Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 84(1): 18-27, 2024 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38447708

RESUMO

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Infection prevention efforts in dialysis centers can avert patient morbidity and mortality but are challenging to implement. The objective of this study was to better understand how the design of the work system might contribute to infection prevention in outpatient dialysis centers. STUDY DESIGN: Mixed methods, observational study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Six dialysis facilities across the United States visited by a multidisciplinary team over 8 months. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: At each facility, structured macroergonomic observations were undertaken by a multidisciplinary team using the SEIPS 1.0 model. Ethnographic observations were collected about staff encounters with dialysis patients including the content of staff conversations. Selective and axial coding were used for qualitative analysis and quantitative data were reported using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Organizational and sociotechnical barriers and facilitators to infection prevention in the outpatient dialysis setting were identified. Features related to human performance, (eg, alarms, interruptions, and task stacking), work system design (eg, physical space, scheduling, leadership, and culture), and extrinsic factors (eg, patient-related characteristics) were identified. LIMITATIONS: This was an exploratory evaluation with a small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: This study used a systematic macroergonomic approach in multiple outpatient dialysis facilities to identify infection prevention barriers and facilitators related to human performance. Several features common across facilities were identified that may influence infection prevention in outpatient care and warrant further exploration.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Controle de Infecções , Diálise Renal , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Ergonomia/métodos
3.
Ann Intern Med ; 174(11): 1554-1562, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34487450

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Candida auris, a multidrug-resistant yeast, can spread rapidly in ventilator-capable skilled-nursing facilities (vSNFs) and long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs). In 2018, a laboratory serving LTACHs in southern California began identifying species of Candida that were detected in urine specimens to enhance surveillance of C auris, and C auris was identified in February 2019 in a patient in an Orange County (OC), California, LTACH. Further investigation identified C auris at 3 associated facilities. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of C auris and infection prevention and control (IPC) practices in LTACHs and vSNFs in OC. DESIGN: Point prevalence surveys (PPSs), postdischarge testing for C auris detection, and assessments of IPC were done from March to October 2019. SETTING: All LTACHs (n = 3) and vSNFs (n = 14) serving adult patients in OC. PARTICIPANTS: Current or recent patients in LTACHs and vSNFs in OC. INTERVENTION: In facilities where C auris was detected, PPSs were repeated every 2 weeks. Ongoing IPC support was provided. MEASUREMENTS: Antifungal susceptibility testing and whole-genome sequencing to assess isolate relatedness. RESULTS: Initial PPSs at 17 facilities identified 44 additional patients with C auris in 3 (100%) LTACHs and 6 (43%) vSNFs, with the first bloodstream infection reported in May 2019. By October 2019, a total of 182 patients with C auris were identified by serial PPSs and discharge testing. Of 81 isolates that were sequenced, all were clade III and highly related. Assessments of IPC identified gaps in hand hygiene, transmission-based precautions, and environmental cleaning. The outbreak was contained to 2 facilities by October 2019. LIMITATION: Acute care hospitals were not assessed, and IPC improvements over time could not be rigorously evaluated. CONCLUSION: Enhanced laboratory surveillance and prompt investigation with IPC support enabled swift identification and containment of C auris. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Assuntos
Candidíase/diagnóstico , Candidíase/prevenção & controle , Cuidados Semi-Intensivos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , California/epidemiologia , Candida auris/genética , Candidíase/transmissão , Feminino , Humanos , Controle de Infecções , Assistência de Longa Duração , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma
4.
Kidney Int ; 99(5): 1045-1053, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33667504

RESUMO

Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) cause substantial morbidity and mortality. Patients on maintenance hemodialysis are 2 to 2.5 times more likely to develop CDI, with mortality rates 2-fold higher than the general population. Hospitalizations due to CDI among the maintenance hemodialysis population are high, and the frequency of antibiotic exposures and hospitalizations may contribute to CDI risk. In this report, a panel of experts in clinical nephrology, infectious diseases, and infection prevention provide guidance, based on expert opinion and published literature, aimed at preventing the spread of CDI in outpatient hemodialysis facilities.


Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Clostridioides , Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos
5.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 74(5): 610-619, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31375298

RESUMO

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Contaminated water and other fluids are increasingly recognized to be associated with health care-associated infections. We investigated an outbreak of Gram-negative bloodstream infections at 3 outpatient hemodialysis facilities. STUDY DESIGN: Matched case-control investigations. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients who received hemodialysis at Facility A, B, or C from July 2015 to November 2016. EXPOSURES: Infection control practices, sources of water, dialyzer reuse, injection medication handling, dialysis circuit priming, water and dialysate test findings, environmental reservoirs such as wall boxes, vascular access care practices, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and whole-genome sequencing of bacterial isolates. OUTCOMES: Cases were defined by a positive blood culture for any Gram-negative bacteria drawn July 1, 2015 to November 30, 2016 from a patient who had received hemodialysis at Facility A, B, or C. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Exposures in cases and controls were compared using matched univariate conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: 58 cases of Gram-negative bloodstream infection occurred; 48 (83%) required hospitalization. The predominant organisms were Serratia marcescens (n=21) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=12). Compared with controls, cases had higher odds of using a central venous catheter for dialysis (matched odds ratio, 54.32; lower bound of the 95% CI, 12.19). Facility staff reported pooling and regurgitation of waste fluid at recessed wall boxes that house connections for dialysate components and the effluent drain within dialysis treatment stations. Environmental samples yielded S marcescens and P aeruginosa from wall boxes. S marcescens isolated from wall boxes and case-patients from the same facilities were closely related by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and whole-genome sequencing. We identified opportunities for health care workers' hands to contaminate central venous catheters with contaminated fluid from the wall boxes. LIMITATIONS: Limited patient isolates for testing, on-site investigation occurred after peak of infections. CONCLUSIONS: This large outbreak was linked to wall boxes, a previously undescribed source of contaminated fluid and biofilms in the immediate patient care environment.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/epidemiologia , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 67(8): 1175-1181, 2018 09 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29659728

RESUMO

Background: Despite substantial attention to the individual topics, little is known about the relationship between racial disparities and antimicrobial-resistant and/or healthcare-associated infection trends, such as for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Methods: We analyzed Emerging Infections Program 2005-2014 surveillance data (9 US states) to determine whether reductions in invasive MRSA incidence (isolated from normally sterile body sites) affected racial disparities in rates. Case classification included hospital-onset (HO, culture >3 days after admission), healthcare-associated community onset (HACO, culture ≤3 days after admission and dialysis, hospitalization, surgery, or long-term care residence within 1 year prior), or community-associated (CA, all others). Negative binomial regression models were used to evaluate the adjusted rate ratio (aRR) of MRSA in black patients (vs in white patients) controlling for age, sex, and temporal trends. Results: During 2005-2014, invasive HO and HACO (but not CA) MRSA rates decreased. Despite this, blacks had higher rates for HO (aRR, 3.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.35-4.35), HACO (aRR, 3.84; 95% CI, 2.94-5.01), and CA (aRR, 2.78; 95% CI, 2.30-3.37) MRSA. Limiting the analysis to chronic dialysis patients reduced, but did not eliminate, the higher HACO MRSA rates among blacks (aRR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.72-1.96), even though invasive MRSA rates among dialysis patients decreased during 2005-2014. These racial differences did not change over time. Conclusions: Previous reductions in healthcare-associated MRSA infections have not affected racial disparities in MRSA rates. Improved understanding of the underlying causes of these differences is needed to develop effective prevention interventions that reduce racial disparities in MRSA infections.


Assuntos
Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Fatores Raciais , Infecções Estafilocócicas/etnologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , População Negra , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/etnologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/etnologia , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Assistência de Longa Duração , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Estatísticos , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca , Adulto Jovem
7.
Clin Infect Dis ; 64(5): 597-604, 2017 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28362911

RESUMO

Background: Invasive community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) incidence in the United States is higher among black persons than white persons. We explored the extent to which socioeconomic factors might explain this racial disparity. Methods: A retrospective cohort was based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Emerging Infections Program surveillance data for invasive community-associated MRSA cases (isolated from a normally sterile site of an outpatient or on hospital admission day ≤3 in a patient without specified major healthcare exposures) from 2009 to 2011 in 33 counties of 9 states. We used generalized estimating equations to determine census tract-level factors associated with differences in MRSA incidence and inverse odds ratio-weighted mediation analysis to determine the proportion of racial disparity mediated by socioeconomic factors. Results: Annual invasive community-associated MRSA incidence was 4.59 per 100000 among whites and 7.60 per 100000 among blacks (rate ratio [RR], 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52-1.80). In the mediation analysis, after accounting for census tract-level measures of federally designated medically underserved areas, education, income, housing value, and rural status, 91% of the original racial disparity was explained; no significant association of black race with community-associated MRSA remained (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, .92-1.20). Conclusions: The racial disparity in invasive community-associated MRSA rates was largely explained by socioeconomic factors. The specific factors that underlie the association between census tract-level socioeconomic measures and MRSA incidence, which may include modifiable social (eg, poverty, crowding) and biological factors (not explored in this analysis), should be elucidated to define strategies for reducing racial disparities in community-associated MRSA rates.


Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Etnicidade , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
8.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; : 1-6, 2024 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38747278

RESUMO

Infections cause substantial morbidity and mortality among patients receiving care in outpatient hemodialysis facilities. We describe comprehensive infection prevention assessments by US public health departments using standardized interview and observation tools. Results demonstrated how facility layouts can undermine infection prevention and that clinical practices often fall short of policies.

9.
Am J Infect Control ; 49(10): 1318-1321, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34375701

RESUMO

Facility-wide testing performed at 4 outpatient hemodialysis facilities in the absence of an outbreak or escalating community incidence did not identify new SARS-CoV-2 infections and illustrated key logistical considerations essential to successful implementation of SARS-CoV-2 screening. Facilities could consider prioritizing facility-wide SARS-CoV-2 testing during suspicion of an outbreak in the facility or escalating community spread without robust infection control strategies in place. Being prepared to address operational considerations will enhance implementation of facility-wide testing in the outpatient dialysis setting.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Falência Renal Crônica , Teste para COVID-19 , Humanos , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , SARS-CoV-2
10.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 66(8): 1581-1586, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30094828

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To describe the epidemiology and incidence of invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in nursing home (NH) residents, which has previously not been well characterized. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of public health surveillance data. SETTING: Healthcare facilities in 33 U.S. counties. PARTICIPANTS: Residents of the surveillance area. MEASUREMENTS: Counts of NH-onset and hospital-onset (HO) invasive MRSA infections (cultured from sterile body sites) identified from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Emerging Infections Program (EIP) population-based surveillance from 2009 to 2013 were compared. Demographic characteristics and risk factors of NH-onset cases were analyzed. Using NH resident-day denominators from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Skilled Nursing Facility Cost Reports, incidence of NH-onset invasive MRSA infections from facilities in the EIP area was determined. RESULTS: A total of 4,607 NH-onset and 4,344 HO invasive MRSA cases were reported. Of NH-onset cases, median age was 74, most infections were bloodstream infections, and known risk factors for infection were common: 1,455 (32%) had previous MRSA infection or colonization, 1,014 (22%) had decubitus ulcers, 1,098 (24%) had recent central venous catheters, and 1,103 (24%) were undergoing chronic dialysis; 2,499 (54%) had been discharged from a hospital in the previous 100 days. The in-hospital case-fatality rate was 19%. The 2013 pooled mean incidence of NH-onset invasive MRSA infections in the surveillance area was 2.4 per 100,000 patient-days. CONCLUSION: More NH-onset than HO cases occurred, primarily in individuals with known MRSA risk factors. These data reinforce the importance of infection prevention practices during wound and device care in NH residents, especially those with a history of MRSA infection or colonization.


Assuntos
Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos/estatística & dados numéricos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Casas de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Vigilância da População , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
11.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 37(2): 205-7, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26554448

RESUMO

Reports of bloodstream infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among chronic hemodialysis patients to 2 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveillance systems (National Healthcare Safety Network Dialysis Event and Emerging Infections Program) were compared to evaluate completeness of reporting. Many methicillin-resistant S. aureus bloodstream infections identified in hospitals were not reported to National Healthcare Safety Network Dialysis Event.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/microbiologia , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Diálise Renal , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Estados Unidos
12.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 37(7): 818-24, 2016 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27072043

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE To determine the clinical diagnoses associated with the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) pneumonia (PNEU) or lower respiratory infection (LRI) surveillance events DESIGN Retrospective chart review SETTING A convenience sample of 8 acute-care hospitals in Pennsylvania PATIENTS All patients hospitalized during 2011-2012 METHODS Medical records were reviewed from a random sample of patients reported to the NHSN to have PNEU or LRI, excluding adults with ventilator-associated PNEU. Documented clinical diagnoses corresponding temporally to the PNEU and LRI events were recorded. RESULTS We reviewed 250 (30%) of 838 eligible PNEU and LRI events reported to the NHSN; 29 reported events (12%) fulfilled neither PNEU nor LRI case criteria. Differences interpreting radiology reports accounted for most misclassifications. Of 81 PNEU events in adults not on mechanical ventilation, 84% had clinician-diagnosed pneumonia; of these, 25% were attributed to aspiration. Of 43 adult LRI, 88% were in mechanically ventilated patients and 35% had no corresponding clinical diagnosis (infectious or noninfectious) documented at the time of LRI. Of 36 pediatric PNEU events, 72% were ventilator associated, and 70% corresponded to a clinical pneumonia diagnosis. Of 61 pediatric LRI patients, 84% were mechanically ventilated and 21% had no corresponding clinical diagnosis documented. CONCLUSIONS In adults not on mechanical ventilation and in children, most NHSN-defined PNEU events corresponded with compatible clinical conditions documented in the medical record. In contrast, NHSN LRI events often did not. As a result, substantial modifications to the LRI definitions were implemented in 2015. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:818-824.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Infecção Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pennsylvania/epidemiologia , Pneumonia/diagnóstico , Pneumonia/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Infecções Respiratórias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA