Familial pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A retrospective analysis of germline genetic testing in a French multicentre cohort.

The rate of genetic diagnosis of French patients with familial pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is not known. We report germline genetic testing data from 133 index cases meeting criteria for familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) as well as 87 'FPC-like' index cases who did not fulfilled strict FPC definition but were evocative for a PDAC predisposition. The overall rate of genetic diagnosis (in BRCA1, BRCA2, CDKN2A, and ATM genes) was 8.3% in FPC patients and 4.6% in FPC-like patients, consistent with the literature in other populations. Genetic variants were also identified in FANCA and BAP1 genes, as well as in the CDKN2A p12 transcript. This pancreas-specific transcript is a known key player in driving pancreatic oncogenesis. This might be the first described case of a PDAC genetic predisposition due to a variant in this specific transcript.

Ovarian metastases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: clinical presentation, role of surgery, and potential value of the mutational profile for the differential diagnosis with primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian metastases (OM) of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) (OM-PA) can mimic primary ovarian mucinous carcinoma (POMC) on imaging and histology. These metastases are often symptomatic and not highly chemosensitive, so that oophorectomy may be considered. AIMS: The aims of this study were to compare the characteristics of OM-PA and POMC, and discuss the role of surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical, imaging, and histological data of patients with OM-PA and POMC (2000-2017) in three tertiary centers were reviewed. Twenty-six genes were analyzed by next generation sequencing (NGS) on both primary PA and OM-PA. RESULTS: Twenty-two women with OM-PA (n = 13, 11 with surgical resection) or POMC (n = 9) were selected. OM-PA were smaller than POMC (p = 0.02); imaging, histological, and immunohistochemistry data did not clearly differentiate OM-PA from POMC in 12 of 22 cases (54%). Seven PA/OM-PA pairs were analyzed, and a concordant KRAS mutation was identified in all cases. In four OM-PA, concordant mutations were also found in TP53 (n = 3), SMAD4 (n = 1), MET (n = 1), and PDGFRA (n = 1) genes. The aim of oophorectomy in 11 OM-PA was for antalgic (n = 6) or curative (n = 5) intent. Pain improved in 4/6 of the former patients, but 2/6 had significant morbidity, and 2/6 died of rapid tumor progression. After oophorectomy, median progression-free and overall survivals were 6 (0-11) and 8 months (1-131), respectively. CONCLUSION: Analysis of mutation profiles in both primary PA and ovarian tumors, especially KRAS, can help to determine the pancreatic origin of OM-PA. Surgical resection of OM-AP in highly selected patients may improve pelvic symptoms but may also cause significant morbidity. The benefit to survival requires further studies.

Cervical bone pain revealing a bone metastatic colon cancer: A case report.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide, with common sites of metastases including abdominal lymph nodes, the liver and lungs. Bone metastases are known to be relatively rare sites of metastasis. The present study reported a patient with advanced colorectal cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with atypical metastases presentation. Bone mCRCs were not frequent and presented a poor prognosis in the present case. It was concluded that further studies are required to clarify the pathogenesis of bone metastases, to improve the management and treatment of patients.

Maintenance therapies in metastatic pancreatic cancer: present and future with a focus on PARP inhibitors.

Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) are now more effectively controlled using chemotherapy combinations such as FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (NabP) regimens with a subset of patients who achieve a sustained tumor stabilization or response. The next challenge is to design maintenance therapies that result in continued tumor control with minimal toxicity. Quality of life should always be a priority in these patients with prolonged survival. Gradually tapering off the intensity of chemotherapy by suppressing drug(s) in the combination is one option. Thus, maintenance with 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine as single agents after FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine-NabP induction, respectively, seems to be a promising approach to minimize neurotoxicity while maintaining efficacy. Another option is to introduce maintenance drug(s) with different anti-tumoral actions. The recent example of olaparib in patients with BRCA mutated PDAC provides a promising proof-of-concept of a switch maintenance strategy in this setting.