Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 49(12): 1821-7, 2009 Dec 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19911973

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Health care-associated, central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections (HA-BSIs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Needleless connectors (NCs) are an important component of the intravenous system. NCs initially were introduced to reduce health care worker needlestick injuries, yet some of these NCs may increase HA-BSI risk. METHODS: We compared HA-BSI rates on wards or intensive care units (ICUs) at 5 hospitals that had converted from split septum (SS) connectors or needles to mechanical valve needleless connectors (MV-NCs). The hospitals (16 ICUs, 1 entire hospital, and 1 oncology unit; 3 hospitals were located in the United States, and 2 were located in Australia) had conducted HA-BSI surveillance using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions during use of both NCs. HA-BSI rates and prevention practices were compared during the pre-MV period, MV period, and post-MV period. RESULTS: The HA-BSI rate increased in all ICUs and wards when SS-NCs were replaced by MV-NCs. In the 16 ICUs, the HA-BSI rate increased significantly when SS-NCs or needles were replaced by MV-NCs (6.15 vs 9.49 BSIs per 1000 central venous catheter [CVC]-days; relative risk, 1.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-1.74; P < .001). The 14 ICUs that switched back to SS-NCs had significant reductions in their BSI rates (9.49 vs 5.77 BSIs per 1000 CVC-days; relative risk, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-1.96; p < .001). BSI infection prevention strategies were similar in the pre-MV and MV periods. CONCLUSIONS: We found strong evidence that MV-NCs were associated with increased HA-BSI rates, despite similar BSI surveillance, definitions, and prevention strategies. Hospital personnel should monitor their HA-BSI rates and, if they are elevated, examine the role of newer technologies, such as MV-NCs.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/microbiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentação , Humanos
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 46(11): 1301-1303, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29805059

RESUMO

Oral streptococcal species are a rare cause of septic arthritis. We describe 4 cases of septic arthritis due to oral streptococcal species following joint injection. The routine use of face masks during joint injection may prevent this rare but serious complication.


Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa/etiologia , Artrite Infecciosa/microbiologia , Streptococcus/classificação , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Desbridamento , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Articulares/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Irrigação Terapêutica
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 37(3): 326-32, 2003 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12884155

RESUMO

We sought to determine the ability of surveillance cultures and isolation of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE)-colonized patients to control nosocomial VRE infection and colonization during a 5-year period (November 1994 through October 1999). During this period, VRE colonization was limited to 0.82% of admissions. The incidence of VRE infection was 0.12 cases per 1000 patient-days (attack rate, 0.07%). Colonized patients were first identified by surveillance (95%) or routine clinical cultures (5%); 14% of colonized patients had a positive clinical culture a median of 15 days after a positive surveillance culture. Ten percent of colonized patients were identified by surveillance at the time of transfer from another health care facility. Identification of these colonized patients was associated with reduction from a peak incidence rate of 2.07% to a rate of 1.25% and stabilization at this lower level. The use of surveillance cultures to identify and isolate patients with asymptomatic colonization can provide sustained control of the spread of VRE within a health care facility.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Doenças Endêmicas , Enterococcus/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/epidemiologia , Resistência a Vancomicina/fisiologia , Vancomicina/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Controle de Infecções
6.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 25(5): 413-7, 2004 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15188848

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Oral vancomycin therapy has been a risk factor for turning culture positive for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE). VRE colonization status was reviewed for all patients who received oral vancomycin and underwent prospective cultures. METHODS: Data were extracted from the medical records of all patients receiving oral vancomycin between August 1995 and February 2001 regarding history, hospital course, and perirectal VRE cultures. Hospital policy required contact isolation for patients receiving oral vancomycin until colonization with VRE was excluded. RESULTS: Twenty-six courses of oral vancomycin were given to 22 patients. VRE colonization status after completion of therapy was evaluated for 23 courses in 20 (91%) of these patients. None of these patients became VRE culture positive during a median follow-up of 18 days (range, 9 to 39 days), with a median duration of treatment of 10 days (range, 3 to 58 days), and with a median total dose of 6,500 mg (range, 1,250 to 29,000 mg). All patients received other antibiotics within 30 days prior to therapy with oral vancomycin, during therapy with oral vancomycin, or both; 95% had received anti-anaerobic therapy and 35% had received parenteral vancomycin. CONCLUSIONS: Even when other risk factors were present, no patient receiving oral vancomycin at our facility subsequently became culture positive for VRE. This suggests that oral vancomycin therapy or other antibiotic use, including anti-anaerobic therapy, may not be a significant independent risk factor for turning culture positive for VRE among patients not previously exposed to the microbe.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Clostridium/tratamento farmacológico , Resistência a Vancomicina , Vancomicina/administração & dosagem , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Pré-Escolar , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Feminino , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vancomicina/uso terapêutico , Virginia
7.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 25(11): 923-8, 2004 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15566025

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of interventions to prevent transmission of influenza and to increase employee compliance with influenza vaccination. DESIGN: The change in the proportion of hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed nosocomial influenza was observed over time and assessed using chi-square for trend analysis. The association between nosocomial influenza in patients and healthcare worker (HCW) compliance with vaccine was assessed by logistic regression. SETTING: A 600-bed, tertiary-care academic hospital. METHODS: After an outbreak of influenza A at this hospital in 1988, a mobile cart program was instituted with increased efforts to motivate employees to be vaccinated and furloughed when ill as well as new measures to prevent nosocomial spread. RESULTS: HCW vaccination rates increased from 4% in 1987-1988 to 67% in 1999-2000 (P < .0001). Proportions of nosocomially acquired influenza cases among employees or patients both declined significantly (P < .0001). Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant inverse association between HCW compliance with vaccination and the rate of nosocomial influenza among patients (P < .001). CONCLUSION: A mobile cart vaccination program and an increased emphasis on HCWs to receive the vaccine were associated with a significant increase in vaccine acceptance and a significant decrease in the rate of nosocomial influenza among patients.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Programas de Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas contra Influenza/uso terapêutico , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos Humanos em Hospital/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Criança , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Incidência , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Controle de Infecções/estatística & dados numéricos , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Modelos Logísticos , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Virginia/epidemiologia
8.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 24(8): 580-3, 2003 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12940578

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: CDC has estimated that 23% of Legionella infections are nosocomial. When a new hospital was being constructed and a substantial increase in transplantation was anticipated, an ultraviolet light apparatus was installed in the water main of the new building because 27% of water samples from taps in the old hospital contained Legionella. This study reports the rate of nosocomial Legionella infection and water contamination since opening the new hospital. METHODS: Charts of all patients with positive Legionella cultures, direct immunofluorescent antibody (DFA), or urine antigen between April 1989 and November 2001 were reviewed. Frequencies of DFAs and urine antigens were obtained from the laboratory. RESULTS: None of the 930 cultures of hospital water have been positive since moving into the new building. Fifty-three (0.02%) of 219,521 patients had a positive Legionella test; 41 had pneumonia (40 community acquired). One definite L. pneumophila pneumonia confirmed by culture and DFA in August 1994 was nosocomial (0.0005%) by dates. This patient was transferred after prolonged hospitalization in another country, was transplanted 11 days after admission, and developed symptoms 5 days after liver transplant. However, tap water from the patient's room did not grow Legionella. Seventeen (2.5%) of 670 urine antigens were positive for Legionella (none nosocomial). Thirty-three (1.2%) of 2,671 DFAs were positive, including 7 patients (21%) without evidence of pneumonia and 6 (18%) who had an alternative diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Ultraviolet light usage was associated with negative water cultures and lack of clearly documented nosocomial Legionella infection for 13 years at this hospital.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Desinfecção/métodos , Doença dos Legionários/prevenção & controle , Serviço Hospitalar de Engenharia e Manutenção/métodos , Raios Ultravioleta , Microbiologia da Água , Purificação da Água/métodos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Técnica Direta de Fluorescência para Anticorpo , Seguimentos , Humanos , Legionella pneumophila/isolamento & purificação , Legionella pneumophila/patogenicidade , Legionella pneumophila/efeitos da radiação , Doença dos Legionários/diagnóstico , Doença dos Legionários/transmissão , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Virginia/epidemiologia , Abastecimento de Água/análise
9.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 23(8): 429-35, 2002 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12186207

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Several hospitals opting not to use active surveillance cultures to identify carriers of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) have reported that adoption of other parts of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline for controlling VRE has had little to no impact. Because use of surveillance cultures and contact isolation controlled a large outbreak at this hospital, their costs were estimated for comparison with the excess costs of VRE bacteremias occurring at a higher rate at a hospital not employing these measures. SETTING: Two university hospitals. METHODS: Inpatients deemed high risk for VRE acquisition at this hospital underwent weekly perirectal surveillance cultures. Estimated costs of cultures and resulting isolation during a 2-year period were compared with the estimated excess costs of more frequent VRE bacteremias at another hospital of similar size and complexity not using surveillance cultures to control spread throughout the hospital. RESULTS: Of 54,052 patients admitted, 10,400 had perirectal swabs taken. Cultures and isolation cost an estimated $253,099. VRE culture positivity was limited to 193 (0.38%) and VRE bacteremia to 1 (0.002%) as compared with 29 bacteremias at the comparison hospital. The estimated attributable cost of VRE bacteremia at the comparison hospital of $761,320 exceeded the cost of the control program at this hospital by threefold. CONCLUSIONS: The excess costs of VRE bacteremia may justify the costs of preventive measures. The costs of VRE infections at other body sites, of deaths from untreatable infections, and of dissemination of genes for vancomycin resistance also help to justify the costs of implementing an effective control program.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Enterococcus , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/prevenção & controle , Vigilância da População/métodos , Resistência a Vancomicina , Técnicas de Cultura de Células , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Análise Custo-Benefício , Infecção Hospitalar/economia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/economia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/epidemiologia , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/economia , Virginia/epidemiologia
10.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 23(10): 622-5, 2002 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12400895

RESUMO

Single-drug prophylaxis is recommended after tuberculin skin test conversion, but not when there is active disease on chest radiograph because resistance develops frequently. Isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis developed in a physician receiving prophylaxis despite "faint left upper lobe soft tissue density" on chest radiograph. Ignoring active disease on chest x-ray renders this strategy counterproductive and cost ineffective.


Assuntos
Antituberculosos/uso terapêutico , Isoniazida/uso terapêutico , Tuberculose Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Antituberculosos/administração & dosagem , Antituberculosos/farmacologia , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional , Isoniazida/administração & dosagem , Isoniazida/farmacologia , Masculino , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/efeitos dos fármacos , Radiografia Torácica , Teste Tuberculínico , Tuberculose Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Tuberculose Pulmonar/prevenção & controle , Tuberculose Pulmonar/transmissão , Virginia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA