Immune perturbations in patients along the perioperative period: alterations in cell surface markers and leukocyte subtypes before and after surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgery renders patients susceptible to life-threatening complications, including infections, multiple organ failure, and presumably cancer metastases. Surgery-induced immune perturbations were suggested to contribute to such deleterious effects, but also to facilitate post-injury healing. Preoperative psychological and physiological stress responses may contribute to these immune perturbations, and could thus jeopardize patients even before surgery. The current study assessed the effects of various operations on an array of immune indices during the perioperative period. To qualify immune changes before surgery, patients' immune status was also compared to that of healthy controls. METHODS: A total of 81 subjects (operated patients and healthy controls) provided up to five daily blood samples during the perioperative period, for assessment of leukocyte subtypes (granulocytes, monocytes, Tc, Th, NK, NKT, CD4+CD25+, CD8(bright)CD4(dim), and B cells) and their surface markers (HLA-DR and LFA-1). RESULTS: Even before surgery patients displayed immune perturbations, including reduced lymphocyte HLA-DR expression and increased monocyte LFA-1 expression. Following surgery, we recorded a reduction in lymphocyte numbers that was subtype specific, increased granulocyte numbers, and reduced expression of HLA-DR by lymphocytes and monocytes. Finally, no significant associations were found between alteration in leukocyte numbers and cell surface markers (although these indices showed high correlations with other variables), implying differential mediating mechanisms. CONCLUSION: Several immune alterations are manifested prior to surgery, and contribute to the marked postoperative changes, which are commonly interpreted as immune suppression. We discuss the possible adaptive and maladaptive nature of these perturbations in the context of natural injury, stress, and surgery.

Blood transfusion promotes cancer progression: a critical role for aged erythrocytes.

BACKGROUND: In cancer patients, allogeneic blood transfusion is associated with poorer prognosis, but the independent effect of the transfusion is controversial. Moreover, mediating mechanisms underlying the alleged cancer-promoting effects of blood transfusion are unknown, including the involvement of donors' leukocytes, erythrocytes, and soluble factors. METHOD: Two syngeneic tumor models were used in Fischer 344 rats, the MADB106 mammary adenocarcinoma and the CRNK-16 leukemia. Outcomes included host ability to clear circulating cancer cells, and host survival rates. The independent impact of blood transfusion was assessed, and potential deleterious characteristics of the transfusion were studied, including blood storage duration; the role of erythrocytes, leukocyte, and soluble factors; and the kinetics of the effects. RESULTS: Blood transfusion was found to be an independent and significant risk factor for cancer progression in both models, causing up to a fourfold increase in lung tumor retention and doubling mortality rates. Blood storage time was the critical determinant of these deleterious effects, regardless of whether the transfused blood was allogeneic or autogenic. Surprisingly, aged erythrocytes (9 days and older), rather than leukocytes or soluble factors, mediated the effects, which occurred in both operated and nonoperated animals. The effects of erythrocytes transfusion in the MADB106 model emerged immediately and dissipated within 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: In rats, transfusion of fresh blood is less harmful than transfusion of stored blood in the context of progressing malignancies. Further studies should address mediating mechanisms through which erythrocytes' storage duration can impact the rate of complications while treating malignant diseases and potentially other pathologies.

Immune suppression while awaiting surgery and following it: dissociations between plasma cytokine levels, their induced production, and NK cell cytotoxicity.

Surgery may render patients susceptible to life-threatening complications, including infections and later metastases. Suppression of cell mediated immunity (CMI) and perturbations in the cytokine network were implicated in these outcomes. The current study assessed the effects of various surgeries on a wide array of immune indices, and compared patients' pre-operative immune status to that of control subjects. A total of 81 subjects (controls, moderate and major surgeries) provided up to five daily blood samples. Whole blood procedures were conducted within hours of blood withdrawal, assessing NK cell number and cytotoxicity, and plasma cytokine levels and induced production (IFNgamma, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-12). Our findings indicate that surgery reduced NK cell numbers/ml blood, and independently suppressed NK activity per NK cell and per ml blood. Among other perturbations in the cytokine network, pro-CMI cytokine production (IL-12 and IFNgamma) was reduced by surgery. Surprisingly, plasma levels of IFNgamma and IL-6 increased following surgery, while their in vitro induced production showed opposite effects. Patients awaiting surgery exhibited impaired IL-12 induced production and NK activity/ml, and reduced IFNgamma plasma levels. No significant associations were found between NK cytotoxicity and Th1 cytokines, although these indices showed high correlations with other variables. Overall, our findings indicate that patients exhibit impaired immune functions even before operation, which seem to contribute to the evident post-operative immune suppression. In the peri-operative context, induced cytokine production and plasma cytokines levels reflect different processes. Last, we suggest that peri-operative suppression of NK activity is mediated by neuroendocrine responses rather than Th1 cytokines.