Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors and Dementia Risk: A Real-World Study.

INTRODUCTION: Biological and scarce epidemiological evidence suggested that phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i) might reduce dementia risk. We aimed to examine the association between PDE5i and dementia using real-world data. METHODS: Two retrospective cohorts within the database of Clalit, the largest healthcare provider in Israel (2005-2023), were studied. The first cohort included new daily users, older than 50 years of age, of low-dose tadalafil, prescribed for benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH), propensity-score matched to new-users of alpha-1 blockers, and analyzed using 2-year lag time. The second cohort included patients with erectile dysfunction, with/without any PDE5i treatment, using time-dependent analysis. Individuals in the cohorts were followed through May 2023 for the occurrence of dementia. RESULTS: The first cohort included 5,204 tadalafil initiators propensity-score matched to 18,565 alpha-1 blockers initiators. There was no association between tadalafil use and dementia risk, HR = 0.99 (95% CI: 0.88-1.12), p = 0.927. Similar results were obtained in a competing risk analysis, and in a sensitivity analysis in which we restricted the cohort to patients older than 60 years at cohort entry. The second cohort of 133,336 patients with erectile dysfunction included new users and nonusers of any PDE5i. In a mean follow-up of 7.9 years, 8,631 patients were newly diagnosed with dementia. In a time-dependent multivariable analysis, PDE5i use was not associated with reduced dementia risk, HR = 0.95 (95% CI: 0.86-1.04). Results were not changed in sensitivity analyses (patients older than 60 years or stratification by PDE5i type). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the use of PDE5 inhibitors is not associated with decreased risk of dementia.

Effectiveness of Evusheld in Immunocompromised Patients: Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tixagevimab and cilgavimab, a combined monoclonal antibody (Evusheld), was granted emergency use authorization for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) preexposure prophylaxis in individuals with immunocompromising conditions. In this study we used population-based real-world data to evaluate the effectiveness of Evusheld in immunocompromised patients. METHODS: Using the computerized database of the largest healthcare provider in Israel, we identified all adult immunocompromised patients who were eligible to receive Evusheld (150 mg tixagevimab and 150 mg cilgavimab) on 15 February 2022. Patients with a documentation of a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection were excluded. A total of 703 patients who received Evusheld were propensity score matched, using a ratio of 1:4, with 2812 patients who had not received Evusheld (control group). Patients were followed through 30 June 2022 for up to 90 days for the first documentation of SARS-CoV-2 infection and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related hospitalization. RESULTS: Overall, 72 patients in the Evusheld group and 377 patients in the control group had SARS-CoV-2 infection, reflecting an incidence rate of 4.18 and 5.64 per 100 person-months, respectively. The hazard ratios were 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI]: .58-.96) for SARS-CoV-2 infection and 0.41 (95% CI: .19-.89) for COVID-19-related hospitalization in the Evusheld group compared to the control group. The magnitude of relative risk reduction of each outcome was greater in nonobese patients (P for interaction = .020 and .045, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that Evusheld is effective in reducing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 hospitalization in immunocompromised patients. The effectiveness of this dose appears to be greater in nonobese patients.

Effectiveness of Paxlovid in Reducing Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Mortality in High-Risk Patients.

BACKGROUND: Paxlovid was granted an Emergency Use Authorization for the treatment of mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), based on the interim analysis of the Evaluation of Protease Inhibition for COVID-19 in High-Risk Patients (EPIC-HR) trial. Paxlovid effectiveness needs to be assessed in a noncontrolled setting. In this study we used population-based real-world data to evaluate the effectiveness of Paxlovid. METHODS: The database of the largest healthcare provider in Israel was used to identify all adults aged 18 years or older with first-ever positive test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 between January and February 2022, who were at high risk for severe COVID-19 and had no contraindications for Paxlovid use. Patients were included irrespective of their COVID-19 vaccination status. Cox hazard regression was used to estimate the 28-day hazard ratio (HR) for severe COVID-19 or mortality with Paxlovid examined as time-dependent variable. RESULTS: Overall, 180 351 eligible patients were included; of these, only 4737 (2.6%) were treated with Paxlovid, and 135 482 (75.1%) had adequate COVID-19 vaccination status. Both Paxlovid and adequate COVID-19 vaccination status were associated with significant decrease in the rate of severe COVID-19 or mortality with adjusted HRs of 0.54 (95% confidence interval [CI], .39-.75) and 0.20 (95% CI, .17-.22), respectively. Paxlovid appears to be more effective in older patients, immunosuppressed patients, and patients with underlying neurological or cardiovascular disease (interaction P < .05 for all). No significant interaction was detected between Paxlovid treatment and COVID-19 vaccination status. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that in the era of Omicron and in real-life settings, Paxlovid is highly effective in reducing the risk of severe COVID-19 or mortality.

Effectiveness of Molnupiravir in High-Risk Patients: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Molnupiravir was granted emergency use authorization for the treatment of mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this study, we used population-based real-world data to evaluate the effectiveness of molnupiravir. METHODS: The database of the largest healthcare provider in Israel was used to identify all adults with first-ever positive test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) performed in the community during January-February 2022, who were at high risk for severe COVID-19, and had no contraindications for molnupiravir use. Patients were included regardless of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status. A total of 2661 patients who received molnupiravir were propensity score matched with 2661 patients who have not received molnupiravir (control group). Patients were followed through 10 March 2022 for up to 28 days for the first occurrence of the composite severe COVID-19 or COVID-19-specific mortality. RESULTS: The composite outcome occurred in 50 patients in the molnupiravir group and 60 patients in the control group. Molnupiravir was associated with a nonsignificant reduced risk of the composite outcome: hazard ratio, 0.83 (95% confidence interval, .57-1.21). However, subgroup analyses showed that molnupiravir was associated with a significant decrease in the risk of the composite outcome in older patients 0.54 (0.34-0.86), in females 0.41 (0.22-0.77), and in patients with inadequate COVID-19 vaccination 0.45 (0.25-0.82). The results were similar when each component of the composite outcome was examined separately. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that in the era of Omicron and in real-life setting, molnupiravir might be effective in reducing the risk of severe COVID-19 and COVID-19-related mortality, particularly in specific subgroups.

Breast cancer polygenic risk scores derived in White European populations are not calibrated for women of Ashkenazi Jewish descent.

PURPOSE: Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) are a major component of accurate breast cancer (BC) risk prediction but require ethnicity-specific calibration. Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) population is assumed to be of White European (WE) origin in some commercially available PRSs despite differing effect allele frequencies (EAFs). We conducted a case-control study of WE and AJ women from the Predicting Risk of Cancer at Screening Study. The Breast Cancer in Northern Israel Study provided a separate AJ population-based case-control validation series. METHODS: All women underwent Illumina OncoArray single-nucleotide variation (SNV; formerly single-nucleotide polymorphism [SNP]) analysis. Two PRSs were assessed, SNV142 and SNV78. A total of 221 of 2243 WE women (discovery: cases = 111; controls = 110; validation: cases = 651; controls = 1772) and 221 AJ women (cases = 121; controls = 110) were included from the UK study; the Israeli series consisted of 2045 AJ women (cases = 1331; controls = 714). EAFs were obtained from the Genome Aggregation Database. RESULTS: In the UK study, the mean SNV142 PRS demonstrated good calibration and discrimination in WE population, with mean PRS of 1.33 (95% CI 1.18-1.48) in cases and 1.01 (95% CI 0.89-1.13) in controls. In AJ women from Manchester, the mean PRS of 1.54 (1.38-1.70) in cases and 1.20 (1.08-1.32) in controls demonstrated good discrimination but overestimation of BC relative risk. After adjusting for EAFs for the AJ population, mean risk was corrected (mean SNV142 PRS cases = 1.30 [95% CI 1.16-1.44] and controls = 1.02 [95% CI 0.92-1.12]). This was recapitulated in the larger Israeli data set with good discrimination (area under the curve = 0.632 [95% CI 0.607-0.657] for SNV142). CONCLUSION: AJ women should not be given BC relative risk predictions based on PRSs calibrated to EAFs from the WE population. PRSs need to be recalibrated using AJ-derived EAFs. A simple recalibration using the mean PRS adjustment ratio likely performs well.

Association between COVID-19 vaccination and myasthenia gravis: A population-based, nested case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Existing data regarding the link between COVID-19 vaccine and myasthenia gravis (MG) are scarce. We aimed to assess the association between Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine with both new-onset MG and MG exacerbation. METHODS: For the first aim, we conducted a nested case-control study in a cohort of 3,052,467 adults, without a diagnosis of MG, from the largest healthcare provider in Israel. Subjects were followed from January 1, 2021 until June 30, 2022 for the occurrence of MG. Ten randomly selected controls were matched to each case of new-onset MG on age and sex. For the second aim, a nested case-control study was conducted in a cohort of 1446 MG patients. Four randomly selected MG patients (controls) were matched to each case of MG exacerbation. Exposure to COVID-19 vaccine in the prior 4 weeks was assessed in cases and controls. RESULTS: Overall, 332 patients had new-onset MG and were matched with 3320 controls. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models showed that the odds ratio (OR) for new-onset MG, associated with COVID-19 vaccine, was 1.14 (95% CI 0.73-1.78). The results were consistent in sensitivity analysis that used more stringent criteria to define MG. Overall, 62 patients with MG exacerbation were matched to 248 MG controls. The multivariable OR for MG exacerbation, associated with COVID-19 vaccine, was 1.35 (95% CI 0.37-4.89). All results were similar when the prior exposure to COVID-19 vaccine was extended to 8 weeks. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is not associated with increased risk of new-onset nor exacerbation of MG.

Ischemic stroke and myocardial ischemia in clopidogrel users and the association with CYP2C19 loss-of-function homozygocity: a real-world study.

Reduced clopidogrel effectiveness in preventing recurrent myocardial ischemia following percutaneous coronary intervention has been demonstrated in CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers. Less is known about the effect of CYP2C19 genotype on the effectiveness of clopidogrel for stroke prevention, particularly in Caucasians. This is a retrospective cohort study, in which we used the Clalit clinical database to follow genotyped clopidogrel initiators, for up to 3 years. Endpoint was a new primary discharge diagnosis of ischemic stroke; secondary endpoints were new primary discharge diagnoses of coronary angioplasty, myocardial infarction (MI), or a composite endpoint of: stroke, MI, or coronary angioplasty. After 3 years of follow up over 628 clopidogrel initiators, 2 out of 12 (16.7%) poor metabolizers, 9 out of 144 intermediate metabolizers (6.3%), and 29 out of 472 (6.1%) normal/rapid/ultrarapid metabolizers have been newly diagnosed with ischemic stroke. Poor metabolizer status was associated with higher risk for ischemic stroke, marginally significant in univariate analysis and in multivariable models; and higher risk for the composite outcome of stroke, myocardial infarction and coronary angioplasty, HR = 3.32 (1.35-8.17) p = 0.009, 2.86 (1.16-7.06) p = 0.02 (univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively). Poor metabolizer status was associated with higher risk for stroke HR = 5.80 (1.33-25.24) p = 0.019, HR = 4.13 (0.94-18.13) p = 0.06 (univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively) in patients who "survived" the first year, and were in the cohort 1-3 years. Caucasian treated with clopidogrel who are homozygote for the CYP2C19 loss-of function allele might be at increased risk for ischemic stroke, and for the composite outcome of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction and coronary angioplasty.

ß2-adrenoceptor agonists and antagonists and risk of Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: ß2-adrenoreceptors have recently been identified as regulators of the α-synuclein gene, which is implicated in the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to assess the association between use of ß2-agonists and ß-antagonists and the risk of developing PD. METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control study in a cohort of 1,762,164 adults without a diagnosis of PD. They were identified on January, 1, 2004, from the electronic medical records of the largest health care provider in Israel. Participants were followed up until June 30, 2017, for the occurrence of PD. Ten randomly selected controls were matched to each case of PD on age, sex, ethnic group, and duration of follow-up. RESULTS: During follow-up 11,314 patients were newly diagnosed with PD and were matched with 113,140 controls. An increased risk of PD was seen with the use of nonselective ß-antagonists (RR, 2.04 [1.90-2.20]) but not with the use of selective ß1-antagonists (RR, 1.00 [0.95-1.05]). Use of ß2-agonists was associated with reduced risk of PD (RR, 0.89 [0.82-0.96] for short-acting; RR, 0.84 [0.76-0.93] for long-acting; and RR, 0.49 [0.25-0.92] for ultra-long-acting ß2-agonists). In an analysis of individual drugs, propranolol and salbutamol were significantly associated with PD risk, even when these drugs were ascertained 5 years prior to the index date, compared with nonusers (RR, 1.31 [1.08-1.58] and 1.89 {1.53-2.33]) in patients who filled <6 and ≥6 propranolol prescriptions, respectively; the corresponding RRs for salbutamol were 0.95 (0.83-1.08) and 0.65 (0.45-0.94), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Use of propranolol appears to be associated with an increased risk of PD, whereas use of ß2-agonists is associated with a decreased risk of PD. © 2018 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Central Nervous System Medications: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations for Older Adults.

Most drugs have not been evaluated in the older population. Recognizing physiological alterations associated with changes in drug disposition and with the ultimate effect, especially in central nervous system-acting drugs, is fundamental. While considering pharmacokinetics, it should be noted that the absorption of most drugs from the gastrointestinal tract does not change in advanced age. There are only few data about the effect of age on the transdermal absorption of medications such as fentanyl. Absorption from an intramuscular injection may be similar in older adults as in younger patients. The distribution of lipophilic drugs (such as diazepam) is increased owing to a relative increase in the percentage of body fat, causing drug accumulation and prolonged drug elimination following cessation. Phase I drug biotransformation is variably decreased in aging, impacting elimination, and hepatic drug clearance has been shown to decrease in older individuals by 10-40% for most drugs studied. Lower doses of phenothiazines, butyrophenones, atypical antipsychotics, antidepressants (citalopram, mirtazapine, and tricyclic antidepressants), and benzodiazepines (such as diazepam) achieve the same extent of exposure. For renally cleared drugs with no prior metabolism (such as gabapentin), the glomerular filtration rate appropriately estimates drug clearance. Important pharmacodynamic changes in older adults include an increased sedative effect of benzodiazepines at a given drug exposure, and a higher sensitivity to mu opiate receptor agonists and to opioid adverse effects. Artificial intelligence, physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation, and concentration-effect modeling enabling a differentiation between the pharmacokinetic and the pharmacodynamic effects of aging might help to close some of the gaps in knowledge.

Medications and Acute Hemolysis in G6PD-Deficient Patients - A Real-World Study.

Many drug labels contain precautions of use in G6PD-deficient patients due to hemolytic concerns, but much of this is based on scarce clinical, epidemiological, or structural data. In this real-world study, we aimed to examine if the administration of presumably risky medications for G6PD-deficient patients was followed by hemolysis. The study is based on data from Clalit Health Services database that provides inclusive health care for more than half of the Israeli population (~ 4.7 million). Within the database, we identified all G6PD-deficient patients by G6PD <6 U/g Hb. Within the G6PD-deficient cohort, we identified all hospitalizations with a discharge diagnosis of hemolysis (January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2022), validated the cases, and identified the culprit event. For the rest of the G6PD-deficient patients with no-hemolysis, we recorded filled prescriptions of medications listed as presumably risky. We identified 31,962 G6PD-deficient patients. Within the cohort, there were 71 cases of major hemolysis requiring hospitalization (0.2% of the cohort), of whom 51 (71.8%) had been caused by ingestion of fava beans, six (8.5%) were associated with an infection, and three (4.2%) suggested to be associated with medications (nitrofurantoin, phenazopyridine, and a "pain killer"). Within the 31,875 patients with no major hemolysis, nitrofurantoin has been prescribed safely to 1,366 G6PD-deficient males and females; hundreds/thousands of G6PD-deficient patients had been prescribed safely ciprofloxacin, glibenclamide, ofloxacin, phenazopyridine, sulfamethoxazole/cotrimoxazole, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, glimepiride, mesalazine, and sulfacetamide. In this real-world study, we are showing that a list of medications, suspected previously as carrying risks for hemolysis in G6PD-deficient patients, have been prescribed safely to G6PD-deficient patients, providing reassurance to patients, prescribers, and regulators.

Interactions Between Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) and Antiseizure Medications: Potential Implications on DOAC Treatment.

The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is increasing because of their superior efficacy and safety compared with vitamin K antagonists. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions, particularly those involving cytochrome P450- mediated metabolism and P-glycoprotein transport, significantly affect the efficacy and safety of DOACs. In this article, we assess the effects of cytochrome P450- and P-glycoprotein-inducing antiseizure medications on DOAC pharmacokinetics in comparison to rifampicin. Rifampicin decreases to a varying extent the plasma exposure (area under the concentration-time curve) and peak concentration of each DOAC, consistent with its specific absorption and elimination pathways. For apixaban and rivaroxaban, rifampicin had a greater effect on the area under the concentration-time curve than on peak concentration. Therefore, using peak concentration to monitor DOAC concentrations may underestimate the effect of rifampicin on DOAC exposure. Antiseizure medications that are cytochrome P450 and P-glycoprotein inducers are commonly used with DOACs. Several studies have observed a correlation between the concomitant use of DOACs and enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications and DOAC treatment failure, for example, ischemic and thrombotic events. The European Society of Cardiology recommends avoiding this combination, as well as the combination of DOACs with levetiracetam and valproic acid, owing to a risk of low DOAC concentrations. However, levetiracetam and valproic acid are not cytochrome P450 or P-glycoprotein inducers, and the implications of their use with DOACs remain to be elucidated. Our comparative analysis suggests DOAC plasma concentration monitoring as a possible strategy to guide dosing owing to the predictable correlation between DOACs' plasma concentration and effect. Patients taking concomitant enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications are at risk for low DOAC concentrations and subsequently, treatment failure and thus can benefit from DOAC concentration monitoring to prophylactically identify this risk.

Association Between ABCG2, ABCB1, ABCC2 Efflux Transporter Single-Nucleotide Variants and Irinotecan Adverse Effects in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: A Real-Life Study.

Among patients treated with irinotecan, homozygous carriers of the UGT1A1*28 allele are at increased risk for neutropenia, but UGT1A1 genotype alone does not account for irinotecan-induced toxicity. Our aim was to study the association between single-nucleotide variants in genes encoding for efflux transporters of irinotecan (ABCG2, ABCB1, and ABCC2) and toxicity in real life. The source population was a cohort of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) in Northern Israel, who had undergone genome-wide association study. From the source population we chose the patients with CRC prescribed irinotecan, and a comparative cohort of patients with CRC treated with other anticancer systemic therapies. Using Clalit Health Services electronic medical records (including laboratory results) we ascertained hematological and gastrointestinal adverse effects and mortality, within 90 days of the first dose, as a composite outcome. There were 601 patients with CRC who received irinotecan, and 756 patients with CRC treated with other anticancer regimens. The minor allele in rs2231142 (ABCG2) was associated with lower incidence of the composite outcome (odds ratio (OR) = 0.54 (0.33, 0.91); P = 0.02) in irinotecan-treated patients with CRC, but not in patients with CRC treated with other regimens. ABCB1 rs1045642 and ABCC2 rs3740066 were not associated with the composite outcome. In a sensitivity analysis, adjusted for UGT1A1 status and for possible demographic and clinical confounders, adjusted OR was 0.56 (0.33, 0.94) for the association between rs2231142 (ABCG2) and the composite outcome. In conclusion, we describe a novel association between the minor allele of rs2231142 in the efflux transporter gene ABCG2 and protection against severe side effects in CRC patients treating with irinotecan.

Association Between Guillain-Barré Syndrome and COVID-19 Infection and Vaccination: A Population-Based Nested Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Existing data regarding occurrence of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and vaccination are inconclusive. We aimed to assess the association between GBS and both severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and COVID-19 vaccine. METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control study in a cohort of 3,193,951 patients aged 16 years or older, without a diagnosis of prior GBS, from the largest health care provider in Israel. Participants were followed from January 1, 2021, until June 30, 2022, for the occurrence of GBS. Ten randomly selected controls were matched to each case of GBS on age and sex. We assessed both SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccine administration in the prior 6 weeks in cases and controls. RESULTS: Overall, 76 patients were diagnosed with GBS during follow-up and were matched to 760 controls. A positive test for SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 9 (11.8%) cases and 18 (2.4%) controls. An administration of COVID-19 vaccine was detected in 8 (10.5%) cases (all Pfizer-BioNTech [BNT162b2] vaccine) and 136 (17.9%) controls (134 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine). Multivariable conditional logistic regression models showed that the odds ratio for GBS associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccine administration was 6.30 (95% CI 2.55-15.56) and 0.41 (95% CI 0.17-0.96), respectively. The results were similar when exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 vaccine administration was ascertained in the prior 4 and 8 weeks, although did not reach statistical significance for COVID-19 vaccine at 4 weeks. DISCUSSION: Our study suggests that SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with increased risk of GBS, whereas Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is associated with decreased risk of GBS.

Association Between COVID-19 Infection and Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Nested Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary fibrosis is associated with significant morbidity. Data are scarce on the link between coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and pulmonary fibrosis. We aimed to assess the association between COVID-19 with pulmonary fibrosis. METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control study in a cohort of 2,894,801 adults without a diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis. The underlying cohort consisted of members of the largest healthcare provider in Israel aged 18 years or older as of May 1, 2020. Subjects were followed up from cohort entry until June 30, 2022, for the occurrence of pulmonary fibrosis. Ten randomly selected controls were matched to each case of pulmonary fibrosis on age, sex, and calendar time. To account for surveillance bias a lag time of 60 days was used for ascertainment of prior COVID-19 and COVID-19 severity. RESULTS: During follow-up 1284 patients were newly diagnosed with pulmonary fibrosis and matched with 12,840 controls. Multivariable conditional logistic-regression models showed that the odds ratio for pulmonary fibrosis was 1.80 (95% confidence interval, 1.47-2.19) in patients with COVID-19 compared with no COVID-19. The multivariable odds ratio for pulmonary fibrosis was 1.33 (1.06-1.68), 2.98 (1.16-7.65), and 9.30 (5.77-14.98) for mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19, respectively, compared with no COVID-19. The magnitude of the association was attenuated but remained statistically significant for severe disease when the lag time was extended to 180 days (1.08 [0.78-1.49], 2.37 [0.75-7.46], and 5.34 [2.75-10.36] for mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 appears to be associated with an increased risk of pulmonary fibrosis and the magnitude of the association increases with COVID-19 severity.

Serum cholesterol increase in statin users associated with antibiotic use: Case-crossover study.

PURPOSE: 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors ("statins") reduce risk of atherosclerotic disease. However, statins need secondary bile acids, produced by the gut microbiota, for absorption. Our hypothesis was that a change in the gut microbiota induced by antibiotics might cause a decrease in statin absorption, and decreased statin effectiveness. Our objective was to study the association between antibiotic treatment and increased cholesterol level in statin users. METHODS: Case-crossover study, in which an individual serves as his own control, by comparing outcome risk among the same individual at different times, adjusting for time-dependent comorbidity index. The study is based on adherent statin users' cohort and two cohorts of patients not treated with statins, in Clalit Health Services. Exposure were antibiotic prescriptions dispensed in the 3 months prior to LDL-C measurements. RESULTS: There were 25,496 statin users and 72,638 time-points. A significant association was found between LDL-C increase and exposure to macrolides and clindamycin, OR = 1.237 (1.138-1.345), p = 6.5*10-7, number needed to harm (NNH) = 19. There was no association between LDL-C increase and negative control objects such as anti-viral treatments; nor between LDL-C and exposure to antibiotics in non-statin users. As a secondary outcome, we have found an association between LDL-C increase and a following atherosclerotic ischemic event. CONCLUSION: An increase in LDL-C in highly adherent statin users is associated with precedent macrolides or clindamycin treatment.