How I do it: Aquablation in very large prostates (> 150 mL).

Aquablation has been well-studied in prostates sizes up to 150 mL. Recently, American Urological Association guidelines distinguish surgical interventions for men with large prostates (80 mL-150 mL) and now very large prostates (> 150 mL). Readers will gain an understanding of how to use Aquablation in the very large prostate size category.

A Critical Appraisal of the American College of Surgeons Medically Necessary, Time Sensitive Procedures (MeNTS) Scoring System, Urology Consensus Recommendations and Individual Surgeon Case Prioritization for Resumption of Elective Urological Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

PURPOSE: Resumption of elective urology cases postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic requires a systematic approach to case prioritization, which may be based on detailed cross-specialty questionnaires, specialty specific published expert opinion or by individual (operating) surgeon review. We evaluated whether each of these systems effectively stratifies cases and for agreement between approaches in order to inform departmental policy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated triage of elective cases postponed within our department due to the COVID-19 pandemic (March 9, 2020 to May 22, 2020) using questionnaire based surgical prioritization (American College of Surgeons Medically Necessary, Time Sensitive Procedures [MeNTS] instrument), consensus/expert opinion based surgical prioritization (based on published urological recommendations) and individual surgeon based surgical prioritization scoring (developed and managed within our department). Lower scores represented greater urgency. MeNTS scores were compared across consensus/expert opinion based surgical prioritization and individual surgeon based surgical prioritization scores. RESULTS: A total of 204 cases were evaluated. Median MeNTS score was 50 (IQR 44, 55), and mean consensus/expert opinion based surgical prioritization and individual surgeon based surgical prioritization scores were 2.6±0.6 and 2.2±0.8, respectively. Median MeNTS scores were 52 (46.5, 57.5), 50 (44.5, 54.5) and 48 (43.5, 54) for individual surgeon based surgical prioritization priority 1, 2 and 3 cases (p=0.129), and 55 (51.5, 57), 47.5 (42, 56) and 49 (44, 54) for consensus/expert opinion based surgical prioritization priority scores 1, 2, and 3 (p=0.002). There was none to slight agreement between consensus/expert opinion based surgical prioritization and individual surgeon based surgical prioritization scores (Kappa 0.131, p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Questionnaire based, expert opinion based and individual surgeon based approaches to case prioritization result in significantly different case prioritization. Questionnaire based surgical prioritization did not meaningfully stratify urological cases, and consensus/expert opinion based surgical prioritization and individual surgeon based surgical prioritization frequently disagreed. The strengths and weaknesses of each of these systems should be considered in future disaster planning scenarios.

Improving Compliance with 24-H Urine Collections: Understanding Inadequacies in the Collection Process and Risk Factors for Poor Compliance.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review paper is to describe the 24-h urine collection in terms of its utility, collection process, and common problems with its acquisition. RECENT FINDINGS: Although 24-h urine collections are standard of care for high-risk stone formers, several nuances in test acquisition including inaccurate urine collections 50% of the time and poor patient compliance limit its potential utility. Compliance in obtaining 24-h urine collections has been shown to be improved in patients who have not undergone surgical treatment of urinary calculi, patients with metabolic stone disease or family history of stone disease, Caucasian ethnicity, and in those with more sedentary occupations. Studies show conflicting data of compliance regarding patient age and gender. Physicians must understand the difficulties regarding 24-h urine collections including patient compliance, variability between collections, and complexities with interpretation to best utilize this tool in guiding clinical management for the treatment of nephrolithiasis.

Men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to BPH undergoing Aquablation with very large prostates (> 150 mL).

INTRODUCTION: The AUA guidelines for benign prostatic hyperplasia distinguish treatments based upon prostate volume (PV), particularly for very large prostates (> 150 mL). While the clinical outcomes and benefits of Aquablation have been studied for men with average and large prostates, it is unknown whether this technology can be used for very large prostates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men with PV > 150 mL undergoing Aquablation were identified retrospectively from four North American hospitals. The surgical times and clinical outcomes of men with very large prostates (> 150 mL) were compared to data from men with average PV ≤ 80 mL (WATER study) and large PV 80 mL-150 mL (WATER II study). RESULTS: The average PV of men who underwent Aquablation with very large prostates was 209 mL ± 56 (n = 34, range 151-362 mL), large PV 107 mL ± 20 (n = 101, range 80-150 mL) and average PV 54 mL ± 16 (n = 116, range 30-80 mL). For men with PV > 150 mL, baseline IPSS was 19 ± 6. With a mean follow up of 7 ± 9 months, the IPSS improved to 7 ± 5 (p < 0.001). Peak urinary flow rate, Qmax, improved from 7 ± 4 mL/s to 19 ± 5 mL/s (p<0.001). Compared to the two other PV groups, there were no differences in terms of improvements in IPSS, quality of life, or uroflowmetry. There were no reports of transfusions (0%) in the cohort of men with very large prostates. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, we demonstrate that Aquablation is effective and safe in prostates greater than 150 mL while showing consistent outcomes compared to average and large prostates sizes.

Dual-Energy CT for Urinary Stone Evaluation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Conventional CT imaging is an excellent tool for the diagnosis of nephrolithiasis however is limited in its ability to detect stone composition. Dual-energy CT (DECT) scans have demonstrated promise in overcoming this limitation. We review the current utility of DECT in nephrolithiasis. RECENT FINDINGS: DECT is superior to conventional CT in differentiating uric acid stones from non-uric acid stones, with numerous studies reporting sensitivities and specificities approaching > 95%. Dose reduction protocols incorporating low-dose CT scans are commonly used, providing significantly lower effective radiation doses compared to conventional CT. DECT remains an effective diagnostic tool in patients with large body habitus. DECT can accurately detect uric acid stones, which can help guide which stones may be suitable to medical dissolution. Further studies evaluating the effectiveness of DECT in guiding management of patients with nephrolithiasis can help to promote its widespread use.

Endoscopic Management of Ureteral Strictures: an Update.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review focuses on the role of endoscopic treatment of ureteral stricture disease (USD) in the era of minimally invasive surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: There is a relative paucity of recent literature regarding the endoscopic treatment of USD. Laser endopyelotomy and balloon dilation are associated with good outcomes in treatment-naïve patients with short (< 2 cm), non-ischemic, benign ureteral strictures with a functional renal unit. If stricture recurs, repetitive dilation and laser endopyleotomy is not recommended, as success rates are low in this scenario. Patients with low-complexity ureteroenteric strictures and transplant strictures may benefit from endoscopic treatment options, although formal reconstruction offers higher rates of success. Formal ureteral reconstruction remains the gold-standard treatment for ureteral stricture disease as it is associated with higher rates of complete resolution. However, in carefully selected patients, endoscopic treatment modalities provide a low-cost, low-morbidity alternative.

Contemporary use trends and survival outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy or bladder-preservation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

BACKGROUND: The current study was performed to examine temporal trends and compare overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) or bladder-preservation therapy (BPT) for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. METHODS: The authors reviewed the National Cancer Data Base to identify patients with AJCC stage II to III urothelial carcinoma of the bladder from 2004 through 2013. Patients receiving BPT were stratified as having received any external-beam radiotherapy (any XRT), definitive XRT (50-80 grays), and definitive XRT with chemotherapy (CRT). Treatment trends and OS outcomes for the BPT and RC cohorts were evaluated using Cochran-Armitage tests, unadjusted Kaplan-Meier curves, adjusted Cox multivariate regression, and propensity score matching, using increasingly stringent selection criteria. RESULTS: A total of 32,300 patients met the inclusion criteria and were treated with RC (22,680 patients) or BPT (9620 patients). Of the patients treated with BPT, 26.4% (2540 patients) and 15.5% (1489 patients), respectively, were treated with definitive XRT and CRT. Improved OS was observed for RC in all groups. After adjustments with more rigorous statistical models controlling for confounders and with more restrictive BPT cohorts, the magnitude of the OS benefit became attenuated on multivariate (any XRT: hazard ratio [HR], 2.115 [95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.045-2.188]; definitive XRT: HR, 1.870 [95% CI, 1.773-1.972]; and CRT: HR, 1.578 [95% CI, 1.474-1.691]) and propensity score (any XRT: HR, 2.008 [95% CI, 1.871-2.154]; definitive XRT: HR, 1.606 [95% CI, 1.453-1.776]; and CRT: HR, 1.406 [95% CI, 1.235-1.601]) analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In the National Cancer Data Base, receipt of BPT was associated with decreased OS compared with RC in patients with stage II to III urothelial carcinoma. Increasingly stringent definitions of BPT and more rigorous statistical methods adjusting for selection biases attenuated observed survival differences. Cancer 2017;123:4337-45. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Since its introduction, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has undergone a variety of changes; however, it remains one of the most utilized treatment modalities for urolithiasis. The goal of this review is to provide the practicing urologist an update on contemporary trends, new technologies, and related controversies in utilizing ESWL for stone treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: ESWL use has come under scrutiny with a shift in focus to cost-effectiveness and healthcare outcomes. Fortunately, advances in lithotripter technology have spawned several generations of devices that strive to improve stone-free rates and decrease complications. Most of all, a focus on patient selection criteria has helped improve procedural success. Years of experience utilizing ESWL for stone treatment have helped urologists better optimize its use and minimize complications. Improvements in technique along with more stringent patient and stone selection have helped ESWL remain a mainstay in the treatment of stone disease.

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Access: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Access by Urologist vs Radiologist.

Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a minimally invasive procedure indicated for the management of staghorn calculi or renal calculi >2.0 cm. Percutaneous renal access is a critical step in this procedure and can be performed by either urologists or interventional radiologists. The purpose of this study is to perform a meta-analysis to compare outcomes between urologist and interventional radiologist-mediated access. Methods: An electronic literature search was conducted to identify studies comparing urologist- and interventional radiologist-acquired access. Studies must have included both urologist- and intervention radiologist-acquired access data but were excluded if (1) not in English; (2) abstract without full text; (3) unable to determine who acquired access; and (4) only included either urologist or interventional radiologist data. Meta-analysis comparison was generated with the Review Manager 5.4 software. Results: After screening the abstracts and title, 55 relevant studies were identified. Nine articles were utilized in the meta-analysis. Urologist-acquired access was associated with a greater stone-free rate (risk ratio [RR] = 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.20), a reduction in major complications (RR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.92), and a shorter hospital stay (mean difference -0.40; 95% CI, -0.64 to -0.16) in comparison with radiologist-acquired access. Urologist-acquired access was associated with greater blood loss (mean difference 0.46; 95% CI, 0.32-0.60) when compared with interventional radiology-acquired access. No significant differences were found with regard to unusable access, multiple tracts, supracostal access, ancillary procedure requirement, operative time, minor complications, and transfusions. Conclusions: Urologist-acquired access may be associated with a higher stone-free rate and a reduction in major complications, whereas interventional radiologist-mediated access may be associated with a reduction in blood loss, despite similar transfusion rates.

Ejaculatory Preserving Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Median Lobe: Preserving Sexual Function While Improving Urinary Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perioperative outcomes related to sexual and urinary function in patients who underwent a holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with selective laser enucleation of the median lobe. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the first 450 HoLEP cases by a single surgeon from April 2019 to March 2022. Fifty-five patients with intravesical-prostatic protrusion or high bladder neck without obstructing lateral lobes underwent selective enucleation of the median lobe of the prostate. Patients were asked to comment on whether they had retrograde ejaculation during their follow-up appointment. Urinary function was assessed using the American Urological Association Symptom Score and subjective evaluation of urinary incontinence. RESULTS: Median age of the cohort was 65 years (range: 44-91). Compared to preoperative, there was significant improvement in mean postoperative American Urological Association Symptom Score (22.5 vs 6.9, P < .001), mean postoperative quality of life scores (4 vs 1.2, P < .001), and mean postoperative post void residual volumes (244.1 vs 69.3 cc, P < .001). No patients reported stress urinary incontinence. Of the 55 patients who underwent selective enucleation of the median lobe, 40 were sexually active. Of those men, 35 reported normal ejaculation, 3 had retrograde ejaculation that was unchanged from pre-op, and 2 had new ejaculatory dysfunction. CONCLUSION: In this case series of selective laser enucleation of the median lobe, urinary function significantly improved in short-term follow-up with preservation of ejaculation in approximately 90% of men.

Impact of tumour location and surgical approach on recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival analysis in patients with ureteric tumours.

UNLABELLED: What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Pathological stage, lymph node metastasis and tumour grade have been established as prognostic factors for upper-tract urothelial carcinoma, but there are few studies to date assessing location within the ureter as a prognostic factor. There are also few studies comparing surgical approaches to radical nephroureterectomy (NU), partial ureterectomy and endoscopic resection (ENDO) with regard to oncological outcomes. This study did not find any prognostic significance for tumour location or surgical approach with regard to outcomes in patients with ureteric tumours. Although NU is the standard treatment for invasive ureteric tumours, partial ureterectomy and ENDO can safely be performed in selected patients. Despite the risk of a shorter time to recurrence, ENDO can be recommended in low grade, non-invasive ureteric tumours but only with close, thorough surveillance practices. OBJECTIVE: • To assess the impact of tumour location within the ureter and the impact of surgical approach on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) with regard to ureteric tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • Data were retrospectively reviewed from 60 patients with isolated primary ureteric tumours, treated at a single tertiary referral centre. • Patients were treated with radical nephroureterectomy (NU, n= 33), partial ureterectomy (n= 17) or endoscopic resection (ENDO, n= 10). • Kaplan-Meier curves were used for the analysis of RFS and CSS after surgery, stratified by tumour location and surgical approach. RESULTS: • With a median follow-up of 29 months, tumour location was not associated with disease recurrence (P= 0.423). • The ENDO group had shorter time to disease recurrence. • There were no significant differences in the probability of CSS with regard to either tumour location or surgical approach (P= 0.523 and P= 0.904, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: • Tumour location or surgical approach were not significant predictors of oncological outcomes in patients with ureteric tumours. • Although NU is standard treatment for invasive ureteric tumours, partial ureterectomy and ENDO can safely be performed in selected patients. Despite the risk of a shorter time to recurrence, ENDO can be recommended in low grade, non-invasive ureteric tumours. • All urothelium-preserving approaches require thorough surveillance.

Initial Experience Performing "Cautery-Free Waterjet Ablation of the Prostate".

Introduction: Herein, we describe our initial experience performing waterjet ablation of the prostate without electrocautery. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing Aquablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia between February and September 2019 was performed. A standardized perioperative protocol for optimizing hemostasis was implemented. The primary endpoint was to define bleeding complications perioperatively and up to 30 days postoperatively after Aquablation. Bleeding complications included hematuria requiring prolonged continuous bladder irrigation, drop in hemoglobin requiring transfusion, or take back to operating room for evacuation of bladder clots and bladder fulguration. Bivariable analysis using Fisher's exact test and unpaired t-tests were used to identify factors associated with bleeding complications. Results: Thirty-two patients underwent Aquablation over the study period. Average preoperative international prostate symptom score was 20 (range: 13-34) and Qmax was 7 mL/s (range: 0-11). Mean prostate volume was 65 cc (range: 30-200 cc). Average perioperative change in hemoglobin was 1.3 g/dL (range: -0.3 to 4.2 g/dL). Eight patients (25%) experienced bleeding complications. Three (9.4%) required blood transfusions. On Fisher's exact test, prostate volume (91 cc vs 55 cc; p = 0.0361) and preoperative prostate-specific antigen (6.6 vs 2.9; p = 0.0218) were associated with postoperative bleeding. Conclusions: Performing waterjet ablation of the prostate without the use of electrocautery after waterjet treatment to control bleeding resulted in significant bleeding complications (25% of our cohort) during our initial experience. A combination of traction and focal bladder neck electrocautery is the best strategy to minimize bleeding complications after Aquablation.

Using Peritumor and Intratumor Vascularity on Preoperative Imaging to Predict Fuhrman Grade Histology of Renal Tumors.

Objective: To investigate if peritumor and/or intratumor vasculature is associated with high-grade tumor histology for renal cell carcinoma. Methods: A retrospective review at a tertiary care facility was performed of patients who underwent radical nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy for a renal tumor between January 2015 and December 2020. Data of tumor characteristics were collected from final pathology reports. A single radiologist specializing in genitourinary imaging reviewed all preoperative cross-sectional imaging for peritumor vessels and intratumor vessels. Single and multivariable logistic regression was utilized to identify variables associated with high-grade tumor histology. Results: The average tumor size on final pathology report was 6.4 cm (range 3.0-17.0 cm). Ninety-two patients (56.1%) had either an enlarged peritumor vessel (n = 72), an intratumor vessel (n = 3), or both a peritumor vessel and an intratumor vessel (n = 17). Of the 92 patients with either a peritumor vessel or both a peritumor vessel and intratumor vessel, 60.9% of these patients had high Fuhrman grade histology on final pathology report (60.9% vs 39.1%, p < 0.001). Pathologic stage T1a tumors with an enlarged peritumor vessel on preoperative imaging were associated with high Fuhrman grade histology (58.3% vs 41.7%, p = 0.015). Across all stages, the presence of an enlarged peritumor vessel was significantly associated with high Fuhrman grade (odds ratio: 2.37, 95% confidence interval 1.17-4.9, p = 0.01). Conclusion: Findings suggest that vessels surrounding small renal tumors and large renal tumors is associated with high tumor grade (Fuhrman grade >3). Further research is needed to support the association of peritumor vessels with high tumor grade.

Comparison of Management and Outcomes of Symptomatic Urolithiasis During the COVID-19 Pandemic to a Comparative Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical presentation and outcomes for patients who presented with symptomatic urolithiasis during the initial months of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed Emergency Department (ED) presentations from a Philadelphia healthcare system for symptomatic urolithiasis between March and June 2020 and compared these with presentations for the same time period from the year prior. Patient demographics, stone characteristics, management, and clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 years. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-nine patients presented during 2020 compared to 269 in 2019. There were fewer patients who presented during the initial COVID-19 pandemic surge who had obesity (37.41% vs 49.44%, P = .024), hyperlipidemia (18.71% vs 31.60, P = .006), and asthma (5.76% vs 16.73%, P = .002). Although overall stone characteristics did not differ between the 2 groups, a larger proportion of patients in 2020 presented with an obstructing stone (81.16% vs 64.1%, P = .001). Patients who presented during the COVID-19 pandemic did not have higher rates of infection, acute kidney injury, or complications. Rates of surgical modalities, emergent procedures, and discharges from the ED were similar between the 2 years. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic initial surge resulted in fewer ED presentations for symptomatic urolithiasis; however, patients who did present were more likely to have obstructing stones, perhaps due to delaying presentation to avoid COVID-19 exposure in the ED. Despite higher rates of obstruction, clinical outcomes and morbidity were similar.

"En-Bloc" Enucleation With Early Apical Release Compared to Standard Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Retrospective Pilot Study During the Initial Learning Curve of a Single Surgeon.

OBJECTIVE: To compare operative efficiency of Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) using both the standard multi-incisional approach and en-bloc enucleation with early apical release during the initial learning curve. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the initial 95 consecutive men who underwent HoLEP between April 2019 and September 2020 by a single surgeon. We compared patient demographics, and pre-, intra-, and post-operative metrics between both groups. Differences between groups were evaluated with Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients underwent the standard HoLEP approach, and 46 patients underwent the en-bloc approach. Compared to a standard HoLEP, the en-bloc approach was associated with decreased operative time (131.11 minutes vs 153.59 minutes, P = .007) with similar weights of tissue removed. Operative efficiency, as measured by grams of prostate tissue removed per minute, was greater for the en-bloc approach (0.49 g/min vs 0.36 g/min, P = .005). There was no difference in length of stay (0.91 days vs 0.96 days, P = .383), laser efficiency (4.41 kJ/g vs 4.83 kJ/g, P = .200), or number of post-operative complications (10 vs 6, P = .236) between the groups. CONCLUSION: Utilization of the en-bloc technique during the initial learning curve allows for a faster, more efficient operation without any difference in functional outcomes or major complications compared to a standard HoLEP.

Facility-Level Variation in Use of Locoregional Therapy for Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to understand patient- and institution-level factors associated with use of locoregional therapy for newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer in the era before the availability of evidence supporting its efficacy. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database to identify patients diagnosed with metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma (stage M1) between 2004 and 2017. We assessed patient factors associated with definitive local therapy with radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy using multilevel logistic regression accounting for clustering within institutions. We further characterized trends in facility-level use and examined institutional factors associated with utilization. RESULTS: We identified 35,933 patients with M1 prostate cancer at 1,188 facilities. A total of 4,146 patients (11.5%) received local therapy for M1 disease (radiation therapy in 3,378 and radical prostatectomy in 768). Use of local treatment was concentrated among a smaller number of facilities: 50% of all local therapy was delivered at 161 facilities (14% of total). At the patient level, uninsured status (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.49-0.79, p <0.01) and high comorbidity (Charlson-Deyo score, OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.26-0.6, p <0.01) were associated with lower odds of local therapy. High-utilizing facilities (top quartile) were more commonly community centers (OR 1.76, 95% CI 10.7-2.95, p <0.01) and differed by geographic region (South Atlantic vs West South Central region: OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25-0.88, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In the period before locoregional therapy was supported by clinical practice guidelines, locoregional therapy use varied significantly at the facility level and was driven by a smaller number of high-utilizing facilities. These findings can contextualize expected increase in the use of local therapy for metastatic prostate cancer.

Investigating Fluid Intake in an Underserved Community: What Factors Are Associated with Low Urine Volume on 24-Hour Urine Collection?

Background: Stone prevention is dependent on high fluid intake, with evidence that low urine volume (LUV) can promote nephrolithiasis in the absence of other metabolic abnormalities. Herein, we investigate patient-related factors associated with LUV on initial 24-hour urine collection in an underserved population. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients treated by a single surgeon for nephrolithiasis from August 2014 to January 2019. Patients who submitted 24-hour urine samples were divided into two groups based on whether their initial collection was >2 L or not. Factors associated with 24-hour urine volume were analyzed using bivariate and multivariate analyses. As a secondary outcome, we investigated factors associated with corrected 24-hour urine volume on repeat 24-hour urine collection. Results: Two hundred eight patients (45.1%) submitted 24-hour urine collections, 63.9% (133/208) of which demonstrated a urine volume of <2 L. LUV was more common in female patients (77.1% vs 49.5%; p = 0.001) and patients with no insurance and Medicaid (no insurance [100%] vs Medicaid [74.1%] vs Medicare/private [58.6%]; p = 0.02). Female gender and insurance status were independent predictors of LUV in the multivariable analysis. Seventeen of 43 patients (39.5%) with LUV who provided a subsequent collection were able to correct their urine volume. Patients who improved their LUV were older (58.5 vs 45.9 years, p = 0.0149) and more likely to have surgical intervention for their kidney stones (94.1% vs 53.8%, p = 0.006). In our multivariable analysis, surgical intervention was associated with correcting urine volume. Conclusions: Female patients and those with no insurance or Medicaid were more likely to have LUV on an initial 24-hour urine collection. Further research into barriers to fluid intake is important for these two groups, along with directed patient education on strategies for increasing fluid intake.

Endourological management of a rare radiopaque ritonavir-composed urinary calculus.

Protease inhibitors are a source of nephrolithiasis in HIV + patients, and these stones are described as not detected by CT. While urinary stones are commonly associated with certain protease inhibitors, stones composed of ritonavir are rare. We present the case of a 58-year-old female on ritonavir-boosted atazanavir who presented to our clinic complaining of gross hematuria and flank pain secondary to a ureteral stone. Surgical removal revealed the stone to be composed of 100% ritonavir with no usual urinary stone components. This is the first report of an HIV medicine stone being detectable by CT scan described as 100% ritonavir.

Prescribing Trends in Post-operative Pain Management After Urologic Surgery: A Quality Care Investigation for Healthcare Providers.

OBJECTIVE: To assess prescribing and refilling trends of narcotics in postoperative urology patients at our institution. Although the opioid epidemic remains a public health threat, no series has assessed prescribing patterns across urologic surgery disciplines following discharge. METHODS: All urologic surgeries were retrospectively reviewed from May 2017-April 2018. Demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative pain management strategies were analyzed. Narcotics usage following surgery were reported in total morphine equivalents (TME). Opioid refill rate was characterized by medical specialty and stratified by urologic discipline. RESULTS: 817 cases were reviewed. Mean age and TME at discharge was 57±15.6 years and 35.43±19.5 mg, respectively. 13.6% (mean age 55±15.9) received a narcotic refill following discharge (mean TME/refill 37.7±28.9 mg). A higher proportion of patients with a pre-operative opioid prescription received a refill compared to opioid naïve patients (38.2% vs 21.6%, P < .01). Refill rate did not differ between urologic subspecialties (P = .3). Urologists were only responsible for 20.4% of all refills filled, despite all patients continuing follow-up with their surgeon. Procedures with the highest rates of post-operative refills were in oncology, male reconstruction/trauma and endourology. Patients with a history of chronic pain (OR 1.9, CI 1.1-3.3) preoperative narcotic prescription (OR 1.6, CI 1.0-2.6), and higher ASA score (OR 1.8, CI 1.6-2.8) were more likely to obtain a postoperative opioid prescription refill. CONCLUSION: Approximately 1 in 7 postoperative urology patients receive a postoperative narcotics refill; however, nearly two-thirds receive refills exclusively from non-urologic providers. Attempts to avoid overprescribing of postoperative narcotics need to account for both surgeon and nonsurgeon sources of opioid refills.

Factors Associated With Compliance With 24-Hour Urine Collection.

OBJECTIVE: To identify how demographic factors, stone-associated medical comorbidities, and treatment predict compliance with 24-hour urine collection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective medical record review of patients treated for urolithiasis between August 2014 and March 2017 was performed. Patient demographics, medical characteristics, stone factors, type of treatment, and compliance data were included for patients requested to submit a collection. Variables that were statistically significant on bivariate analysis were then used to formulate a model predicting submission of a 24-hour urine sample. RESULTS: Of the 303 patients who met inclusion criteria, 183 (60.4%) submitted an initial 24-hour urine collection. On bivariate analysis, patients older than 50 were more likely to submit a 24-hour urine collection (71.4% vs 51.5%; P <.001), patients with a metabolic predisposition for stones were more likely to submit a 24-hour urine collection (70.6% vs 53.1%; P <.003), and patients who did not have surgery were more likely to submit a 24-hour urine collection (97.9% vs 53.5%; P <.001). Our 3-variable prediction model found that not undergoing surgery was a strong predictor of 24-hour urine collection. CONCLUSIONS: We suspect that patients perceive surgery as a more definitive treatment for kidney stones than conservative management. Patient education on the natural history and role of metabolic management in the prevention of nephrolithiasis is essential in improving compliance with 24-hour urine collection.