Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Crohns Colitis 360 ; 6(2): otae022, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720935

RESUMO

Background: Since 2009, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) specialists have utilized "IBD LIVE," a weekly live video conference with a global audience, to discuss the multidisciplinary management of their most challenging cases. While most cases presented were confirmed IBD, a substantial number were diseases that mimic IBD. We have categorized all IBD LIVE cases and identified "IBD-mimics" with consequent clinical management implications. Methods: Cases have been recorded/archived since May 2018; we reviewed all 371 cases from May 2018-February 2023. IBD-mimics were analyzed/categorized according to their diagnostic and therapeutic workup. Results: Confirmed IBD cases made up 82.5% (306/371; 193 Crohn's disease, 107 ulcerative colitis, and 6 IBD-unclassified). Sixty-five (17.5%) cases were found to be mimics, most commonly medication-induced (n = 8) or vasculitis (n = 7). The evaluations that ultimately resulted in correct diagnosis included additional endoscopic biopsies (n = 13, 21%), surgical exploration/pathology (n = 10, 16.5%), biopsies from outside the GI tract (n = 10, 16.5%), genetic/laboratory testing (n = 8, 13%), extensive review of patient history (n = 8, 13%), imaging (n = 5, 8%), balloon enteroscopy (n = 5, 8%), and capsule endoscopy (n = 2, 3%). Twenty-five patients (25/65, 38%) were treated with biologics for presumed IBD, 5 of whom subsequently experienced adverse events requiring discontinuation of the biologic. Many patients were prescribed steroids, azathioprine, mercaptopurine, or methotrexate, and 3 were trialed on tofacitinib. Conclusions: The diverse presentation of IBD and IBD-mimics necessitates periodic consideration of the differential diagnosis, and reassessment of treatment in presumed IBD patients without appropriate clinical response. The substantial differences and often conflicting treatment approaches to IBD versus IBD-mimics directly impact the quality and cost of patient care.

2.
Inflamm Bowel Dis ; 25(4): 803-810, 2019 03 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30295811

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), fecal calprotectin (FC) concentrations correlate with endoscopic inflammation evidence. This study investigated the effect of vedolizumab induction on FC concentrations and whether FC concentrations could be a reliable surrogate measure of disease status. METHODS: Data from the placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial GEMINI 1 were used to evaluate week-6 relationships between outcomes (including clinical remission, mucosal healing [MH], and endoscopic remission) and both absolute FC concentration values and relative FC concentration changes from baseline (%FC0-6). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by cross-tabulation; the value of week-6 FC concentration as surrogate biomarker was measured with Youden J statistic computed for various cut points. RESULTS: GEMINI 1 induction phase enrolled 895 patients. Fecal calprotectin concentration decreases were deeper in patients with clinical remission, MH, and/or endoscopic remission than in patients without. The best week-6 indicator of clinical or endoscopic remission in this data set was absolute FC concentration ≤150 µg/g. The surrogate biomarker values (based on areas under the curve) for the best-performing cut points (FC0-6 reduction >90%, FC ≤150 µg/g) were fair (range, 0.70-0.77, total population). More patients met the ≤150 µg/g cut point with vedolizumab than with placebo. Baseline FC concentrations were not correlated with clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Fecal calprotectin concentration reductions were greater with vedolizumab induction than with placebo. Week-6 FC concentrations had only fair surrogate biomarker value for endoscopic status. Our data suggest that, while FC may reflect inflammatory burden, FC concentration after vedolizumab induction may not be a robust biomarker of mucosal inflammation.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Colite Ulcerativa/metabolismo , Fezes/química , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/uso terapêutico , Complexo Antígeno L1 Leucocitário/metabolismo , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Colite Ulcerativa/patologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Curva ROC , Indução de Remissão , Adulto Jovem
4.
BMC Res Notes ; 8: 188, 2015 May 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25947008

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare and aggressive skin malignancy that arises from primary neural cells and has a tendency for local recurrence and regional lymph node metastases. There are only a few cases in the literature reporting metastases of Merkel cell carcinoma to the gastrointestinal tract. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a 70 year old Caucasian female with distant history of Merkel cell carcinoma who presented with iron-deficiency anemia. Colonoscopy performed later for the evaluation of anemia revealed 1 cm polyp in ascending colon which turned out to be the recurrence of Merkel cell carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma to the gastrointestinal tract or any other organ should be considered in patients with a history of Merkel cell carcinoma.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Célula de Merkel/patologia , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/secundário , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Recidiva
6.
J Nucl Med ; 50(11): 1751-9, 2009 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19837758

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: We preoperatively determined the accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for differentiating fixed muscle hypertrophy and fibrotic stenoses from acute transmural inflammatory stenoses in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) scheduled to undergo surgical resection for obstructive symptoms. METHODS: Seventeen patients with known CD prospectively underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT before already-planned surgery for obstructive symptoms. Image interpretation was by consensus of 2 readers with knowledge of patient participation in the study but not of other clinical history. Lesions were qualitatively graded on a 5-point scale for the presence of increased (18)F-FDG uptake consistent with active inflammation. Maximum lean standardized uptake value (SUL(max)) was determined for lesions scored 1 or more. Imaging results were compared with the pathologic grading of inflammation and predominant histopathologic subtype for each patient's surgical specimen, whether mainly inflammation, fibrosis, or muscle hypertrophy. RESULTS: Thirteen of the 17 patients underwent surgery (median, 28 d after PET/CT; range, 2-148 d), and 12 of these 13 had histopathologic correlation. Despite the predominant histopathologic subtype (inflammation, 5; fibrosis, 4; and muscle hypertrophy, 3), acute and chronic inflammation, fibrosis (median, 50%; range, 40%-90%), and muscle hypertrophy (median, 20-fold thickening; range, 9- to 40-fold thickening) were found in all patients. SUL(max) was significantly higher in severe than in mild-to-moderate chronic inflammation (8.2 +/- 2.8 vs. 4.7 +/- 2.5, P = 0.04). No patient with predominantly fibrosis or muscle hypertrophy (n = 7) had an SUL(max) greater than 8. Visually, 10 of 12 patients on PET/CT were considered to have active inflammation of the bowel. CONCLUSION: Patients with CD who undergo surgery for obstructive symptoms have histopathologically mixed findings of inflammation, fibrosis, and muscle hypertrophy. Qualitative PET interpretations were quite sensitive, but additional semiquantitative analyses using SUL(max) helped identify patients with active inflammation. This information may be beneficial for referring gastroenterologists considering medical therapy versus surgery for patients with CD who present with obstructive symptoms.


Assuntos
Doença de Crohn/diagnóstico , Doença de Crohn/cirurgia , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Adulto , Constrição Patológica/complicações , Constrição Patológica/diagnóstico , Doença de Crohn/complicações , Doença de Crohn/patologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertrofia/complicações , Hipertrofia/diagnóstico , Inflamação/complicações , Inflamação/diagnóstico , Laboratórios , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Músculos/patologia , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
7.
Liver Transpl ; 11(8): 881-90, 2005 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16035068

RESUMO

Diarrhea is common after liver transplantation (LT). The true incidence of diarrhea in liver transplant recipients is unknown but possibly ranges from 10% to 43% based on a few published studies in other solid organ and bone marrow transplantation. Infectious etiologies, including cytomegalovirus (CMV), Clostridium difficile, and occasional atypical intestinal infections, are the most common causes. Diarrhea is also a frequent side effect of immunosuppressive medications. To variable extents, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine A (CSA), tacrolimus, and sirolimus are all known to be associated with diarrhea. Rarely, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), lymphoproliferative disorder, de novo inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), or colon cancer may present as diarrhea. Flare-up of preexisting IBD is also not uncommon after LT. However, the cause of acute diarrhea remains unidentified in 1 of 3 patients. This review summarizes the literature and provides recommendations on the management of acute diarrhea after LT. Although our focus is on LT, the etiology and management recommendations apply to most transplant recipients.


Assuntos
Diarreia/etiologia , Diarreia/terapia , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias do Colo/complicações , Diarreia/microbiologia , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/complicações , Humanos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Infecções/complicações , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/complicações
8.
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol ; 8(3): 211-221, 2005 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15913510

RESUMO

Functional disturbances occur in approximately 10% to 15% of the general population and in a similar percentage of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Because overlapping irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is so common, one of the most important interventions a clinician can make is recognizing its existence. This requires a thorough understanding of underlying pathophysiologic processes. Differentiating among the causes of symptoms is especially significant in a minority of patients mislabeled as having 'refractory IBD.' Escalating therapy directed at disease activity may have no effect on functional symptoms other than to reinforce their presence. Treatment of IBS in patients with IBD is similar to that of the general population. The cornerstone of treatment is establishing a constructive doctor-patient relationship. Initial therapy usually involves a conservative approach that includes patient education and diet and lifestyle modifications. Pharmacologic treatment is individualized and generally directed at the predominant symptoms. Options may broadly include antispasmodics, antidiarrheals, and antidepressants, either alone or in combination. Psychosocial therapies have shown to be beneficial in selected individuals.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA