Troubleshooting Tips for Diagnosing Complex Fetal Genitourinary Malformations.

Fetal genitourinary anomalies can present a diagnostic challenge for the radiologist. The absence of a normally located kidney may represent agenesis or be secondary to a fusion or migration abnormality. A dilated renal pelvis should prompt evaluation for a specific cause, including ureteropelvic junction obstruction, reflux, or an obstructed duplicated system. Cystic parenchymal changes are characteristic of a multicystic dysplastic kidney but may also be seen in obstructive cystic dysplasia. There are numerous causes of megacystis including chromosomal (trisomy 18 syndrome), obstruction (posterior urethral valves, urethral atresia), or muscular dysfunction (prune belly syndrome, megacystis microcolon intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome). Important mimics of a large bladder include hydrocolpos and urogenital sinus or cloacal malformation. Complications of genitourinary malformations are common and include oligohydramnios, urinary ascites, and urinoma. Making an accurate diagnosis often requires additional US views beyond those obtained in the standard fetal survey and occasionally performing fetal MRI. The appropriate use of orthogonal T2-weighted sequences, in conjunction with diffusion-weighted images for evaluation of the kidneys and gradient-recalled-echo sequences for evaluation of T1-hyperintense meconium in the colon, can play an integral role in diagnosis. Accurate diagnosis of fetal genitourinary malformations is vital to direct patient counseling and pregnancy management as outcomes are highly variable. Some conditions can be surgically corrected quite simply, some require multiple complex procedures, and some are lethal. The authors offer troubleshooting tips to narrow the differential diagnosis for four observations: unilateral absent kidney, dilated renal pelvis, cystic renal parenchyma, and megacystis and its mimics. ©RSNA, 2023 Test Your Knowledge questions are available in the Online Learning Center.

Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: A Do-Not-Miss Diagnosis.

The rate of cesarean section (CS) for delivery has increased internationally, reaching 50% in some countries. Abnormal implantation of a new pregnancy at the site of the prior hysterotomy is an important complication because of the risks of hemorrhage, uterine rupture, and progression to placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), a condition with high morbidity with potential for catastrophic obstetric hemorrhage, maternal and fetal mortality, and loss of fertility. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy (CSEP) is the recommended term to describe these pregnancies, which are recognized on the basis of the sac implantation site, growth pattern, and associated abnormal perfusion. The true incidence of CSEP is unknown because the condition is likely underdiagnosed and underreported. The 2022 Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine consult series notes that severe maternal morbidity and mortality are linked to difficulty in making the diagnosis of CSEP. The authors review the signs of CSEP at imaging, some pitfalls that may lead to delayed or missed diagnosis, and the consequences thereof. CSEPs must be differentiated from low implantation of a normal pregnancy, cervical ectopic pregnancy, and evolving pregnancy loss. Early recognition allows prompt and safe treatment that is usually surgical. Early treatment results in decreased health care costs, a shorter hospital stay, preservation of fertility, and prevention of iatrogenic preterm delivery, which is typical in cases that progress to PAS. Hysterectomy has serious negative psychologic consequences for patients of childbearing age; early diagnosis and prompt treatment of CSEP can prevent this often-ignored complication. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on CT scans ordered from the emergency department for abdominal complaints.

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected healthcare systems and patients alike across the USA. We seek to elucidate changes in abdominal imaging ordered from the emergency department (ED) in a healthcare system undergoing non-surge conditions in April 2020 compared to April 2019. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational study comparing patients undergoing CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis ordered from the ED in April 2020 vs. April 2019 at a single healthcare center. Via review of the radiology report and electronic medical record, we determined the positive or negative status of these scans. We evaluated percentages of positive CT scans and differences in outcomes, including admission rates, interventions, and mortality. RESULTS: Comparing 2020 to 2019, there was a 31.6% decrease in the number of CT scans performed from the ED. We found a higher percentage of positive CT findings, 58.2% vs. 50.8% (p = 0.025), and increased admission rates, 40.8% vs. 34.1% (p = 0.036). Differences were found in rates of appendicitis, colitis, and cholangitis. No difference was found in ICU admissions, interventions, or in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic in a region undergoing non-surge conditions, we found increased rates of positive CT scans performed from the ED for abdominal complaints with an increased percentage of hospital admissions compared to a control year. No differences in ICU admissions or rates of procedural intervention were found to suggest higher acuity of pathology on presentation. Our findings suggest appropriately decreased healthcare utilization in our study period, driven by pre-hospital patient self-selection.

Equity and achievement in access to contraceptives in East Africa between 2000 and 2010.

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in equity in contraceptive use, and in contraceptive-prevalence rates in six East African countries. METHODS: In this repeated cross-sectional study, Demographic and Health Surveys Program data from women aged 15-49 years in Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda between 2000 and 2010 were analyzed. Individuals were ranked according to wealth quintile, stratified urban/rural populations, and calculated concentration index-a statistic integrating information from all wealth quintiles to analyze disparities. RESULTS: Equity and contraceptive-prevalence rates increased in most country regions over the study period. Notably, in rural Rwanda, contraceptive-prevalence rates increased from 3.9 to 44.0, and urban Kenya became the most equitable country region, with a concentration index of 0.02. The Pearson correlation coefficient between improvements in concentration index and contraceptive-prevalence rates was 0.52 (P=0.011). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that countries seeking to increase contraceptive use should prioritize equity in access to services and contraceptives.