Non-TNF-Targeted Biologic vs a Second Anti-TNF Drug to Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients With Insufficient Response to a First Anti-TNF Drug: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: One-third of patients with rheumatoid arthritis show inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) inhibitors; little guidance on choosing the next treatment exists. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a non-TNF-targeted biologic (non-TNF) vs a second anti-TNF drug for patients with insufficient response to a TNF inhibitor. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 300 patients (conducted between 2009-2012) with rheumatoid arthritis, with persistent disease activity (disease activity score in 28 joints-erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28-ESR] ≥ 3.2 [range, 0-9.3]) and an insufficient response to anti-TNF therapy were included in a 52-week multicenter, pragmatic, open-label randomized clinical trial. The final follow-up date was in August 2013. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a non-TNF-targeted biologic agent or an anti-TNF that differed from their previous treatment. The choice of the biologic prescribed within each randomized group was left to the treating clinician. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with good or moderate response according to the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) scale at week 24. Secondary outcomes included the EULAR response at weeks 12 and 52; at weeks 12, 24, and 52; DAS28ESR, low disease activity (DAS28 ≤3.2), remission (DAS28 ≤2.6); serious adverse events; and serious infections. RESULTS: Of the 300 randomized patients (243 [83.2%] women; mean [SD] age, 57.1 [12.2] years; baseline DAS28-ESR, 5.1 [1.1]), 269 (89.7%) completed the study. At week 24, 101 of 146 patients (69%) in the non-TNF group and 76 (52%) in the second anti-TNF group achieved a good or moderate EULAR response (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.27-3.37; P = .004, with imputation of missing data; absolute difference, 17.2%; 95% CI, 6.2% to 28.2%). The DAS28-ESR was lower in the non-TNF group than in the second anti-TNF group (mean difference adjusted for baseline differences, -0.43; 95% CI, -0.72 to -0.14; P = .004). At weeks 24 and 52, more patients in the non-TNF group vs the second anti-TNF group showed low disease activity (45% vs 28% at week 24; OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.27 to 3.43; P = .004 and 41% vs 23% at week 52; OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.33 to 3.86; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with rheumatoid arthritis previously treated with anti-TNF drugs but with inadequate primary response, a non-TNF biologic agent was more effective in achieving a good or moderate disease activity response at 24 weeks than was the second anti-TNF medication. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01000441.

Impact of a nurse-led programme on comorbidity management and impact of a patient self-assessment of disease activity on the management of rheumatoid arthritis: results of a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial (COMEDRA).

OBJECTIVES: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients are at an increased risk of developing comorbid conditions. A close monitoring of the disease targeting a status of low disease activity is associated with a better outcome. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the impact of a nurse-led programme on comorbidities and the impact of patient self-assessment of disease activity on the management of RA. METHODS: We enrolled 970 patients (mean age 58 years, 79% women) in a prospective, randomised, controlled, open-label, 6-month trial. In the comorbidity group (n=482), the nurse checked comorbidities and sent the programme results to the attending physicians. In the self-assessment group (n=488), the nurse taught the patient how to calculate his/her Disease Activity Score which had to be reported on a booklet to be shared with the treating rheumatologist. The number of measures taken for comorbidities and the percentage of patients recording a change (initiation, switch or increased dose) in disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in the 6 months follow-up period of the study defined the outcomes of the trial. RESULTS: The number of measures taken per patient was statistically higher in the comorbidity group: 4.54±2.08 versus 2.65±1.57 (p<0.001); incidence rate ratio: 1.78 (1.61-1.96) and DMARD therapy was changed more frequently in the self-assessment group: 17.2% versus 10.9% (OR=1.70 (1.17; 2.49), p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the short-term benefit of a nurse-led programme on RA comorbidity management and the impact of patient self-assessment of disease activity on RA treatment intensification. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT #01315652.

COVID-19 presentation and outcomes in patients with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases receiving IL6-receptor antagonists prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Objective: COVID-19 outcome may be less favourable in patients with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) receiving immunosuppressive therapy. We aimed to investigate whether RMD patients on anti-IL6 therapy prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection have less severe disease and better outcomes of COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a retrospective national, multicentre cohort study using data from the French RMD COVID-19 cohort. We compared the severity and outcome of highly suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection in RMD patients previously treated with tocilizumab or sarilumab (anti-IL6 group) with patients who did not receive anti-IL6 therapy (no anti-IL6 group). Results: Data were collected for 1883 patients with mean age of 55.2 years [SD 16.7] and 1256 (66.7%) female. Two hundred ten (11.1%) developed severe COVID-19 and 115 (6.4%) died. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, severe COVID-19 was less frequent in the anti-IL6 group compared with the no anti-IL6 group (aOR for moderate vs. mild severity, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.10 to 0.54], p ≤ 0.01 and aOR for severe vs. mild, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.10 to 0.81], p ≤ 0.01). No significant differences were found for the evolution of COVID-19 between the anti-IL6 group and the no anti-IL6 group (aOR for recovery with sequelae vs recovery without sequelae, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.41 to 1.48] and aOR for death vs recovery without sequelae, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.07 to 1.30]). Conclusion: RMD patients receiving anti-IL6 therapy prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection have less severe forms of COVID-19. No difference was observed in COVID-19 evolution, i.e., sequelae or death, between the groups.

Ultrasound prevalence of wrist, hand, ankle and foot synovitis and tenosynovitis in systemic sclerosis, and relationship with disease features and hand disability.

INTRODUCTION: In systemic sclerosis, few studies have shown that hand and wrist ultrasound is more sensitive than clinical examination in the detection of synovitis and tenosynovitis. Even fewer studies have investigated ankle and foot involvement with ultrasound. Our objectives were to investigate ultrasound prevalence of wrist, hand, ankle and foot synovitis and tenosynovitis in patients with systemic sclerosis classified with ACR/EULAR 2013 criteria, and to study their relationship with disease features and hand disability. METHODS: Consecutive patients with systemic sclerosis, classified with ACR/EULAR 2013 criteria, were included in a monocentric cross-sectional study. They underwent standardized musculoskeletal clinical examination and hand, wrist, ankle and foot ultrasound. Clinical, biological and imaging data were also collected. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were included. Ultrasound was more sensitive than clinical examination to detect at least one synovitis (respectively 52% versus 25%, P=0.025) and at least one tenosynovitis (respectively 16% versus 4%, P=0.009); 18% of patients had ankle tenosynovitis and 29% had ankle and/or foot synovitis, mostly located at metatarsophalangeal joints (25.5%). Having at least one ultrasound hand synovitis was associated with higher Cochin hand functional disability scale (mean 25±3 versus 12±2, P=0.003) and diffuse cutaneous subset (P=0.038). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that ultrasound is more sensitive than clinical examination to detect synovitis and tenosynovitis in systemic sclerosis. The foot involvement is less frequent than hand involvement, mainly localized at metatarsophalangeal joint. Finally, having at least one synovitis of the hand is associated with diffuse cutaneous subset and higher hand disability.

Rheumatoid Meningitis a Rare Extra-Articular Manifestation of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Report of 6 Cases and Literature Review.

OBJECTIVES: Central neurological manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) like rheumatoid meningitis (RM) are rare, little known and have a high rate of morbi-mortality. METHODS: We described six cases of RM that were directly related to RA activity after exhaustive assessment. RESULTS: They were mainly women, aged of 50 to 69. All were positive for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies and half for rheumatoid factors. RA activity, duration, and treatments were heterogeneous including oral steroids, conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologic DMARDs. Symptoms were various, with acute or progressive beginning; main were: generalized or focal seizure (4/6), fever (3/6), headaches (3/6), and frontal syndrome (2/6). Imaging lesions were four leptomeningitis, one pachymeningitis, and one association of both. MRI usually showed hypersignal in various territories in T2-FLAIR (fluid attenuated inversion recovery) mode, and enhancement in T1-weighted mode after gadolinium injection. All patients had lumbar puncture that found sterile cerebrospinal fluid, no neoplasic cell, elevated cell count in 5/6 cases and elevated proteins concentration in 3/6 cases. Cerebral biopsy was possible for three patients, and definitively confirmed the diagnosis of aseptic lepto- or pachymenintis, excluding vasculitis and lymphoma. Different treatments were used like intravenous high dose steroids, immunoglobulins or biologic DMARDs, with variable clinical and imaging outcome: one death, one complete recovery, and four recoveries with sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical symptoms, imaging, lumbar puncture, and serological studies are often nonspecific, only histologic examination can confirm the diagnosis of RM. Any central neurological manifestation in RA patients, even in quiescent and ancient RA, should warn the physician.

Screening for and management of comorbidities after a nurse-led program: results of a 3-year longitudinal study in 769 established rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Background/purpose: Cardiovascular (CV) risk, cancer, infections and osteoporosis should be screened for in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objective was to assess 3-year effects of a nurse visit for comorbidity counselling. Methods: This was an open long-term (3 years) extension of the Comorbidities and Education in Rheumatoid Arthritis 6-month randomised controlled trial in which patients with definite, stable RA were visiting a nurse for comorbidity counselling. Comorbidity status was assessed and nurses provided advice on screening and management, at baseline and 3 years later. A score was developed to quantify comorbidity screening and management: 0-100, where lower scores indicate better screening and management. The score was compared between baseline and 3-year assessment using a Wilcoxon test for paired data. Results: Of the 970 recruited patients, 776 (80%) were followed-up at 2-4 years and 769 (79%) had available data for comorbidities at both time points: mean (±SD) age 58 (±11) years and mean disease duration 14 (±10) years; 614 (80%) were women, the mean Disease Activity Score 28 was 3.0±1.3, and 538 (70%) were receiving a biologic. At baseline, the mean comorbidity screening score was 36.6 (±19.9) and it improved at 3 years to 24.3 (±17.8) (p<0.0001), thus with a relative improvement of 33% (improvement of 12 points). CV risk screening, vaccination status and bone densitometry performance improved the most. Conclusions: Comorbidity screening was suboptimal but improved notably over 3 years, after a nurse-led programme aiming at checking systematically for comorbidity screening and giving patient advice. This long-term efficacy pleads in favour of nurse-led interventions to better address comorbidities in RA. Trial registration number: NCT01315652.

Risk of postoperative infections and the discontinuation of TNF inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether continuation of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) before surgery increases the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted from January 2000 to May first 2014, using the databases of PubMed, Cochrane review, Embase, and manual research of abstracts presented in scientific congresses. Most included studies were retrospective. We compared the risk of SSI in the case of discontinuation of TNFi versus continuing TNFi treatment before a surgery. RESULTS: Six studies, with a total of 2743 patients (1360 in the group continuing TNFi agent and 1383 in the group discontinuing TNFi) were included. There was a decreased risk of SSI in patients stopping TNFi (relative risk [RR]=0.62 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-0.89], P=0.99, I2=0%). Concerning overall complications, there was also a decreased risk in patients discontinuing TNFi treatment (RR=0.60 [95% CI 0.42-0.87], P=0.26, I2=25%). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed an increased risk of SSI in patients under TNF inhibitor, and a decreased risk of SSI in case of interruption of treatment during the perioperative time.

Prevalence of Renal Impairment in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results From a Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and associations of renal dysfunction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: COMEDRA is a French nationwide cross-sectional multicenter study on comorbidities in RA. Renal function was assessed from the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. RA characteristics and risk factors for renal impairment were collected. Two logistic regression models, 1 with and 1 without the Framingham Risk Score, were constructed from variables that were significantly associated with an eGFR of <60 ml/minute/1.73 m(2) or were clinically relevant. RESULTS: Of the 970 recruited patients, 931 were analyzed (women 79.6%, mean age 57.8 years, disease duration 11.1 years, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28-ESR] 3.1). A total of 82 patients (8.8%) had an eGFR <60 ml/minute/1.73 m(2) and 9% had proteinuria. In univariate analysis, renal impairment was associated with age (P < 0.001), history of hypertension (P < 0.001), high systolic blood pressure (P = 0.03), and the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) equation (P = 0.002), but not with sex, disease duration, disease activity (as assessed by DAS28-ESR), nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use, disease severity (erosions, joint replacement), or RA medications. Multivariate analysis models showed that age (odds ratio [OR] 1.05 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.03-1.09]) and hypertension (OR 2.5 [95% CI 1.5-4.3]) were associated with renal impairment. A second model showed that the SCORE equation (OR 1.33 [95% CI 1.06-1.67]) was associated with renal impairment. CONCLUSION: Renal impairment is relatively common in RA and is associated with cardiovascular risk factors such as age, hypertension, and the SCORE equation but not with disease activity or severity.

The learning curve of nurses for the assessment of swollen and tender joints in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), nurses are now increasingly involved in joint count assessment but training is not standardized. The aim was to evaluate and describe the learning curve of nurses for the assessment of swollen and tender joints in RA. METHOD: Twenty nurses from university rheumatology centres inexperienced with joint counts were allocated to a rheumatologist from their centre (teacher). Acquisition of skills consisted of Phase 1: (training), a centralized 4hour training session, with (a) lecture and demonstration, and (b) practical sessions on patients with their teachers, followed by Phase 2: (practice) involving further practice on 20 patients in their own hospitals. Primary outcome was achievement of adequate swollen joint agreement between nurse and their teacher ("gold standard") at the "joint" level defined by prevalence adjusted biased adjusted kappa (PABAK)>0.60. Agreement at the "patient" level of swollen joint count (SJC), tender joint count (TJC) as well as DAS28 between nurse and their teacher were assessed with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: During the training phase, 75% of nurses achieved a swollen joint PABAK>0.60 when compared with their teachers, which further improved to 89% after the 20 practice patients (Phase 2). Median swollen joint PABAK improved from 0.64 (Q1:Q3 0.55,0.86) to 0.83 (Q1:Q3 0.77,1) by the end of Phase 2. At the "patient" level, SJC agreement remained globally stable (ICC, 0.52 to 0.66), while TJC and DAS28 agreement remained excellent throughout. CONCLUSION: Nurses inexperienced in joint counts were able to achieve excellent agreement with their teachers in assessment of tender and swollen joints through a short training session; practice further enhanced this agreement. Larger longitudinal studies are required to assess skills retention.

Improving agreement in assessment of synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Synovitis assessment through evaluation of swollen joints is integral in steering treatment decisions in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, there is high inter-observer variation. The objective was to assess if a short collegiate consensus would improve swollen joint agreement between rheumatologists and whether this was affected by experience. METHODS: Eighteen rheumatologists from French university rheumatology units participated in three 30 minutes rounds over a half day meeting evaluating joint counts of RA patients in small groups, followed by short consensus discussions. Agreement was evaluated at the end of each round as follows: (i) global agreement of swollen joints (ii) swollen joint agreement according to level of experience of the rheumatologist (iii) swollen joint count and (iv) agreement of disease activity state according to the Disease Activity Score (DAS28). Agreement was calculated using percentage agreement and kappa. RESULTS: Global agreement of swollen joints failed to improve (kappa 0.50 to 0.52) at the joint level. Agreement between seniors did not improve but agreement between newly qualified rheumatologists and their senior peer, which was initially poor (kappa 0.28), improved significantly (to 0.54) at the end of the consensus exercises. Concordance of DAS28 activity states improved from 71% to 87%. CONCLUSION: Consensus exercises for swollen joint assessment is worthwhile and may potentially improve agreement between clinicians in clinical synovitis and disease activity state, benefit was mostly observed in newly qualified rheumatologists.

Risk factors for total joint arthroplasty infection in patients receiving tumor necrosis factor α-blockers: a case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to assess natural microbial agents, history and risk factors for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) infections in patients receiving tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α-blockers, through the French RATIO registry and a case-control study. METHODS: Cases were TJA infections during TNFα-blocker treatments. Each case was compared to two controls (with TJA and TNFα-blocker therapy, but without TJA infection) matched on age (±15 years), TJA localization, type of rheumatic disorder and disease duration (±15 years). Statistical analyses included univariate and multivariate analyses with conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: In the 20 cases (18 rheumatoid arthritis), TJA infection concerned principally the knee (n = 12, 60%) and the hip (n = 5, 25%). Staphylococcus was the more frequent microorganism involved (n = 15, 75%). Four patients (20%) were hospitalized in an intensive care unit and two died from infection. Eight cases (40%) versus 5 controls (13%) had undergone primary TJA or TJA revision for the joint subsequently infected during the last year (P = 0.03). Of these procedures, 5 cases versus 1 control were performed without withdrawing TNFα-blockers (P = 0.08). In multivariate analysis, predictors of infection were primary TJA or TJA revision for the joint subsequently infected within the last year (odds ratio, OR = 88.3; 95%CI 1.1-7,071.6; P = 0.04) and increased daily steroid intake (OR = 5.0 per 5 mg/d increase; 1.1-21.6; P = 0.03). Case-control comparisons showed similar distribution between TNFα-blockers (P = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving TNFα-blockers, TJA infection is rare but potentially severe. Important risk factors are primary TJA or TJA revision within the last year, particularly when TNFα-blockers are not interrupted before surgery, and the daily steroid intake.

Acute pancreatitis related to tigecycline: case report and review of the literature.

Tigecycline is a new broad-spectrum antibiotic. Nausea and vomiting are its most common side-effects. We describe here a case of severe acute pancreatitis related to tigecycline in order to highlight the possible occurrence of this adverse event and to remind clinicians to measure the lipase rate if in any doubt.