Different Clinical Phenotypes of Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: A Subgroup Analysis of 86 Patients.

INTRODUCTION AND STUDY AIM: Embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS) represent a rather recent diagnostic entity under clinical research for relapse prevention in cryptogenic stroke patients. Despite strict diagnostic criteria, ESUS definition ignores major clinical and radiological aspects, so including heterogeneous cases and probably influencing trial results. This study researches clinically relevant phenotypes among ESUS patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated ESUS patients admitted at Trento Stroke Unit over a 4-year period. Vascular risk factors (RFs), neurological deficit severity, presence of potential embolic sources, and ASCOD phenotype were recorded. Ischemic lesions were categorized considering their extension in 4 groups. Subgroup comparisons by predefined differences in age, amount of RFs, history of previous stroke, deficit severity, and stroke lesion extension were done. RESULTS: ESUS cases were 86. Patients younger than 50 years old (n = 17) had a lower prevalence of RFs, left atrial enlargement, left ventricle diastolic dysfunction, a higher proportion of ASCOD score A0 (P < .05). Patients without RFs (n = 18) differed from those with greater than or equal to 3 RFs (n = 23) for a younger age and a lower prevalence of potential causes of embolism (P < .05). Patients without a previous stroke (n = 70) were younger, had a lower prevalence of RFs, left ventricle diastolic dysfunction, a higher prevalence of ASCOD score A0 (P < .05). No differences were observed comparing minor and major clinical and radiological strokes. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: ESUS patients can be distinguished in 2 opposite phenotypes defined by a lower and a higher load of atherosclerotic pathology. They may suggest possible underlying pathogenic mechanisms and support interpretation of ongoing trials results.

Carotid stenosis as predictor of stroke after transient ischemic attacks.

ABCD2 score identifies high-risk TIAs but its validity in different countries and hospitals is unknown. Doubts remain also about the role of diagnostic work up for patients with TIAs in the emergency department. The present study was undertaken to confirm the usefulness of ABCD2 score in the emergency department of Trento Hospital and to evaluate if other exams (carotid ultrasound or CT scan) commonly performed in TIA patients are helpful. We retrospectively analysed discharge diagnosis of around 120,000 patients seen at the first aid of Trento Hospital over a 28 month period. ABCD2 score, carotid ultrasound and CT scan were recorded and were correlated with recurrence of stroke at different time points (mean follow-up period of 11.4 months) in all patients with TIA. We identified 965 patients with focal neurologic deficit and 502 could be classified as TIA. An ischemic stroke recurred in 30 patients at the end of the follow-up (30% in the first two days). ABCD2 score confirmed its value. A significant carotid stenosis (>70%) was an independent risk factor for stroke at any time point. Our study confirms the role of ABCD2 in a large Italian cohort of TIA patients but also suggests the importance of performing a carotid ultrasound as soon as possible.