Assessment of Coagulation by Thromboelastography During Ongoing Postpartum Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Rapid assessment of hemostasis during postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is essential to allow characterization of coagulopathy, to estimate bleeding severity, and to improve outcome. Point of care (POC) coagulation monitors could be of great interest for early diagnosis and treatment of coagulation disorders in PPH. METHODS: Women with ongoing PPH >500 mL who clinically required an assessment of coagulation with thromboelastography (TEG) were included. The primary aim of this retrospective observational cohort study was to assess the predictive accuracy of TEG parameters for the diagnosis of coagulation disorders (hypofibrinogenemia ≤2 g/L, thrombocytopenia ≤80,000/mm, prothrombin ratio ≤50%, or activated partial thromboplastin time ratio ≥1.5) during PPH. The analyzed TEG parameters were Kaolin-maximum amplitude (K-MA), Kaolin-maximum rate of thrombus generation using G (K-MRTGG), functional fibrinogen-maximum amplitude (FF-MA), and functional fibrinogen-maximum rate of thrombus generation using G (FF-MRTGG). Secondary aims of this study were (1) comparison of the time delay between classical parameters and velocity curve-derived parameters (K-MA versus K-MRTGG and FF-MA versus FF-MRTGG) and (2) evaluation of the accuracy of TEG parameters to predict severe hemorrhage estimated by calculated blood losses. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were included with 98 simultaneous TEG analyses and laboratory assays. All parameters had an excellent predictive performance. For the Kaolin assay, no significant difference was evidenced between K-MA and K-MRTGG for the predictive performance for hypofibrinogenemia ≤2 g/L and/or thrombocytopenia ≤80,000/mm (respective area under the curve [AUC], 0.970 vs 0.981). For the functional fibrinogen assay, no significant difference was evidenced between FF-MA and FF-MRTGG for the predictive performance for hypofibrinogenemia ≤2 g/L (respective AUC, 0.988 vs 0.974). For both assays, the time to obtain results was shorter for the velocity parameters (K-MRTGG: 7.7 minutes [2.4 minutes] versus K-MA: 24.7 minutes [4.2 minutes], P < .001; FF-MRTGG: 2.7 minutes [2.7 minutes] versus FF-MA: 14.0 minutes [4.3 minutes], P < .001). All TEG parameters derived from the Kaolin and functional fibrinogen assays and Clauss fibrinogen were significantly predictive of severe PPH >2500 mL. CONCLUSIONS: During PPH, when coagulation assessment is indicated, TEG provides a rapid and reliable detection of hypofibrinogenemia ≤2 g/L and/or thrombocytopenia ≤80,000/mm. No difference in performance was evidenced between the velocity-derived parameters (K-MRTGG and FF-MRTGG) and the classical parameters (K-MA and FF-MA). However, velocity-derived parameters offer the advantage of a shorter time to obtain results: FF-MRTGG parameter is available within ≤5 minutes. POC assessment of hemostasis during PPH management may help physicians to diagnose clotting disorders and to provide appropriate hemostatic support.

The relationship between bispectral index and propofol during target-controlled infusion anesthesia: a comparative study between children and young adults.

BACKGROUND: In this prospective study, we compared the relationship between propofol concentrations and bispectral index (BIS) in children versus young adults anesthetized with target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol. METHODS: Forty-five prepubertal subjects (children) and 45 postpubertal subjects (adults) were studied. All patients were anesthetized with TCI of propofol, based on the Kataria et al.'s model for children and on the Schnider et al.'s model for adults. All data from the BIS and the TCI system were continuously recorded using Rugloop software. Remifentanil was continuously administered throughout the study (0.25 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)). In all patients, after the end of surgery, a 12-min period with a stable target plasma concentration (Ct) of propofol, randomly assigned at 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 microg/mL, was performed. In addition, in most of the patients, another 12-min period was performed during which the BIS was targeted at 50 +/- 5. After each 12-min steady-state period, the Ct and BIS were noted and the plasma concentration of propofol was measured (Cm). The Ct and Cm corresponding to half maximal effect (BIS(50)) was determined by the Hill equation, and by targeting BIS at 50. RESULTS: In children, as in adults, BIS values were highly correlated with the corresponding Ct or Cm of propofol following classical E(max) dose-response curves. The ECt(50) and the ECm(50), derived from the dose-response curves, were higher in children than in adults: ECm(50): 4.0 (3.6-4.5) microg/mL vs 3.3 (3.0-3.7) microg/mL [mean (95% CI)], P < 0.001; as well were the Ct and Cm clinically obtained when BIS was targeted at 50 (Cm(50): 4.3 +/- 1.1 microg/mL vs 3.4 +/- 1.2 microg/mL, (mean +/- SD) P < 0.05, children versus adults). Cm was generally under-estimated by the Ct, and the bias was higher in children than in adults: 2.6 +/- 2.6 microg/mL vs 1.7 +/- 1.6 microg/mL (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The good relationship between propofol and BIS demonstrated in children as in adults suggested a slightly lower sensitivity to propofol in children. As the predictability of plasma propofol concentrations with the classical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models is limited in children, a cerebral pharmacodynamic feedback, such as BIS, may be useful in this population.

Neonatal fluid management.

Perioperative fluid management in paediatrics has been the subject of many controversies in recent years, but fluid management in the neonatal period has not been considered in most reviews and guidelines. The literature regarding neonatal fluid management mainly appears in the paediatric textbooks and few recent data are available, except for resuscitation and fluid loading during shock and major surgery. In the context of anaesthesia, many neonates requiring surgery within the first month of life have organ malformation and/or dysfunction. This article aims at reviewing basic physiological considerations important for neonatal fluid management and mainly focusses on fluid maintenance and replacement during surgery.