Familiarity and Perceptions of Aducanumab in Caregivers of Hawaii Alzheimer's Disease Patients: Results of a Telephone Survey.

AIM: To identify current perceptions of aducanumab among patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and their caregivers. METHODS: A total of 352 caregivers of AD patients seen at Hawaii's largest multidisciplinary neuroscience center between January 01, 2019, and June 21, 2021, were surveyed by telephone to understand patient and caregiver knowledge, familiarity, and hesitancy toward aducanumab. RESULTS: Thirty-seven percent of caregivers were familiar with aducanumab. Caregivers who were spouses of their respective patients with AD (p=0.0023) had increased odds of familiarity. Additional predictors of aducanumab familiarity included patients with higher mini-mental state examination scores (p=0.0076) and those who received mental stimulation (p=0.007). Conversely, caregivers who identified as native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islanders (NHPI) (p=0.044) or the patient's child (p=0.010) were predictors of decreased familiarity. Only 33% of caregivers familiar with aducanumab believed it to be safe and 56% reported "side effects" as their top concern. Thirty percent of caregivers were moderately ready or very ready to use aducanumab if given the opportunity. CONCLUSION:  Most caregivers of Hawaii AD patients were unfamiliar with aducanumab. Furthermore, those familiar were hesitant to trial the medication. Improved education and awareness of AD therapies are important, so families and caregivers of AD patients can make more informed decisions regarding AD treatment.

Identification of risk factors and distinguishing psychogenic nonepileptic seizures from epilepsy: A retrospective case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) experience significant morbidity and early mortality, secondary to delayed diagnosis. Better characterizing risk factors and exploring how PNES differentially affects sex and racial strata may facilitate earlier diagnosis. METHODS: From a Hawai'i neuroscience institution, 101 PNES patients were investigated in relation to sociodemographic and medical comorbidities. Cases were compared to 202 sex-, age-, and race-matched controls-representing patients with neurological disorders (general controls)-, as well as 404 unmatched epilepsy controls. RESULTS: Relative to general controls, PNES patients had increased odds (p < 0.05) of being: female, younger age, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (NHPI), suburban origin, from the lowest income quartile, Medicaid beneficiaries, homeless, current/former smoker, illicit drug users (marijuana, opioids/narcotics, polysubstance abuse), have anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder, traumatic history, World Health Organization obesity class 3, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, and somatoform disorder. In relation to epilepsy controls, PNES patients exhibited increased odds of being: employed, having attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, asthma, migraines, and chronic pain. Relative to females, male PNES patients exhibited increased odds of military insurance, diabetes mellitus type 2, and hypertension. Relative to Whites, the NHPI and Asian PNES patients presented increased odds of asthma, migraines, chronic pain, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and thyroid disease. Per multivariable logistic regression, anxiety was the only consistent predictor of PNES across all sex and race strata. CONCLUSION: Predictors of PNES's vary amongst the strata of race and sex. Lower socioeconomic status, along with several psychiatric and medical comorbidities, could increase a clinician's suspicion for earlier medical workup and diagnosis of PNES.

Role of psychiatric, cardiovascular, socioeconomic, and demographic risk factors on idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: A retrospective case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: Currently, predicting and preventing idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) remains challenging, especially for patients without a history of cerebrovascular disease. By exploring the role of cardiovascular and psychiatric history, demographics, and socioeconomic status in iNPH, will provide better direction for elucidating the etiology or addressing healthcare inequalities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To investigate iNPH with respect to the selected risk factors, we conducted a retrospective case-control study from a neuroscience institute in Hawaii with a patient pool of 25,843. After excluding patients with a history of cerebrovascular disease, we identified 29 cases which meet the American-European guidelines for iNPH diagnosis. Meanwhile, 116 controls matched to age, sex, and race were also randomly selected. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 83 (IQR: 74-88), with cases estimated 22 years older than controls (95 % CI: 14.00-29.00; p = 0.0000001). Patients with iNPH were more likely to be White (OR 4.01, 95 % CI: 1.59-10.11; p = 0.0042) and less likely Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander (OR 0.010, 95 % CI: 0.00-0.78; p = 0.014). Median household income was $2874 (95 % CI: 0.000089-6905; p = 0.088) greater amongst iNPH cases. Effect size amongst cardiovascular risk factors was not found statistically significant (i.e., body mass index, hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, coronary artery disease or prior myocardial infarction history, peripheral vascular disease, smoking status, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation/flutter, and history of prosthetic valve replacement). However, iNPH patients were more likely to have a history of alcohol use disorder (OR 8.29, 95 % CI: 0.99-453.87; p = 0.050) and history of a psychiatric disorder (OR 2.48; 95 % CI: 1.08-5.68; p = 0.029). Odds ratio for autoimmune disorder, thyroid disorder, glaucoma, and seizures did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Patient race (i.e., White; Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander) was found associated with iNPH development. Meanwhile, after excluding those with cerebrovascular disease, cardiovascular risk factors were not found associated with iNPH. Lastly, iNPH cases were more inclined to have a history of alcohol use disorder and prior psychiatric disorder. Overall, this data reveals that a racial disparity exists amongst iNPH, as well as highlights the role of various cardiovascular and psychiatric risk factors, which can potentially provide direction in etiology elucidation.