RESUMO
PURPOSE: Incisional hernias are a frequent complication following robotic radical prostatectomy. Observational data in men undergoing robotic prostatectomy suggest that transverse closure resulted in lower hernia rates than vertical closure. We sought to compare the incidence of incisional hernia after robotic radical prostatectomy after vertical and transverse extraction site closure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a clinically integrated, crossover, cluster randomized trial at a single tertiary referral center (January 2016-September 2021) comparing the rate of hernia after transverse vs vertical extraction site excision in 1356 patients treated with minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. The primary outcome was between-group incidence of incisional hernia within 15 months of prostatectomy defined by physical examination and self-reported patient surveys. RESULTS: Overall, 197 (20%) patients developed an incisional hernia within 15 months, 797 did not have an incisional hernia within this period, and 362 had missing outcome data regarding incisional hernia. We found no significant difference in hernia rates between the 2 incision types (absolute between-group difference 1.8%; 95% CI -3.4%, 6.6%; P = .5) in the primary analysis or in the 3 sensitivity analyses. Notably, because of the inclusive definition of hernia used, these data cannot be used as an estimate of the true prevalence of incisional hernia. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons should choose the incision and closure approach they are most comfortable with when extracting specimens. Studies of modifications to the surgical technique are best conducted as randomized comparisons, and the clinically integrated, crossover, cluster randomized trial allows large trials to be completed at a single center and at low cost. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01407263.
Assuntos
Estudos Cross-Over , Hérnia Incisional , Prostatectomia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hérnia Incisional/epidemiologia , Hérnia Incisional/etiologia , Hérnia Incisional/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Incidência , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether urothelial carcinoma (UC) with sarcomatoid differentiation is associated with a lower pathological response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and worse oncological outcomes compared to UC without variant histology among patients undergoing radical cystectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with UC undergoing cystectomy from 1995 to 2018 at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre were identified. Patients with sarcomatoid differentiation at transurethral resection (TUR) or cystectomy, and patients without variant histology were selected. Downstaging from ≥cT2 to ≤pT1N0 defined partial response and pT0N0 defined complete response. Recurrence-free, cancer-specific and overall survival were modelled. RESULTS: We identified 131 patients with sarcomatoid differentiation and 1722 patients without variant histology, of whom 25 with sarcomatoid histology on biopsy and 313 without variant histology received NAC. Those with sarcomatoid differentiation presented with higher consensus tumour stage (94% ≥T2 vs 62%; P < 0.001) and were, therefore, more likely to receive NAC (29% vs 18%; P = 0.003). We found no evidence to support a difference in partial (24% vs 31%) or complete (20% vs 24%) response between patients with sarcomatoid histology and those with pure UC at TUR (P = 0.6). Among patients with sarcomatoid differentiation, 5-year recurrence-free survival was 55% (95% confidence interval [CI] 41-74) among patients receiving NAC and 40% (95% CI 31-52) among patients undergoing cystectomy alone (P = 0.1). Adjusting for stage, nodal involvement, margin status and receipt of NAC, sarcomatoid differentiation was associated with worse recurrence-free (hazard ratio [HR] 1.82, 95% CI 1.39-2.39), disease-specific (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.23-2.22), and overall survival (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.06-1.78). CONCLUSIONS: Sarcomatoid differentiation was associated with higher stage at presentation and independently associated with worse survival. Given similar pathological response rates if sarcomatoid differentiation is detected at initial resection, and greater survival among patients receiving NAC, treatment with NAC appears warranted. Other drivers of the poor outcomes of this histology must be investigated.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células de Transição , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/patologia , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/cirurgia , Cistectomia , Humanos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To analyse the risk of uretero-enteric anastomotic stricture in patients randomised to open (ORC) or robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with extracorporeal urinary diversion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 118 patients randomised to RARC (n = 60) or ORC (n = 58) at a single, high-volume institution from March 2010 to April 2013. Urinary diversion was performed by experienced open surgeons. Stricture was defined as non-malignant obstruction on imaging, corroborated by clinical status, and requiring procedural intervention. The risk of stricture within 1 year was compared between groups using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: In all, 58 and 60 patients were randomised to RARC and ORC, respectively. We identified five strictures, all in the ORC group. In patients with ≥1 year of follow-up, the increase in risk of stricture from open surgery was 9.3% (95% confidence interval 1.5%, 17%). Of the five strictures, three were managed endoscopically while two required open revision. There was no evidence that perioperative Grade 3-5 complications were associated with development of a stricture (P = 1) and no evidence of a difference in 24-month estimated glomerular filtration rate between arms (P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: In this study at a high-volume centre, RARC with extracorporeal urinary diversion achieved excellent ureteric anastomotic outcomes. Purported increased risk of stricture is not a reason to avoid RARC. Future research should examine the impact of different surgical techniques and operator experience on the risk of stricture, especially as more intracorporeal diversions are performed.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Robótica , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Derivação Urinária , Humanos , Cistectomia/efeitos adversos , Cistectomia/métodos , Constrição Patológica/etiologia , Constrição Patológica/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Derivação Urinária/efeitos adversos , Derivação Urinária/métodosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Prophylactic antibiotics are routinely given at the time of catheter removal post-radical prostatectomy (RP). The low rate of infectious complications entails that large sample sizes are required for randomized controlled trials, a challenge given the cost of standard randomized controlled trials. We evaluated infectious complications associated with 1 vs 3 days of prophylactic antibiotics at the time of catheter removal post-RP using a novel, clinically integrated trial with randomization at the surgeon level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surgeons were cluster randomized for periods of 3 months to prescribe 1-day vs 3-day regimen of prophylactic antibiotics at the time of catheter removal. The primary end point was an infectious complication as routinely captured by nursing phone call within 10 days of catheter removal and defined as positive urine cultures (≥105 CFU) and at least 1 of the following symptoms: fever (>38°C), urgency, frequency, dysuria or suprapubic tenderness. RESULTS: A total of 824 patients were consented and underwent RP with, respectively, 389 and 435 allocated to 1-day and 3-day antibiotics, predominantly ciprofloxacin. Accrual was achieved within 3 years: 95% vs 88% of patients received the allocated 3-day vs 1-day antibiotic regimen. There were 0 urinary tract infections (0%) in the 1-day regimen and 3 urinary tract infections (0.7%) in the 3-day regimen, meeting our prespecified criterion for declaring the 1-day regimen to be noninferior. CONCLUSIONS: A clinically integrated trial using cluster randomization accrued rapidly with no important logistical problems and negligible burden on surgeons. If surgeons choose to prescribe empiric prophylactic antibiotics after catheter removal following RP, then the duration should not exceed 1 day.
Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Idoso , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/microbiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Catéteres/efeitos adversos , Ciprofloxacina/administração & dosagem , Estudos Cross-Over , Remoção de Dispositivo/efeitos adversos , Esquema de Medicação , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/microbiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Próstata/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Cateterismo Urinário/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Urinário/instrumentação , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia , Infecções Urinárias/prevenção & controleRESUMO
PURPOSE: Frailty is associated with adverse outcomes following radical cystectomy. Prospective tools to identify factors affecting outcomes are needed. We describe a novel electronic rapid fitness assessment to evaluate geriatric patients undergoing radical cystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Before undergoing radical cystectomy between February 2015 and February 2018, 80 patients older than age 75 years completed the electronic rapid fitness assessment and were perioperatively comanaged by the Geriatrics Service. Physical function and cognitive function over 12 domains were evaluated and an accumulated geriatric deficit score was compiled. Hospital length of stay, discharge disposition, unplanned intensive care unit admissions, urgent care visits, readmissions, complications and deaths were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients who underwent radical cystectomy for bladder cancer without concomitant procedures completed the assessment. Median age was 80 (77, 84) years and 52 (80%) were male. A higher proportion of patients with intensive care unit admission, urgent care visit and major complications had impairments identified within electronic rapid fitness assessment domains, including Timed Up and Go. Readmission rates were similar between patients with or without deficits identified. Higher accumulated geriatric deficit score was significantly associated with intensive care unit admission (p=0.035), death within 90 days (p=0.037) and discharge to other than home (p=0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the feasibility of assessing fitness in patients older than 75 years undergoing radical cystectomy using a novel electronic fitness tool. Physical limitations and overall impairment corresponded to higher intensive care unit admission rates and adverse postoperative outcomes. Larger studies in less resourced environments are required to validate these findings.
Assuntos
Cistectomia , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cistectomia/métodos , Tecnologia Digital , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Período Pré-Operatório , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the noninferiority of the fundamentals of robotic surgery (FRS) skills curriculum over current training paradigms and identify an ideal training platform. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: There is currently no validated, uniformly accepted curriculum for training in robotic surgery skills. METHODS: Single-blinded parallel-group randomized trial at 12 international American College of Surgeons (ACS) Accredited Education Institutes (AEI). Thirty-three robotic surgery experts and 123 inexperienced surgical trainees were enrolled between April 2015 and November 2016. Benchmarks (proficiency levels) on the 7 FRS Dome tasks were established based on expert performance. Participants were then randomly assigned to 4 training groups: Dome (n = 29), dV-Trainer (n = 30), and DVSS (n = 32) that trained to benchmarks and control (n = 32) that trained using locally available robotic skills curricula. The primary outcome was participant performance after training based on task errors and duration on 5 basic robotic tasks (knot tying, continuous suturing, cutting, dissection, and vessel coagulation) using an avian tissue model (transfer-test). Secondary outcomes included cognitive test scores, GEARS ratings, and robot familiarity checklist scores. RESULTS: All groups demonstrated significant performance improvement after skills training (P < 0.01). Participating residents and fellows performed tasks faster (DOME and DVSS groups) and with fewer errors than controls (DOME group; P < 0.01). Inter-rater reliability was high for the checklist scores (0.82-0.97) but moderate for GEARS ratings (0.40-0.67). CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence of effectiveness for the FRS curriculum by demonstrating better performance of those trained following FRS compared with controls on a transfer test. We therefore argue for its implementation across training programs before surgeons apply these skills clinically.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Simulação por Computador , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/educação , Treinamento por Simulação/métodos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/educação , Análise de Variância , Currículo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medição de Risco , Método Simples-Cego , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate treatment patterns and associated outcomes of patients with urethral cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After obtaining institutional review board approval we identified 165 patients treated for primary urethral cancer between 1956 and 2017. Treatment included monotherapy (surgery or radiation), dual therapy (surgery+radiation, surgery+chemotherapy, or chemotherapy+radiation) or triple therapy (surgery+radiation+chemotherapy). Rates of different treatments were described by treatment year. The association between treatment type and outcomes was evaluated with multivariable Cox regression models, adjusting for disease characteristics. RESULTS: The study cohort included 74 men and 91 women, with a median age of 61 years. Common histologies were squamous cell (36%), urothelial (27%) and adenocarcinoma (25%). At presentation, 72% of patients had invasive disease, 24% had nodal involvement, and 5% had metastases. Treatment included monotherapy (57%), dual therapy (21%), and triple therapy (10%). The use of monotherapy decreased over time, while rates of dual therapy remained consistent, and rates of triple therapy increased. The median follow-up was 4.7 years. Estimated 5-year local recurrence-free, disease-specific and overall survival were 51%, 48% and 41%, respectively. Monotherapy was associated with decreased local recurrence-free survival after adjusting for stage, histology, sex and year of treatment (P = 0.017). There was no evidence that treatment type was associated with distant recurrence, cancer-specific or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: We found preliminary evidence that multimodal therapy, more commonly used in recent years, was of benefit in patients with primary urethral cancer. This finding should be confirmed in further studies involving multiple centres because of the low incidence of the disease.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Uretrais/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoAssuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Singapura/epidemiologia , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/virologia , SARS-CoV-2/genéticaRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) is being increasingly performed worldwide. This review summarizes recent technical developments and outcome data for RARC with ICUD. RECENT FINDINGS: With the recent description of intracorporeal continent cutaneous diversion, all classes of urinary diversion can presently be performed totally intracorporeally. The summary of our seven cases of intracorporeal continent cutaneous diversion in this article brings the number of reported cases in the literature to 17. Additional recent advancements in ICUD focus on novel technical descriptions and outcome data. Several intracorporeal orthotopic ileal neobladder techniques have been described with intermediate perioperative outcomes. There is some rationale for reduced overall, wound, gastrointestinal and genitourinary complications with ICUD. SUMMARY: RARC with intracorporeal diversion is a feasible option for patients with bladder cancer. Prospective and randomized outcome data are needed to better characterize the benefit of ICUD in patients following radical cystectomy.
Assuntos
Cistectomia/métodos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Derivação Urinária/métodos , Colo/cirurgia , Cistectomia/efeitos adversos , Cistectomia/instrumentação , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Íleo/cirurgia , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , Excisão de Linfonodo/instrumentação , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Margens de Excisão , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/instrumentação , Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Derivação Urinária/efeitos adversos , Derivação Urinária/instrumentação , Coletores de UrinaRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: More than a century of development has led to contemporary urinary diversion. It is paramount that robotic intracorporeal diversions uphold the principles defined by open surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: In this review, we discuss the fundamental open surgical principles that have led to contemporary techniques of urinary diversion. We then outline the technical aspects of several recently described robotic intracorporeal urinary diversions in the context of these surgical principles. Several potential benefits of intracorporeal urinary diversion are being investigated-such as a reduction in gastrointestinal complications, ureteral strictures, and wound complications. Finally, we highlight the important aspects of establishing an intracorporeal urinary diversion program integrated with an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) program. We have included the perioperative outcomes of 100 consecutive cases of intracorporeal urinary diversion with an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol. In this series, 49% were continent diversions. Patients had a median length of stay of 5 days, with 37% staying 4 days or less. High-grade complications and readmissions were noted in 22 and 20% of patients, respectively. The benefits of intracorporeal urinary diversion appear promising, and there is continued need for high-quality randomized controlled trials to define its role in patients undergoing radical cystectomy.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Derivação Urinária/métodos , Protocolos Clínicos , Cistectomia , Humanos , Cuidados Pós-OperatóriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare user performance of four fundamental inanimate robotic skills tasks (FIRST) as well as eight da Vinci Skills Simulator (dVSS) virtual reality tasks with intra-operative performance (concurrent validity) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and to show that a positive correlation exists between simulation and intra-operative performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 21 urological surgeons with varying robotic experience were enrolled. Demographics were captured using a standardized questionnaire. User performance was assessed concurrently in simulated (FIRST exercises and dVSS tasks) and clinical environments (endopelvic dissection during RARP). Intra-operative robotic clinical performance was scored using the previously validated six-metric Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) tool. The relationship between simulator and clinical performance was evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation. RESULTS: Performance was assessed in 17 trainees and four expert robotic surgeons with a median (range) number of previous robotic cases (as primary surgeon) of 0 (0-55) and 117 (58-600), respectively (P = 0.001). Collectively, the overall FIRST (ρ = 0.833, P < 0.001) and dVSS (ρ = 0.805, P < 0.001) simulation scores correlated highly with GEARS performance score. Each individual FIRST and dVSS task score also demonstrated a significant correlation with intra-operative performance, with the exception of Energy Switcher 1 exercise (P = 0.063). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to show a significant relationship between simulated robotic performance and robotic clinical performance. Findings support implementation of these robotic training tools in a standardized robotic training curriculum.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Prostatectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/educação , Treinamento por Simulação , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
Advances in endoscopic imaging technology may improve sensitivity for the detection of bladder cancer and provide a more complete understanding of the urothelial landscape, and it also may lead to improved short-term and long-term cancer control. Fluorescence cystoscopy requires intravesical administration of a photosensitizing agent (5-aminolevulinic acid or hexaminolevulinate), and imaging with a blue-light endoscopy system demonstrably improves the detection of papillary and flat bladder lesions compared with conventional white-light cystoscopy. Prospective phase 3 clinical trials have demonstrated improved diagnostic ability, enhanced tumor resection, and a small but significant reduction in recurrence-free survival. Optical coherence tomography delineates subsurface microarchitecture information about bladder lesions in real time and has the ability to discriminate between noninvasive and invasive cancers. Narrow-band imaging may augment white-light cystoscopy by providing increased contrast between normal and abnormal tissue on the basis of neovascularity. Confocal laser endoscopy has been applied to the urinary tract using thinner probes adapted from use in gastrointestinal malignancies and provides exquisite images at microscopic resolution. More technology is on the horizon that may further enhance our ability to detect and accurately stage bladder tumors and distinguish benign from malignant or dysplastic lesions.
Assuntos
Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Cistoscopia/métodos , Microscopia Confocal , Imagem Multimodal/métodos , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico , Ácido Aminolevulínico , Carcinoma/patologia , Carcinoma Papilar/diagnóstico , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Fluorescência , Humanos , Fármacos Fotossensibilizantes , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/ultraestruturaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Our group has previously reported the development and validation of FIRST (Fundamental Inanimate Robotic Skills Tasks), a series of 4 inanimate robotic skills tasks. Expanding on the initial validation, we now report face, content and construct validity of FIRST in a large multi-institutional cohort of experts and trainees. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 96 residents, fellows and attending surgeons completed the FIRST exercises at participating institutions. Participants were classified based on previous robotic experience and task performance was compared across groups to establish construct validity. Face and content validity was assessed from participant ratings of the tasks on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: A total of 51 novice, 22 intermediate and 23 expert participants with a median previous robotic experience of 0 (range 0 to 3), 10 (range 5 to 30) and 200 cases (range 55 to 2,000), respectively (p<0.001), were assessed across all 4 inanimate robotic skills tasks. Expert and intermediate groups reliably outperformed novices (p<0.01). Experts also performed better than intermediates on all exercises (p<0.01). A survey of participants on their perceptions of the tasks yielded excellent face and content validity. CONCLUSIONS: We confirm robust face, content and construct validity of 4 inanimate robotic training tasks in a large multi-institutional cohort. FIRST tasks are reliably able to discern among expert, intermediate and novice robotic surgeons. Validation data from this large multi-institutional cohort is useful as we incorporate these tasks into a comprehensive robotic training curriculum.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica/normas , Bolsas de Estudo , Internato e Residência , Laparoscopia/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/educação , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Currículo/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos AnatômicosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We demonstrate the construct validity, reliability, and utility of Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS), a clinical assessment tool designed to measure robotic technical skills, in an independent cohort using an in vivo animal training model. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional observational study design, 47 voluntary participants were categorized as experts (>30 robotic cases completed as primary surgeon) or trainees. The trainee group was further divided into intermediates (≥5 but ≤30 cases) or novices (<5 cases). All participants completed a standardized in vivo robotic task in a porcine model. Task performance was evaluated by two expert robotic surgeons and self-assessed by the participants using the GEARS assessment tool. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the GEARS performance scores to determine construct validity; Spearman's rank correlation measured interobserver reliability; and Cronbach's alpha was used to assess internal consistency. RESULTS: Performance evaluations were completed on nine experts and 38 trainees (14 intermediate, 24 novice). Experts demonstrated superior performance compared to intermediates and novices overall and in all individual domains (p < 0.0001). In comparing intermediates and novices, the overall performance difference trended toward significance (p = 0.0505), while the individual domains of efficiency and autonomy were significantly different between groups (p = 0.0280 and 0.0425, respectively). Interobserver reliability between expert ratings was confirmed with a strong correlation observed (r = 0.857, 95 % CI [0.691, 0.941]). Experts and participant scoring showed less agreement (r = 0.435, 95 % CI [0.121, 0.689] and r = 0.422, 95 % CI [0.081, 0.0672]). Internal consistency was excellent for experts and participants (α = 0.96, 0.98, 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: In an independent cohort, GEARS was able to differentiate between different robotic skill levels, demonstrating excellent construct validity. As a standardized assessment tool, GEARS maintained consistency and reliability for an in vivo robotic surgical task and may be applied for skills evaluation in a broad range of robotic procedures.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/educação , Adulto , Animais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Cirurgiões/educação , Suínos , Análise e Desempenho de Tarefas , Estados UnidosRESUMO
PURPOSE: We present a 2-institution experience with completely intracorporeal robotic orthotopic ileal neobladder after radical cystectomy in 132 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Established open surgical techniques were duplicated robotically with all neobladders suture constructed intracorporeally in a globular configuration. Nerve sparing was performed in 56% of males. Lymphadenectomy was extended (up to aortic bifurcation in 51, 44%) and superextended (up to the inferior mesenteric artery in 20, 17%). Ureteroileal anastomoses were Wallace-type (86, 65%) or Bricker-type (46, 35%). The learning curve at each institution was assessed using chronological subgroups and by trends across the entire cohort. Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively queried. RESULTS: Mean operating time was 7.6 hours (range 4.4 to 13), blood loss was 430 cc (range 50 to 2,200) and hospital stay was 11 days (median 8, range 3 to 78). Clavien grade I, II, III, IV and V complications within 30 days were 7%, 25%, 13%, 2% and 0%, respectively, and between 30 and 90 days were 5%, 9%, 11%, 1% and 2%, respectively. Mean nodal yield was 29 (range 7 to 164) and the node positivity rate was 17%. Operative time, blood loss, hospital stay and prevalence of late complications improved with experience. During a mean followup of 2.1 years (range 0.1 to 9.8) cancer recurred in 20 patients (15%). Five-year overall, cancer specific and recurrence-free survival was 72%, 72% and 71%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a refined technique of robotic intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder diversion, duplicating open principles. Operative efficiency and outcomes improved with experience. Going forward, we propose a prospective randomized comparison between open and robotic intracorporeal neobladder surgery.
Assuntos
Cistectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Derivação Urinária/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Íleo/cirurgia , Período Intraoperatório , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Bexiga Urinária/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Robotic arm surgical systems provide minimally invasive access and are commonly used in multiple surgical fields, with limited application in neurosurgery. Our institutional experience has led us to explore the benefits of a neurosurgeon trained to perform robotic surgery as part of a multidisciplinary team. The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of robotic resection for spinal nerve sheath tumors (NST). METHODS: Retrospective case series of robotic-assisted intracavitary approaches and resection of NSTs including thoracic, retroperitoneal, and transperitoneal. Surgical outcomes are compared to a historical cohort of open surgical resection of NSTs. RESULTS: Nineteen cases presented, of which 2 were combined posterior spinal followed by robotic tumor resection. One of 19 cases was converted to an open surgery. Gross total resection was achieved in all cases. There were 2 cases of postoperative Horner's syndrome, and 1 case with an intraoperative durotomy that was repaired primarily with no postoperative sequelae. Median estimated blood loss was 50 cc (range: 5-650) and median length of stay was 1 day (range: 0-6), with 9 (47.4%) patients discharged on postoperative day 1 and 3 (15.8%) patients discharged on an outpatient basis. Compared with our previously reported institutional outcomes for open resection of 25 tumors, there was a significant increase in rates of gross total resection (100 vs 60%, P = .002) and decrease in length of stay (median 1 vs 5 days, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Robotic resection of complex paraspinal tumors appears safe and effective including for preservation of neurological function and may reduce surgical morbidity. Integration of robotic surgical platforms holds the potential to significantly affect neurological surgery.