Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMJ Open ; 12(3): e059647, 2022 03 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35260463

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Status migrainosus is a disabling complication of migraine, which frequently results in hospitalisation. For patients who fail to respond to simple analgesia, triptans and intravenous prochlorperazine or chlorpromazine, there are limited treatment options, and a paucity of high-quality evidence to guide clinical practice. Eptinezumab, an intravenous monoclonal antibody specific for the calcitonin gene-related peptide ligand which achieves maximal plasma concentration immediately following administration and may improve migraines from day one. Intravenous lignocaine is an anaesthetic medication used in treatment of status migrainosus, often requiring prolonged admissions and with potential cardiac adverse events. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in the treatment of status migrainosus in comparison to intravenous lidocaine. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Status migrainosus inpatient treatment with eptinezumab is a randomised, controlled, single-centre clinical trial conducted in a parallel design with an active comparator conducted in Melbourne, Australia. This study randomises forty patients (1:1) to receive either eptinezumab or an infusion of intravenous lignocaine for up to 5 days. It will assess the effect of eptinezumab compared with intravenous lignocaine in aborting status migrainosus, with the primary outcome of time from infusion until resolution of pain. It will explore several secondary measures including change in health resource utilisation, effect on patient reported outcomes of migraine disability and the safety and tolerability of each medication. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been reviewed and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Alfred Health, local reference number 443/21, and all participants will provide informed consent for participation in the trial and dissemination of results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The trial registration number is ACTRN12621001616864. The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and social media.


Assuntos
Pacientes Internados , Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Método Duplo-Cego , Hospitalização , Humanos , Lidocaína/uso terapêutico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Epilepsia Open ; 5(2): 230-239, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32524048

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate feasibility, safety, and tolerability of long-term (48 weeks) add-on treatment with triheptanoin (UX007), the triglyceride of heptanoate, in adults with drug-resistant epilepsy. METHODS: This extension study was offered to adult participants with drug-resistant epilepsy who completed a 12-week randomized controlled trial of add-on medium-chain triglycerides (MCT) vs triheptanoin. Participants were asked to titrate triheptanoin to their maximum tolerated dose over 3 weeks, followed by 48-week maintenance before tapering or treatment extension. The primary aims were to assess retention and safety of the triheptanoin treatment, and secondary aims to assess the tolerated doses and changes in seizure frequency. RESULTS: Eleven adults were enrolled and ten people were analyzed (because one patient was diagnosed as having nonepileptic seizures while on the study). Two adults finished the study and extended their treatment. Eight participants withdrew from the study, due to lack of efficacy (n = 3), unknown reasons (n = 2), belief of weight gain (n = 1), wanting to try a different treatment (n = 1), and a colonoscopy (n = 1). Diarrhea in two people and bloating in one person were deemed possibly related to treatment, but other adverse events were not. The duration of maintenance treatment dose was 27-513 days (median 247 days, range 27-513 days), and 0.49 -1.1 mL/kg triheptanoin was taken per day (0.77 ± 0.19 mL/kg, mean ± standard deviation, 40-100 mL/d). Two participants experienced >90% and three people >50% reduction in seizure frequency, and all had focal seizures. The median seizure reduction was 48% (average 38%). SIGNIFICANCE: Our results indicate antiseizure effects of triheptanoin on focal seizures in 5 out of 10 adults. However, only two people finished and extended the 48-week add-on treatment phase, despite lack of safety or tolerability issues.More studies focused on improved treatment formulations, the potential of lower dosages, and efficacy are needed. Trial registration number: ACTRN12615000406505.

3.
Epilepsia Open ; 4(1): 153-163, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30868125

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility, safety, and tolerability of add-on treatment of the triglycerides of heptanoate (triheptanoin) vs the triglycerides of octanoate and decanoate (medium chain triglycerides [MCTs]) in adults with treatment-refractory epilepsy. METHODS: After an 8-week prospective baseline period, people with drug-resistant epilepsy were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive triheptanoin or MCTs. Treatment was titrated over 3 weeks to a maximum of 100 mL/d to be distributed over 3 meals and mixed into food, followed by 12-week maintenance before tapering. The primary aims were to assess the following: (a) safety by comparing the number of intervention-related adverse events with triheptanoin vs MCT treatment and (b) adherence, measured as a percentage of the prescribed treatment doses taken. RESULTS: Thirty-four people were randomized (17 to MCT and 17 to triheptanoin). There were no differences regarding (a) the number of participants completing the study (11 vs 9 participants), (b) the time until withdrawal, (c) the total number of adverse events or those potentially related to treatment, (d) median doses of oils taken (59 vs 55 mL/d, P = 0.59), or (e) change in seizure frequency (54% vs 102%, P = 0.13). Please note that people with focal unaware seizures were underrepresented in the triheptanoin treatment arm (P = 0.04). The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal disturbances (47% and 62.5% of participants). Five people taking on average 0.73 mL/kg body weight MCTs (0.64 mL/kg median) and one person taking 0.59 mL/kg triheptanoin showed >50% reduction in seizure frequency, specifically focal unaware seizures. SIGNIFICANCE: Add-on treatment with MCTs or triheptanoin was feasible, safe, and tolerated for 12 weeks in two-thirds of people with treatment-resistant epilepsy. Our results indicate a protective effect of MCTs on focal unaware seizures. This warrants further study.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA