RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Despite its serious side effects, succinylcholine is commonly used for neuromuscular relaxation in short procedures, such as rigid bronchoscopy and tracheobronchial interventions. The application of low-dose rocuronium reversed by low-dose sugammadex might be a modern alternative. The aim of this study was to compare patient satisfaction, incidence of postoperative myalgia (POM) as well as intubating conditions of these two muscle relaxants for rigid bronchoscopy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A single-center, prospective-randomized, blinded study of 95 patients, scheduled for rigid bronchoscopy and tracheobronchial intervention was conducted. The patients were anesthetized with propofol, remifentanil and either low-dose succinylcholine (S) (0.5 mg/kg) or low-dose rocuronium (0.25 mg/kg) with sugammadex (RS) (0.5 mg/kg). All patients were evaluated on the first and second postinterventional day for their satisfaction with the treatment (rigid bronchoscopy) using a Numeric Analog Rating Scale (NAS 0-10) and the presence and severity of POM (NAS 1-4). Intubating conditions were assessed as excellent, good, or poor on the basis of position of vocal cords and reaction to insertion of the rigid bronchoscope. RESULTS: Patients in the S group were less satisfied with the treatment than patients in RS group (72.7 vs. 93.7%, p = 0.007). The incidence of POM on the first day after intervention was significantly higher in the S group then in the RS group (56.9% vs. 4.3%, p < 0.001). Although the intubation was faster (p < 0.001) and the intubating conditions significantly superior (p < 0.003) with succinylcholine, acceptable conditions were also achieved with low-dose rocuronium in 75% of patients. The anesthetic drug costs were significantly higher in the RS group then in the S group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that low-dose rocuronium provided better patient satisfaction and less POM. But with the use of low-dose succinylcholine, the intubating conditions are more comfortable, and it is less expensive than rocuronium/sugammadex.
Assuntos
Androstanóis/administração & dosagem , Broncoscopia/métodos , Intubação Intratraqueal/métodos , Mialgia/prevenção & controle , Satisfação do Paciente , Succinilcolina/administração & dosagem , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mialgia/epidemiologia , Fármacos Neuromusculares não Despolarizantes/administração & dosagem , Estudos Prospectivos , RocurônioRESUMO
Background: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most common complication following general thoracic surgery. POAF significantly increases the risk of adverse cardiovascular events, such as thromboembolism, heart failure, and mortality. Additionally, it also leads to prolonged hospital stays and higher costs. The objective of this observational study was to examine the impact of perioperative administration of magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) on the incidence of POAF. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted, enrolling one hundred patients undergoing thoracotomy for lung resection. We compared the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) before and after implementing a change in our standard anesthetic management, which involved the addition of MgSO4. MgSO4 was administered during anesthesia induction at a dose of 40 mg/kg over ten minutes, followed by a 24-hour infusion at a rate of 10 mg/kg/h. The primary outcome was the incidence of POAF within the first seven days after surgery. Results: Within the initial three days following surgery, there was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of POAF between the MgSO4 group and the control group. However, on postoperative day 7, patients treated with MgSO4 exhibited a reduced incidence of POAF compared to the control group (4% vs. 26%; P=0.01). In the subgroup of patients not receiving pre-existing ß-blockers, the addition of MgSO4 significantly decreased the occurrence of POAF (14% vs. 80%; P<0.001). Conclusions: Prophylactic administration of MgSO4 is a potentially beneficial approach for reducing the incidence of POAF after non-cardiac surgery, particularly in patients not receiving long-term ß-blocker treatment.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Thoracotomy leads to acute and chronic post-thoracotomy pain (CPTP). The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) administered perioperatively on acute postoperative and CPTP syndrome. METHODS: One hundred patients were enrolled in this prospective, observational study. Analgesic medication was provided according to the World Health Organization pain relief ladder (control group). The study group received additionally MgSO4 (40 mg/kg over 10 minutes) during induction of anesthesia followed by an infusion over 24 hours (10 mg/kg/h). The presence and severity of pain were assessed before surgery, on postsurgical days 1-8, 30 and 90, respectively. The Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) was used pre- and postoperatively for documentation of neuropathic pain. The incidence and severity of CPTP were assessed by a telephone survey 30 and 90 days after surgery. RESULTS: Numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores at rest were significantly lower in the study group receiving MgSO4 at days 1 to 8 (P<0.05). Thirty days after surgery, 2.1% of the MgSO4-patients had a LANSS score ≥12 compared to 14.3% in the control group (P=0.031). No patient had a LANSS score ≥12 in the study group compared to the control group (0% vs. 12.2%, P<0.05) 90 days following surgery. CONCLUSIONS: MgSO4 administration reduces postoperative pain at rest according to the NRS pain scores and is effective in preventing chronic neuropathic post-thoracotomy pain measured by LANSS score. Prospective-randomized trials are needed to confirm the results of the present study.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In June 2010, the Helsinki Declaration was passed. As a result, an online nationwide critical incident reporting system named CIRSmedical Anaesthesiology (CIRSains) was implemented in Germany. The aim of the article is to evaluate CIRSains for practicability and to provide solutions to the problems detected during evaluation. METHODS: Every medical staff member could take part voluntarily. Data were deidentified. All reports for anesthesiology (1548) were taken into account. Data collection lasted from April 2010 to February 2011. Incident report forms were classified according to World Health Organization and National Patient Safety Agency taxonomy. RESULTS: Most reports (1347; 87.0%) contained American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification, stratifying the severity of patients' underlying disease. Only some mentioned patients' age, even less sex. Physicians filed more reports than nurses. Staff-related factors constituted 794 (51.3%) choices, with attention issues (433; 28.0%) and routine violations (143; 9.2%) leading. Clinical processes (443; 28.6%), medication (347; 22.4%), and medical devices (530; 34.2%) were the leading incident category types. Most consequences ranged in low (398; 25.7%) and moderate (826; 53.4%) risk categories. Mitigating factors were barely mentioned. CONCLUSION: CIRSains displays the German effort to establish the Helsinki declaration. Easy accessibility, anonymity, medicolegal safety, and high flexibility resulted in high usage. The study shows a sufficient practicability of the database, but the data input has to be improved for better scientific use, for example, by implementation of more multiple-choice questions. Given the high magnitude and importance of patient safety problems, improving CIRSains remains a priority for the future.