Implications of geographical variation on clinical outcomes of cardiovascular trials.

Cardiovascular clinical trials are increasingly conducted globally as a means to reduce costs, expedite timelines, provide broad applicability, and satisfy regulatory authorities. Potential problems with trial globalization include regional differences in patient characteristics, medical practice patterns, and health policies which may influence outcomes and limit generalizability. Moreover, concerns have been raised about ethical misconduct and unsatisfactory quality oversight in regions with less trial experience and infrastructure. This article reviews geographical differences in cardiovascular trials in heart failure, acute coronary syndromes, hypertension and atrial fibrillation. It also explores potential explanations for these differences and methods to standardize the presentation of trial results. This review is based on discussions between basic scientists and clinical trialists at the 8th Global Cardio Vascular Clinical Trialists Forum 2011 in Paris, France, from December 2 to 3.

A randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation in advanced heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) delivers nonexcitatory electrical signals to the heart during the absolute refractory period intended to improve contraction. METHODS: We tested CCM in 428 New York Heart Association class III or IV, narrow QRS heart failure patients with ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 35% randomized to optimal medical therapy (OMT) plus CCM (n = 215) versus OMT alone (n = 213). Efficacy was assessed by ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT), primary end point, peak Vo2 (pVo2), and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWFQ) at 6 months. The primary safety end point was a test of noninferiority between groups at 12 months for the composite of all-cause mortality and hospitalizations (12.5% allowable delta). RESULTS: The groups were comparable for age (58 ± 13 vs 59 ± 12 years), EF (26% ± 7% vs 26% ± 7%), pVo2 (14.7 ± 2.9 vs 14.8 ± 3.2 mL kg⁻¹ min⁻¹), and other characteristics. While VAT did not improve at 6 months, CCM significantly improved pVo2 and MLWHFQ (by 0.65 mL kg⁻¹ min⁻¹ [P = .024] and -9.7 points [P < .0001], respectively) over OMT. Forty-eight percent of OMT and 52% of CCM patients experienced a safety end point, which satisfied the noniferiority criterion (P = .03). Post hoc, hypothesis-generating analysis identified a subgroup (characterized by baseline EF ≥ 25% and New York Heart Association class III symptoms) in which all parameters were improved by CCM. CONCLUSIONS: In the overall target population, CCM did not improve VAT (the primary end point) but did improve pVo2 and MLWHFQ. Cardiac contractility modulation did not have an adverse affect on hospitalizations or mortality within the prespecified boundaries. Further study is required to clarify the role of CCM as a treatment for medically refractory heart failure.

Subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation in advanced heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) signals are nonexcitatory electrical signals delivered during the absolute refractory period intended to improve contraction. We previously tested the safety and efficacy of CCM in 428 NYHA functional class III/IV heart failure patients with EF ≤35% and narrow QRS randomized to optimal medical treatment (OMT) plus CCM (n = 215) versus OMT alone (n = 213) and found no significant effect on ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT), the study's primary end point. In the present analysis, we sought to identify if there was a subgroup of patients who showed a response to CCM. METHODS AND RESULTS: The protocol specified that multiregression analysis would be used to determine if baseline EF, NYHA functional class, pVO(2), or etiology of heart failure influenced the impact of CCM on AT. Etiology and baseline pVO(2) did not affect efficacy. However, baseline NYHA functional class III and EF ≥25% were significant predictors of increased efficacy. In this subgroup (comprising 97 OMT and 109 CCM patients, ∼48% of the entire population) VAT increased by 0.10 ± 2.36 in CCM versus -0.54 ± 1.83 mL kg(-1) min(-1) in OMT (P = .03) and pVO(2) increased by 0.34 ± 3.11 in CCM versus -0.97 ± 2.31 (P = .001) at 24 weeks compared with baseline; 44% of CCM versus 23% of OMT subjects showed improvement of ≥1 class in NYHA functional class (P = .002), and 59% of CCM versus 42% of OMT subjects showed a ≥10-point reduction in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (P = .01). All of these findings were similar to those seen at 50 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this retrospective hypothesis-generating analysis indicate that CCM significantly improves objective parameters of exercise tolerance in a subgroup of patients characterized by normal QRS duration, NYHA functional class III symptoms, and EF >25%.

The influence of renal function on clinical outcome and response to beta-blockade in systolic heart failure: insights from Metoprolol CR/XL Randomized Intervention Trial in Chronic HF (MERIT-HF).

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on the risk and impact of renal dysfunction on the response to beta-blockade and mode of death in systolic heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Renal function was estimated with glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the simplified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. Patients from the Metoprolol CR/XL Controlled Randomized Intervention Trial in Chronic HF (MERIT-HF) were divided into 3 renal function subgroups (MDRD formula): eGFR(MDRD) > 60 (n = 2496), eGFR(MDRD) 45 to 60 (n = 976), and eGFR(MDRD) < 45 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) body surface area (n = 493). Hazard ratio (HR) was estimated with Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for prespecified risk factors. Placebo patients with eGFR < 45 had significantly higher risk than those with eGFR > 60: HR for all-cause mortality, 1.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28 to 2.81) comparing placebo patients with eGFR < 45 and eGFR > 60, and for the combined end point of all-cause mortality/hospitalization for worsening HF (time to first event): HR, 1.91 (95% CI, 1.44 to 2.53). No significant increase in risk with deceased renal function was observed for those randomized to metoprolol controlled release (CR)/extended release (XL) due to a highly significant decrease in risk on metoprolol CR/XL in those with eGFR < 45. For total mortality, metoprolol CR/XL vs placebo: HR, 0.41 (95% CI. 0.25 to 0.68; P < .001) in those with eGFR < 45 compared with HR, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.95; P < .021) for those with eGFR > 60; corresponding data for the combined end point was HR, 0.44 (95% CI, 0.31 to 0.63; P < .0001) and HR, 0.75 (0.62 to 0.92; P = .005, respectively; P = .095 for interaction by treatment for total mortality; P = .011 for combined end point). Metoprolol CR/XL was well tolerated in all 3 renal function subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Renal function as estimated by eGFR was a powerful predictor of death and hospitalizations from worsening HF. Metoprolol CR/XL was at least as effective in reducing death and hospitalizations for worsening HF in patients with eGFR < 45 as in those with eGFR > 60.

Atenolol is inferior to metoprolol in improving left ventricular function and preventing ventricular remodeling in dogs with heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: beta-Blockers are standard therapy for patients with heart failure (HF). This study compared the effects of chronic monotherapy with 2 different beta(1)-selective adrenoceptor blockers, namely atenolol and metoprolol succinate, on left ventricular (LV) function and remodeling in dogs with coronary microembolization-induced HF [LV ejection fraction (EF) 30-40%]. METHODS: Twenty HF dogs were randomized to 3 months of therapy with atenolol (50 mg once daily, n = 6), metoprolol succinate (100 mg, once daily, n = 7) or to no therapy (control, n = 7). LV EF and volumes were measured before initiating therapy and after 3 months of therapy. The change (Delta) in EF and volumes between measurements before and after therapy was calculated and compared among study groups. RESULTS: In controls, EF decreased and end-systolic volume increased. Atenolol prevented the decrease in EF and the increase in ESV. In contrast, metoprolol succinate significantly increased EF and decreased end-systolic volume. DeltaEF was significantly higher and Deltaend-systolic volume significantly lower in metoprolol succinate-treated dogs compared to atenolol-treated dogs (EF: 6.0 +/- 0.86% vs. 0.8 +/- 0.85%, p < 0.05; end-systolic volume: -4.3 +/- 0.81 ml vs. -1 +/- 0.52 ml, p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In HF dogs, chronic therapy with atenolol does not elicit the same LV function and remodeling benefits as those achieved with metoprolol succinate.

Globalization of cardiovascular clinical research: the balance between meeting medical needs and maintaining scientific standards.

A substantial need to conduct research studies and identify effective treatments for cardiovascular diseases in the developing world exists. Careful consideration of several issues is warranted to ensure that clinical trials conducted solely in developing nations are held to accepted scientific standards. Researchers conducting clinical trials in developing countries should critically evaluate the purpose and appropriateness of conducting the trial in the proposed location, the accessibility of the therapy if proven effective, the quality of the informed consent process, the presence of infrastructure to support clinical research, and the translation of data to other populations. This article discusses the importance of these considerations using a recent example of a clinical trial conducted in a developing nation. These and other issues are critical to address as the conduct of cardiovascular clinical trials continues to expand beyond the western world.

Left atrial reverse remodeling in dogs with moderate and advanced heart failure treated with a passive mechanical containment device: an echocardiographic study.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of global left ventricular (LV) remodeling is important in evaluating the efficacy of pharmacologic and device therapies for the treatment of chronic heart failure (HF). The effects of pharmacologic or device therapies on global left atrial (LA) remodeling in HF, although also important, are not often examined. We showed that long-term therapy with the Acorn Cardiac Support Device (CSD), a passive mechanical ventricular containment device, prevents or reverses LV remodeling in dogs with HF. This study examined the effects of the CSD on global LA remodeling in dogs with moderate and advanced HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Studies were performed in 24 dogs with coronary microembolization-induced HF. Of these, 12 had moderate HF (ejection fraction, EF 30% to 40%) and 12 advanced HF (EF < or = 25%). In each group, the CSD was implanted in 6 dogs and the other 6 served as controls. Dogs were followed for 3 months in the moderate group and 6 months in the advanced HF group. LA maximal volume (LAVmax), LA volume at the onset of the p-wave (LAVp), LA minimal volume (LAVmin), LA active emptying volume (LAAEV), and LA active emptying fraction (LAAEF) were measured from 2-dimensional echocardiograms obtained before CSD implantation and at the end of the treatment period. Treatment effect (delta) comparisons between CSD-treated dogs and controls showed that CSD therapy significantly decreased LA volumes (deltaLAVmax: 3.33 +/- 0.70 vs. -2.87 +/- 1.31 mL, P = .002; 7.77 +/- 1.76 versus -0.37 +/- 0.87 mL, P = .002) and improved LA function (deltaLAAEF: -6.00 +/- 1.53 versus 1.85 +/- 1.32%, P = .003; -2.39 +/- 1.10 versus 3.13 +/- 1.66%, P = .02) in the moderate HF and advanced HF groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Progressive LA enlargement and LA functional deterioration occurs in untreated dogs with HF. Monotherapy with the CSD prevents LA enlargement and improves LA mechanical function in dogs with moderate and advanced HF indicating prevention or reversal of adverse LA remodeling.

Novel Mitochondria-Targeting Peptide in Heart Failure Treatment: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Elamipretide.

BACKGROUND: Mitochondrial dysfunction and energy depletion in the failing heart are innovative therapeutic targets in heart failure management. Elamipretide is a novel tetrapeptide that increases mitochondrial energy; however, its safety, tolerability, and therapeutic effect on cardiac structure and function have not been studied in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose trial, patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (ejection fraction, ≤35%) were randomized to either a single 4-hour infusion of elamipretide (cohort 1 [n=8], 0.005; cohort 2 [n=8], 0.05; and cohort 3 [n=8], 0.25 mg·kg-1·h-1) or placebo control (n=12). Safety and efficacy were assessed by clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic assessments performed at pre-, mid- and end-infusion and 6-, 8-, 12- and 24-hours postinfusion start. Peak plasma concentrations of elamipretide occurred at end-infusion and were undetectable by 24 hours postinfusion. There were no serious adverse events. Blood pressure and heart rate remained stable in all cohorts. Compared with placebo, a significant decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (-18 mL; P=0.009) and end-systolic volume (-14 mL; P=0.005) occurred at end infusion in the highest dose cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate elamipretide in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and demonstrates that a single infusion of elamipretide is safe and well tolerated. High-dose elamipretide resulted in favorable changes in left ventricular volumes that correlated with peak plasma concentrations, supporting a temporal association and dose-effect relationship. Further study of elamipretide is needed to determine long-term safety and efficacy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02388464.

Hemodynamic and neurohormonal predictors and consequences of the development of atrial fibrillation in dogs with chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure increases the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), which frequently results in heart failure progression. This prospective study examined the contribution of hemodynamic and neurohormonal activation to the spontaneous occurrence of AF in heart failure, and assessed the effects of AF on left ventricular (LV) function and neurohormonal activation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Heart failure (LV ejection fraction [LVEF] 25%-30%) was induced in 27 dogs via sequential coronary microembolizations. Hemodynamic and neurohormonal measurements were performed at 1 month (prior to development of AF) and 4 months post-embolization. During the time between measurements, 10 dogs developed spontaneous AF. Plasma norepinephrine concentration (PNE) at 1 month was higher in animals that subsequently developed AF (576 + 101 vs. 425 + 197 pg/mL, P = .03). There were no significant differences between the groups in 1-month LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP), cardiac output, end-diastolic volume (EDV), LVEF, or plasma renin activity (PRA). At 4 months, cardiac output was lower (2.1 + .4 vs. 2.6 + .6 L/h, P = .02) and PNE was higher (1036 + 857 vs. 508 + 288 pg/mL, P = .03) in dogs with AF versus those in sinus rhythm. There were no significant differences between groups in 4-month LVEDP, PAWP, EDV, LVEF, or PRA. CONCLUSION: Spontaneous AF in heart failure was preceded by a significant increase in PNE. In animals that developed AF, there was a further decline in cardiac output and increase in PNE.

Effects of long-term monotherapy with eplerenone, a novel aldosterone blocker, on progression of left ventricular dysfunction and remodeling in dogs with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: In heart failure (HF), aldosterone has been implicated in the formation of reactive interstitial fibrosis, a maladaptation that contributes to left ventricular (LV) remodeling. Eplerenone is a novel selective aldosterone blocker. The present study examined the effects of long-term monotherapy with eplerenone on the progression of LV dysfunction and remodeling in dogs with chronic HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: HF was produced in 14 dogs by intracoronary microembolizations that were discontinued when LV ejection fraction (EF) was between 30% and 40%. Two weeks after the last embolization, dogs were randomized to 3 months of oral therapy with eplerenone (10 mg/kg twice daily, n=7) or no therapy at all (control, n=7). Hemodynamic measurements were made just before randomization and were repeated at the end of 3 months of therapy. In control dogs, LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volume increased significantly (62+/-4 versus 68+/-4 mL, P<0.001, and 38+/-3 versus 47+/-3 mL, P<0.001, respectively), and EF decreased significantly (38+/-1% versus 31+/-2%, P<0.001). In contrast, end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and EF remained unchanged during the 3 months of treatment in eplerenone-treated dogs. LV end-diastolic wall stress increased significantly in control dogs but decreased significantly in eplerenone-treated dogs. Compared with control, eplerenone was associated with a 28% reduction in cardiomyocyte cross-sectional area, a 37% reduction of volume fraction of reactive interstitial fibrosis, and a 34% reduction of volume fraction of replacement fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that long-term therapy with eplerenone prevents progressive LV dysfunction and attenuates LV remodeling in dogs with chronic HF.

Dose of metoprolol CR/XL and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure: analysis of the experience in metoprolol CR/XL randomized intervention trial in chronic heart failure (MERIT-HF).

OBJECTIVES: We performed a post-hoc subgroup analysis in the Metoprolol CR/XL Randomized Intervention Trial in Chronic Heart Failure (MERIT-HF) with the aim of reporting on the heart rate (HR) response during the titration phase and clinical outcomes from the three-month follow-up visit to end of study in two dosage subgroups: one that had reached more than 100 mg of metoprolol CR/XL once daily (high-dose group; n = 1,202; mean 192 mg) and one that had reached 100 mg or less (low-dose group; n = 412; mean 76 mg). BACKGROUND: Clinicians have questioned whether patients need to reach the target beta-blocker dose to receive benefit. METHODS; Outcome (Cox-adjusted) was compared with all placebo patients with dose available at the three-month visit (n = 1,845). RESULTS: Data indicated somewhat higher risk in the low-dose group compared with the high-dose group. Heart rate was reduced to a similar degree in the two dose groups, indicating higher sensitivity for beta-blockade in the low-dose group. The reduction in total mortality with metoprolol CR/XL compared with placebo was similar: 38% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16 to 55) in high-dose group (p = 0.0022) and also 38% (95% CI, 11 to 57) in the low-dose group (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Risk reduction was similar in the high- and low-dose subgroups, which, at least partly, may be the result of similar beta-blockade as judged from the HR response. The results support the idea of an individualized dose-titration regimen, which is guided by patient tolerability and the HR response. Further research is needed to shed light on why some patients respond with a marked HR reduction and reduced mortality risk on a relatively small dose of a beta-blocker.

Benefits of beta-blocker therapy for heart failure: weighing the evidence.

Our understanding of factors contributing to the progression of heart failure has advanced dramatically over the past 2 decades. We have also gained considerable insight into the pharmacology of beta-adrenergic receptor blockers (beta-blockers). Based on this knowledge, we can now appreciate the potential of these drugs for the treatment of heart failure. Several beta-blockers have been shown to be clinically effective in the treatment of heart failure. Critical evaluation of the evidence from basic research studies, as well as clinical trials in patients with heart failure, helps to delineate the theoretical and clinical benefits of beta-blockers.

Metoprolol CR/XL in black patients with heart failure (from the Metoprolol CR/XL randomized intervention trial in chronic heart failure).

A subgroup analysis was performed in black patients who participated in the Metoprolol CR/XL Randomized Intervention trial in Congestive Heart Failure trial. Results suggest a beneficial effect of beta blockade and support the use of beta blockers in black patients with clinically stable heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction.

Echocardiographic predictors of prognosis after first acute myocardial infarction.

We prospectively studied 490 patients who had a first myocardial infarction and performed a complete 2-dimensional echocardiographic study

Effects of the AT1-receptor antagonist eprosartan on the progression of left ventricular dysfunction in dogs with heart failure.

1. We examined the effects of eprosartan, an AT(1) receptor antagonist, on the progression of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and remodelling in dogs with heart failure (HF) produced by intracoronary microembolizations (LV ejection fraction, EF 30 to 40%). 2. Dogs were randomized to 3 months of oral therapy with low-dose eprosartan (600 mg once daily, n=8), high-dose eprosartan (1200 mg once daily, n=8), or placebo (n=8). 3. In the placebo group, LV end-diastolic (EDV) and end-systolic (ESV) volumes increased after 3 months (68+/-7 vs 82+/-9 ml, P<0.004, 43+/-1 vs 58+/-7 ml, P<0.003, respectively), and EF decreased (37+/-1 vs 29+/-1%, P<0.001). In dogs treated with low-dose eprosartan, EF, EDV, and ESV remained unchanged over the course of therapy, whereas in dogs treated with high-dose eprosartan, EF increased (38+/-1 vs 42+/-1%, P<0.004) and ESV decreased (41+/-1 vs 37+/-1 ml, P<0.006), Eprosartan also decreased interstitial fibrosis and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. 4. We conclude that eprosartan prevents progressive LV dysfunction and attenuates progressive LV remodelling in dogs with moderate HF and may be useful in treating patients with chronic HF.

Long-term effects of non-excitatory cardiac contractility modulation electric signals on the progression of heart failure in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: We previously showed that acute delivery of non-excitatory cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) electric signal during the absolute refractory period improved LV function in dogs with chronic heart failure (HF). In the present study we examined the long-term effects of CCM signal delivery on the progression of LV dysfunction and remodeling in dogs with chronic HF. METHODS: Chronic HF was produced in 12 dogs by multiple sequential intracoronary microembolizations. The CCM signal was delivered using a lead implanted in the distal anterior coronary vein. A right ventricular and a right atrial lead were implanted and used for timing of CCM signal delivery. In six dogs, CCM signals were delivered continuously for 6 h daily with an average amplitude of 3.3 V for 3 months. Six HF dogs did not have leads implanted and served as controls. RESULTS: In control dogs, LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) and LV end-systolic volume (ESV) increased (64+/-5 ml vs. 75+/-6 ml, P=0.003; 46+/-4 ml vs. 57+/-4 ml, P=0.003; respectively), and ejection fraction (EF) decreased (28+/-1% vs. 23+/-1%, P=0.001) over the course of 3 months of follow-up. In contrast, CCM-treated dogs showed a smaller increase in EDV (66+/-4 vs. 73+/-5 ml, P=0.01), no change in ESV, and an increase in EF from 31+/-1 to 34+/-2% (P=0.04) after 3 months of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In dogs with HF, long-term CCM therapy prevents progressive LV dysfunction and attenuates global LV remodeling. These findings provide compelling rationale for exploring the use of CCM for the treatment of patients with chronic HF.

Effects of pre-existing left ventricular hypertrophy on ventricular dysfunction and remodeling following myocardial infarction in rats.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial hypertrophy is a characteristic component of left ventricular (LV) remodeling that may, at least initially, have a beneficial effect on LV function following myocardial infarction (MI). In the present study, we examine the effects of pre-existing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) on LV function and chamber enlargement following MI in inbred Lewis rats. METHODS: The one-kidney, one-clip model (1K1C) of hypertension was used to produce LVH. Four weeks after 1K1C, rats were randomized to left anterior descending coronary artery ligation (LVH + MI group, n = 8) or sham ligation (LVH group, n = 11). Another group of rats underwent sham 1K1C. Four weeks later, they were randomized to coronary ligation (MI group, n = 12) or sham ligation (Sham group, n = 12). LV end-diastolic pressure (EDP, mm Hg), end-diastolic volume (EDV, ml), end-systolic volume (ESV, ml) and ejection fraction (EF) (determined by angiography) were measured in all groups 2 months after MI. RESULTS: LV EDP was 20 +/- 2 mm Hg in the LVH + MI group compared with 9 +/- 1 mm Hg in the MI group (p < 0.05). LV EDV and ESV were significantly greater with LVH + MI than with MI alone (EDV 0.90 +/- 0.03 vs 0.75 +/- 0.02 ml; ESV 0.68 +/- 0.02 vs 0.50 +/- 0.03 ml; p < 0.05). Pre-existing LVH resulted in a greater reduction in EF following MI (25 +/- 2% for LVH + MI vs 34 +/- 2% for MI alone; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-existing LVH is an important determinant of progressive LV dysfunction and remodeling following MI in Lewis inbred rats.

Debate: Do all patients with heart failure require automatic implantable defibrillators for the prevention of sudden death?

Recent clinical trials indicate that approximately two-thirds of patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II and III, who comprise almost 90% of patients with heart failure, die suddenly. Patients in NYHA class IV usually die of progressive heart failure. Implantation of implantable cardioverters defibrillators (ICDs) in this population would represent a huge logistic problem and economic expense. Clinical trials have recently demonstrated that beta-blocker therapy with carvedilol, bisoprolol, and toprol XL decrease the sudden death rate by almost 50%, in addition to impacting significantly on death due to worsening heart failure. This medical approach is beneficial to all patients, and should be our major therapy. However, it is reasonable to attempt to identify that subpopulations of heart failure patients who could benefit from an ICD.