Using pediatric advanced life support in pediatric residency training: does the curriculum need resuscitation?

OBJECTIVE: The Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) course is used throughout North American pediatric residency programs to provide a core pediatric resuscitation curriculum. Despite this widespread use, its effectiveness has not been formally assessed in pediatric residents. This study aimed to evaluate the PALS curriculum's effectiveness in providing pediatric residents with knowledge, skill and confidence in pediatric resuscitation. DESIGN: Course evaluation. SETTING: Tertiary care pediatric hospital. SUBJECTS: Pediatric residents. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were followed prospectively for 1 yr following completion of an annual PALS course. Multiple choice and short answer questionnaires were used to evaluate residents' knowledge immediately before and after completion of the course and throughout the following year. Confidence in ten aspects of pediatric resuscitation was assessed. Scores were compared before and after the PALS course to evaluate acquisition of knowledge and confidence. Scores at 12 months were compared with the immediate post-PALS course scores to evaluate maintenance of knowledge and confidence over time. Technical skills were evaluated by staff anesthetists using a 3-point scale. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Knowledge questionnaire scores were significantly higher post-PALS compared with pre-PALS, but knowledge of the details of PALS algorithms decreased significantly over the following 12 months. Confidence ratings improved post-PALS on only two of ten measures and remained very low overall. Residents could complete the four core technical skills but required assistance or multiple attempts. CONCLUSIONS: PALS is successful in providing basic resuscitation knowledge to pediatric residents, but knowledge of critical algorithm details is not sustained. The course does not provide for the expected level of competency in relevant technical skills. Residents do not achieve the confidence to feel well prepared to provide comprehensive care to pediatric patients in cardiopulmonary arrest. These findings support the hypothesis that the PALS course alone is insufficient to provide pediatric residents with competency in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Simulation in paediatrics: An educational revolution.

Recent changes in the culture of medical education have highlighted deficiencies in the traditional apprenticeship model of education, and emphasized the need for more experiential modalities of learning. Simulations, which are scenarios or environments designed to closely approximate real-world situations, have recently found their way into the medical training of health care providers. High-fidelity simulators are life-like mannequins connected to computer systems that control the physiological and physical responses of the mannequin. These simulators are able to provide direct feedback to learners in safe, risk-free environments. This technology has been used to teach all aspects of medical care, including medical knowledge, technical skills, and behavioural training or communication skills. The present article provides a general overview of simulation that will hopefully help to generate interest in paediatric simulation across Canada. Several tertiary care paediatric hospitals in Canada are already using simulation to teach health care providers; continued growth and interest is expected in this exciting area of medical education.

Evaluation of the impact of a simulation-enhanced breaking bad news workshop in pediatrics.

INTRODUCTION: Our goal was to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a simulation-based workshop for teaching pediatric trainees' communication skills in breaking bad news. METHODS: A simulation-based workshop was developed to teach skills in breaking bad news. After a classroom-based introduction, small groups of residents participated in 3 scenarios, each starting with a simulated resuscitation, followed by 2 conversations with the patient's parent, played by actors. Each conversation was observed through a 1-way mirror and was followed by a debriefing. After the workshop, the residents completed workshop evaluations and a self-assessment. Before and after the workshop, residents were evaluated in Objective Structured Clinical Examination stations where they were required to give bad news. Two physician experts and 2 parents who personally experienced receiving bad news about their child evaluated resident performance using a previously validated communication evaluation tool. RESULTS: Residents' ratings of the workshop were very high for all items, and 100% of the residents reported improvement in their ability to deliver bad news after the workshop. Statistically significant improvement was found in 14 of 17 items of the evaluation tool used by experts and parents, with the parents reporting greater improvement than the experts. CONCLUSIONS: This reflective, simulation-based workshop successfully improved pediatric trainees' skills in having difficult conversations with families, as evaluated by the participants, by physician experts, and, most importantly, by parents who have experienced these conversations in real life.

The development and assessment of an evaluation tool for pediatric resident competence in leading simulated pediatric resuscitations.

INTRODUCTION: It is critical that competency in pediatric resuscitation is achieved and assessed during residency or post graduate medical training. The purpose of this study was to create and evaluate a tool to measure all elements of pediatric resuscitation team leadership competence. METHODS: An initial set of items, derived from a literature review and a brainstorming session, were refined to a 26 item assessment tool through the use of Delphi methodology. The tool was tested using videos of standardized resuscitations. A psychometric assessment of the evidence for instrument validity and reliability was undertaken. RESULTS: The performance of 30 residents on two videotaped scenarios was assessed by 4 pediatricians using the tool, with 12 items assessing 'leadership and communication skills' (LCS) and 14 items assessing 'knowledge and clinical skills' (KCS). The instrument showed evidence of reliability; the Cronbach's alpha and generalizability co-efficients for the overall instrument were α=0.818 and Ep(2)=0.76, for LCS were α=0.827 and Ep(2)=0.844, and for KCS were α=0.673 and Ep(2)=0.482. While validity was initially established through literature review and brainstorming by the panel of experts, it was further built through the high strength of correlation between global scores and scores for overall performance (r=0.733), LCS (r=0.718) and KCS (r=0.662) as well as the factor analysis which accounted for 40.2% of the variance. CONCLUSION: The results of the study demonstrate that the instrument is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate pediatric resuscitation team leader competence.