RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mepolizumab was available in France as part of an early access programme for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (nominative autorisation temporaire d'utilisation [temporary use authorisation] (nATU)) before its commercialisation. This study aimed to characterise patients who received mepolizumab in the nATU. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study analysed data from the hospital medical records of patients up to 24â months after treatment initiation. Study objectives were to describe patient baseline characteristics, the evolution of disease severity and treatment modifications during follow-up; safety was also investigated. FINDINGS: Overall, 146 patients who received ≥1 dose of mepolizumab were included. At inclusion, patients had a mean age of 58.2â years with a mean severe asthma duration of 13.4â years, and 37.0% had respiratory allergies. Patients experienced, on average, 5.8 exacerbations per patient per year at baseline, 0.6 and 0.5 of which required hospitalisation and emergency department visits, respectively. These values improved to 0.6, 0.1 and 0.1 exacerbations per patient per year, respectively, at 24â months of follow-up. Most patients (92.8%) were using oral corticosteroids at baseline, compared with 34.7% by 24â months of follow-up. Moreover, mean blood eosinophil counts improved from 722â cells·µL-1 at baseline to 92â cells·µL-1 at 24â months of follow-up; lung function and asthma control followed a similar trend. INTERPRETATION: Results confirm findings from clinical trials, demonstrating that mepolizumab is associated with important improvements in several clinically meaningful outcomes and has a favourable safety profile in a population with severe eosinophilic asthma, outside of the controlled environment of a clinical trial.
Assuntos
Antiasmáticos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Asma , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , França , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
This round table is the result of an observation. The observation being that controlled human infection clinical trials (also called "infectious challenge" trials or "Controlled Human Infection Models", "CHIM") recommended or even encouraged in the context of vaccine developments in particular, are not carried out in France. However, there are no formal prohibitions within regulations or ethical principles, which point to the prior assessment of risks and benefits for individuals and for society. The participants in this Round Table thus wished to examine, through the prism of their respective disciplines, the scientific and medical relevance of conducting such trials in France and, if possible, to imagine the conditions under which they would be carried out, thus resulting in recommendations on (1) the advisability of their conduct in France (2), the conditions under which they would be implemented in terms of logistics and regulations, and (3) their social acceptability. The recommendations on which the participants of the Round Table came to an agreement are presented as the analysis progresses.
Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Infecções , Humanos , França , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/ética , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chronic hand eczema is an inflammatory dermatosis that results in a significant psychological and socio-economic burden. Alitretinoin (AL) is indicated in adults with severe chronic hand eczema (sCHE) unresponsive to potent topical corticosteroids. OBJECTIVES: To assess AL effectiveness and safety in patients with sCHE under real-life conditions based on a prospective observational study in France (2010-2014). MATERIALS & METHODS: Clinical severity was assessed using Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and Modified Total Lesion Symptom Score (mTLSS) and quality of life by Skindex and visual analogue scales. Patients were treated with AL for 12-24 weeks and followed for 24 months. Responders were patients with clear/almost clear skin based on PGA at the end of treatment and the primary outcome was remission (clear, almost clear, or mild skin) at one and two years after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 394 patients with severe or moderate PGA were included in the study by 109 dermatologists. AL treatment duration was 5.4 ± 4.1 months (mean ± SD) and 112/274 patients evaluated at the end of treatment were responders. Of the 112 responders, 41/51 evaluable patients were in remission after one year and 36/46 after two years. At the end of treatment, Skindex improved from 48.8 ± 18.1% to 27.1 ± 23.2%. Among the 112 responders, 68/84 did not relapse (mTLSS increased >75% from baseline). The most common adverse events were headache (24%) and dyslipidaemia (4%). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports a positive benefit/risk profile for AL for sCHE patients unresponsive to topical corticosteroids.