Ceftolozane/tazobactam for difficult-to-treat Gram-negative infections: A real-world tertiary hospital experience.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the real-world clinical efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) in difficult-to-treat infections caused by multi-drug resistant Gram-negative microorganisms, including carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of adult patients treated with C/T for at least 48 hours for infections caused by multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria in a tertiary hospital from May 2016 until August 2019. The primary outcome analysed was clinical failure, defined as a composite of symptomatology persistence after 7 days of C/T treatment, infection recurrence, and/or all-cause mortality within 30 days of follow-up. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: 96 episodes of C/T treatment were included, mostly consisting of targeted treatments (83.9%) for the following sources of infection: intra-abdominal (22.6%), urinary tract (25.8%), skin and soft tissue (19.4%), hospital-acquired pneumonia (14%), and other (6.4%). The most frequently isolated bacteria were carbapenem-resistant (88, 94.6%). Clinical failure rate was 30.1%, due to persistent infection at day 7 (4.3%), recurrence of the initial infection (16.1%), or 30-day all-cause mortality (8.6%). Adverse events most frequently reported were Clostridium difficile infection (9%) and cholestasis (8%). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: C/T showed a favourable clinical profile for difficult-to-treat multidrug-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections, regardless of the source of infection.

Pharmaceutical care in the screening process of phase I oncohaematological clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmaceutical interventions in patients eligible for phase I cancer clinical trials, focusing specifically on exclusion criteria related to medication or relevant interactions. METHOD: Descriptive, observational study conducted at a comprehensive cancer centre. Patients undergoing screening for phase I clinical trials (March 2019-December 2022) were included. The pharmacist reviewed concomitant medication and provided a recommendation. RESULTS: The concomitant medication of 512 patients eligible to participate in 84 phase I clinical trials was analysed. In 230 (44.9%) patients, the clinical trial treatment included oral medication. The median number of concomitant medications was 5 (IQR 3-8) per patient.A total of 280 pharmaceutical interventions were performed in 140 (27.3%) patients: 240 (85.7%) were due to interactions in 124 (24.2%) patients, and 40 (14.3%) were due to exclusion criteria in 34 (6.6%) patients. Interactions and exclusion criteria were detected in 18 (3.5%) patients. The main groups of drugs involved were 68 (24.3%) antacids and antiulcer drugs, 28 (10.0%) antidepressants and 26 (9.3%) opioids. Acceptance analysis of the recommendation was applicable in 215 cases; in 208 (96.7%), the pharmaceutical intervention was accepted.Differences were identified for exclusion criteria (7 vs 27) and interactions (37 vs 87) between parenteral and oral clinical trial medication (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The pharmacist's review of concomitant medication during the screening period in phase I clinical trials enables the detection of prohibited medication or relevant interactions, potentially avoiding screening failures and increasing the efficacy and safety of treatments.