RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous pedicle instrumentation (PPI) has been used for the treatment of thoracic and thoracolumbar (TL) trauma. However, the ability of PPI to correct significant post-traumatic kyphosis requires further investigation. The objective of this study is to compare the amount of kyphosis correction achieved by PPI vs the traditional open posterior approach in patients presenting with significant kyphotic deformity following traumatic thoracic and TL spine injuries. METHODS: Following Institutional Review Board approval, patients who underwent surgery for thoracic (T1-T9) or TL (T10-L2) fractures with at least 15° of focal kyphosis in a 5-year period were included in this study. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts based on surgical technique: traditional open posterior approach and minimally invasive PPI. Kyphosis correction was measured using Cobb angle 1 vertebrae above and 1 below the level of injury on sagittal preoperative computed tomography image, immediate and follow-up postoperative upright lateral radiographs. Initial degree of correction and loss of correction at the final follow-up were compared. RESULTS: Of 91 patients included, 65 (71%) underwent open surgery and 26 (29%) underwent PPI. Open patients had 11° (95% CI, 9°-13°) of immediate correction compared with 11° (95% CI, 6°-15°) for PPI (P = 0.81). Follow-up data were available for 70 patients with a median of 105.5 days. Both groups had 1° (95% CI, 0°-2°) of loss of correction at follow-up (P = 0.82). Regardless of surgical technique, obesity (>30 kg/m2) and AO type-A compression fractures had significantly less correction. For each unit of body mass index, there was a 0.75° decrease in correction achieved (P < 0.0001). Other factors did not influence the degree of correction. CONCLUSIONS: PPI techniques provide equivalent postoperative angular correction and maintenance of correction compared with open surgery in thoracic and TL trauma patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides evidence for spine surgeons to utilize either technique for treating significant traumatic kyphotic deformity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic 3.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardiovasculares/efeitos adversos , Extremidade Superior/lesões , Plexo Braquial/lesões , Humanos , Isquemia/etiologia , Posicionamento do Paciente , Fatores de Risco , Esternotomia/efeitos adversos , Extremidade Superior/irrigação sanguínea , Extremidade Superior/inervaçãoRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis. OBJECTIVE: To determine if bariatric surgery prior to posterior lumbar decompression and fusion (PLDF) for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) is a cost-effective strategy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Obesity poses significant perioperative challenges for DS. Treated operatively, obese patients achieve worse outcomes relative to non-obese peers. Concomitantly, they fare better with surgery than with nonoperative measures. These competing facts create uncertainty in determining optimal treatment algorithms for obese patients with DS. The role of bariatric surgery merits investigation as a potentially cost-effective optimization strategy prior to PLDF. METHODS: We simulated a Markov model with two cohorts of obese individuals with DS. 10,000 patients with body mass index (BMI) more than or equal to 30 in both arms were candidates for both bariatric surgery and PLDF. Subjects were assigned either to (1) no weight loss intervention with immediate operative or nonoperative management ("traditional arm") or (2) bariatric surgery 2 years prior to entering the same management options ("combined protocol").Published costs, utilities, and transition probabilities from the literature were applied. A willingness to pay threshold of $100,000/QALY was used. Sensitivity analyses were run for all variables to assess the robustness of the model. RESULTS: Over a 10-year horizon, the combined protocol was dominant ($13,500 cheaper, 1.15 QALY more effective). Changes in utilities of operative and nonoperative treatments in non-obese patients, the obesity cost-multiplier, cost of bariatric surgery, and the probability of success of nonoperative treatment in obese patients led to decision changes. However, all thresholds occurred outside published bounds for these variables. CONCLUSION: The combined protocol was less costly and more effective than the traditional protocol. Results were robust with thresholds occurring outside published ranges. Bariatric surgery is a viable, cost-effective preoperative strategy in obese patients considering elective PLDF for DS.Level of Evidence: 3.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Descompressão Cirúrgica , Obesidade , Fusão Vertebral , Espondilolistese , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Cirurgia Bariátrica/economia , Cirurgia Bariátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Descompressão Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Descompressão Cirúrgica/economia , Descompressão Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Obesidade/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Fusão Vertebral/economia , Fusão Vertebral/estatística & dados numéricos , Espondilolistese/complicações , Espondilolistese/epidemiologia , Espondilolistese/cirurgia , Redução de PesoRESUMO
Osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) is a common condition associated with ankle injury that brings challenges in the diagnosis and treatment. Symptoms related to this condition are nonspecific including pain, swelling, stiffness, and mechanical symptoms of locking and catching. While the natural history of the OLTs is not well understood, surgical treatment is often required especially in chronic cases and acute cases with displaced articular fragments. Arthroscopic treatment of the OLTs aims to restore ankle joint function and pain relief by the removal of the chondral or osteochondral fragment, debridement and stabilization of cartilage rim and subchondral bone, and stimulate healing of the bone and damaged cartilage. In patients with a large lesion or after a failure of previous bone marrow stimulation, biologic restoration techniques including the use of particulate juvenile cartilage techniques, autogenous chondrocyte implantation, and osteochondral autograft or allograft transplantation may have role. This article summarizes the contemporary concepts in the clinical evaluation and treatment of OLTs with particular emphasis on surgical strategies.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) comprise a range of neurodevelopmental conditions of varying severity, characterized by marked qualitative difficulties in social relatedness, communication, and behavior. Despite overwhelming evidence of high heritability, results from genetic studies to date show that ASD etiology is extremely heterogeneous and only a fraction of autism genes have been discovered. METHODS: To help unravel this genetic complexity, we performed whole exome sequencing on 100 ASD individuals from 40 families with multiple distantly related affected individuals. All families contained a minimum of one pair of ASD cousins. Each individual was captured with the Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon kit, sequenced on the Illumina Hiseq 2000, and the resulting data processed and annotated with Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA), Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK), and SeattleSeq. Genotyping information on each family was utilized in order to determine genomic regions that were identical by descent (IBD). Variants identified by exome sequencing which occurred in IBD regions and present in all affected individuals within each family were then evaluated to determine which may potentially be disease related. Nucleotide alterations that were novel and rare (minor allele frequency, MAF, less than 0.05) and predicted to be detrimental, either by altering amino acids or splicing patterns, were prioritized. RESULTS: We identified numerous potentially damaging, ASD associated risk variants in genes previously unrelated to autism. A subset of these genes has been implicated in other neurobehavioral disorders including depression (SLIT3), epilepsy (CLCN2, PRICKLE1), intellectual disability (AP4M1), schizophrenia (WDR60), and Tourette syndrome (OFCC1). Additional alterations were found in previously reported autism candidate genes, including three genes with alterations in multiple families (CEP290, CSMD1, FAT1, and STXBP5). Compiling a list of ASD candidate genes from the literature, we determined that variants occurred in ASD candidate genes 1.65 times more frequently than in random genes captured by exome sequencing (P = 8.55 × 10-5). CONCLUSIONS: By studying these unique pedigrees, we have identified novel DNA variations related to ASD, demonstrated that exome sequencing in extended families is a powerful tool for ASD candidate gene discovery, and provided further evidence of an underlying genetic component to a wide range of neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric diseases.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Endemic measles was declared eliminated in the United States in 2000, but imported measles cases continue to cause outbreaks. On June 20, 2011, 5 epidemiologically linked measles cases were reported to the Indiana State Department of Health. We investigated to identify additional cases and to prevent further spread. METHODS: Case findings and contact investigations during the June 3, 2011-August 13, 2011 outbreak identified measles cases, exposed persons, and exposure settings. Laboratory confirmation included measles serology and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. Control measures included evaluating measles immune status and providing post-exposure prophylaxis, isolation, and quarantine. RESULTS: Fourteen confirmed measles illnesses were identified (10 [71%] females; median age, 11.5 years [range, 15 months-27 years]). The source patient was an unvaccinated US resident who recently traveled from Indonesia. Twelve patients were unvaccinated members of the source patient's extended family. Two hospitalizations and no deaths were reported. Among 868 exposed persons identified through contact investigation, 644 (74%) had documented measles immunity, 153 (18%) were lost to follow-up, and 71 (8%) lacked evidence of immunity. CONCLUSIONS: Misdiagnosis of measles in an unvaccinated patient with recent travel history to a measles-endemic region resulted in the second largest measles outbreak in the United States during 2011. Clinicians should consider measles among patients presenting with febrile rash illness and history of recent travel, and clinicians should promptly report suspected illnesses. Early identification of infectious patients, rapid public health investigation, and maintenance of high vaccine coverage are critical for the prevention and control of measles outbreaks.