8%), comprehensive ophthalmology (23.9%), and retina and uveitis (17.3%). The most common diagnoses in the virtual group were from the eyelids, lacrimal system, and orbits group (26.9%), while in the in-person groups were choroid and retina conditions (19.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Numerous ocular conditions were evaluated and managed through virtual visits, and external complaints and oculoplastic consults appear to be well-suited to the virtual format. Further studies focusing on visual outcomes and patient experience will be beneficial.

An analysis of time to treatment in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Currently, no guidelines exist regarding the appropriate time from diagnosis to treatment among pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. Herein, we aim to define the median time to treatment in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, factors associated with treatment delay, and prognostic significance. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients, stage I-IV, at a tertiary referral center (2017-2020). We subdivided time to treatment (days) into 4 components: (1) Ti: symptom onset to initial provider evaluation, (2) Tii: initial provider evaluation to diagnosis, (3) Tiii: diagnosis to specialist consultation, (4) Tiv: specialist visit to treatment. RESULTS: In total, 217 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median Ti, Tii, Tiii, and Tiv were 20, 12, 4, and 14 days, respectively. The total time to treatment was 75 days. Patients with weight loss had longer Ti (ß = 108.6). More frequent hospitalizations (ß = 19.5) and misdiagnosis (ß = 33.4) were associated with longer Tii. Patients with a history of malignancy (ß = 15) or active treatment of a second disease (ß = 19.4) had longer Tiii. Poor performance status (ß = 6.2) or private insurance (ß = 50.2) were associated with a longer Tiv. Black patients had longer Ti+ii+iii+iv (ß = 100). Time to treatment was not associated with overall survival (P > .05). CONCLUSION: It takes a median time of less than a month for a patient with pancreatic adenocarcinoma to start treatment, even after they visit a primary provider. The greatest opportunity to shorten the overall time to treatment is by having patients seek medical attention earlier (Ti).