A hypothesis on treatment strategy of severe multicentric Castleman disease with continuous renal replacement therapy.

Castleman disease (CD) is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder, with non-specific clinical manifestations, often delayed diagnosis and treatment, which pose a significant challenge in the present times. Patients diagnosed with this disease have poor prognosis due to the limited treatment options. Multicentric CD occurs at multiple lymph node stations and is associated with a proinflammatory response that leads to the development of the so-called 'B symptoms'. IL-6 seems to be a key cytokine involved in various manifestations such as lymphadenopathies, hepatosplenomegaly, and polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia. Its levels correlate with the activity of the disease. Other consequences of MCD include increased fibrinogen levels leading to deep vein thrombosis and thromboembolic disorders, high hepcidin levels causing anaemia, elevated VEGF levels promoting angiogenesis and vascular permeability, which, along with hypoalbuminemia, induce oedema, ascites, pleural and pericardial effusions, and in severe cases, generalized anasarca. In extreme cases multiple organ failure can occur, often resulting in death. We propose the use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in managing severe multicentric CD. Our arguments are based on the principles that CRRT is able to remove IL-6 from circulation thus attenuating the cytokine storm, can influence hepcidin levels, and reduction in oedema, and is often used in multiple organ failure to regain homeostasis control. Therefore, it could be used as a therapy or bridge therapy in severe cases. To sustain our hypothesis with evidence, we have gathered several studies from the literature confirming the successful removal of cytokines, especially IL-6 from circulation, which can be used as a starting point.

Anaesthesia Management for Giant Intraabdominal Tumours: A Case Series Study.

BACKGROUND: Due to a lack of randomised controlled trials and guidelines, and only case reports being available in the literature, there is no consensus on how to approach anaesthetic management in patients with giant intraabdominal tumours. METHODS: This study aimed to evaluate the literature and explore the current status of evidence, by undertaking an observational research design with a descriptive account of characteristics observed in a case series referring to patients with giant intraabdominal tumours who underwent anaesthesia. RESULTS: Twenty patients diagnosed with giant intraabdominal tumours were included in the study, most of them women, with the overall pathology being ovarian-related and sarcomas. Most of the patients were unable to lie supine and assumed a lateral decubitus position. Pulmonary function tests, chest X-rays, and thoracoabdominal CT were the most often performed preoperative evaluation methods, with the overall findings that there was no atelectasis or pleural effusion present, but there was bilateral diaphragm elevation. The removal of the intraabdominal tumour was performed under general anaesthesia in all cases. Awake fiberoptic intubation or awake videolaryngoscopy was performed in five cases, while the rest were performed with general anaesthesia with rapid sequence induction. Only one patient was ventilated with pressure support ventilation while maintaining spontaneous ventilation, while the rest were ventilated with controlled ventilation. Hypoxemia was the most reported respiratory complication during surgery. In more than 50% of cases, there was hypotension present during surgery, especially after the induction of anaesthesia and after tumour removal, which required vasopressor support. Most cases involved blood loss with subsequent transfusion requirements. The removal of the tumor requires prolonged surgical and anaesthesia times. Fluid drainage from cystic tumour ranged from 15.7 L to 107 L, with a fluid extraction rate of 0.5-2.5 L/min, and there was no re-expansion pulmonary oedema reported. Following surgery, all the patients required intensive care unit admission. One patient died during hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to the creation of a certain standard of care when dealing with patients presenting with giant intraabdominal tumour. More research is needed to define the proper way to administer anaesthesia and create practice guidelines.