Mre11 and Ku70 interact in somatic cells, but are differentially expressed in early meiosis.

Double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) pose a major threat to living cells, and several mechanisms for repairing these lesions have evolved. Eukaryotes can process DSBs by homologous recombination (HR) or non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). NHEJ connects DNA ends irrespective of their sequence, and it predominates in mitotic cells, particularly during G1 (ref. 3). HR requires interaction of the broken DNA molecule with an intact homologous copy, and allows restoration of the original DNA sequence. HR is active during G2 of the mitotic cycle and predominates during meiosis, when the cell creates DSBs (ref. 4), which must be repaired by HR to ensure proper chromosome segregation. How the cell controls the choice between the two repair pathways is not understood. We demonstrate here a physical interaction between mammalian Ku70, which is essential for NHEJ (ref. 5), and Mre11, which functions both in NHEJ and meiotic HR (Refs 2,6). Moreover, we show that irradiated cells deficient for Ku70 are incapable of targeting Mre11 to subnuclear foci that may represent DNA-repair complexes. Nevertheless, Ku70 and Mre11 were differentially expressed during meiosis. In the mouse testis, Mre11 and Ku70 co-localized in nuclei of somatic cells and in the XY bivalent. In early meiotic prophase, however, when meiotic recombination is most probably initiated, Mre11 was abundant, whereas Ku70 was not detectable. We propose that Ku70 acts as a switch between the two DSB repair pathways. When present, Ku70 destines DSBs for NHEJ by binding to DNA ends and attracting other factors for NHEJ, including Mre11; when absent, it allows participation of DNA ends and Mre11 in the meiotic HR pathway.

Activation of a system for the joining of nonhomologous DNA ends during Xenopus egg maturation.

Mature Xenopus laevis eggs provide an elementary reaction system of illegitimate recombination which efficiently joins nonhomologous DNA ends (P. Pfeiffer and W. Vielmetter, Nucleic Acids Res. 16:907-924, 1988). Here we show that stage VI oocytes, known to express a system for homologous recombination (D. Carroll, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80:6902-6906, 1983), are completely devoid of this joining system. Nonhomologous DNA end-to-end joining, however, attains full activity only at an extremely late stage of egg maturation. Cycloheximide inhibition patterns indicate that nonhomologous joining activity is regulated at the G2 restriction point of the cell cycle. Implications of homologous and nonhomologous recombination activities during egg maturation are discussed.

DNA double-strand break repair in cell-free extracts from Ku80-deficient cells: implications for Ku serving as an alignment factor in non-homologous DNA end joining.

Non-homologous DNA end joining (NHEJ) is considered the major pathway of double-strand break (DSB) repair in mammalian cells and depends, among other things, on the DNA end-binding Ku70/80 hetero-dimer. To investigate the function of Ku in NHEJ we have compared the ability of cell-free extracts from wild-type CHO-K1 cells, Ku80-deficient xrs6 cells and Ku80-cDNA-complemented xrs6 cells (xrs6-Ku80) to rejoin different types of DSB in vitro. While the two Ku80-proficient extracts were highly efficient and accurate in rejoining all types of DNA ends, the xrs6 extract displayed strongly decreased NHEJ efficiency and accuracy. The lack of accuracy is most evident in non-homologous terminus configurations containing 3'-overhangs that abut a 5'-overhang or blunt end. While the sequences of the 3'-overhangs are mostly preserved by fill-in DNA synthesis in the Ku80-proficient extracts, they are always completely lost in the xrs6 extract so that, instead, small deletions displaying microhomology patches at their breakpoints arise. In summary, our results are consistent with previous results from Ku-deficient yeast strains and indicate that Ku may serve as an alignment factor that not only increases NHEJ efficiency but also accuracy. Furthermore, a secondary NHEJ activity is present in the absence of Ku which is error-prone and possibly assisted by base pairing interactions.

Pathways of DNA double-strand break repair and their impact on the prevention and formation of chromosomal aberrations.

DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) are considered the critical primary lesion in the formation of chromosomal aberrations (CA). DSB occur spontaneously during the cell cycle and are induced by a variety of exogenous agents such as ionising radiation. To combat this potentially lethal damage, two related repair pathways, namely homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous DNA end joining (NHEJ), have evolved, both of which are well conserved from bacteria to humans. Depending on the pathway used, the underlying mechanisms are capable of eliminating DSB without alterations to the original genomic sequence (error-free) but also may induce small scale mutations (base pair substitutions, deletions and/or insertions) and gross CA (error-prone). In this paper, we review the major pathways of DSB-repair, the proteins involved therein and their impact on the prevention of CA formation and carcinogenesis.

Chromosomal aberrations: formation, identification and distribution.

Chromosomal aberrations (CA) are the microscopically visible part of a wide spectrum of DNA changes generated by different repair mechanisms of DNA double strand breaks (DSB). The method of fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) has uncovered unexpected complexities of CA and this will lead to changes in our thinking about the origin of CA. The inter- and intrachromosomal distribution of breakpoints is generally not random. CA breakpoints occur preferentially in active chromatin. Deviations from expected interchromosomal distributions of breakpoints may result from the arrangement of chromosomes in the interphase nucleus and/or from different sensitivities of chromosomes with respect to the formation of CA. Telomeres and interstitial telomere repeat like sequences play an important role in the formation of CA. Subtelomeric regions are hot spots for the formation of symmetrical exchanges between homologous chromatids and cryptic aberrations in these regions are associated with human congenital abnormalities.

Mechanisms of DNA double-strand break repair and their potential to induce chromosomal aberrations.

DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) are considered to be critical primary lesions in the formation of chromosomal aberrations. DSB may be induced by exogenous agents, such as ionizing radiation, but also occur spontaneously during cellular processes at quite significant frequencies. To repair this potentially lethal damage, eukaryotic cells have evolved a variety of repair pathways related to homologous and illegitimate recombination, also called non-homologous DNA end joining, which may induce small scale mutations and chromosomal aberrations. In this paper we review the major cellular sources of spontaneous DSB and the different homologous and illegitimate recombination repair pathways, with particular focus on their potential to induce chromosomal aberrations.

Nonhomologous DNA end joining in Schizosaccharomyces pombe efficiently eliminates DNA double-strand-breaks from haploid sequences.

Cells of higher eucaryotes are known to possess mechanisms of illegitimate recombination which promote the joining between nonhomologous ends of broken DNA and thus may serve as basic tools of double-strand-break (DSB) repair. Here we show that cells of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe also contain activities of nonhomologous DNA end joining resembling the ones found in higher eucaryotes. Nonhomologous end joining activities were detected by transformation of linearized self-replicating plasmids in yeast cells employing a selection procedure which only propagates transformants carrying recircularized plasmid molecules. Linear plasmid substrates were generated by duplicate restriction cuts carrying either blunt ends or 3' or 5' protruding single strands (PSS) of 4 nt which were efficiently joined in any tested combination. Sequence analysis of joined products revealed that junctional sequences were shortened by 1 to 14 nt. Two mechanisms may account for junction formation (i) loss of terminal nucleotides from PSS tails to produce blunt ends which can be joined to abutting ends and (ii) interactions of DNA termini at patches of sequence homologies (1-4 bp) by formation of overlap intermediates which are subsequently processed. A general feature of the yeast joining system is that end joining can only be detected in the absence of sequence homology between the linear substrate and host genome. In the presence of homology, nonhomologous DNA end joining is efficiently competed by activities of homologous recombination.

Localisation of RAD50 and MRE11 in spermatocyte nuclei of mouse and rat.

Synaptonemal complexes (SCs) are zipperlike structures that are assembled between homologous chromosomes during meiotic prophase. They consist of two axial elements (AEs) (one along each of the two homologous chromosomes), which, in mature SCs, are connected by numerous transverse filaments along their length. Several proteins involved in the later steps of meiotic recombination most probably function in close association with the AEs of SCs, because the proteins involved in these steps have all been localised along AEs or SCs by immunocytochemical methods. It is not known at which step in meiotic recombination this association with the AEs is established. In order to shed some light on this issue, we analysed the localisation of two proteins that are involved in early steps of meiotic recombination, RAD50 and MRE11, relative to AEs and SCs by immunofluorescence labelling of paraffin sections of the mouse testis, using affinity-purified polyclonal antibodies against RAD50 and MRE11, and monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against SC components. The localisation patterns of MRE11 and RAD50 within spermatocytes were very similar. MRE11 and RAD50 appeared in high abundance in preleptotene spermatocytes, just before SC components could be detected. From preleptotene until early zygotene they were present throughout the nucleus. In mid and late zygotene, MRE11 and RAD50 concentrated in distinct areas; in early pachytene the two proteins had almost disappeared from the nucleus, except from the sex vesicle (the chromatin of the XY bivalent), where they persisted in high abundance until diplotene. We propose that MRE11 and RAD50, together with other proteins, prepare chromatin throughout the early meiotic prophase nucleus for the initiation of meiotic recombination. Possibly, only a small fraction of the RAD50- and MRE11-containing (pre)recombination complexes associates transiently with AEs, where further steps in meiotic recombination can take place.

Nonhomologous DNA end joining of synthetic hairpin substrates in Xenopus laevis egg extracts.

Processes of DNA end joining are assumed to play a major role in the elimination of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) in higher eucaryotic cells. Linear plasmid molecules terminated by nonhomologous restriction ends are the typical substrates used in the analysis of joining mechanisms. However, due to their limited structural variability, DSB ends generated by restriction cleavage cover probably only part of the total spectrum of naturally occurring DSB termini. We therefore devised novel DNA substrates consisting of synthetic hairpin-shaped oligonucleotides which permit the construction of blunt ends and 5'- or 3'-protruding single-strands (PSS) of arbitrary sequence and length. These substrates were tested in extracts of Xenopus laevis eggs known to efficiently join linear plasmids bearing nonhomologous restriction termini (Pfeiffer and Vielmetter, 1988). Sequences of hairpin junctions indicate that the short hairpins are joined by the same mechanisms as the plasmid substrates. However, the bimolecular DNA end joining reaction was only detectable when both hairpin partners had a minimal duplex stem length of 27bp and their PSS-tails did not exceed 10nt.