Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Stroke ; 17(1): 77-82, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33527886

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of e-CTA (product name) (Brainomix) in the automatic detection of large vessel occlusions in anterior circulation stroke. METHODS: Of 487 CT angiographies from patients with large vessel occlusions stroke, 327 were used to train the algorithm while the remaining cases together with 140 negative CT angiographies were used to validate its performance against ground truth. Of these 301 cases, 144 were randomly selected and used for an additional comparative analysis against 4 raters. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV), accuracy and level of agreement with ground truth (Cohen's Kappa) were determined and compared to the performance of a neuroradiologist, a radiology resident, and two neurology residents. RESULTS: e-CTA had a sensitivity and specificity of 0.84 (0.77-0.89) and 0.96 (0.91-0.98) respectively for the detection of any large vessel occlusions on the correct side in the whole validation cohort. This performance was identical in the comparative analysis subgroup and was within the range of physicians at different levels of expertise: 0.86-0.97 and 0.91-1.00, respectively. For the detection of proximal occlusions, it was 0.92 (0.84-0.96) and 0.98 (0.94-1.00) for the whole cohort and 0.93 (0.80-0.98) and 1.00 (0.95-1.00) for the comparative analysis, respectively for e-CTA. The range was 0.8-0.97 for sensitivity and 0.97-1.00 for specificity for the four physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of e-CTA in detecting any large vessel occlusions is comparable to less experienced physicians but is similar to experienced physicians for detecting proximal large vessel occlusions.


Assuntos
Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Angiografia Cerebral , Humanos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagem
2.
Int J Stroke ; 11(4): 438-45, 2016 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26880058

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS) is an established 10-point quantitative topographic computed tomography scan score to assess early ischemic changes. We compared the performance of the e-ASPECTS software with those of stroke physicians at different professional levels. METHODS: The baseline computed tomography scans of acute stroke patients, in whom computed tomography and diffusion-weighted imaging scans were obtained less than two hours apart, were retrospectively scored by e-ASPECTS as well as by three stroke experts and three neurology trainees blinded to any clinical information. The ground truth was defined as the ASPECTS on diffusion-weighted imaging scored by another two non-blinded independent experts on consensus basis. Sensitivity and specificity in an ASPECTS region-based and an ASPECTS score-based analysis as well as receiver-operating characteristic curves, Bland-Altman plots with mean score error, and Matthews correlation coefficients were calculated. Comparisons were made between the human scorers and e-ASPECTS with diffusion-weighted imaging being the ground truth. Two methods for clustered data were used to estimate sensitivity and specificity in the region-based analysis. RESULTS: In total, 34 patients were included and 680 (34 × 20) ASPECTS regions were scored. Mean time from onset to computed tomography was 172 ± 135 min and mean time difference between computed tomographyand magnetic resonance imaging was 41 ± 31 min. The region-based sensitivity (46.46% [CI: 30.8;62.1]) of e-ASPECTS was better than three trainees and one expert (p ≤ 0.01) and not statistically different from another two experts. Specificity (94.15% [CI: 91.7;96.6]) was lower than one expert and one trainee (p < 0.01) and not statistically different to the other four physicians. e-ASPECTS had the best Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.44 (experts: 0.38 ± 0.08 and trainees: 0.19 ± 0.05) and the lowest mean score error of 0.56 (experts: 1.44 ± 1.79 and trainees: 1.97 ± 2.12). CONCLUSION: e-ASPECTS showed a similar performance to that of stroke experts in the assessment of brain computed tomographys of acute ischemic stroke patients with the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score method.


Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagem , Médicos , Software , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Alberta , Competência Clínica , Erros de Diagnóstico , Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética , Humanos , Aprendizado de Máquina , Reconhecimento Automatizado de Padrão , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA