Weight Changes With Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor Therapy in the Management of HIV Infection: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To describe weight changes with integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) therapy. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was performed (through December 15, 2021) using the PubMed and CINAHL databases using the search terms: "integrase inhibitors," "integrase strand transfer inhibitors," and "weight." STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Studies were included that provided relevant information on weight or body mass index (BMI) changes on INSTI therapy. Controlled or observational studies comparing different INSTI therapies or compared INSTI therapy to another class of antiretroviral therapy were included. DATA SYNTHESIS: Forty-three articles met criteria for inclusion, and data are presented. Although some trials have observed similar weight gains between INSTI, protease inhibitor, and non-nucleoside inhibitor therapies, the increase appears to be greater with INSTI therapy, particularly during initiation of therapy. Risk factors for weight gain with INSTI therapy include female gender, lower CD4 count, and combined use of tenofovir alafenamide. Within the INSTI class, dolutegravir and bictegravir appear to have the greatest propensity for weight gain. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: INSTI-based therapies are the preferred initial management of HIV infection. Discerning the factors contributing to weight changes on INSTI therapy and risks of associated health-related outcomes is important to both the management of weight gain and HIV medical management. CONCLUSIONS: Within the INSTI class, dolutegravir and bictegravir may be associated with the greatest risk for weight gain particularly when combined with tenofovir alafenamide. Further research is needed to determine mechanisms for observed weight changes and any contributions to clinically significant metabolic and cardiovascular adverse outcomes associated with INSTI therapy.

Bridging the gap: An approach to reporting antimicrobial stewardship metrics specific to solid organ transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: This study seeks to describe inpatient antimicrobial use (AU) utilizing the National Healthcare Safety Network-AU (NHSN-AU) framework among solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr) within 12 months after transplant. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included SOTr ≥ 18 years of age who underwent transplantation from January 2015 to December 2016 at a Midwestern US transplant center. Inpatient AU was followed for 12 months post-transplant. Hospital days present up to 12 months post-transplant, AU variables, and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) occurrences were analyzed. RESULTS: The cohort of 530 SOTr included 225 kidney (42.5%), 171 liver (32.3%), 45 lung (8.5%), 40 heart (7.5%), 39 multivisceral (7.4%), seven small bowel (1.3%), and three pancreas (0.6%) transplants. Total days of therapy (DOT) were 22 782 among the cohort, with a median of 5 days [interquartile range [IQR], 1-12]. Lung and liver transplants had the most total DOT (6571 vs. 5569 days), while lungs and small bowels had the highest median DOT (13 [IQR, 2-56] vs. 12 [IQR, 2-31]). The facility-wide DOT/1000 days were lowest in pancreas and highest in lung transplants (5.3 vs. 428.1). Small bowel transplants received the most resistant-Gram-positive infection and hospital-onset infection agents for facility-wide DOT/1000 days present. Pancreas and kidney transplants accounted for the most high-risk CDI agents. CDI occurred in 34 patients, with kidney and liver transplants experiencing 13 each. CONCLUSION: This study represents one of the first reports of AU in SOTr utilizing the NHSN-AU framework. More studies are needed for further peer-to-peer comparison of AU in this complex patient population.

Evaluation of computerized clinical decision support system to reduce unnecessary nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing.

Our health system implemented a novel clinical decision-support system to reduce unnecessary duplicate nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) orders. In an 8-month period, the rate of duplicate MRSA PCR orders within 7 days declined from 4.7% (370 of 7,861) to 1.2% (120 of 9,833).

Positivity of repeat nasal MRSA PCR screening: a single-center experience.

Repeating nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) within 14 days may increase healthcare costs and inform anti-MRSA antibiotic therapy without known benefit. Within an inpatient admission, our retrospective, single-center evaluation found that conversion from negative to positive on repeat nasal MRSA PCR screen was uncommon (2%).

Evaluating the Impact of Substance Use Disorder Resources on Outcomes of Persons Who Inject Drugs with Infections.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of inpatient substance use disorder (SUD) resources on outcomes of persons who inject stimulants and/or opioids (PWIDs) with infections. METHODS: This retrospective cohort evaluated PWIDs hospitalized from July 1, 2020, to May 31, 2021, and prescribed an antimicrobial course. The patients were compared based on inpatient implementation of SUD resources, including consultation of addiction medicine/behavioral health, implementation of an opioid withdrawal treatment protocol, or continuation/initiation of medications for opioid use disorder. The primary outcome was a composite of antibiotic completion, no unplanned discharge, and no 30-day readmission. Notable secondary outcomes included length of stay and presence of stigmatizing language in the electronic medical record. RESULTS: A total of 119 patients were analyzed-74 (62.2%) received SUD resources. The primary outcome was met by 43 patients with SUD resources implemented (58.1%) and 19 patients without resources (42.2%, P = 0.093). After adjustment for infection type, implementation of SUD resources (adjusted odds ratio, 2.593; 95% confidence interval, 1.162-5.789) was independently associated with primary outcome success. The patients who received SUD resources had a median length of stay of 7 days (4-13.3) compared with 4 days (2-6.5) in those without resources ( P < 0.001). Stigmatizing language was present in 98% of patient electronic medical records. CONCLUSIONS: Patient care provided to PWIDs with infections is optimized when SUD resources are implemented. This study further supports the necessity of improving SUD management when PWIDs are admitted to healthcare facilities.

Impact of Hypoalbuminemia on Ceftriaxone Treatment Failure in Patients With Enterobacterales Bacteremia: A Propensity-Matched, Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Ceftriaxone is frequently prescribed due to its convenience of dosing and robust antimicrobial activity. However, patients with hypoalbuminemia may experience suboptimal ceftriaxone exposure due to the high degree of protein binding. We aimed to evaluate the impact of hypoalbuminemia on treatment failure among hospitalized adults with Enterobacterales bacteremia who received ceftriaxone therapy. Methods: We conducted an observational cohort study among patients with Enterobacterales bacteremia who received >72 hours of ceftriaxone initiated within 48 hours of index culture. A propensity-score model was used to match and compare patients with hypoalbuminemia. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as a composite of (1) escalation from ceftriaxone to ertapenem or an intravenous antibacterial agent with activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, or (2) inpatient death. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, duration of antibiotic therapy, and time to infection resolution. Results: Of 260 patients included, the majority developed bacteremia from a urinary source (71.5%), and Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen identified (72.3%). Patients with hypoalbuminemia experienced numerically higher rates of treatment failure, although not reaching statistical significance (12.3% vs 7.7%; P = .21). Among patients receiving care in the intensive care unit, the impact of hypoalbuminemia on treatment failure was more pronounced (24.4% vs 7.3%; P = .07). Conclusions: Hypoalbuminemia may not have a significant impact on clinical outcomes among patients with Enterobacterales bacteremia treated with ceftriaxone. However, critically ill patients may be subject to higher incidence of treatment failure in the presence of hypoalbuminemia.