Sulfidation of silver nanoparticles decreases Escherichia coli growth inhibition.

Sulfidation of metallic nanoparticles such as silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) released to the environment may be an important detoxification mechanism. Two types of AgNPs-an engineered polydisperse and aggregated AgNP powder, and a laboratory-synthesized, relatively monodisperse AgNP aqueous dispersion-were studied. The particles were sulfidized to varying degrees and characterized to determine the effect of initial AgNP polydispersity and aggregation state on AgNP sulfidation, and then exposed to Escherichia coli to determine if the degree of sulfidation of pristine AgNPs affects growth inhibition of bacteria. The extent of sulfidation was found to depend on the HS(-)/Ag ratio. However, for the same reaction times, the more monodisperse particles were fully transformed to Ag(2)S, and the polydisperse, aggregated particles were not fully sulfidized, thus preserving the toxic potential of Ag(0) in the aggregates. A higher Ag(2)S:Ag(0) ratio in the sulfidized nanoparticles resulted in less growth inhibition of E. coli over 6 h of exposure. These results suggest that the initial properties of AgNPs can affect sulfidation products, which in turn affect microbial growth inhibition, and that these properties should be considered in assessing the environmental impact of AgNPs.

Managing fatigue in operational settings. 1: Physiological considerations and countermeasures.

The authors consider three aspects of managing fatigue in the workplace. They provide a brief overview of important scientific findings related to sleep and circadian physiology that establish the psychobiological foundation of fatigue. Their major focus is on the relevance of these findings to operational settings. In addition, they provide examples to describe practical fatigue countermeasures that can be used in operational settings.

Managing fatigue in operational settings 2: An integrated approach.

The six domains that must be addressed in managing fatigue in operational settings are identified, and examples of how the aviation industry is dealing with the problems in each domain are given. Challenges facing healthcare providers in managing fatigue are also discussed.

Flight crew fatigue VI: a synthesis.

Sleep, circadian rhythms, subjective fatigue, mood, nutrition, and physical symptoms were monitored in flight crews before, during, and after scheduled commercial operations. Duty-related changes in these measures were examined in four different types of air transport: short-haul fixed-wing; short-haul helicopter; domestic overnight cargo; and long-haul. The extent of these changes, and the duty-related and physiological factors contributing to them, are compared among the different operations. During all operations, the level of sleep loss was such that the majority of crewmembers would be expected to have become increasingly sleepy across trip days, with some experiencing performance decrements. In addition, during overnight cargo and long-haul operations, crewmembers were sometimes flying aircraft during the circadian low point in alertness and performance. Specific recommendations for reducing flight crew fatigue are offered for each operating environment.

Flight crew fatigue I: objectives and methods.

In 1980, NASA-Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, initiated a program to assess flight crew fatigue, determine its potential operational consequences, and provide practical countermeasure suggestions. To assess the extent of the problem, crewmembers were monitored before, during, and after commercial short-haul (fixed-wing and helicopter aircraft), overnight cargo, and long-haul operations. A total of 197 volunteers were studied on 94 trip patterns with 1299 flight segments and 2046 h of flying time. The present paper outlines the program and describes the common methodology used in these studies, which are then presented in detail in the four subsequent papers. The sixth paper offers a synthesis of this work, reviewing the major causes of flight crew fatigue and making specific suggestions about ways to manage it in different operations.

Flight crew fatigue II: short-haul fixed-wing air transport operations.

We monitored 74 crewmembers before, during, and after 3-4-d commercial short-haul trips crossing no more than one time zone per 24 h. The average duty day lasted 10.6 duty hours, with 4.5 flight hours and 5.5 flights. On trips, crewmembers slept less, woke earlier, and reported having more difficulty falling asleep, with lighter, less restful sleep than pretrip. The consumption of caffeine, alcohol, and snacks increased on trip days, as did reports of headaches, congested nose, and back pain. The study suggests the following ways of reducing fatigue during these operations: base the duration of rest periods on duty hours as well as flight hours; avoid scheduling rest periods progressively earlier across a trip; minimize early duty report times; and inform crewmembers about strategic use of caffeine and alternatives to alcohol for relaxing before sleep.

Flight crew fatigue III: North Sea helicopter air transport operations.

We studied 32 helicopter pilots before, during, and after 4-5 d trips from Aberdeen, Scotland, to service North Sea oil rigs. On duty days, subjects awoke 1.5 h earlier than pretrip or posttrip, after having slept nearly an hour less. Subjective fatigue was greater posttrip than pretrip. By the end of trip days, fatigue was greater and mood more negative than by the end of pretrip days. During trips, daily caffeine consumption increased 42%, reports of headache doubled, reports of back pain increased 12-fold, and reports of burning eyes quadrupled. In the cockpits studied, thermal discomfort and high vibration levels were common. Subjective workload during preflight, taxi, climb, and cruise was related to the crewmembers' ratings of the quality of the aircraft systems. During descent and approach, workload was affected by weather at the landing site. During landing, it was influenced by the quality of the landing site and air traffic control. Beginning duty later, and greater attention to aircraft comfort and maintenance, should reduce fatigue in these operations.

Flight crew fatigue IV: overnight cargo operations.

We monitored 34 B-727 crewmembers before, during, and after 8-d commercial overnight cargo trips crossing no more than one time zone per 24 h. Daytime sleep episodes were 41% shorter and were rated as poorer than nighttime sleep episodes. When the layover was long enough, crewmembers usually slept again in the evening before going back on night duty. Nevertheless, the total sleep per 24 h on duty days averaged 1.2 h less than pretrip. The circadian temperature rhythm did not adapt completely to night duty, delaying by about 3 h. Self-rated fatigue was highest around the time of the temperature minimum, which occurred near the end of the nighttime duty period. On trip days, crewmembers ate more snacks and there was a marked increase in reports of headaches, congested noses, and burning eyes. Comparisons with daytime short-haul operations confirm that a daytime rest period does not represent the same sleep opportunity as a nighttime rest period of the same duration. We examine regulatory and scheduling options, and personal countermeasure strategies, that could help to reduce sleep loss during overnight cargo operations.

Flight crew fatigue V: long-haul air transport operations.

We monitored 32 flight crewmembers before, during, and after 4-9 d commercial long-haul trips crossing up to 8 time zones per 24 h. The average duty day lasted 9.8 h, and the average layover 24.8 h. Layover sleep episodes averaged 105 min shorter than pretrip sleep episodes. However, in two-thirds of layovers, crewmembers slept twice so that their total sleep per 24 h on trips averaged 49 min less than pretrip. Greater sleep loss was associated with nighttime flights than with daytime flights. The organization of layover sleep depended on prior flight direction, local time, and the circadian cycle. The circadian temperature rhythm did not synchronize to the erratic environmental time cues. Consequently, the circadian low point in alertness and performance sometimes occurred in flight. On trip days, by comparison with pretrip, crewmembers reported higher fatigue and lower activation; drank more caffeine; ate more snacks and fewer meals; and there were marked increases in reports of headaches, congested nose, and back pain. Scheduling strategies and countermeasures to improve layover sleep, cockpit alertness, and performance, are discussed.

Flight controller alertness and performance during spaceflight shiftwork operations.

Decreased alertness and performance associated with fatigue, sleep loss, and circadian disruption are issues faced by a diverse range of shiftwork operations personnel. During Space Transportation System (STS) operations, Mission Operations Directorate (MOD) personnel provide 24-hr. coverage of critical tasks. A joint NASA Johnson Space Center and NASA Ames Research Center project was undertaken to examine these issues in flight controllers during MOD shiftwork operations. An initial operational test of procedures and measures was conducted during the STS-53 mission in December 1992. The study measures included a Background Questionnaire, a subjective daily logbook completed on a 24-hour basis (to report sleep patterns, work periods, etc.), and an 8 minute performance and mood test battery administered at the beginning, middle, and end of each shift period. Seventeen flight controllers representing the 3 Orbit shifts participated. The initial results clearly support the need for further data collection during other STS missions to document baseline levels of alertness and performance during MOD shiftwork operations. Countermeasure strategies specific to the MOD environment are being developed to minimize the adverse effects of fatigue, sleep loss, and circadian disruption engendered by shiftwork operations. These issues are especially pertinent for the night shift operations and the acute phase advance required for the transition of day shift personnel into the night for shuttle launch. Implementation and evaluation of the countermeasure strategies to maximize alertness and performance is planned. As STS missions extend to further EDO (extended duration orbiters), and timelines and planning for 24-hour Space Station operations continue, alertness and performance issues related to sleep and circadian disruption will remain highly relevant in the MOD environment.

Fatigue in operational settings: examples from the aviation environment.

The need for 24-h operations creates nonstandard and altered work schedules that can lead to cumulative sleep loss and circadian disruption. These factors can lead to fatigue and sleepiness and affect performance and productivity on the job. The approach, research, and results of the NASA Ames Fatigue Countermeasures Program are described to illustrate one attempt to address these issues in the aviation environment. The scientific and operational relevance of these factors is discussed, and provocative issues for future research are presented.