Uncoupling actin filament fragmentation by cofilin from increased subunit turnover.

The actin depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilin family of proteins interact with actin monomers and filaments in a pH-sensitive manner. When ADF/cofilin binds F-actin it induces a change in the helical twist and fragmentation; it also accelerates the dissociation of subunits from the pointed ends of filaments, thereby increasing treadmilling or depolymerization. Using site-directed mutagenesis we characterized the two actin-binding sites on human cofilin. One target site was chosen because we previously showed that the villin head piece competes with ADF for binding to F-actin. Limited sequence homology between ADF/cofilin and the part of the villin headpiece essential for actin binding suggested an actin-binding site on cofilin involving a structural loop at the opposite end of the molecule to the alpha-helix already implicated in actin binding. Binding through the alpha-helix is primarily to monomeric actin, whereas the loop region is specifically involved in filament association. We have characterized the actin binding properties of each site independently of the other. Mutation of a single lysine residue in the loop region abolishes binding to filaments, but not to monomers. Using the mutation analogous to the phosphorylated form of cofilin (S3D), we show that filament binding is inhibited at physiological ionic strength but not under low salt conditions. At low ionic strength, this mutant induces both the twist change and fragmentation characteristic of wild-type cofilin, but does not activate subunit dissociation. The results suggest a two-site binding to filaments, initiated by association through the loop site, followed by interaction with the adjacent subunit through the "helix" site at the opposite end of the molecule. Together, these interactions induce twist and fragmentation of filaments, but the twist change itself is not responsible for the enhanced rate of actin subunit release from filaments.

The transformation of hexabromocyclododecane in aerobic and anaerobic soils and aquatic sediments.

The biological transformation of hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD), a brominated fire retardant commonly used in a variety of consumer goods, was investigated in aerobic and anaerobic soils and freshwater sediments. Soil, river water, and aquatic sediments were collected from several locations in the United States and transformation of HBCD was evaluated in the correspondingly composed microcosms based on the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) Test Guidelines 307 (Aerobic and Anaerobic Transformation in Soil) or 308 (Aerobic and Anaerobic Transformation in Aquatic Sediment Systems). Soil and sediment reaction mixtures, prepared under either aerobic or anoxic conditions, were dosed with HBCD at a concentration ranging from approximately 10 to 80 ng/g dry weight. The soils and sediments were then placed at 20 degrees C for approximately 4 months and the concentration of HBCD in the microcosms was determined at selected time intervals utilizing high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). HBCD loss was observed in both the aerobic and anaerobic soils and sediments although the rates were appreciable faster under anoxic conditions. Biologically mediated transformation processes (i.e., biotransformation) accelerated the rate of loss of HBCD when compared to the biologically inhibited (i.e., autoclaved) soils and sediments. Biotransformation half-lives for HBCD were determined to be 63 and 6.9 days in the aerobic and anaerobic soils, respectively, while biotransformation half-lives for HBCD in the two river systems ranged from 11 to 32 days and 1.1 to 1.5 days under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, respectively. Brominated degradation products were not detected in any of the soils or sediments during the course of the study.

Biodegradation of bisphenol A in aquatic environments: river die-away.

The biodegradability of bisphenol A (BPA) was assessed in surface waters from seven different rivers across the United States and Europe. Rapid biodegradation of BPA was observed in all rivers following lag phases ranging from 2 to 4 d. Biodegradation half-lives for BPA were typically less than 2 d following the lag phase. Mineralization of BPA was observed in all river waters, with average carbon dioxide yields of approximately 76% of the theoretical maximum (range 59-103%) at the end of the incubation period (< or = 18 d). Short half-lives (0.5 to 3 d) were noted for BPA biodegradation in river waters regardless of geographic location, sampling site (i.e., upstream vs downstream of wastewater outfalls), sediment addition (< or = 0.05%), and initial test chemical concentration (50-5,500 microgram/L). Subsequent studies conducted at environmentally relevant concentrations (0.05 and 0.5 microgram/L) also indicated short half-lives (3-6 d) for BPA and support the extrapolation of the half-lives measured in this study over a wide range of environmental concentrations. The fact that BPA was degraded rapidly in surface waters taken from diverse locations in the United States and Europe as well as in studies recently conducted in Japan suggests that BPA degrading microorganisms are widely distributed in nature. These observations provide clear evidence that BPA is not persistent in the aquatic environment.

Exogenous gelsolin binds to sarcomeric thin filaments without severing.

We have investigated the binding of gelsolin to thin myofilaments in situ and their stability against severing. Differentiated myotubes from chicken skeletal muscle containing cross-striated myofibrils were permeabilized with Triton X-100 and incubated with gelsolin. Immunofluorescence microscopy localized both endogenous and exogenous gelsolin in the I-Z-I-regions of the sarcomers. The staining pattern suggested a binding of the exogenous gelsolin along the entire length of the thin filaments. This binding was Ca2+ dependent, but gelsolin was not removed after subsequent addition of EGTA. The fluorescence staining for actin remained unchanged after gelsolin incubation, indicating that thin filaments in cross-striated myofibrils were resistant to the severing action of gelsolin, in contrast to the microfilaments in stress fibers. After extraction of the permeabilized cells with high ionic strength to remove tropomyosin and myosin, gelsolin still bound along the entire thin filament and the actin pattern also remained unchanged. After Triton X-100 permeabilization and high ionic strength extraction, the giant protein nebulin was found to be still present as a myofibrillar component. Gelsolin treatment after high salt extraction affected neither actin nor nebulin in the thin filaments. We therefore conclude that nebulin confers the gelsolin resistance to the sarcomeric actin filaments.

A six-module human nebulin fragment bundles actin filaments and induces actin polymerization.

We have investigated the interaction of a 6-repeat recombinant human nebulin fragment (S6R2R7) with F-actin, with Mg2+-induced actin paracrystals, and G-actin, respectively. This fragment corresponds to super-repeat 6, repeat 2 to 7 of human nebulin, and is located in the N-terminal part of the super-repeat region of the nebulin molecule. The S6R2R7 fragment included an immuno-tag of three amino-acid residues (EEF) at one end which was detectable by a monoclonal anti-tubulin YL1/2. By a cosedimentation assay, interaction between F-actin and S6R2R7 was observed. Electron microscopy revealed the formation of large bundle-like aggregates containing highly parallelized actin filaments, apparently caused by actin bundling of the nebulin fragment. Compared with Mg2+-induced actin paracrystals where the helices of the actin filaments are arranged in register, the filaments in the actin-nebulin bundles seem to be packed in a different way and show no obvious periodicity. The bundles were also visible in the light microscope, and immunofluorescence microscopy revealed binding of the nebulin fragment S6R2R7 to both preformed Mg2+ paracrystals and to F-actin. We also analyzed the effect of S6R2R7 on actin under non-polymerizing conditions by cosedimentation assays and pyrene actin fluorimetry, as well as fluorescence microscopy and electron microscopy. Nebulin-induced actin polymerization was observed with an enhancement of the nucleation step indicating a stabilization of actin nuclei by S6R2R7. Light and electron microscopy revealed bundle-like actin-nebulin aggregates similar to those formed by pre-assembled F-actin and S6R2R7. Thus, even in the absence of salt, S6R2R7 promotes actin polymerization and induces formation of tightly packed actin filament bundles. We assume that the actin filaments are crosslinked by the nebulin fragments, indicating a rather low cooperativity of binding to a single filament.

Conformational difference between nuclear and cytoplasmic actin as detected by a monoclonal antibody.

Using a reconstituted complex of profilin and skeletal muscle actin as an antigen, we generated a monoclonal mouse antibody against actin, termed 2G2. As revealed by immunoblots of proteolytic actin fragments and by pepscan analysis, the antibody recognises a nonsequential epitope on actin which is located within three different regions of the sequence, consisting of aa131-139, aa155-169, and aa176-187. In the actin model derived from X-ray diffraction, these sequences lie spatially close together in the region of the nucleotide-binding cleft, but do not form a coherent patch. In immunoblots, 2G2 reacts with all SDS-denatured actin isoforms and with actins of many vertebrates. In contrast, its immunofluorescence reactivity is highly selective and fixation-dependent. In fibroblasts and myogenic cells, fixed and extracted by formaldehyde/detergent, stress fibres or myofibrils, respectively, remained unstained. Likewise, after microinjection into living cells, 2G2 did not bind to such microfilament bundles. Extraction of myosin and tropomyosin did not alter this pattern indicating that the lack in reactivity is probably not due to epitope-masking by actin-binding proteins. More likely, the reason for the lack of reactivity with filamentous actin is that its epitope is not accessible in F-actin. However, the antibody revealed a distinct pattern of nuclear dots in differentiated myogenic cells but not in myoblasts, and of fibrillar structures in nuclei of Xenopus oocytes. In contrast, after methanol treatment, a 2G2-specific staining of stress fibres and myofibrils was observed, but no nuclear dot staining. We conclude that 2G2, in addition to binding to SDS- and methanol-denatured actin, recognises a specific conformation of native actin which is present in the nucleus and specified by compaction of the antibody-reactive region into a coherent patch. This conformation is apparently present in differentiated myogenic cells and oocytes, but not in cytoplasmic actin filament bundles.